IAS 16 (CAF5 S18) : (I) (Ii) (Iii) - Rs. in Million
IAS 16 (CAF5 S18) : (I) (Ii) (Iii) - Rs. in Million
IAS 16 (CAF5 S18) : (I) (Ii) (Iii) - Rs. in Million
Assets given-up:
Original cost 10.3 12.4 14.5
Book value 6.4 7.3 3.4
Estimated fair value 8.5 6.6 4.6
Assets received:
Estimated fair value 7.1 9.0 4.1
Additional information:
In case of transaction (i), fair values of both assets are reliably measurable.
In case of transaction (ii), fair value of the asset received is clearly more evident.
In case of transaction (iii), fair value of neither asset is reliably measurable.
Required:
Compute gain or loss on disposal of fixed assets in each of the above transactions. (06)
Case (i) Fair value of asset given up ± Cash 8.5 – 1.1 = 7.4
Case (ii) Fair value of asset received = 9.0
Case (iii) Carrying amount ± Cash 3.4 + 0 = 3.4
Page 1 of 1 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 1
Rooney manufactured a press for $30 million. The press comprises two significant parts, the
hydraulic system and the ‘frame’. The hydraulic system has a three year life and the ‘frame’ has an
eight year life. Rooney depreciates plant on a straight line basis. The cost of the hydraulic system
is 30% of the total cost of manufacture.
Rooney uses the IAS 16 revaluation model in accounting for diamond presses and revalues these
assets on an annual basis.
Revaluation surpluses or deficits are apportioned between the hydraulic system and the ‘frame’ on
the basis of their year-end book values before the revaluation.
Required
Explain the IAS 16 rules on accounting for significant parts of property, plant and equipment and
show the accounting treatment of the diamond press in the financial statements for the financial
years ending:
(i) 31st March 2016 (assume that the press has a fair value of $ 21million)
(ii) 31st March 2017 (assume that the press has a fair value of $ 19.6 million).
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 1
IAS 16 requires that each part of an item (that has a cost that is significant in relation to the total
cost) is depreciated separately. Therefore the cost recognized at initial recognition must be
allocated to each part accordingly.
(i) 31st March 2016
Hydraulic System Frame Total
Carrying amount 1-4-2015 9,000 21,000 30,000
Depreciation (3,000) (2,625) (5,625)
Carrying amount 31-3-2016 6,000 18,375 24,375
Loss on revaluation 6,000 / 24,375 x 3,375 = 18,375 / 24,375 x 3,375
(831) = (2,544) (3,375)
Fair value 5,169 15,831 21,000
Out of 3,447 revaluation gain 3,375 will be accounted for in profit or loss account as reversal of
revaluation loss and balance of 72 will be accounted for in other comprehensive incomes.
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 2
The following information relates to the financial statements of Ehtisham for the year to 31 March
2015.
The head office of Ehtisham was acquired on 1 April 2012 for $1 million. Ehtisham intend to
occupy the building for 25 years. On 31 March 2014 it was revalued to $1.15 million. On 31 March
2015, a surplus of vacant commercial property in the area had led to a fall in property prices and
the fair value was now only $0.8 million.
Required
Explain the correct accounting treatment for the above (with calculations if appropriate).
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 2
On 31st March 2014 the asset is two years old. Its carrying value before revaluation was therefore
$1million less accumulated depreciation of $80,000 (2/25 × $ 1million).
Cost/valuation 1,000,000
Accumulated depreciation (80,000)
Net book value 920,000
In order to effect the revaluation, the cost is uplifted to fair value of $1.15m, the accumulated
depreciation is eliminated, and the uplift to the net book value is credited to a revaluation surplus
account.
Cost/valuation 150,000
Accumulated depreciation 80,000
Revaluation surplus 230,000
The asset is depreciated over its remaining useful economic life of 23 years giving a charge of $
50,000 ($ 1,150,000/23 years) per annum in the year to 31st March 2015.
