Tugas 2 Indah Fitriany Purwaningtyas - 01012622024017

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

TUGAS PENYELESAIAN PROBLEM 4.9 DAN 4.

17

DARI BUKU QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS FOR MANAGEMENT

Dibuat untuk memenuhi salah satu tugas mata kuliah Analisa Kuantitatif

Disusun Oleh:

Indah Fitriany Purwaningtyas 01012622024017

Dosen Pengajar: Prof. Dr. H. Didik Susetyo, M.Si

JURUSAN MAGISTER MANAJEMEN

FAKULTAS EKONOMI

UNIVERSITAS SRIWIJAYA

2020
1. Problem 4.9
John Smith has developed the following forecasting model:
Ŷ = 36 + 4,3 X1
Where:
Ŷ = Demand for K10 air conditioners
𝑋1 = The outside temperature (⸰F)
Condition:
a. Forecast the demand for K10 when the temperature is 70°F.
b. What is the demand for a temperature of 80°F?
c. What is the demand for a temperature of 90°F?
With formula:
Ŷ = 36 + 4,3 X1
Solution:
a. For X1 = 70°F
Ŷ = 36 + 4,3 X1
= 36 + 4.3 (70°F)
= 337
b. For X1 = 80°F
Ŷ = 36 + 4,3 X1
= 36 + 4,3 (80°F)
= 380
c. For X1 = 90°F
Ŷ = 36 + 4,3 X1
= 36 + 4,3 (90°F)
= 423

2. Problem 4.17
Accountants at the firm Walker and Walker believed that several traveling
executives submit unusually high travel vouchers when they return from business
trips. The accountants took a sample of 200 vouchers submitted from the past year;
they then developed the following multiple regression equation relating expected
travel cost (Y) to number of days on the road (X1 ) and distance traveled (X2 ) in
miles:
Ŷ = $90,00 + $48,50 X1 + $0,40 X2
Condition:
The coefficient of correlation computed was 0,68.
a. If Thomas Williams returns from a 300-mile trip that took him out of town
for five days, what is the expected amount that he should claim as expenses?
b. Williams submitted a reimbursement request for $685; what should the
accountant do?
c. Comment on the validity of this model. Should any other variables be
included? Which ones? Why?
With formula:
Ŷ = $90,00 + $48,50 X1 + $0,40 X2
Solution:
a. The expected amount that Thomas Williams have to claim as expenses:
Known:
X1 = 5 days (number of days on the road )
X2 = 300 miles (distance traveled)
So the answer is:
Ŷ = $90,00 + $48,50 X1 + $0,40 X2
= $90,00 + $48,50 (5) + $0,40 (300)
= $90,00 + $242,5 + $120
= $452,5

b. First Solution:
Based on the equation model above, we can calculate that the expected
amount that Thomas Williams have to claim as expenses from a 300-mile
trip that took him out of town for five days is only $452,5, meanwhile the
reimbursement requested by Thomas is $685 and it was above the
prediction. I think, the accountant should ask Thomas why it can be
happened and what's the additional expenses that can make the amount
being above from the prediction. Thomas have to explain one by one about
his additional expenses and present the evidences to the accountant.
Second Solution:
If Thomas can present the evidences of the additional expenses to the
accountant, we can connect the possibility of correlation between this case
and the model equation. With correlation of coefficient (r) = 0,68 it means
measurement between two variable (X1 and X2).
From r, we can find r2 = (0,682) = 0,4624.
The r2 explain about the proportion of variability in Y that is explained by
the regression equation. Because the r2 is less than 0,5 or 50% so the validity
of this regression r2 is low. I think the accountant might pay the
reimbursement because the regression r2 is low.

c. The validity of this equation model


After we calculate the value of r2, we can found the proportion of variability
in Y that is explained by the regression equation is low (0,4624). From the
correlation of coefficient that measure of the strength of relationship
between two variable is 0,68. To make the regression can be more valid, the
accountant can increase the number of sample or add any other variable such
as accommodation (hotel), food and beverage cost, laundry, transport
during in the location, or anything else. Because that variables is very
important to fulfil employee's daily needs during the duty.

You might also like