Gnrha Stop Protocol Versus Long Protocol in Poor Responder Ivf Patients
Gnrha Stop Protocol Versus Long Protocol in Poor Responder Ivf Patients
Gnrha Stop Protocol Versus Long Protocol in Poor Responder Ivf Patients
Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center (V.R.H.R.C), Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(T.U.M.S), Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Background: Recently different studies suggested that discontinuation of
gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) at beginning of ovarian
stimulation (improvement of ovarian response to gonadotrophins) may have some
benefit to poor responder patients in invitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.
Objective:The efficacy of GnRHa stop protocol in poor responder patients in IVF
cycles was assessed.
Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that
40 poor responder patients (less than three mature follicles in a previous cycle) with
normal basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were randomly allocated into two
protocols: 1) Non-stop protocol: long GnRHa suppression, and start gonadotrophins
from day 3 of mense. 2) Stop-protocol: GnRHa is stopped with the onset of menses,
and gonadotrophin doses remained similar to group 1.
Results: A significantly higher number of follicles, oocytes, embryos and fertilization
rate also shorter stimulation days and lower human menopausal gonadotropins (HMG)
ampoules were recorded in the stop protocol compared to the control group. Both
protocols resulted in a similar cancellation rate, pregnancy rate, estradiol level and LH
level.
Conclusion: Early follicular cessation of GnRHa permitted the retrieval of a
significantly higher number of follicles, oocytes and embryos, and can reduce the
number of HMG and stimulation days.
Key words: GnRHa long protocol, IVF, Poor respondr, GnRHa stop protocol.
In fact, serum concentrations of estradiol were 8. Detti L, Williams DB, Robins JC, Maxwell RA, Thomas
higher in the stop protocol, although the value did MA. Comparison of three downregulation approaches for
poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization, Fertil
not reach statistically significant differences, Steril 2005; 84(5): 1401-1405.
probably due to the limited sample size of this 9. Beckers NGM, Laven JSE, Eijkemans MJC. Follicular
study. When clinicians observe a low response to and luteal phase characteristics following early cessation
IVF stimulation (less than three follicles), cycle of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during
ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod
cancellation is usually counseled to the patients, in 2000; 15: 43–49.
the hope that a better response might be obtained 10. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Requena A, Martínez-
in a subsequent cycle. This trend is based on the Salazar FJ, Landazábal A, Remohí J, et al. High doses of
assumption that poor responders have a poor IVF gonadotrophins combined with stop versus non-stop
outcome as they usually have a low oocyte quality. protocol of GnRH analogue administration in low
responder IVF patients: a prospective, randomized,
According to their based FSH concentrations, controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2292-2296.
young low responders with high basal FSH 11. Gil-Salom M, Mínguez Y, Rubio C, De los Santos MJ,
concentrations have a poor outcome based on the Remohí J, Pellicer A. Efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm
low quality of the oocytes retrieved. However, injection using testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1995;
10: 3166–3170.
young low responders with normal day 3 FSH 12. Sungurtekin U, Jansen RPS. Profound Latinizing
concentrations; although their ovarian reserve may hormone suppression after stopping the gonadotrophin
be compromised (19), might benefit from releasing hormone-agonist leuprolide acetate. Fertil Steril
alternative protocols such as the stop protocol, as 1995; 63: 663–665.
their chances of achieving a pregnancy seem to be 13. Horvath PM, Styler M, Hammond JM, Shelden RM,
Kemmann E. Exogenous gonadotropin requirements are
similar to those of normal responders (20). In Detti increased in leuprolide suppressed women undergoing
study, flare protocol versus stop protocol ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 159–162.
demonstrated a trend toward higher delivery rates 14. Kowalik A, Barmat L, Damario M, Liu HC, Davis O,
(8), this may be because of the number of HMG or Rosenwaks Z. Ovarian estradiol production in vivo.
Inhibitory effect of leuprolide acetate. J Reprod Med
higher dose of GnRHa. 1998; 43: 413–417.
The stop protocol increases the number of 15. Latouche J, Crumeyrolle-Arias M, Jordan D, Kopp N,
available embryos and decrease the quantity of Augendre-Ferrante B, Cedard L, et al. GnRH receptors in
gonadotrophin required. Further studies with more human granulosa cells: anatomical localization and
number of patients are required to determine characterization by autoradiographic study.
Endocrinology 1989; 125: 1739–1741.
weather early cessation of GnRHa leads to 16. Aleem, FA, Predanic M. The hemodynamic effect of
increase in implantation rate and pregnancy rate. GnRH agonist therapy on uterine leiomyoma vascularity:
a prospective study using transvaginal color Doppler
References sonography. Gynecol Endocrinol 1995; 9: 253-528.
17. Zeleznik AJ, Schuler HM, Reichert LEJ. Gonadotrophin-
1. Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J. Clinical binding sites in the Rhesus monkey ovary: role of the
management of low ovarian response to stimulation for vasculature in the selective distribution of human
IVF. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9: 61-76. chorionic gonadotrophin to the preovulatory follicle.
2. Garcia JE, Jones GS, Acosta AA, Wright GJr. Human Endocrinology 1981; 109: 356–362.
menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin 18. Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agrawal R, Bekir JS,
follicular maturation for oocyte aspiration. Fertil Steril Campbell S, Tan SL. Value of ovarian stromal blood flow
1983; 39(2): 174-179. velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in
3. Keay SD, Liversedge NH, Mathur RS, Jenkins JM. the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of
Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 22–
gonadotrophin stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 29.
104: 521-527. 19. Bhal PS, Pugh ND, Chui DK, Gregory L, Walker SM,
4. Scott RT Jr. Evaluation and treatment of low responders. Shaw RW. The use of transvaginal power Doppler
Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1996; 14: 317–337 ultrasonography to evaluate the relationship between
5. Karande V, Gleicher N. A rational approach to the perifollicular vascularity and outcome in in-vitro
management of low responders in in-vitro fertilization. fertilization treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:
Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1744–1748. 939–945.
6. Faber BM, Mayer J, Cox B, Jones D, Toner JP, Oehninger 20. Lashen H, Ledger W, Lopez-Bernal A, Barlow D. Poor
S, et al. Cessation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-
agonist therapy combined with high-dose gonadotrophin vitro fertilization worthwhile? Hum Reprod 1999; 14:
stimulation yields favorable pregnancy results in low 964–969.
responders. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 826–830. 21. Schachter M, Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Bern
7. Dirnfield M, Fruchter O, Yshai D. Cessation of O, Ron-el R. Improvement of IVF outcome in poor
gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) responders by discontinuation of GnRH analogue during
upon down-regulation versus conventional long GnRH-a the gonadotropin stimulation phase--a function of
protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro improved embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;
fertilization. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 406–411. 18: 197-204.