Pharmaceutical Sciences: Recent Advances and Treatments of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome
Pharmaceutical Sciences: Recent Advances and Treatments of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome
Pharmaceutical Sciences: Recent Advances and Treatments of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome
Please cite this article in press Sarwar Rafique et al, Recent Advances And Treatments Of Childhood
Nephrotic Syndrome., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2020; 07(10).
www.iajps.com Page 5
IAJPS 2020, 07 (10), 5-7 Sarwar Rafique et al ISSN 2349-7750
www.iajps.com Page 6
IAJPS 2020, 07 (10), 5-7 Sarwar Rafique et al ISSN 2349-7750
DISCUSSION: REFERENCES:
There have been no consistent clinical cues to either 1. A. Howman, T. L. Chapman, M. M. Langdon et
whether a patient with nephrotic syndrome has the al., “Immunosuppression for progressive
risk of becoming steroid-resistant in the future or membranous nephropathy: a UK randomised
whether they will suffer recurrence post-transplant6. controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 381, no.
There are weak clinical associations with recurrence 9868, pp. 744–751, 2013
(for example, age at onset of disease, race, and 2. Abeyagunawardena AS, Sebire NJ, Risdon RA,
serum albumin at diagnosis or time to first et al. Predictors of long-term outcome of
dialysis/transplant. Interestingly, the last two children with idiopathic FSGS. Pediatr Nephrol
features may point to the possibility that CFD has a 2007; 22(2):215-221
more aggressive presentation and natural course, 3. Mekahli D, Liutkus A, Ranchin B et al. Long-
compared with the monogenic or ‘other’ groups6. To term outcome of idiopathic steroid resistant
address the question of whether there are clinical nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter study.
features that pertain to CFD, we hypothesized that Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:1525-15327.
patients with the archetypal CFD, those with post- 4. Nauidet P. Treatment of childhood nephrotic
transplant recurrence, would have distinct early syndrome with a combination of cyclosporine
clinical features regarding their initial response to and prednisone. French Society of Pediatric
immunosuppression7. If a patient has initial steroid Nephrology. Kidney Int 1997;125:981-86.
sensitivity (otherwise described as secondary steroid 5. Lombel RM, Hodson E, Gipson D. Treatment
resistance), they are likely to have an immune- of steroid -resistant nephrotic syndrome in
mediated circulating factor causing their underlying children- new guidelines from KDIGO. Pediatr
disease and therefore high risk of recurrence 8. Nephrol 2012; DOI 10.1007/s00467-012-2304-
8.
Treatment of SRNS in children continues to pose a 6. Hafeez F, Ahmad TM, Anwar S. Efficacy of
therapeutic challenge to the pediatric nephrologists. steroids, cyclosporin, and cyclophosphamide in
The lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials steroid resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.
leads to a paucity of strong evidence to inform JCPSP 2005;15(6):329-332
treatment decisions. The treatment strategies are 7. Hodson EM, Habashy D, Craig JC. Intervention
heterogeneous with variable efficacy and side for idiopathic steroid resistant nephrotic
effects' profile. Optimal strategies with least toxicity syndrome in children. Cochrane Database Syst
remain to be determined9. Without effective Rev 2006;(2): CD003594.
treatment, progression to the end-stage kidney 8. Kari JA, Halawani M, Mokhtar G, Jalalah SM,
disease is very likely10. Anshasi W. Pattern of steroid resistant
CONCLUSION: nephrotic syndrome in children living in the
Nephrotic syndrome can increase your child’s risk kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Kidney Dis
of infection and blood clots. It always affects both Transpl 2009;20(5):854-857.
kidneys and usually appears in the early years of 9. Gulati S, Kher V, Sharma RK, Gupta A.
your child’s life. Most children with this disorder Steroid response pattern in Indian children with
outgrow it by young adulthood. nephrotic syndrome. Acta Pediatr Scand
1994;83:530-533.
10. Gulati S, Sengupta D, Sharma RK, Sharma A,
Gupta RK, Singh U, et al. Steroid resistant
nephrotic syndrome: Role of histopathology.
Ind Pediatr 2006;43(10):55-60.
www.iajps.com Page 7