Cost/valuation 1,150,000
Accumulated depreciation (50,000)
Net book value 1,100,000
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 3
The following is an extract from the financial statements of Carly on 31 December 2014.
Property, plant and equipment
Land and Plant and Computers Total
buildings equipment
$ $ $ $
Cost
On 31 December 2014 1,500,000 340,500 617,800 2,458,300
Accumulated depreciation
On 31 December 2014 600,000 125,900 505,800 1,231,700
Carrying amount
On 31 December 2014 900,000 214,600 112,000 1,226,600
Accounting policies
Depreciation
Depreciation is provided at the following rates.
On land and buildings 2% per annum straight line on buildings only
On plant and equipment 25% reducing balance
On computers 33.33% per annum straight line
(2) A machine which had cost $ 80,000 and had accumulated depreciation of $ 57,000 at the
start of the year was sold for $ 25,000 in the first week of the year.
(3) A new machine was purchased on 31 March 2015. The following costs were incurred:
$
Purchase price, before discount, inclusive of reclaimable sales tax of $ 3,000 20,000
Discount 1,000
Delivery costs 500
Installation costs 750
Interest on loan taken out to finance the purchase 300
(4) On 1 January it was decided to change the method of providing depreciation on computer
equipment from the existing method to 40% reducing balance.
Required
Produce the analysis of property, plant and equipment as it would appear in the financial
statements of Carly for the year ended 31 December 2015.
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 3
Workings:
W1 -Depreciation charges
Buildings = (1,500,000 – 500,000) x 2% 20,000.
Plant and machinery:
New machine (17,550 x 25% x 9/12) 3,291
Existing plant (((340,500 – 80,000) – (125,900 – 57,000)) x 25%) 47,900
Total 3,291 + 47,900 51,191
Computer equipment = 112,000 x 40% 44,800
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 4
(b) A grinder was purchased on 1 January 2012 for $100,000. The plant had an estimated
useful life of ten years and a residual value of nil. Depreciation is charged on the straight
line basis. On 1 January 2015, when the asset’s net book value is $ 70,000, the directors
decide that it would be more appropriate to depreciate this asset using the sum of digits
approach. The remaining useful life is unchanged.
(c) The company purchased a fifty year lease some years ago for $1,000,000. This was being
depreciated over its life on a straight line basis. On 1 January 2015, when the net book
value is $ 480,000 and twenty-four years of the lease are remaining, the asset is revalued
to $ 1,500,000. This revised value is being incorporated into the accounts.
Required
Explain the effects of these changes on the depreciation for the year to 31 December 2015.
Page 1 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 4
Part (a)
The lathe was purchased in 2009 and was originally being written off over an estimated useful life
of twelve years. As at 1 January 2015 six of the years have elapsed with a further six years
remaining. It was decided that the machine will now only be usable for a further four years.
IAS 16 requires that where the original estimate of useful life is revised, adjustments should be
made in current and future periods (not in prior periods). The unamortized cost of the asset should
be charged to revenue over the remaining useful life of the asset. The net book value of $75,000
should therefore be charged over the remaining four years of useful life, giving an annual
depreciation charge of $18,750.
The revision is not a change in accounting policy, or a fundamental error but a change in
accounting estimate. It is therefore not appropriate to deal with any excess depreciation by
adjusting opening retained earnings.
Part (b)
The grinder was purchased in 2012 and was originally being depreciated on a straight line basis. It
has now been decided to depreciate this on the sum of digits basis.
IAS 16 requires that depreciation methods be reviewed periodically and if there is a significant
change in the expected pattern of economic benefits, the method should be changed.
Depreciation adjustments should be made in current and future periods. This change might be
appropriate if, for instance, usage of the machine is greater in the early years of an asset’s life
when it is still new and consequently it is appropriate to have a higher depreciation charge.
If the change is implemented, the unamortized cost (the net book value) of the asset should be
written off over the remaining useful life commencing with the period in which the change is made.
The depreciation charge for the remaining life of the asset will therefore be as follows.
