C.-Smarter TOD PDF
C.-Smarter TOD PDF
C.-Smarter TOD PDF
TOD
Learnings from MoUD's
TOD Guidance Document
and Smart City Plans
Copyright © 2017
National Institute of Urban Affairs (India)
and
Foreign & Commonwealth Office (UK)
TOD
Learnings from MoUD's
TOD Guidance Document
and Smart City Plans
Expert Advisors
Akshima Ghate (The Energy & Resource Institute)
Arun Rewal (Arun Rewal Associates)
Banashree Banerjee (Institute of Housing & Urban Development Studies)
Dr. Divya Sharma (Oxford Policy Management)
Mriganka Saxena (Habitat Tectonics Architecture & Urbanism)
Graphic Design
Deep Pahwa
Kavita Rawat
Copy Editor
Razia Grover
Foreword
The Smart City Mission has directed the attention of the urban sector in India to the need and benefits of following an integrated approach
to the formulation of city development strategies and the preparation of purposeful projects which can be implemented with efficiency.
The Mission has also made us highly conscious of the interrelationships between planning, governance, finance and capacity; the fact that
all these aspects must be addressed while envisaging a project or a development strategy. The outcomes that are expected from such an
integrated and holistic approach are an improved quality of life, better quality of assets and enhanced efficiency and sustainability.
One of the fundamental principles of smart cities is the integration between land use and transportation. Urban historians will remind us
that this integration is at the heart of city planning. Even a cursory glance at the oldest cities, which we admire for their streets and public
places as much as their buildings, reveals the inherent bond between the spaces for movement and the spaces for rest. However, this bond
became weak during the late 20th century because of proliferating modes of personal transportation and rampant unplanned urbanisation,
which skewed the balance between density of population and land use and provision of basic services. The ‘smart’ city is one that aims to
restore the balance and to reclaim the public purpose of cities, which is expected to result in improved economic and social performance.
Over the last several months, NIUA was engaged in a research project on Transit Oriented Development in Indian Smart Cities. As a part of
this project, NIUA published ‘Transit Oriented Development for Indian Smart Cities — A Global Review of Transportation-Land-Use Integration’
in September 2016. This publication established five constructs-Urban Density, Urban Diversity, Urban Design, Housing and Mobility — as
the core themes in a TOD. This publication was followed up by interactions with over 10 Indian smart cities through national, international
workshops and an international immersion visit. NIUA is now pleased to published the final set of deliverables in this project. It includes
three Guidance Documents with the purpose of helping Indian smart cities in the process of implementing TOD. The three Guidance
Documents are:
• A Smart(er) TOD — Learnings from MoUD’s TOD Guidance Document and Smart City Plans is a study of TODs in 21 Smart Cities
with respect to the Ministry of Urban Developments’ TOD Guidance document.
• Game Changers in Transit Oriented Development discuss two important tools in operationalising TOD- Value Capture Financing for
financial sustainability and Form-Based Codes for community-driven urban design.
• Assessing TOD — A List of Indicators compiles indicators of TOD within the five constructs established in Transit Oriented Development
for Indian Smart Cities — A Global Review of Transportation-Land-Use Integration.
These publications illustrate the opportunity, role and scope of TOD in Indian Smart Cities.
We are thankful to the group of expert advisers — Arun Rewal, Banashree Banerjee, Dr. Divya Sharma, Mriganka Saxena, and Akshima Ghate
— who have shared their wisdom and experience with the NIUA team and our technical partners from RICS India, D.T.V. Raghu Ramaswamy,
Ashish Gupta, Dr. Anil Sawhney and Sunil Agarwal. The project has been made possible through the generous funding provided by the
Prosperity Fund of the Foreign & Commonwealth Office of the United Kingdom and the support and encouragement provided by Ms. Natalie
Toms, Mr. Sushil Rana and the team at the UK High Commission.
Prof. Jagan Shah
Director, NIUA
ABD: Area Based Development GSIDCL: Goa State Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.
AMRUT: Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation HDMC: Hubli-Dharwad Municipal Corporation
ASSOCHAM: Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of HEC: Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd
India HIG: High Income Group
BBSR: Bhubaneswar ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability — South Asia:
BPTSL: Bhubaneswar Public Transport Service Limited International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
BIT: Birla Institute of Technology ICT: Information Communication Technology
BRT: Bus Rapid Transport IIM: Indian Institute of Management
BSUP: Basic Services for Urban Poor IPSCDL: Imagine Panaji Smart City Development Limited
CBD: Central Business District IPT: Intermediate Para Transit
CCP: Corporation of City of Panaji ITDP: Institute for Transportation Development Policy
CCTV: Close Circuit Tele-vision ITMS: Intelligent Transport Management System
CDP: City Development Plan IUT: Institute of Urban Transport
CNTA: Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act JICA: Japan International Cooperation Agency
CRZ: Coastal Regulation Zone JnNURM: Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility JSUDP: Jharkhand Sustainable Urban Development Project
CTTP: City Traffic & Transportation Plan KIADB: Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
DCR: Development Control Regulation KRDCL: Karnataka Road Development Corporation Limited
DMA: Directorate of Municipal Administration KTC: Kadamba Transport Corporation
DPC: District Planning Committee KUIDFC: Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance
DUTF: Dedicated Urban Transport Fund. Corporation
EDC: Economic Development Corporation Ltd LIG: Lower Income Group
EWS: Economically Weaker Section LRT: Light Rail Transport
FAR: Floor Area Ratio MIG: Medium Income Group
FSI: Floor Space Index MNRE: Ministry of New & Renewable Energy
FCO: Foreign & Commonwealth Office MoUD: Ministry of Urban Development
FMCG: Fast Moving Consumer Goods MRTS: Mass Rapid Transit System
GHAG: Goa Heritage Action Group NABARD: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
GLDBCR: Goa Land Development & Building Construction Regulations NIFFT: National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology
GoI: Government of India NIUA: National Institute of Urban Development
GoJ: Government of Jharkhand NKDA: New Town Kolkata Development Authority
GoG: Government of Goa NMT: Non Motorised Transport
GoMP: Government of Madhya Pradesh NWKRTC: North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation
GoK: Government of Karnataka ODP: Outline Development Plan
GRP: Goa Regional Plan PBS: Public Bike Share
Smart City Mission Guidelines, TOD Guidance Document & the Global Review Document
Bhubaneswar....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Bhopal.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................20
Ajmer........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22
Thane........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24
Jabalpur................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Guwahati............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Chandigarh........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
Chennai...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................32
Amritsar...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................34
Kochi........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 36
Indore.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................40
Agra........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
Faridabad.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 44
Ahmedabad......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48
Panaji....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 66
Hubli-Dharwad..................................................................................................................................................................................................................80
Ujjain........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................90
Annexure I...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................100
Annexure II...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................112
Endnotes................................................................................................................................................................................................................................113
Supportive Principles: and for the preparation of a Detailed Project Report (DPR) when the
Smart City Plan has already been selected.
1. Engage Private Sector: Foster private sector participation in
the TOD planning and implementation process, including
financing infrastructure upgrades related to real estate
development.
2. Barrier Free Environment: Build and retrofit the pedestrian
The projects proposed in the Smart City Mission align directly with
the Sub-Components listed in the TOD Guidance Document, and the
TOD PRINCIPLES
The next section explains the method of analysing the Smart City Plans on the basis of the relationship between the various documents
discussed earlier.
CITIES STUDIED in the city beyond the SCP in terms of the TOD Principles.
