Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    A & P 1 Group Activity Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Tinke Winke
    The document is a rubric for assessing a group activity with multiple criteria. It evaluates elements like document quality, knowledge of topic, use of references, factual information presented, comprehension, persuasiveness, delivery, rebuttal, quality of questions asked, and relevance of questions to the discussion topic. Participants can earn between 1-4 marks for each criteria, with higher scores given for exceeding expectations through extraordinary writing style, clear understanding of topic, proper use of references, thorough comprehension, logical arguments, clear communication, and highly relevant questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    A & P 1 Group Activity Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Tinke Winke
    35 views3 pages
    The document is a rubric for assessing a group activity with multiple criteria. It evaluates elements like document quality, knowledge of topic, use of references, factual information presented, comprehension, persuasiveness, delivery, rebuttal, quality of questions asked, and relevance of questions to the discussion topic. Participants can earn between 1-4 marks for each criteria, with higher scores given for exceeding expectations through extraordinary writing style, clear understanding of topic, proper use of references, thorough comprehension, logical arguments, clear communication, and highly relevant questions.

    Original Title

    Group_Activity_Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a rubric for assessing a group activity with multiple criteria. It evaluates elements like document quality, knowledge of topic, use of references, factual information presented, comprehension, persuasiveness, delivery, rebuttal, quality of questions asked, and relevance of questions to the discussion topic. Participants can earn between 1-4 marks for each criteria, with higher scores given for exceeding expectations through extraordinary writing style, clear understanding of topic, proper use of references, thorough comprehension, logical arguments, clear communication, and highly relevant questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    35 views3 pages

    A & P 1 Group Activity Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Tinke Winke
    The document is a rubric for assessing a group activity with multiple criteria. It evaluates elements like document quality, knowledge of topic, use of references, factual information presented, comprehension, persuasiveness, delivery, rebuttal, quality of questions asked, and relevance of questions to the discussion topic. Participants can earn between 1-4 marks for each criteria, with higher scores given for exceeding expectations through extraordinary writing style, clear understanding of topic, proper use of references, thorough comprehension, logical arguments, clear communication, and highly relevant questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    A & P 1 Group Activity Rubric

    Category Criteria Exceeds Meets Needs Inadequate Score


    Expectations Expectations Improvement
    – 1 mark
    – 4 marks – 3 marks – 2 marks
    Document Quality of Piece was Piece was Piece had little Piece had no
    Writing written in an written in an style or voice style or voice
    extraordinary interesting Gives some Gives no new
    style and style and new information and
    voice voice information but very poorly
    Very Somewhat poorly organized
    informative informative organized
    and well- and organized
    organized
    Knowledge of Writing Writing Writing shows Writing shows
    Topic shows strong shows a clear adequate little
    understanding understanding understanding understanding
    Ideas Presents ideas Presents ideas Ideas are too Ideas are vague
    in an original in a consistent general or unclear
    manner manner
    Grammar, Virtually no Few spelling A number of So many
    Usage & spelling, and spelling, spelling,
    Mechanics punctuation or punctuation punctuation or punctuation and
    grammatical errors, minor grammatical grammatical
    errors grammatical errors errors that it
    errors interferes with
    the meaning
    Use of Compelling Professionally Although References are
    References evidence from legitimate attributions are seldom cited to
    professionally sources that occasionally support
    legitimate support given, many statements.
    sources is claims are statements
    given to generally seem
    support present and unsubstantiated.
    claims. attribution is, The reader is
    Attribution is for the most confused about
    clear and part, clear and the source of
    fairly fairly information and
    represented. represented. ideas.
    Defense Factual Used many Used some Used few facts Did not present
    Information facts facts to support facts to support
    to support all to support all arguments. arguments.
    arguments. arguments.
    Comprehensio Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
    n thorough accurate minimal misunderstandin
    understanding understanding understanding of g of the
    of information. of important information. information
    information.

    Persuasiveness All arguments Most Some arguments Few arguments


    were logical arguments were logical and were logical and
    and convincing were logical convincing convincing
    and convincing

    Delivery Communicate Communicate Seldom Failed to


    d clearly and d clearly; communicated communicate
    confidently; frequent eye clearly; poor eye clearly; no eye
    maintained eye contact; good contact; poor contact;
    contact; voice and voice and monotone
    excellent voice delivery rate. delivery rate. delivery.
    inflection and
    delivery rate.
    Rebuttal Addressed all Addressed Addressed some Did not address
    opponent most of of opponent’s opponent’s
    arguments opponent’s arguments with arguments.
    with counter- arguments counter-
    evidence. with counter- evidence.
    evidence.
    Questions Critical Questions Questions Questions Questions posed
    Thinking posed posed posed demonstrate no
    demonstrate a demonstrate a demonstrate a rigor and critical
    high level of moderate low level of thinking
    rigor and level of rigor rigor and
    critical and critical critical thinking
    thinking thinking
    Relevance of All questions Three of more Two or less All questions
    questions relevant to the questions questions irrelevant to the
    discussion relevant to the relevant to the discussion topic
    topic discussion discussion topic
    topic
    Extra
    Credit
    (specify)
    2 Marks
    Total

    References
    Cox, J. (2020). Sample Essay Rubric for Elementary Teachers. Retrieved from
    https://www.thoughtco.com/essay-rubric-2081367

    Education World. (2004). Debate Rubric. Retrieved from


    https://www.educationworld.com/tools_templates/Final_templates_set2_debate.doc

    You might also like