Year No of digits Depreciation
2015 7 (7/28 x 70,000) 17,500
2016 6 (6/28 x 70,000) 15,000
2017 5 12,500
2018 4 10,000
2019 3 7,500
2020 2 5,000
2021 1 2,500
½ x 7 (7 + 1) 28 70,000
Disclosure will need to be made in the accounts of the details of the change, including the effect
on the charge in the year.
Page 2 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 4
Part (c)
IAS 16’s allowed alternative treatment in respect of measurement of property plant and equipment
(subsequent to initial recognition), is that of revaluation. Revaluation is made at fair value.
Where any item of property plant or equipment is revalued, the entire class to which the asset
belongs should be revalued. Revaluations must be kept up to date. Where there are volatile
movements in fair value, the revaluation should be performed annually. Where there are no such
movements, revaluations every three to five years may be appropriate.
AS 16 requires that the subsequent charge for depreciation should be based on the revalued
amount. The annual depreciation will therefore be $62,500, i.e. $1,500,000 divided by the 24 years
of remaining life.
There will then be a difference between the revalued depreciation charge and the historical
depreciation charge.
The resulting excess depreciation may be dealt with by a movement in reserves, i.e. by
transferring from the revaluation reserve to retained earnings a figure equal to the depreciation
charged on the revaluation surplus each year.
Page 3 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 5
(2) A deposit of $ 20,000 is paid for a new computer system which is undelivered at the year
end.
(4) Additions to fixtures, excluding the deposit on the new computer system, are $ 40,000.
(6) Land and buildings were revalued at 1 January 2015 to $ 1,500,000, of which land is worth
$ 900,000. The revaluation was performed by Messrs Jackson & Co, Chartered Surveyors,
on the basis of existing use value on the open market.
(7) The useful economic life of the buildings is unchanged. The buildings were purchased ten
years before the revaluation.
(8) Depreciation is provided on all assets in use at the year end at the following rates.
Buildings 2% per annum straight line
Plant 20% per annum straight line
Fixtures 25% per annum reducing balance
Required
Show the disclosure under IAS 16 in relation to fixed assets in the notes to the published accounts
for the year ended 31 December 2015.
Page 1 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 5
Accounting policies
(a) Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less depreciation, or at valuation.
(b) Depreciation is provided on all assets, except land, and is calculated to write down the cost or
valuation over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Land and buildings have been revalued during the year by Messrs Jackson & Co on the basis of
an existing use value on the open market.
Page 2 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 5
Workings:
W1 - Additions to assets under construction
Additions to assets under construction 53
Deposit on computer 20
73
Page 3 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 6
(a) On July 1, 2012, Humayun Chemicals Limited acquired a machine at a cost of $ 10 million.
The useful life of the machine and its salvage value was estimated at 5 years and $ 3.0
million respectively. The cost of machine is being depreciated under the straight line
method.
Based on the practice followed by similar type of companies, the company has determined
that the remaining useful economic life of the machine is six years. It has also been
established that the residual value at the end of the useful life will be equal to 10% of the
cost of machine.
Required
Compute the depreciation expenses and other adjustments (if any) required to be made in the
financial statements of the company for the year ended June 30, 2015 under each of the following
assumptions:
(i) the review of useful life and residual value was carried out on June 30, 2015;
(ii) the review of useful life and residual value was carried out on June 30, 2014 but in the
financial statements for the year then ended the depreciation expense was erroneously
recorded on the previous basis.
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 6
Part (a)(i)
If review is performed on June 30, 2015
Cost of machine 10,000,000
Depreciation (10,000,000 - 3,000,000) x 20% x 2 years (2,800,000)
WDV as at June 30, 2014 7,200,000
Residual value (10% of the cost of machine) (1,000,000)
Depreciable amount - on July 1, 2014 6,200,000
Remaining useful lives 6 years
Depreciation charge for the year ended June 30, 2015 1,033,333
Part (a)(ii)
If review is performed on June 30, 2014
Cost of machine 10,000,000
Depreciation (10,000,000 - 3,000,000) x 20% (1,400,000)
WDV as at June 30, 2013 8,600,000
Residual value (10% of the cost of machine) (1,000,000)
Depreciable amount - on July 1, 2013 7,600,000
Remaining useful lives 6 years
Depreciation charge for the year ended June 30, 2015 1,266,667
Depreciation charged for the year ended June 30, 2014 1,400,000
Part (b)
According to IAS-16, the following factors should be considered when estimating the useful life of
a depreciable asset:
(i) Expected usage
(ii) Expected physical wear and tear
(iii) Obsolescence
(iv) Legal or other limits on the use of the assets.