Optimised Densities
First and Last Mile
Housing Diversity
Managed Parking
Complete Streets
Traffic Calming`
Informal Sector
Street Oriented
Interconnected
Street Network
NMT Networks
Multi–modal
Connectivity
Integration
Integration
Buildings
Cities
Agra
Ahmedabad
Ajmer
Amritsar
Bhopal
Bhubaneswar
Chandigarh
Chennai
Faridabad
Guwahati
Gwalior
Hubli-Dharwad
Indore
Jabalpur
Kochi
Nagpur
New Town Kolkata
Panaji
Ranchi
Thane
Ujjain
MODE SHARE
Bicycle
Public Transit 17%
11%
Two Wheelers
33%
Other
IPT
39%
12%
Walk Cars
21% 6%
Source: SCP
Ranital
Gol Bazaar
Civic Centre
Wright
Stadium
Madan Mahal
Railway
Station
Bicycle
13%
Bus
29%
IPT
2%
AREA BASED DEVELOPMENT
IPT-AutoRickshaw
4%
Two
Wheeler
8%
Car
15%
Bus
73%
MODE SHARE
Walk
27%
Private Vehicles
37%
Public Bicycle
Transit 20%
16%
Walk
37%
Private Vehicles
42%
Bicycle
17%
Public Transit
4%
FATEHABAD ROAD
Source: SCP
NMT
35%
Private Vehicle
51%
Public
Transit
11%
Commuter IPT
Rail 2%
1%
Ranchi has proposed implementation of a TOD as its Greenfield ABD Ranchi's Smart City Plan echoes this vision through the statement:
in its Smart City Plan. TOD is a growth management tool and it must "Ranchi aspires to be a learning and knowledge centre to its
be considered in context of the city's growth and development. For citizens, by addressing their socio-economic needs by leveraging its
this, it must be considered at the different scales of policy and design knowledge institution ecosystem."
within the city. Broadly, these are five:
• State Level: Includes any policies and programmes that give POLICY FRAMEWORK
directives, guidelines or recommendations from the State to the For Ranchi, the Policy Framework is primarily comprised of:
ULB.
• Regional Level: Presence of an Urban Metropolitan Transportation 1. Jharkhand TOD Policy Draft, 2016 | at State Level
Authority (UMTA) can be particularly significant in larger cities 2. Ranchi Master Plan, 2037 | at City Level
or in the case of urban agglomeration. In the case of Ranchi, it 3. Ranchi Smart City Plan | at Site Level & City Level
has proposed the creation of an UMTA by 2037. 4. Jharkhand Building Bye-laws, 2015 | at State Level & Site Level
• City Level: Master Plan of a city is one of the most common 5. Jharkhand Affordable Housing Policy, 2016 | at State Level
city scale document guides development in a city. In the case of
Ranchi, the city is further divided into: Jharkhand TOD Policy Draft, 2016 was prepared by the Urban
• Zone Development and Housing Department of the Government of
• Planning Unit Jharkhand. It will come into force immediately, once approved by
• Site Level (of the Area Based Development): In the context of our the Government of Jharkhand. It shall be applicable to:
study, this is the TOD as proposed within the ABD.
• Building Level: These are mostly regulations working at • Urban/Regional Development Authorities in Jharkhand
the building level, including Development Control Regulations • All Municipal Corporations (MCs) and Municipalities in Jharkhand
(DCR).
It will also inform functioning of all departments, corporations and
RANCHI'S VISION agencies of the Government of Jharkhand at State and city levels. It
The city's vision as stated in the Master Plan 2037 is to become will supersede the Building Bye-laws and Master Plan.
a vibrant capital, where education, health, tourism, information
technology and other knowledge based service sectors drive the Ranchi's Master Plan, 2012‒2037 was approved by the state of
city's development, economy and quality of life, providing attractive Jharkhand in November 2015. The document was prepared by
investment opportunities. the Urban Development Department for the Ranchi Municipal
Corporation.
The Master Plan also outlines the following goals:
Site Level | Smart City Plan and Building Bye-laws • 45% NMT mode share.
• Knowledge Smart City proposes 6 acres for affordable housing • 91% of all the trips in the city are within 5 km and 8.5% of the
(nearly 860 EWS units). trips are within 5‒10 km.
• The Building Bye-laws also mandate provision of 25% EWS/LIG • Average trip length for the city is 7.9 km.
in all integrated development. • 3% usable footpaths in the city.
• All housing is expected to fit within a 5 minute walking distance • 74% of streets have street lights.
of a bus stop. • 683.7 km of roads (10% of the land).
• 65 buses which make up for the 5% public transport mode share
MOBILITY (400 buses are required).
• Proposed target mode of 40% for public transport.
• Rapid increase in private vehicle ownership, increasing more
State Level | Jharkhand TOD Policy Draft
than two-fold in the last decade.
• Recommends elimination of minimum parking regulations. • Proposed widening of all major streets in the city to accommodate
• Recommends restricting the amount of parking free of FAR in a the increasing traffic.
development. • The current bus network is 185 km long; additional 61 km has
• Recommends allowing market to control the parking prices. been proposed.
• Mandates provision of bicycle parking in all developments. • Recommends locating bus stops within every 500‒600 m.
• A buffer of 500 meters around each bus stop for higher density • UMTA is proposed to be formed by 2037.
than the surrounding area with the aim of accommodating 60% • Interim Transportation Planning and Traffic Management Cell to
of the population in this zone. be created. It will be headed by a Transportation Planner and it
will coordinate with all the multiple agencies in the city.
VEHICLE OWNERSHIP • Two Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridors are being developed with
the financial support of JICA in the city. These are expected to
carry 15,000 to 25,000 PHPDT.
• Parking strategies in the Master Plan:
• Collector streets with on-street parking should have
minimum 4 lanes and no median
• On-street parking in city centre when the street has 4 lanes
• Building off-street parking with private investment
• Tie parking pricing to time and availability of space
• Discourage long-term parking
• Encourage provision of off-street parking
Source: ITDP
City Level | Master Plan • According to the Master Plan new residential development has
been proposed along the city's peripheral ring road.
• The city's population has increased by 27% in the last decade, • It also recognises areas of "composite use" where residential,
however its area has reduced by 2 sq.km, indicating increase of commercial, semi-public, public and recreational uses will
80% in its overall density. coexist. These areas are surrounded by residential areas. They
• It has a current gross residential density of 129 PPH. are proposed as integrated district centres, social facilities centre,
• The city's land is fragmented as a result of the CNTA, restricting etc.
opportunities of large-scale development. • There is very little composite use proposed along the LRT
• It has also resulted in pockets of unused land within the city. Corridor.
• Zonal Development Plans are to be prepared for further details of
Site Level | Smart City Plan and Building Bye-laws areas within the city.
BUS ROUTES
The city recognises convergence with the following bodies as • Within its SCP, the city has proposed a rich network of bus
stakeholders for implementation of its SCP: routes in the ABD, capturing 100% of the population within
a 5-minute walking distance of a bus stop.
• Jharkhand Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited • In addition to the proposed 13.7 km of infrastructure
• Jharkhand Renewable Energy Development Department improvement for NMT and proposed smaller block size,
• Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Department the city has the opportunity to create a dense network of
• Jharkhand Police, Jharkhand Police (Traffic) pedestrian and bicycle paths in addition to the street grid.
• Transport Department: RTA, Urban Development & Housing • The MRT corridor cuts through the city north-east to
Department, GoJ south-west. The proposed land use in the Master Plan only
• Jharkhand Pollution Control Board indicates a high density residential along the corridor and
• Developer diversity of land use is not evident. If the area along MRT
• Academic Institutions like AMITY, AMRITA, Symbiosis, G.N.SINHA corridors is not developed with a variety of uses that reduce
• Vendors the need to travel, the dependence on private vehicles will
• Contractors not reduce. The city needs to align mixed-use with MRT
corridors at the city level in addition to high residential
Resources for SCP density.
• Government of India (GoI) under SCM/RMC Equity • Create a diverse and resilient transportation system in the city.
• Equity from Government of Jharkhand
• Convergence with Grants from GoI/GoJ • The city has three different modes of public transit: railway,
• Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) light rail and bus.
• Pradhaan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) under Housing For All • The SCP proposes a robust bus network within the ABD.
(HFA) Mission But, the bus routes proposed in the Master Plan (beyond
• Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) the ABD) don't connect the areas where the new residential
• Solar City Scheme of Ministry of New & Renewable Energy development is proposed along the ring road, neither does
• World Bank under JSUDP Project it serve all the areas with "composite" or mixed-use.
