Guidelines: Towards A Culture of Doctoral Education at Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin
Guidelines: Towards A Culture of Doctoral Education at Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin
Guidelines: Towards A Culture of Doctoral Education at Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin
Universität zu Berlin
These guidelines are drawn up in German, the English translation is provided for
convenience only. Only the German version is binding.
2. The right to confer a doctoral degree lies with the faculties of Humboldt-Universität
zu Berlin. Each faculty sets the standards for its own doctoral examination procedure
in the form of doctorate regulations based on the present guidelines.
5. The faculty board decides about admission to the doctoral track, the opening of the
doctoral process, and the determination of the overall result; this responsibility may
be transferred to the dean or a Doctoral Degree Committee.
7. The key element for successful completion of the doctoral degree is the independent
preparation of a dissertation that answers an original research question using
suitable scholarly methods. Both the doctoral candidate and their academic
supervisors commit themselves to adhere to the rules of good scientific practice [1].
8. Doctoral candidates receive regular advice from their academic supervisors. The
content and form of the supervision is governed by a binding supervision agreement
which is annually updated according to the requirements of the progress of the
doctorate. The independent nature of the doctoral candidate’s scientific work remains
unaffected by the supervision agreement.
10. Attendance at conferences and other events is listed in a supplement that can be
appended to the doctoral certificate if so desired by the candidate. If successful
participation in certain events is specified as a requirement for admission to doctoral
studies, this participation becomes a prerequisite for a successful completion of the
doctoral degree.
11. If prior publications are used as part of the dissertation, doctorate regulations require
that the dissertation be a substantially original achievement that goes beyond work
previously submitted for publication or published. In particular, doctorate regulations
2
govern how the doctoral candidate’s proportionate contribution is to be determined in
the event of multiple authors.
12. In addition to the written form, the doctoral thesis must also be submitted
electronically. This ensures that, if appropriate, the work can be checked for
unauthorised plagiarism and for incorrect citations.
13. To ensure the quality of the doctoral work, an independent assessment of the
doctoral thesis will be undertaken by at least two reviewers in accordance with the
quality standards in place in the relevant scholarly community. These thesis
assessment reports will be prepared independently of each other. It is strongly
recommended that at least one thesis assessment report be prepared by a university
lecturer outside of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Before the reviewers are
appointed, they must be asked about and assessed for any possible grounds for bias
towards the doctoral candidate, in order to ensure that other individuals may be
included in the assessment procedure in good time if required. This rule does not
apply to reviewers who have supervised the dissertation.
14. A public doctoral defence is part of the doctoral examination process. It provides the
doctoral candidate with the opportunity to prove his or her scholarly aptitude in a
presentation and scholarly discussion. Doctoral candidates are entitled to inspect the
thesis assessment reports at least 14 days before their doctoral defence. The
discussion should relate to the dissertation and presentation, and may require
knowledge of the environment of the topic being treated.
15. In accordance with its PhD regulations, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin awards the
grades of ‘summa cum laude’, ‘magna cum laude’, ‘cum laude’, ‘rite’ and ‘non
sufficit’. The overall grade is composed by both the assessment report grades and
the grade for presentation and discussion during the defence. The overall grade
‘summa cum laude’ is only awarded if all individual achievements have been graded
‘summa cum laude’ and at least three thesis assessment reports are available for the
doctoral work. The overall grade of ‘non sufficit’ (fail) is used if a grade lower than
‘rite’ has been awarded for the majority of individual sections. The grading scale is
formally communicated to all those involved in the doctoral examination procedure,
and in particular, the reviewers, when the procedure is initiated.