Once the useful life of a depreciable asset is determined, it shall be reviewed at least at each
financial year-end.
If expectations vary from the previous estimates, then change should be adjusted for current and
future periods in accordance with the requirements of IAS 8.
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 7
Faraday Pharmaceutical Limited (FPL) acquired a building for $ 200 million on July 1, 2011. The
following information relating to the building is available:
(ii) FPL uses the revaluation model for subsequent measurement of its property, plant and
equipment and accounts for revaluations on the net replacement value method. The details
of revaluation carried out by the independent valuers during the past years are as follows:
Revaluation date Fair value
$ in million
July 1, 2012 230
July 1, 2013 170
July 1, 2014 180
(iii) FPL transfers the maximum possible amount from the revaluation surplus to retained
earnings on an annual basis.
Required
Prepare the journal entries to record the above transactions from the date of acquisition of the
building to the year ended June 30, 2015.
(Ignore deferred tax)
Page 1 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 7
Journal Entries:
Date Particulars Dr. $ 000 Cr. $ 000
01.07.2011 Building 200,000
Bank 200,000
Record purchase of plant
Page 2 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 7
Page 3 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 8
The factory was estimated to have a recoverable amount of $ 19,277,000 at June 30, 2015
Other related information is as under:
(i) The plant was imported at FOB price of Z 800,000. The payment was made at the time of
shipment on July 1, 2005 at $ 52 per Z. Other charges including installation cost amounted
to $ 7 million. Installation of the plant was completed on December 31, 2005 and
commercial production commenced from April 1, 2006.
(ii) The company uses straight line method of deprecation. Depreciation is charged from the
month the asset is available for use up to the month prior to disposal. At the time of
purchase, the estimated useful life of the plant was estimated at 15 years whereas the
salvage value was estimated at $ 2.0 million.
(iii) Based on the report of a professional independent valuer, the plant was revalued on July 1,
2010 at $ 45 million. There was however, no change in estimated useful life of the plant.
(iv) The factory remained closed from April 1, to June 30, 2012 due to law and order situation.
(v) The salvage value has not changed since it was first estimated at the time of purchase.
Required
Prepare accounting entries for the year ended June 30, 2015. Give all the necessary calculations.
(Ignore taxation)
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 8
W1 – Plant $ 000
FOB price (Z 800,000 at $ 52) 41,600
Other charges including installation cost 7,000
48,600
Accumulated depreciation(1-1-2006 to 30-6-2010)
(13,980)
(48,600-2,000)/15 years = $ 3,106 x 4.5 years
WDV as on 30-6-2010 34,620
Revaluation surplus (45,000-34,620) 10,380
Revalued amount as of July 1, 2010 45,000
Accumulated depreciation(1-7-2010 to 30-6-2015)
(20,476)
(45,000-2,000)/ 10.5 years = $ 4,095 x 5 years
WDV as on 30-6-2015 24,524
Impairment loss β 5,247
Recoverable amount 19,277
Note 1
Since impairment loss is less than the revaluation surplus on impairment date, the full amount of
impairment would be adjusted against the revaluation surplus.
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 9
You have recently been appointed as the Chief Accountant of Steel Air Limited, a commercial
airline. Your accountant has prepared the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2006.
You have reviewed them and found them satisfactory except for the note on tangible fixed assets.
You have scrutinized the records and extracted the following information:
(i) The company acquired land on 99 years lease on January1, 1999 for Rs. 200 million.