• There is a significant focus on widening the streets as
RRDA, RIADA, HEC are not seen among the stakeholders. compared to construction of new streets. Moving away
from the centre of the city, the street network grows sparse
(as observed in a study conducted by ITDP). The city needs
to focus on densifying its street network to shorten trip
MoUD Principle Proposed Interventions in SCP Recommendations based on MoUD Guidance Document
Multi-modal Integration
Multi-modal • 375 buses and 207 bus stops proposed • Provision of vendor zones, public facilities, pedestrian only
Integration • Intra city shuttle every 3‒4 minutes and City zone close to station area
Connect Bus every 8‒12 minutes • Specific drop-off area for private vehicles
• IPT, bike share and parking at Inter-modal Hub • Provide Park and Ride
First and Last • NMT infrastructure for 13.7 km, pedestrian • Size of block in terms should be identified
Mile Connectivity crossing at 110 m • Dedicated pedestrian streets, greenways, cycle tracks and
• Multi-modal transportation hub with bike sharing, cut-through should also be identified
IPT and bicycle parking, e-rickshaw stand, bus stop • Last mile connectivity needs stronger network of smaller
every 400 m streets (no specific project listing)
• LRT with stops every 400 m. Short routes for
pedestrians and cyclists
Interconnected • Shorter route options for cycles and pedestrians • Create a diverse street hierarchy with prioritisation of
Street Network • Pedestrian crossings every 110 m different modes — pedestrians, bicycles only streets, shared
streets — with specific appropriate speed limits
• Street hierarchy: 9 m, 12 m, 18 m, 24 m, 30 m
streets • Replicate the existing dense street network (440 m
perimeter) of the city centre in other areas to get smaller
block sizes
• Recommended area of pedestrian spill-out space > 1.9 sq.m
should be identified and tied to any passenger pick-up and
drop off
• Blocks larger than 2 ha should be broken up either through
cut-through and pathways or by means of statutory planning
Complete Streets • Redesign of 13.7 km for NMT infrastructure for 18 • Set average speeds according to IRC classification; provide
m, 24 m and 30 m street slower speeds on narrower streets/internal streets.
• Create a diverse street hierarchy with prioritisation of
different modes
NMT Network • NMT corridor of 13.7 km • Clearly identify space for utilities and street furniture
• Pedestrian/NMT plans adopted and conditional to • Provide public toilets, bicycle parking, wider sidewalks
infrastructure funding in cities • Transparent compound walls
• Access to plots on two sides when possible • Manage spacing of trees and foliage
• Primary pedestrian access for buildings with shortest
walking distance from nearest bus stop
Street Oriented • Elimination set-back proposed by TOD policy for • The institutional only areas within the ABD might lack active
Building commercial uses along street frontage even with a street oriented building
• Two access points as recommended by SCP
• Visibility for safety: boundary wall transparency
• Reducing availability of long term parking • Define parking availability within the ABD with respect to the
distance from LRT & multi-modal hub
• Pricing parking based on location, time and
availability • Provide Park and Ride facility for the multi-modal hub as it
also has railway connectivity beyond the city
• Penalty for illegal parking to fund appropriately
located off-street parking • Provide shared parking in the spaces that can be shared by
the commercial and residential uses based on time. Ranchi’s
• Reducing parking minimums
ABD has institutional areas adjacent to residential areas;
parking space could be shared between these two
Informal Street • 1565 DUs in 5 slums under RAY and 4776 DUs • City needs to make space allocation for vendors in the ABD
Integration sanctioned under PMAY • Prepare plan for street vending within 800 m from transit
• Private sector investment of ` 6500 crore for LIG station as per ‘The Street Vendors Act’, 2014
housing among other projects • Vending zones within 50 m walking distance from the exit of
• Land sold to government by HEC the station facility
• The Master Plan recommends that 1% of land in a • Vending spaces should be marked in addition and adjacent
development for affordable or low income housing to the walking path, especially along high pedestrian volume
should be set aside for informal market areas to activate the street and make it safe
• e-rickshaw stand, bus stops on Trunk Road at
maximum 400 m from any place on site
Housing Diversity • City proposes minimum 15% affordable housing • Minimum 15% of FAR for all TOD projects should be of unit
• TOD policy draft recommends 3 times the FAR in sizes 40 sq.m or less
neighbouring areas at a premium price • Additional FAR equivalent to 100% of the built-up area
utilised for EWS and 50% of the built-up area utilised for LIG
units
CHALLENGES IN PANAJI
The SWOT6 the following challenges in Panaji:
ENVISIONING TRANSIT ORIENTED Panaji's SCP centres on improving liveability. It focuses on improving
DEVELOPMENT IN PANAJI transportation and public spaces — two major components of a TOD
Constraints on develop-able land and scale of developments are in the densest part of the city.
some of the biggest weaknesses in the case of Panaji. This limits
the opportunities of growth within the city, triggering urban sprawl. A 2 sq.km area in the core city reflecting the heritage and culture
Coupled with poor public transportation systems, this also affects of Panaji has been selected for retrofitting as part of the Area Based
the quality of life in the city. The Smart City Mission is an opportunity Development (ABD). This selected site is among the densest areas
to revisit the model of growth in Panaji. It gives the city an new of the city, and is a rich mosaic of heritage buildings, ecologically
opportunity to address its pressing challenges and to make the city fragile coastal ecosystems, contemporary development and pockets
sustainable and inclusive city with excellent quality of life. There are of urban poor. It includes the Central Business District and areas of
three key strategies that can help the city: residential development to the south of the CBD. The selected area is
• Efficient land utilisation unique as it is a true reflection of the concerns and potential of the
• Improvement of public transportation whole city, and not only the selected area.
• Diversifying the economic base
The success of these strategies depends upon the creation of high
density job centres. However, this is limited by the restrictions on POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR A
development. TOD as a land utilisation strategy can be effective in TOD IN PANAJI
helping the city achieve this objective. Further, the ongoing projects 1. Goa Regional Plan, 2021 | at State Level
under various state schemes and city level programmes, as well 2. Revised City Development Plan of Panaji, 2041 | at City Level
as the emphasis on eco-mobility in the SCP, can be leveraged to 3. Goa Land Development & Building Construction Regulations,
implement TOD in the city. 2010 | at State level & Site level
4. Outline Development Plan for Panaji | at City Level
The sense of TOD varies for different cities. As MoUD's Transit 5. Smart City Plan for Panaji | at City Level
Oriented Development Guidance Document says — mass rapid 6. Comprehensive Mobility Plan | at City Level
transit is not necessarily a pre-requisite for creating successful 7. Decongestion Plan for Panaji | at City Level
TODs.14 The Guidance Document suggests that local bus ways, if 8. Detailed Project Report (DPR) for Public Bicycle Share System
designed to function as high quality transit systems may attract (PBS) in Panaji | at City Level
successful TOD projects at strategic locations such as multi-modal
interchanges.15 Goa Regional Plan, 2021 (GRP) is a Perspective Plan for the entire
Smart City Plan for Panaji prepared under the National Smart City develop an efficient, comfortable, safe public transport system so
Mission, proposes various projects in a selected area in the city as to facilitate movement of people and not vehicles. It promotes
and softer interventions for the entire city. SCP acts as a point of compact development to reduce urban sprawl.
convergence between several ongoing projects within the city itself
for ease of implementation using the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Decongestion Plan for Panaji is prepared by the Charles Correa
formed as mandated by the mission. Foundation for the CCP. It predominantly prepares strategies in
four areas to decongest the city. They are re-arranging traffic
Comprehensive Mobility Plan was prepared under the JnNURM in flow, introducing light bus rapid transit, parking strategies and
compliance with the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP). CMP improvement in pedestrian environment.
of Panaji envisions maximising investments in public transport to
• The city has an average density of 4928 persons per sq.km (1232 • Tourism contributes approximately 34% of the State Domestic
households per sq.km). Product, providing employment to nearly 30% of the total
• Population density has decreased by 32% in the decade workforce in the state.
2001‒2011 due to outward migration.
• 34% of land in the city is protected or reserved for natural City Level | Revised City Development Plan and Outline
resources, conservation/preservation, defence land and
Development Plan
watershed.
• The city has a compact, low-rise built form throughout except in • The Revised CDP assumes that mixed-use in the city will increase
the Patto administrative area where it is high rise. by 2% over the next three decades. Using this assumption, it is
• Unavailability of land and restriction on FAR has caused estimated that the requirement of mixed-use houses by 2041 will
increase in land prices in the city, making it unaffordable for be 0.34 lakh.
everyone except the very high income group. This is leading to • The ODP includes Panaji city (8.12 sq.km) and adjacent areas
mushrooming of outgrowths just outside the city level. (0.18 sq.km). Only 66% (5.50 sq.km) of the land is developable as
• ODP defines land uses in the city, and adopts the GLDBCR for per ODP. The break-up of existing land use (developable land) is
development regulations in each land use. shown.