(ii) The company has a fleet of nine aircrafts, relevant details of which are as under:
Each aircraft consists of two major components i.e., engine and airframe having
useful economic life of 20 and 12 years respectively. 70% of the cost of aircrafts
pertains to the engine and 30% to the airframe. The company has10 year’s
replacement policy for airframes.
Five aircrafts were acquired on January 1, 2000 for Rs. 220 million each.
Four used aircrafts were also bought on January 1, 2000 from another airline for Rs.
55 million each. Each aircraft was renovated and overhauled at a cost of Rs. 25
million. Rs. 10 million were spent on the airframe and Rs. 15 million on the engine.
15% of these expenditures have been in respect of costs of consumables. The
useful economic lives of engines and airframes are estimated to be the same as
those of new aircrafts.
Salvage value of engines as well as the airframes is estimated at 10% if sold at the
end of their economic life. Salvage value of airframes at the time of replacement is
estimated at 15% of the cost.
A newly acquired aircraft was damaged during landing due to computer malfunction
on October 31, 2005. It remained in-operative during the remaining period of the
year. However, it does not require any revaluation.
(iii) Engineering machineries were acquired on April 01, 2000 for Rs. 330 million. As a result of
annual checkup, certain parts were replaced at a cost of Rs. 50 million on July 01, 2005.
This replacement did not enhance the useful life nor did it affect the efficiency of the
machineries. New parts have a useful life of 30,000 hours. Cost of replaced defective parts
was Rs. 20 million and they were sold for Rs. 8 million.
Total useful life of machinery is 60,000 hours and the average usage has been 500
machine hours per month. Estimated salvage value is 10% of cost.
(iv) Hangers for aircrafts have been in use since July 1, 2000. The total cost of their
construction was Rs. 20 million and the total estimated useful life is 20 years.
(v) Furniture and fixtures costing Rs. 13 million, Rs. 7 million and Rs. 4 million were acquired
on July 01, 2000, July 01, 2002 and July 01, 2005 respectively.
(vi) Ten vehicles were taken on finance lease on July 1, 2005 with fair market value of Rs. 1
million each.
Page 1 of 4 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 9
Required:
Draft a note to the accounts on fixed assets strictly in accordance with the requirements of
International Accounting Standards and the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Also submit necessary
workings. (Give all figures to the nearest thousand)
(22 marks)
Page 2 of 4 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 9
DEPRECIATION
Rate % 1.01% 5% 10% 10% 5% 10% 20%
Carrying Amount 184,849 689,812 192,425 176,625 14,000 15,101 8,000 1,280,812
W1 Leasehold Land
Depreciation up to 01-07-05 Rs. 200,000 / 99 years x 6.5 years = Rs. 13,131
Depreciation for the year Rs. 200,000 / 99 years = Rs. 2,020
Page 3 of 4 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 9
W4 Hangers
Depreciation up to 01-07-05 Rs. 20,000 / 20 years x 5 years = Rs. 5,000
Depreciation for the year Rs. 20,000 / 20 years = Rs. 1,000
Page 4 of 4 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 10
Faraz Brothers Transport Company exchanged a number of used trucks and Cash for vacant plot
of Industrial Land. The trucks have a combined book value of Rs.126,000 (Cost 192,000 and
Accumulated Depreciation Rs 66,000). Faiz Ahmad, a purchasing the secondhand market
indicates that the trucks have a fair Market value of Rs 147,000. In addition to trucks Faraz
Brothers is also required to pay Rs 51,000 cash for the plot of Land.
Required:
Taking into account the requirements of IAS,16 calculate the following:
(i) Cost of land (01 mark)
(ii) Gain on disposal of used truck (02 marks)
(iii) Prepare journal entry to record the aforesaid exchange transaction (02 marks)
(i) The fair value of land is not available, therefore, the land shall be recognized initially at fair
value of assets given in exchange i.e. trucks and cash paid. Rs. 147,000 + 51,000 = Rs.
198,000
(ii) The gain on exchange transaction is Rs. 21,000 [Rs. 147,000 fair value – Rs. 126,000
carrying value).
(iii)
Date Particulars Dr. Rs Cr. Rs
xx.xx.xx Land 198,000
Accumulated depreciation 66,000
Trucks 192,000
Bank 51,000
P&L (gain) 21,000
(exchange of trucks with land acquired recorded)
Page 1 of 1 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 11
Accumulated Rate of
Particulars Cost
Depreciation Depreciation
(Rs. in million) (%)
Land 78.000 ---
Factory building 167.000 68.523 10
Machinery 265.000 108.735 10
Factory Equipment 0.900 0.369 10
Office Equipment 0.800 0.328 10
Vehicles 4.600 2.931 20
Computers and Accessories 2.300 0.944 10
(a) One of the vehicles costing Rs. 600,000 included in cost purchased on 1 August, 1998
totally destroyed in accident on July 01, 1999. Insurance was not covered.
(b) Machinery included additions at the beginning of the year of Rs.35 million.
(c) An old machinery purchased on 1 September, 1996 amounting to Rs.30 million which was
sold at beginning of the year ended 30 June, 2000 for Rs.18 million credited to machinery
account.
(d) The company uses reducing balance method. The depreciation for the year has not been
charged yet.
Required:
Calculate depreciation for the year ended as on 30 June, 2000 after adjustment of above.
(10 marks)
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 11
Depreciation on Rs. m
Land (not to be depreciated) Nil
Factory building Rs.[167 – 68.523] x 10% 9.8477
Machinery Rs.[(265 + 18 error – 30 disposal) – (108.735 – 7.725 disposal w1)] x 10% 15.1990
Factory equipment Rs.[0.900 – 0.369] x 10% 0.0531
Office equipment Rs.[0.800 – 0.328] x 10% 0.0472
Vehicles Rs.[4.60 – 0.6 disposal) – (2.931 – 0.11 disposal w2) x 20% 0.2358
Computer etc Rs.[2.3 – 0.944] x 10% 0.1356
Total depreciation 25.9435
Cost 30
1997 Depreciation 10% x 10/12 2.5
Carrying amount 1997 27.5
1998 Depreciation 10% 2.75
Carrying amount 1998 24.75
1999 Depreciation 10% 2.475
Carrying amount 1999 22.275
Rs. 2.5+2.75+2.475 = Rs. 7.725
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 12
Freehold land can be depreciated only when its useful life is determinable e.g.
(i) Land is expected to be taken over by the government
(ii) There is legal restriction on the future use of the land
(iii) Land is expected to be covered under water because the river is changing its direction
(iv) Land at sea shore is expected to become unusable due to increase in water level at sea.
(v) A land sliding is expected near mountains etc making the use of land impossible.
Page 1 of 1 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 13
All the following factors are considered in determining the useful life of an asset:
(a) expected usage of the asset. Usage is assessed by reference to the asset’s expected
capacity or physical output.
(b) expected physical wear and tear, which depends on operational factors such as the number
of shifts for which the asset is to be used and the repair and maintenance programme, and
the care and maintenance of the asset while idle.
(c) technical or commercial obsolescence arising from changes or improvements in production,
or from a change in the market demand for the product or service output of the asset.
(d) legal or similar limits on the use of the asset, such as the expiry dates of related leases.
Page 1 of 1 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 14
(a) A special trade discount of 25% was allowed by the supplier due to efforts of the agent
involved in the deal, who had close association with Mr. Aslam. Normally the supplier
allows only 10% trade discount to his customers.
(c) Civil and electrical work includes cost of certain instruments amounting to Rs. 150,000,
which were poorly handled by the workers and were totally damaged. Now they carry no
value.
(d) On January 01, 2005 test run was started and successfully completed on January 31, 2005
at a cost of Rs. 550,000. The sale proceeds of test production were Rs. 320,000.