• Except for the old city area of Panaji, there is a segregation of
land uses with only residential uses in the southern part of the
State Level | Goa Regional Plan • The public bus transport system in the Panaji CCP is currently
being served by private operators and Kadamba Transport
• The state of Goa has 20 ferry routes, out of which three are Corporation Limited (KTC).
connected to Panaji. • The fleet of buses operated by the private sector includes 70
• The GRP projects that by 2021, 20 lakh people could generate buses operating in the Panaji CCP area. Two buses are operated
30 lakh ferry trips per day (at 1.5 trips per person per day) in the by the KTC.
state. • The Road Transport Authority of Goa decides routes for the
• The Kadamba Transport Corporation is the state body responsible public transport network and registers private buses which can
for public transportation in the state. ply on these roads.
• Goa ranks first among all the states in terms of households • Currently, public transit is only 2.3% of mode share.
owning two-wheelers and/or a car with around 81.5% compared • The overall bus transport network favours only key tourist routes
to the national average of 25.7%. and does not prioritise the local residents and daily commuters.
• Since the ticketing system favours the operator, the drivers wait
for the bus to get overcrowded before they start the trip.
detailed zoning plan presents scope of re-densification later. future growth centres to keep a check on the development sprawl
• The maximum FSI allowed as per these regulations is 2.5 and the across all urban centres in the state.
maximum permissible height of buildings (28m) applies to the • An overlay district can be established on the Patto area which
special commercial zone (C1-S) which is in the Patto area which will allow increased permitted densities, restricted auto-oriented
falls within the ABD. uses, parking strategies, and also promote pedestrian-oriented
• The city bus terminus is located in Patto. The SCP proposes development in the areas.
improvement in public transportation by introducing 20 new • The city shows a demand for compact rental and sale units with
buses and a public bike share system. the decrease in family size and long duration tourists visiting the
• Patto area has existing open spaces which will need only city. With several million tourists visiting the state each year, Goa
improvement and up-gradation. gives very high rental returns.
Opportunities
MoUD Principle Proposed Interventions in SCP Recommendations based on MoUD Guidance Document
Multi-modal • Bus loops (LBRT) with 20 mini buses • Provide park-and-ride facility at Kadamba bus terminus
Integration • Redesigning and redevelopment of Kadamba bus • Organised parking of IPT at major bus stops, ferry stations
terminus necessary to prevent haphazard parking on street
• Public bike share • Universally accessible footpaths with minimum conflict points with
• Enhancement of ferry system vehicular traffic necessary in the station area
• Light BRT bus stops
• Public bike share station integrated with bus loop
routes and bus terminus
• Road improvement, universally accessible
walkways, street furniture in bus terminus
First and • Pedestrianisation of 18th June Road, Church • Street design using parking for the benefit of pedestrians at
Last Mile square and Cafe Bhosle square junctions, by making wider sidewalks as crossing enhancements
Connectivity • Improvement of Altinho steps (The Altinho steps • Specifics of the road improvement project, such as width and
is a cut-through for pedestrians) character of the footpath and NMT lane is not shared in the SCP
• Reorganisation of traffic to free road for bicycling and has to be explored in the detailing of the project
and LBRT routes
• Road improvement, universally accessible
walkways, street furniture
• Relaying of all roads in the selected area
• Bike share scheme with 1040 bikes and 66
stations
Inter- • Pedestrianisation of 18th June Road, Church • Preserve city's small block size to ensure walkability
connected Street square and Artist Zone at Cafe Bhosle square • Create large spill-out spaces at Kadamba bus terminus to make
Network room for the large number of commuters
Complete Streets • The LBRT proposed in SCP suggests dedicated • Specifics of the road improvement project, such as width and
lanes for mini-buses, which will automatically character of the footpath and NMT lane is not shared in the SCP
reduce the road width available for personal and has to be explored in the detailing of the project
vehicles • Create vending zones at the bus terminus and along pedestrianised
streets since there is little scope for widening the city streets
NMT Network • Table-top pedestrian junction at church square • Specifics of the road improvement project, such as width and
• Street cafés on 18th June Road character of the footpath and NMT lane is not shared in the SCP
and has to be explored in the detailing of the project
• The main streets of Panaji have a mixed-
use street frontage with ground floor retail • Eliminate on-street parking in dense commercial areas with higher
promoting an active street edge pedestrian volume and replace with suitably located off-street
parking to increase widths of sidewalks
• Implement vehicle restraint measures for personal transportation
during peak hours in areas of congestion
CHALLENGES
With the expected acceleration of economic
growth and industrial development, Hubli-
Dharwad is likely to face many issues as a result of
population influx and its implications on housing
demand. Some of the key challenges it will have to
address are:
Source: Syed Zohaibullah
PLANNING FOR A SUCCESSFUL Hubli-Dharwad has been trying to address some of its key issues of
TOD IN HUBLI-DHARWAD non-contiguous spatial development and overcrowded CBD areas by
Hubli-Dharwad’s strategy is to develop its growth corridor on TOD using TOD principles of building denser) — mixed-use developments
principles. The existing support mechanisms for implementing TOD along the public transit corridors. Navanagar has been identified
exists at the following levels: as pilot project along the proposed Phase I of the BRT in the CDP.
SCP aims to establish TOD along Phase II of the BRT to support the
• Regional level: The State Transport Corporation buses serve proposed city-scale commercial development.
as the public transit for the city of Hubli. The North Western
Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (NWKRTC) jurisdiction
covers the Belagavi, Dharwad, North Canara, Bagalkot, Gadag and Policy Framework
Haveri districts. For Hubli-Dharwad, the policy framework19 is primarily comprised
• City level: A Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) along with of:
the zoning regulations guides the city’s spatial growth.
• Site level: Smart City Plan of Hubli-Dharwad has identified the 1. Hubli-Dharwad Comprehensive Development Plan, 2021 | at City
area around the second phase of the BRT corridor to be developed Level
using TOD Principles. 2. Hubli-Dharwad Smart City Plan | at City Level and Site Level
• Building level: Building Bye-laws regulate the building level 3. Hubli-Dharwad Mahanagar Palike Building Bye-laws, 2004 | at
development based on uses. City level
4. Hubli-Dharwad Zoning Regulations | at City Level Hubli-Dharwad Mahanagar Palike Building Bye-laws, 2004
5. Housing and Habitat Policy Draft, 2009 | State Level describes the physical development of buildings of all sizes and uses,
in turn defining the form of the city. The Bye-laws are applicable
Hubli-Dharwad Comprehensive Development Plan, 2021 was within the jurisdiction of the HDMC.
prepared by the Hubli-Dharwad Urban Development Authority
(HDUDA). The land-use document was released in 2015. The earlier Hubli-Dharwad Zoning Regulations was prepared under the
plan dates back to 2003. The CDP allocates land use for development. Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961. It is applicable to
It plans the city in 3 zones Hubli, Navanagar and Dharwad the entire local planning area boundary. It outlines:
Hubli-Dharwad Smart City Plan outlines the proposed interventions • The proposed, permitted and restricted land uses is prescribed
for development of the identified ABD site along the Airport Road on by Zoning Regulations (ZR).
TOD Principles. It includes projects leading towards improved road • The land uses permissible in ABD, the standards for open spaces
infrastructure, up-gradation of existing transit terminals and depots, around buildings, plot coverage, Floor Area Ratio, height of the
NMT network, cycling and pedestrian facilities. It also includes building, building lines, parking etc. as defined by the ZR.
provision for commercial and mixed-use development including
affordable housing. Karnataka Housing and Habitat Policy Draft, 2009 was prepared
by the housing department and is applicable to the entire state of
• The site proposed for ABD covers an area of 992 acres and is Karnataka.
located along the growth corridor (identified by CDP and CTTP).
• The site covers 2% of the city area, spreading over 7 wards and
part of 6 wards. The total population of the site is 1.17 lakh STRATEGIES FOR TOD
which is 11% of the city’s population, while 6037 is the slum
population. The density in ABD is 340 PPH which is 7 times the HOUSING
gross density of the city.