(e) The plant went into normal production from February 01, 2005 and attained 45% capacity
during the period ended on June 30, 2005. The company, at this stage, discovered that the
actual capacity of the plant is about 85% of the capacity declared by the supplier. The
matter was discussed with the supplier and his agent. The agent finally agreed to pay a
compensation of 3% on invoice value and issued his credit note to this effect on June 30,
2005.
(f) The company accounts for its assets under cost model and on June 30, 2005 it estimated
Rs. 21 million as the fair value of the plant. It is further estimated that in case of disposal,
the following expenditure will have to be incurred:
Rs. in 000
Cost of dismantling 250
Cost of transportation 100
Terminal benefits of labours to be laid off 300
Legal costs 100
Stamp duty 50
Salary of production manager during dismantling 100
(g) Depreciation is to be charged at 10% on straight line basis from the commencement of
normal production.
Required:
Calculate the following, also submit your explanation if necessary:
(a) Initial recognition of the cost of plant. (05 marks)
(b) Impairment loss, if any, as at June 30, 2005 and accounting treatment thereof. (06 marks)
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 14
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 15
(a) Jubilee Processing (Pvt.) Limited, trades off its used Plant and Machinery for a new model.
The machine given up has a book value of Rs 16,000 (original cost Rs 24,000 and
accumulated depreciation Rs 8,000) and a fair value of Rs 12,000. It is traded for a new
model that has a list price of Rs 32,000. In negotiations with the seller, a trade-in allowance
of Rs 18,000 is finally agreed on for the used machine.
REQUIRED:
In the light of IAS-16
(i) Calculate the cost of new Machine; (03 marks)
(ii) Compute Gain/(Loss) occurred in exchange transaction; (02 marks)
(iii) Record the transaction in the Books of Jubilee Processing (Pvt.) Limited (02 marks)
(b) A free hold Building is purchased on January 01, 2000, for Rs 40,000. Its estimated useful
life is 20 years and it is depreciated at the rate of Rs 2,000 per annum in each of the ended
December 31, 2000 and 2001. On January1, 2002 a professional valuer estimates the
value of the building at Rs 108,000.
REQUIRED:
On the assumption that the revaluation is to be incorporated in to the books of account, and
that the original estimate of the useful life was correct, show the relevant ledger accounts
for the period January 2000 to December 31, 2002.
(08 marks)
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 15
Part (b)
Building
Date Particulars Rs. Date Particulars Rs.
01.01.00 Bank 40,000 31.12.00 Balance c/d 40,000
40,000 40,000
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 16
State the disclosure requirements for assets carried at revalued amounts, as referred to in IAS –
16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’. (04)
When items of property, plant and equipment are stated at revalued amounts the following must
be disclosed:
The effective date of the revaluation;
Whether an independent valuer was involved;
For each revalued class of property, plant and equipment, the carrying amount that would have
been recognised had the assets been carried under the cost model; and
The revaluation surplus, indicating the change for the period and any restrictions on the
distribution of the balance to shareholders.
Page 1 of 1 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 17
SL transfers the maximum possible amount from revaluation surplus to retained earnings
on an annual basis.
(iii) The revalued amount of buildings as determined by Accurate Valuers (Private) Limited, an
independent valuation company, on 1 January 2015 and 2016 was Rs. 456 million and Rs.
378 million respectively.
(iv) Equipment costing Rs. 35 million was purchased on 1 August 2015. Half of the equipment
purchased on 1 January 2014 was disposed off on 30 June 2016.
Required:
In accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, prepare a note on ‘Property plant
& equipment’ (including comparative figures) for inclusion in SL’s financial statements for the year
ended 31 December 2016. (18)
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 17
Accumulated depreciation
1 Jan 24 10.96 34.96 22.5 5 27.5
Revaluation - cancellation (24) (24) (22.5) (22.5)
Disposal W2 (5.76) (5.76)
Depreciation W1 21 6.39 27.39 24 5.96 29.96
31 Dec 21 11.59 32.59 24 10.96 34.96
The revaluation was performed on 1 January 2016 by Accurate Valuers (Private) Limited, an independent
firm of valuers. The entity transfers effect of incremental depreciation from revaluation surplus to retained
earnings on annual basis.