• The vision is to link various transit nodes present along the growth State Level
corridor in the city. TOD corridor is proposed with increased
density and premium FSI focusing on mixed-use development. • Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) has ongoing projects such as
• Length of the BRT corridor is about 7.5 km connecting the '100 housing projects', '225 schemes', '53 housing projects',
Railway Station to Hubli Airport. 'Suvarna Karnataka' and other board schemes.20
• The ZR provides the set-backs and FAR based on land use and • Dedicated cycle track is proposed in the ABD.
size of the plot, along with certain permissible land uses within • Footpath development and up-gradation of 101 km is proposed,
the zone. which will cover 14% of the total road network.
• ZR norms have some flexibility to provide diversity in land • ZR proposed set-backs are based on the street width. The height
MoUD Principle Proposed Interventions in SCP Recommendations based on MoUD Guidance Document
Informal Sector • 1122 slum households to be redeveloped under • Provide space for street vendors near the transit stations
Integration convergence and along high pedestrian volume areas
• Dedicated NMT network, e-Baiku (PBS) and auto.com
(Green IPT) — dedicated cycle track on 10 km stretch,
30 PBS stations proposed
• Smart Mobility — Complete street schematic shows
2.5 m wide MUZ in 18 m width road, 27.2 km (phase I)
complete street network
• State has recently adopted the street vending policy in
2016
Interconnected
Street Network
Managed • Dynamic fare for parking during peak hours within the • Identify off-street parking spaces along the corridor and
Parking ABD, enforced via parking regulations around transit stops and stations. Include parking in FAR
• At present, on-street parking is free in the city • Implement a parking pricing strategy
• Eliminate parking minimums close to transit
• Provide dedicated park-and-ride facilities at terminal
stations and major multi-modal interchanges.
• Provide shared parking
Mixed Land • Station redevelopment- • Delineate Transit Oriented Zone (TOZ) along the BRT
Uses TOD corridor — mixed-use high-rise with premium FSI corridor to implement denser mixed-use development
• Revised Master Plan should identify areas as mixed-use
• Allow flexibility in the ZR for mix of uses
First and • Junction improvement and last mile connectivity • Create dedicated and physically segregated bicycle tracks
Last Mile — dedicated cycle tracks on 10 km of road stretch; with minimum width of 2 m in each direction for vehicle
Connectivity e-Baiku (PBS) + 30 PBS stations carriageway larger than 10 m after providing adequately
• 8 intelligent mid-block crossing sized footpaths in each direction based on pedestrian
traffic
• Streetscape redesign — footpath improvement 3 m
wide (typical section of complete street); improving • Provide ‘cut-throughs’ in the existing road network
101 km of footpaths, new and existing • Provide mid-block crossings every 250 m on average;
minimum 5 safe street-level crossings per km
• Scale footpath based on adjacent land uses
Multi-modal • Existing city bus routes connecting the twin city • Identify drop-off location for private taxi/car
integration • Bus stops are spaced at approx. 500 m
• Junction improvement and last mile connectivity
— dedicated cycle tracks on 10 km of road stretch;
e-Baiku (PBS) + 30 PBS stations; auto.com (green IPT),
new NMT links proposed
Housing • Increased density through provision of premium FSI • Provide minimum reserved units (15% of the FAR), for
Diversity along TOD corridor (BRTS route) — PB Road, Gokul affordable housing units (40 sq.m or less)
Road resulting in additional office and retail space, and • Provide minimum reserved units (15% of the FAR) for all
overall increase in employment opportunities TOD projects for rental or for sale; housing with unit sizes
• Affordable housing and mixed-use-development — no larger than 25 sq.m
1.4 lakh sq.ft of affordable housing and mixed-use
development under new economic development project
• 1122 slum households to be redeveloped under
convergence
NMT Network • Streetscape redesign — footpath improvement:3 m • Provide unobstructed footpath in streets above 10 m
wide (typical section 18 m wide complete street and 2 • Width of footpath shall be determined based on pedestrian
m wide footpath on 12 m wide road); improving 101 volume
km of footpaths, new and existing
• Streetscape amenities
• At least 125 trees per km for streets with ROW smaller
than 12 m
Optimised • High density mixed- use corridor, through the • Integrate prospective development along the upcoming
Densities implementation of concept of mutation corridor with BRT corridors with the existing non-contiguous
premium FSI. Increased density through provision of development between Hubli-Dharwad and rest of the city
premium FSI along • Based on the identified TOD zones in the revised Master
• TOD corridor (BRTS route) — PB Road, Gokul Road, Plan, the zoning regulations should prescribe the FAR and
resulting in additional office and retail space, and densities for integrated development
overall increase in employment opportunities • Provide mandatory 50% residential units of size ranging
between 32‒40 sq. m and the balance 50% comprising
homes ≤65 sq.m
Street Oriented
Buildings
Traffic Calming • Co-ordinate traffic signals — 16 proposed under Smart • Provide minimum buffer of 0.5 m between cycle tracks and
Mobility motor vehicle lanes
• Pedestrianised junctions • Provide mid-block crossings every 250 m on average.
Minimum 5 safe street-level crossings per km
• Limit speed on urban arterial roads and sub-arterial streets
to 50 km/h and on collector and local streets to 30 km/h
• Limit maximum speed on streets meant primarily for NMT,
and all streets of ROW 12 m or below to 20 km/hr through
traffic calming
A SMART(ER) TOD {89}
UJJAIN
Ujjain is one of the oldest living cities in the The city is one of the seven sacred Hindu cities
CASE 4
world. It is located on the banks of Shipra River and is home to one of the 12 Jyotirlinga Shrines
in the Malwa Plateau region of the central state dedicated to lord Shiva. It receives upto 20,000
of Madhya Pradesh. It is located 50 km north of to 30,000 visitors every year. Every 12 years, the
Indore and Dewas, two of the largest industrial city also hosts the Kumbh Mela, drawing millions
cities in the state of Madhya Pradesh. Ujjain has of visitors and pilgrims to the city. The Roza at
developed its identity as a great religious and Ujjain is a highly revered place of the Bohras
cultural centre as well as an emerging centre for and an yearly congregation is held here which
the textile industry (establishment of 4 textile is attended by people from across the world.
mills in 1915, development of Freeganj area as Traditional Bohra settlements in Ujjain were
an octroi free area in 1930 and development of established by migrants from Gujarat during the
several cotton and spinning factories on Agar late Mughal period. The Bohras have maintained
road from 1920 to 1930, establishment of Kalidas their traditional neighbourhoods and settlements,
Academy in 1978). helping them preserve their cherished way of
community living, as well as the character of the
city.
Ujjain's Smart City Plan repeats the theme in its vision — A Ujjain Smart City Plan outlines the proposed interventions for
sustainable religious tourist destination taking forward the ancient development of the site selected for ABD. It includes projects
heritage, providing diverse opportunities in a knowledge-based enhancing road infrastructure in the core city, creation of multi-
economy and thriving on wellness & smart initiatives. modal hub, BRT corridor, and cycling and pedestrian facilities.
Madhya Pradesh State Urban Parking Policy, 2015 came into force
POLICY FRAMEWORK in December 2015. Indore, Bhopal, Ujjain and Gwalior are initiating
The Policy Framework for Ujjain city exists at the following levels: implementation of the policy. The policy will be implemented by the
1. Ujjain City Development Plan, 2021 | at City Level newly created state level Unified Transport Council, headed by the
2. Development Plan, 2021 | at City Level Chief Minister.
3. Ujjain Smart City Plan | at Site Level & City Level
4. Madhya Pradesh Urban Parking Policy, 2015 | at State Level & Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Niyam (MPBVN), 1984 (Updated
City Level 2012) comprises all the parameters related to permission for
5. Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Niyam (MPBVN), 1984 | at State development of land in planning and non-planning areas. The
Level & Site level regulatory body for its implementation is the Town and Country
6. Draft Madhya Pradesh Affordable Housing Policy, 2015| at State Planning office, MP. The regulations support the parking policy, and
Level & City Level restricts the over-densification of any zone by pre-defining its limits.
DIVERSITY • There is no new development in the city core; only residential and
retail activities are proposed near the railways station.
• No development zone has been marked to preserve the built
State Level | Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Niyam
heritage and open spaces in the city; this includes the Mela
(MPBVN), 1984
ground. Most of the newer development is primarily proposed
• Recommends ensuring planning for creation of employment along the ring road towards the south due to the proximity to
centres within TOD zones. Dewas and Indore.
• Dedicated zone for religious activities has been proposed to be
City Level | Development Plan 2021 situated along the Shipra River.
• Modification in the street design (road section) has been proposed
• Nearly 90% of the employment in the city is through tertiary to create pedestrian friendly streets and to increase walk ability.
sector. According to the Smart City Plan, the carriageway will reduce in
• City has mixed-use along many main streets. the heritage zone to accommodate sidewalks and additional lanes
• Bohra settlements in the city also demonstrate mixed-use as for NMT.
many of their traditional houses have commercial activities at • Duplex houses have been provided for in-situ redevelopment
the ground level and residential on the upper levels. under "Apni Zameen Apni Chhat".
Site Level | Smart City Plan and Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Site Level | Smart City Plan
Vikas Niyam (MPBVN), 1984
• Streets within the ABD will be redesigned to make room for NMT
• 3000 sq.m of dedicated street vending space. infrastructure along the 5.2 km of BRT corridor.
• Mixed-use proposed as part of the Knowledge Hub and Economic • Complete street design for the neighbourhood of the temple area.
Hub in the TOD. • Pedestrian friendly active front age zones has been proposed.
• Proposed Multi-modal Transit Hub to integrate commercial and • Creation of 25,100 new jobs under various sectors is expected.
office space. • Ujjain Municipal Corporation has implemented the automation
• Diversity in types of housing proposed to be included in the ABD of the building plan approval process by introducing AutoDCR
-affordable housing, dormitories, night shelters. system. The process reduces the human interfaces in the
approval and faster the process by five times as compared to
normal approval.
DESIGN
MoUD Principle Proposed Interventions in SCP Recommendations based on MoUD Guidance Document
Multi-modal • BRTS — Railway station -bus terminal along with • Bus network connect the development to the BRT
Integration multi-level park and ride Corridor, but IPT is required to ensure last mile
• IPT integrated with multi-modal development connectivity within the Knowledge and Economic Hub
• PBS scheme (400 bicycles & 10 PB stands) • Public bike share should connect temple areas in close
proximity (2 km) to BRTS
First and Last Mile • 10 mid-block pedestrian crossing enhancement • Continuous unobstructed footpath of 2m minimum on
Connectivity • 2.4 km of Greenway along the river each side of all streets with ROW wider than 12m.
• 300 e-rickshaw and CNG autos • The mid-block pedestrian crossings should be provided
every 250 m
• 5.68 km of no-vehicle streets
• IPT parking should located at regular intervals and at
• BRT corridor will have active street frontage along
transit stops
with mix of uses
• Public bike share stands should be integrated with
• Dedicated bicycle lane along the BRT corridor and in
public transit stops
urban parks
• Make sidewalks should universally accessible and scale
• PBS scheme
them to adjacent land uses
• Bicycle lanes should be extended through the city to
provide easy mobility
Interconnected Street • City should ensure smaller block sizes to reduce
Network walking distances
• City should recognise spill out space at the multi-
modal hub, identifying drop-off and pick-up zones
• With older neighbourhoods and heritage sites, the city
has seen an organic growth of streets. It should clearly
identify the hierarchy of the variety of its streets and
specify speeds
Complete Streets • Dedicated BRTs route for 5.2 km • Foot paths should be extended beyond the BRT
• Unobstructed 2.1 m wide foot path along BRTs corridor into the Knowledge and Economic Hub
corridor • City should create active street frontages in the
• 2.5 m wide segregated bicycle lane along BRTS Knowledge and Economic Hub, beyond the TOD
corridor corridor
• 3 m of MUZ along BRT corridor
• 3000 sq.m of dedicated street vending zone near the
multi-modal transit hub
Informal Street • 3000sqmts of dedicated street vending zone at multi- • Prepare plan for street vending as per the 'The Street
Integration modal hub Vendors Act, 2014'
• 6114 slum households rehabilitated in-situ • Vending spaces should be marked in along high
pedestrian volume areas to activate the street and
make it safe
Housing Diversity • 5990 housing units (1842 affordable housing units) • Other incentives such as fast track approval process,
• 6114 housing units for slum inhabitants exemption from building plan sanction fee should be
identified for private sector involvement
• 10 night shelters
• Provide units off different sizes and tenure for variety
• 5 working women’s hostel
of household types
• 50 vernacular housing
• Streetscape redesign foot- • Vehicular intersection improvement • TOD along metro stations • Multi-modal facility | • Mobility and intelligent
path improvement | as per street design guidelines | • Improvement of roads, footpaths ` 267 cr. traffic management |
` 83 cr. ` 60.5 cr. and traffic junctions | ` 432 cr. ` 136.7 cr.
Complete Streets
• Junction improvement and • Road development as per street • Bharalu River project | ` 296 cr. • Proposed BRTS
last mile connectivity | design guidelines | ` 126.62 cr.
` 21.75 cr. • Development of bus stops | ` 4.3 cr.
• Junction improvement and • Signalisation | ` 57.5 cr. • TOD along metro stations • Teen Haath Naka junction • Mobility and intelligent
last mile connectivity | • Road development as per street • Improvement of roads, footpaths improvement | ` 239 cr. traffic management |
` 21.75 cr. design guidelines | ` 126.62 cr. and traffic junctions | ` 432 cr. • Multi-modal facility | ` 136.7 cr.
• e-Baiku (PBS) • Bharalu River project | ` 296 cr. ` 267 cr.
• Streetscape redesign | • Pedestrian improvement
` 83 cr. | ` 23 cr.
First and Last Mile Connectivity
• Affordable housing and • 55% of the redeveloped residential • 70 acre Brownfield town- • Relocation of dense
Housing Diversity
Mixed-use development | units for affordable EWS and LIG ship | ` 3974 cr. polluting urban clusters
` 103.32 cr. housing | ` 784 cr.
• High density mixed-use
mutation corridor at premi-
um FSI
• Renovation of core city • Road development as per street • Bharalu River project | ` 296 cr. • Multi-modal facility | • Redevelopment of
market area | ` 114.78 cr. design guidelines | ` 126.62 cr. • Mora Bharalu River project | ` 267 cr. public facilities and
Informal Sector
• NMT Zone | ` 4 cr. • Slum housing built-up | ` 83.72 cr. ` 421 cr. amenities | ` 202.3 cr.
Integration
• Water transport infra- • Project TenderSURE | ` 220 cr. • Differently abled foot path • Annual cost of pedestrianisation of • Pedestrian friendly
structure | ` 42 cr. | ` 15.84 cr. Jan Marg on weekend | ` 0.73 cr. pathways and non vehicle
• Bicycle lanes | ` 15.84 cr. • Dedicated cycle tracks shared with streets/zones | ` 40.9 cr.
• Redesign of 20 roads as • Metro proposed along the TOD • Upcoming metro railway
complete streets (Garia-Airport Metro) and
• ISBT exists in the ABD
mono-rail projects
• Urban design — public plaza — de-
• Vending zone | ` 2.7 cr.
sign for FoW plazas | ` 37.92 cr.
• Open space corridor • Project Nirmal Nag River | ` 150 cr. • Traffic calming of streets| • Dedicated cycle tracks shared with • Dedicated bi-cycle lanes
linking DH ground to • Bandara road TOD Precinct Influence Area — ` 7.43 cr. footpath | ` 2.8 cr. along the roads | ` 180 cr.
Mangalavanam | ` 9 cr. IPT parking within 150 m of metro station • Differently abled foot path • e-rickshaws | ` 1.15 cr. • Bicycle sharing pro-
• Walkway from EKM jetty • Project TenderSURE | ` 220 cr. | ` 15.84 cr. • Public bike sharing | ` 4.22 cr. gramme | ` 1 cr.
to metro station | ` 9 cr. • Bicycle lanes | ` 15.84 cr. • Pedestrian friendly
• Project Share-a-bike (PPP) • Footpath | ` 7.2 cr.