W1 – Depreciation Rs. m
2015 – Building [456 / 19 years] 24
2015 – Equipment [45 x 10% = 4.5] + [35 x 10% x 5/12 = 1.46] 5.96
2016 – Building [378 / 18 years] 21
2015 – Equipment [74.04 – 20.25] x 10% + 1.01 6.39
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 18
The following information pertains to property, plant and equipment of Orchid Limited (OL), a listed
company:
Buildings
The revalued amount of buildings as determined by Shabbir Associates, an independent valuer, on 31
December 2015 and 2017 was Rs. 700 million and Rs. 463 million respectively.
On 30 June 2017 a building having original cost of Rs. 66 million was sold to Baqir Limited for Rs. 85
million. It was last revalued at Rs. 87 million. OL incurred a cost of Rs. 2 million on disposal.
OL transfers the maximum possible amount from revaluation surplus to retained earnings on an annual
basis.
Plant
On 31 December 2016 the recoverable amount of the plant was assessed at Rs. 360 million with no
change in useful life.
During 2017, OL has decided to change the depreciation method for plant from straight line to reducing
balance. The new depreciation rate would be 10%.
Required:
Prepare following notes (along with comparative figures) to be presented in the financial statements of OL
for the year ended 31 December 2017 in accordance with the requirements of relevant IFRSs and
Companies Act, 2017:
(a) Property, plant and equipment (18)
(b) Change in depreciation method (02)
Page 1 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 18
Acc. depreciation/Impairment
1 Jan 24.14 115 139.14 0 19 19
Disposal W2 (4.5) (4.5)
Depreciation W1 22.64 36 58.64 24.14 19 43.14
Revaluation (Cancellation) (42.28) (42.28)
Impairment W1 77 77
31 Dec 0 151 151 24.14 115 139.14
Building Plant
Measurement basis Revaluation model Cost model
Useful life / depreciation rate 30 years 10%
Depreciation method Straight line Reducing balance
The last revaluation was performed on 31 December 2017 by Shabbir Associates, an independent firm of
valuer.
Cost / Rev.
Book Value Sale Price Gain Mode of
Assets disposed Purchaser amount
disposal
Rs. in million
Building Baqir Ltd 87.00 82.50 85.00 0.5 Tender
Cost of disposal Rs. 2 m
Change in estimate
Due to significant change in the expected pattern or consumption of the future economic benefits
in the Plant assets, therefore, the company has decided to change the depreciation method of
plant from straight line to reducing balance method. The new depreciation rate is 10%.
Had the deprecation method been not changed, profit of 2017 would have been higher by Rs.
20.35 million. [Rs. 360 x 10% - 360 /23 years]
Page 2 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 18
Plant
2015 – Depreciation [475 / 25 years] 19
2016 – Depreciation [475 / 25 years] 19
2016 – Impairment [475 – 19 – 19] – [360 Recoverable amount] 77
2017 – Depreciation [360 x 10% reducing balance] 36
Page 3 of 3 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 19
Following information pertains to a building acquired by SK Limited (SKL) on 1 July 2012 for Rs. 360
million:
(ii) SKL uses revaluation model for subsequent measurement of buildings. It accounts for revaluation
on net replacement value method. The details of revaluations as carried out by independent valuer
are as follows:
Fair value
Revaluation date
(Rs. in million)
31 December 2013 323
31 December 2015 208
31 December 2017 167
(iv) SKL transfers the maximum possible amount from the revaluation surplus to retained earnings on
an annual basis.
Required:
Prepare entries to record revaluation surplus/loss on each of the above revaluation date. (Entries to
record depreciation expense, incremental depreciation and elimination of accumulated depreciation
are not required) (11)
Page 1 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)
IAS 16 Question 19
Debit Credit
Date Description
Rs. M
31 Dec 2013 Accumulated depreciation 18 + 36 54
Building 54
Building 17
Revaluation Surplus (OCI) 17
Page 2 of 2 (kashifadeel.com)