• Standard footpath • Cycle sharing system with pathways and non vehicle
including signages | ICT application | ` 0.15 cr. streets/zones | ` 40.9 cr.
` 28.53 cr.
• World class arterial
roads | ` 52.87 cr.
• Relaying of roads |
` 42 cr.
• Relaying of roads
aesthetic and improved
urban design pedestrian
facilities with street fur-
niture, boulevards and
urban greenery (main
roads) | ` 16.5 cr.
• Dynamic fare for parking • Multi-level car parking | ` 18.84 cr. • Parking management | • Mobility and intelligent
Managed Parking
• Station re-development • TOD around Madan Mahal & major • Relocation of dense
• TOD corridor — mixed-use roads polluting urban clusters
high rise with premium FSI | ` 784 cr.
Mixed Land Uses
• Junction improvement and • Development of bus stops | ` 4.3 cr. • Bharalu River project | ` 296 cr. • Multi-modal facility | ` • Proposed BRTS
last mile connectivity | • IPT services | ` 3.75 cr. • Mora Bharalu River project | ` 267 cr. • Redevelopment of
Multi-modal Integration
• High density mixed-use • Development of Madan Mahal and • A global FSI of 4 has been
mutation corridor at premi- major roads on TOD principles, target proposed for the township
Optimised
Densities
• Broadway market and • Project TenderSURE | ` 220 cr. • Differently abled foot path • Urban design — public plaza — de- • Pedestrian friendly
Ernakulam market • Public market places | ` 2 cr. | ` 15.84 cr. sign for FoW plazas | ` 37.92 cr. pathways and non vehicle
redevelopment and Mat- • Sector 43 — urban retrofit develop- streets/zones | ` 40.9 cr.
tancherry spice market | ment | ` 4932 cr.
` 110 cr.
• Footpath | ` 7.2 cr.
• Annual cost of pedestrianisation of
Jan Marg on weekends | ` 0.73 cr.
• MLCP and commercial • Bandara road TOD precinct influence area — • MLCP with ICT application • Multilevel car park (300 cars capaci- • Smart Parking | ` 13.50
complex at Kacheripady within 50 m of station area only bike parking, | ` 120 cr. ty) | ` 16.50 cr. cr.
| ` 50 cr. cars only at 150 to 300 m of station area. Car • On street parking manage-
parking only after 150 m from station ment with ICT application
• Smart parking (multi-level for 500 cars) at 3 | ` 0.30 cr.
locations
• Bandara road TOD precinct influence area • Mixed-use as a land use • Sector 43 — urban retrofit develop- • Central Business District al-
mixed-use core category in the master plan ment | ` 4932 cr. lows up to 49% use of land
• 7.2Km long Vikas Marg corridor as for residential purpose. In
transit oriented development (TOD) residential areas upto 40%
of residential space for
commercial purpose. City
also follows cluster based
approach to development
ensuring compact growth
of neighborhoods.
• Electric feeders, bicycle • MOVE PEOPLE initiative (e-buses) | ` 37 cr. • PAN city feeder buses & • Electric buses (refurbishment of • ToTo, auto Smart Stands
sharing, elevated walk- • Smart bus shelters | ` 3 cr.
infrastructure under metro existing buses) | ` 152 cr. | ` 6 cr.
ways and travelators | project • Bus stops | ` 12 cr.
• e-rickshaws | ` 5 cr.
` 11.48 cr. • Cycle sharing system with
• Project share-a-bike (PPP) • e-rickshaws | ` 1.15 cr.
• MLCP and commercial ICT application | ` 0.15 cr.
• Automated MLCP at Pardi | ` 15 cr. • Public bike sharing | ` 4.22 cr.
complex at Kacheripady • Differently abled foot
| ` 50 cr. • Bandara road TOD precinct influence area — • Footpaths | ` 7.2 cr.
paths | ` 15.84 cr.
• Jetty improvement | within 50 m of metro station area only bicycle
` 8 cr. parking, cars only after 150 to 300 m of metro
station area. Integration with bus transit
• Project TenderSURE | ` 220 cr. • Differently abled foot path • Sector 43 — urban retrofit develop- • Pedestrian friendly
• 10 e-toilets at important public locations bicycle lanes | ` 15.84 cr. ment | ` 4932 cr. pathways and non vehicle
• Refurbishment of existing public streets/zones | ` 40.9 cr.
• No compound walls in proposed mixed-use core
and station area development in ABD toilets | ` 1.8 cr.
• Premium FSI — from • Bandara road TOD precinct influence area • Transit oriented planned develop- • Higher FAR on metro
4 to 6 mixed-use core ment model (FSI=3.0), building height corridor for encouraging
(Ground + 9 Storeys) as per draft TOD development
policy
• Streetscape redesign | • Road development as per street • Bharalu River project | ` 296 cr. • 3 Lakefront developments • Mobility and intelligent
` 83 cr. design guidelines | ` 126.62 cr. • Mora Bharalu River project | | ` 16 cr. traffic management |
` 136.7 cr.
NMT Network
• NMT Zone | ` 4 cr. • Development of green corridor | ` 421 cr. • Pedestrian improvement
` 4 cr. • Deepar Beel project | ` 250 cr. | ` 23 cr. • 24 x 7 Electricity |
• Street lighting | ` 28.85 cr. • LED street lighting | ` 5.9 cr.
• Improvement of roads, footpaths
and traffic junctions | ` 432 cr. ` 27 cr. • Redevelopment of
public facilities and
amenities | ` 202.3 cr.
• Smart mobility • Vehicular intersection improvement • Improvement of roads, footpaths • Teen Haath Naka junction • Mobility and intelligent
as per street design guidelines | and traffic junctions | ` 432 cr. improvement | ` 239 cr. traffic management |
Traffic Calming
• Bandara road TOD precinct influence area • Ground floor as commer- • Urban design — public plaza — de-
mixed-use core cial as per master plan sign for FoW plazas | ` 37.92 cr.
• Sector 43 — Urban retrofit develop-
ment | ` 4932 cr.
• Project TenderSURE (Road and NMT) • Traffic calming streets • Signalisation at intersections (vehi-
cle activated ATCS compatible traffic
signals) | ` 4.6 cr.
• Transport and walkability — road • Road improvement, universally • Transport & circulation (roads) with • Redevelopment of Amkho bus stand | ` 5 cr.
development as per street design accessible walkways, street furni- pedestrian facility duct for utilities • e-rickshaw as IPT | ` 5 cr.
guidelines | ` 129.41 cr. ture | ` 128.54 cr. including gas line, power line, optical
• Public bike share stations
• Light BRT (procurement of buses fibre, provision for sewerage & drainage
Complete Streets
• Transport and walkability — vehicu- • Road improvement, universally • EWS | ` 38.84 cr. • Up-gradation of existing road network to
lar intersection improvement as per accessible walkways, street furni- • TOD Policy Draft full section development | ` 132.09 cr.
First and Last Mile Connectivity
street design guidelines — mid block ture | ` 128.54 cr. • Development of BRT corridor | ` 16 cr.
pedestrian junctions | ` 56 cr. • Public bike sharing | ` 9.75 cr. • Mixed-use TOD development PPP
• Transport and walkability — IPT ser-
• Transit infrastructure | ` 24 cr.
vices — battery operated e-rickshaws
in pedestrian areas | ` 6.25 cr.
• Transport and walkability — road
development as per street design
guidelines | ` 129.41 cr.
• Riverfront development — foot over
bridges | ` 96 cr.
• Redevelopment of public land — slum • Transport & circulation (roads) with • Affordable housing as a residential compo-
Housing Diversity
housing built up | ` 129.41 cr. pedestrian facility duct for utilities nent of mixed-use TOD development
• Redevelopment of public land — Com- including gas line, power line, optical • Development of rental housing for floating
pensatory tenements built-up | fibre, provision for sewerage & drainage population | ` 45 cr.
` 270.33 cr. | ` 209.83 cr.
• Housing component in Gwalior Habitat and
• IPT integration | ` 2.7 cr. Trade Centre
• Transport and walkability — road • Urban poor area — combined • Transport & circulation (roads) with • Hawker's and vending zones with dedicated
Informal Sector Integration
development as per street design utility trench for water, gas, elec- pedestrian facility duct for utilities smart card for hawkers | ` 10 cr.
guidelines | ` 129.41 cr. tricity, Telecom | ` 12.16 cr. including gas line, power line, optical • Affordable housing as a residential compo-
• Redevelopment of public land — slum fibre, provision for sewerage & drainage nent of mixed-use TOD development
housing built up | ` 232.76 cr. | ` 209.83 cr.
• Mobility | • Road up-gradation • Public bicycle sharing scheme • Partivartan Path • Footpath development | • Enhancing experience • Retrofitting of
` 95 cr. and multi-level fly- | ` 9.5 cr. | ` 42 cr. ` 22.4 cr. of accessing — foot- utility network |
over | ` 25.51 cr. • Project URBS — urban regen- • Multi-modal • Segregated cycle track | paths | ` 197.27 cr. ` 385 cr.
• NMT — footpath eration through Bhubaneswar transit hub | ` 34.92 cr. • Agra-Etawah Lion • NMT tracks/
and cycle tracks | streets | ` 71.5 cr. ` 92.05 cr. • Redevelopment of water Safari cycle highway | cycle tracks |
` 25.51 cr. • Janpath people's smart path | body | ` 0.11 cr. ` 4.20 cr. ` 2 cr.
• Smart centralised ` 72.5 cr. • Parks and open air gym • Street designing | ` • Smart traffic
bus stand | ` 50 cr. | ` 6.54 cr. 168 cr. — integrated
• Vending zones | • Street vending zone | transit manage-
` 215 cr. ` 8 cr. ment platform |
` 194 cr.
• Mobility | • NMT — footpath • Janpath people's smart path | • Aradhana Path | • Segregated cycle track | • Agra-Etawah Lion • NMT tracks/
` 95 cr. and cycle tracks | ` 72.5 cr. ` 126.74 cr. ` 34.92 cr. Safari Cycle highway | cycle tracks |
` 25.51 cr. • BBSR cycle highway | ` 16 cr. • Parivartan Path | • Auto rickshaw parking area ` 4.20 cr. ` 2 cr.
eration through Bhubaneswar • Dharohar Path | • e-rickshaw stands | ` 5 cr. ` 168 cr.
streets | ` 71.5 cr. ` 34.1 cr. • Cycle parking area | • Bicycle sharing |
• Area • Road up-gradation • e-rickshaw project | ` 10.5 cr. • Ashray | • Parks and open air gym | • Redevelopment
improvement | and multi-level fly- • Mission Abaas | ` 840 cr. ` 478.84 cr. ` 6.54 cr. of Wadaj slum |
` 20 cr. over | ` 25.51 cr. • Multi-modal • e-rickshaw stands | ` 5 cr. ` 604 cr.
• Janpath people's smart path |
• Vending zones | ` 72.5 cr. transit hub | • Auto rickshaw parking
` 215 cr. ` 92.05 cr. Area | ` 0.97 cr.
• Redevelopment of water
body | ` 0.11 cr.
• Small block sizes in ABD • Pedestrianisation of Church • Transit Hub | ` 184.1 cr. • Development of BRT corridor | ` 16 cr.
• Transport and walkability — road Square | ` 23.46 cr. • Safety & security | ` 21.73 cr.
development as per street design • Pedestrianisation of 18th June • TOD Policy Draft — Provide 3 times FAR
guidelines | ` 129.41 cr. Road, Street cafés on 18th June in TOD Zone for premium price
Interconnected Street Network
• ABD has ground floor retail in most • Mixed-use urban sub-centre at • IPT integration | ` 2.7 cr. • Mixed-use TOD development under PPP
buildings Patto proposed
Mixed Land Uses
• Mobility | ` • Road up-gradation • Railway station multi-modal • Multi-modal • Multiple level parking • Façade improvement
95 cr. and multi-level hub | ` 845 cr. transit hub | (railway station and Badkal in TajGanj along herit-
• Parking in the flyover | ` 215 cr. ` 92.05 cr. more metro station) | age walk; cleaning of
• Mobility | • Road up-gradation • Project URBS — urban regen- • Multi-modal • Cycle parking area | • Beautification and • Development of
` 95 cr. and multi-level eration through Bhubaneswar transit hub | ` 0.49 cr. streetscaping of Fate- intermodal hub |
flyover | ` 215 cr. streets | ` 71.5 cr. ` 92.05 cr. • Footpath development | habad Road | ` 125 cr.
• Smart parking | • Railway station multi-modal ` 22.4 cr. ` 3.90 cr.
` 115 cr. hub | ` 845 cr. • Multi-modal hub at railway • Conversion of street
• Multi-modal hub station lights to LED | ` 7.05
railway station cr.
• Multiple level parking
(railway station and Badkal • Roadside plantation |
• Safety and security — street lighting • Urban forestry, 5000 trees, My • High density (FAR>=4) • Development of BRT corridor | ` 16 cr.
on major roads | ` 16.60 cr. trees initiative | ` 0.36 cr. Medium density (FAR= 4 to 2.5)
• Up-gradation of existing road network to
• Safety and security — street lighting • Pedestrianisation of 18th June Low density (FAR<=2.5)
full section development | ` 132.09 cr.
on other local streets and pedestrian Road, Street cafés on 18th June • Heritage network trail | ` 20.75 cr.
Optimised Densities
• Redevelopment of public land | • Increase in footfall with mix of land • High density (FAR>=4) • Mixed-use TOD development under PPP
Street Oriented
` 2670.45 cr. use on currently deserted Patto Medium density (FAR= 4 to 2.5)
Building
retail in ground floors in most of the ported by EDC | ` 0.35 cr. pedestrian facility duct for utilities
buildings including gas line, power line, optical
fibre, provision for sewerage & drainage
| ` 209.83 cr.
• Riverfront development — foot over • ITS | ` 1.645 cr. • Transport & circulation (roads) with • Up-gradation of existing road network to
bridges | ` 96 cr. pedestrian facility duct for utilities full section | ` 132.09 cr.
• Transport and walkability — vehicu- including gas line, power line, optical
fibre, provision for sewerage & drainage
Traffic Calming
• Area improve- • NMT — footpath • Janpath people's smart path | • Parivartan Path | • Footpath development | • Retrofitting of
ment | ` 20 cr. and cycle tracks ` 72.5 cr. ` 42 cr. ` 22.4 cr. utility network |
road up-gradation • Project URBS — urban regen- • Mobility | • Solar LED street lighting | ` 385 cr.
and multi-level fly- eration through Bhubaneswar ` 125.99 cr. ` 10.68 cr.
over | ` 25.51 cr. streets | ` 71.5 cr. • Smart toilets | ` 3.75 cr.
• Community smart toilets |
` 0.05 cr.
• Anasagar prome- • 600 PPH proposed density • Parivartan Path | • Increased density and • Façade improvement • Redevelopment
nade | ` 110.69 cr. ` 42 cr. compact development with in TajGanj along herit- of Wadaj slum |
• Artha Kshetra |
consistent development age walk; cleaning of ` 604 cr.
` 45.43 cr. control to be incorporated Taj corridor | • Wadaj TOZ |
in the TOD guideline ` 15.75 cr. ` 510 cr.
• Activity generat- • Road up-gradation • Janpath people's smart path | • Parivartan Path | • Variable message
ing uses to keep and multi-level ` 72.5 cr. ` 42 cr. signboards, pelican
streets safe flyover | ` 215 cr. • Project URBS - urban regener- signals, corridor im-
Karnataka Slum Clearance Board (KSCB), Karnataka Rajya Nirmana Kendra (KRNK) are other organisations working under
the administrative control of the housing department and are responsible for slum up-gradation, and improvement of their
quality of life by providing basic infrastructure facilities.
21
Housing for All, GoK Report
22
CTTP (https://WWW.scribd.com/document/153591460/Hubli-Dharwad-CTTP-Executive-Summary-pdf.com
23
It has so far developed 160 industrial areas in 29 Districts in the state covering an extent of 76,136 acres. It has acquired
more than 1,000 acres in Hubli-Dharwad.
24
Unavailable for review at the time of the publication
25
Status Progress Report RAY, March 2016, MoHUPA
This study has been supported by generous grant from Prosperity Programme, Foreign & Commonwealth Office, Government of UK