Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact On U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns

Hunter Biden, Burisma,
and Corruption:
The Impact on U.S.
Government Policy and
Related Concerns
U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs
U.S. Senate Committee on Finance

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
II. INTRODUCTION
III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS WERE
AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE
ON BURISMA’S BOARD.
V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.
VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED MYKOLA ZLOCHEVSKY AS A

CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS
ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION.
VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S

OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO
UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE.
VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S

BOARD.
IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING FIRM

HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER UKRAINIAN
OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO.
X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A

RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO
INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.
XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH

UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE
CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS.
XII. CONCLUSION
2
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding
integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the
country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on Feb. 21 when
Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych abdicated by fleeing the country. Less than two months
later, over the span of only 28 days, significant events involving the Bidens unfolded.
On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon
Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon
after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.”
The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April
28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner,
Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma,
and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid
millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.
The 2014 protests in Kyiv came to be known as the Revolution of Dignity — a revolution
against corruption in Ukraine. Following that revolution, Ukrainian political figures were
desperate for U.S. support. Zlochevsky would have made sure relevant Ukrainian officials were
well aware of Hunter’s appointment to Burisma’s board as leverage. Hunter Biden’s position on
the board created an immediate potential conflict of interest that would prove to be problematic
for both U.S. and Ukrainian officials and would affect the implementation of Ukraine policy.
The Chairmen’s investigation into potential conflicts of interest began in August 2019,
with Chairman Grassley’s letter to the Department of Treasury regarding potential conflicts of
interest with respect to Obama administration policy relating to the Henniges transaction. 1
During the Obama administration, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
(CFIUS) approved a transaction that gave control over Henniges, an American maker of anti-
vibration technologies with military applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation
company and a China-based investment firm with established ties to the Chinese government.
One of the companies involved in the Henniges transaction was a billion-dollar private
investment fund called Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was formed in November 2013 by a
merger between the Chinese-government-linked firm Bohai Capital and a company named
Rosemont Seneca Partners. Rosemont Seneca was formed in 2009 by Hunter Biden, the son of
then-Vice President Joe Biden, by Chris Heinz, the stepson of former Secretary of State John
Kerry, and others. 2
1 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley Raises Concerns Over Obama Admin Approval of U.S.
Tech Company Joint Sale to Chinese Government and Investment Firm Linked to Biden, Kerry Families (Aug. 15, 2019),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/grassley-raises-concerns-over-obama-admin-approval-of-us-tech-company-
joint-sale-to-chinese-government-and-investment-firm-linked-to-biden-kerry-families.
2 Peter Schweizer, Inside the Shady Private Equity Firm Run by Kerry and Biden’s Kids, NEW YORK POST (Mar. 15, 2018),
https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/; Peter Schweizer, The

Troubling Reason Why Biden is so Soft on China, NEW YORK POST (May 11, 2019), https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-
reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/; Tom Llamas et al., Biden Sidesteps Questions About His Son’s Foreign Business
Dealings but Promises Ethics Pledge, ABC NEWS (June 20, 2019), https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-sidesteps-questions-
sons-foreign-business-dealings-promises/story?id=63820806 (Stating that Hunter Biden was a managing partner at Rosemont
Seneca Partners.).
3
Access to relevant documents and testimony has been persistently hampered by criminal
investigations, impeachment proceedings, COVID-19, and several instances of obstructive
behavior. Accordingly, this investigation has taken longer than it should have. The Chairmen’s
efforts have always been driven by our belief that the public has the right to know about
wrongdoing and conflicts of interest occurring within government, and especially those conflicts
brought about by the actions of governmental officials. This is a good-government oversight
investigation that relies on documents and testimony from U.S. agencies and officials, not a
Russian disinformation campaign, as our Democratic colleagues have falsely stated.
What the Chairmen discovered during the course of this investigation is that the Obama
administration knew that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board was problematic and did
interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine. Moreover, this
investigation has illustrated the extent to which officials within the Obama administration
ignored the glaring warning signs when the vice president’s son joined the board of a company
owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch. And, as will be discussed in later sections, Hunter Biden
was not the only Biden who cashed in on Joe Biden’s vice presidency.
This report not only details examples of extensive and complex financial transactions
involving the Bidens, it also describes the quandary other U.S. governmental officials faced as
they attempted to guide and support Ukraine’s anticorruption efforts. The Committees will
continue to evaluate the information and evidence as it becomes available.
Key Findings
 In early 2015 the former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv,
Ukraine, George Kent, raised concerns to officials in Vice President Joe Biden’s office
about the perception of a conflict of interest with respect to Hunter Biden’s role on
Burisma’s board. Kent’s concerns went unaddressed, and in September 2016, he
emphasized in an email to his colleagues, “Furthermore, the presence of Hunter Biden
on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an
anticorruption agenda in Ukraine.”
 In October 2015, senior State Department official Amos Hochstein raised concerns with
Vice President Biden, as well as with Hunter Biden, that Hunter Biden’s position on
Burisma’s board enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S.
policy in Ukraine.
 Although Kent believed that Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board was awkward for
all U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine, the Committees are only
aware of two individuals — Kent and former U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for
International Energy Affairs Amos Hochstein — who raised concerns to Vice President
Joe Biden (Hochstein) or his staff (Kent).
 The awkwardness for Obama administration officials continued well past his presidency.
Former Secretary of State John Kerry had knowledge of Hunter Biden’s role on
4
Burisma’s board, but when asked about it at a town hall event in Nashua, N.H. on Dec. 8,
2019, Kerry falsely said, “I had no knowledge about any of that. None. No.” Evidence
to the contrary is detailed in Section V.
 Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland
testified that confronting oligarchs would send an anticorruption message in Ukraine.
Kent told the Committees that Zlochevsky was an “odious oligarch.” However, in
December 2015, instead of following U.S. objectives of confronting oligarchs, Vice
President Biden’s staff advised him to avoid commenting on Zlochevsky and
recommended he say, “I’m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals.”
 Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma’s board (supposedly consulting on corporate

governance and transparency) when Zlochevsky allegedly paid a $7 million bribe to
officials serving under Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Vitaly Yarema, to “shut the case
against Zlochevsky.” Kent testified that this bribe occurred in December 2014 (seven
months after Hunter joined Burisma’s board), and, after learning about it, he and the
Resident Legal Advisor reported this allegation to the FBI.
 Hunter Biden was a U.S. Secret Service protectee from Jan. 29, 2009 to July 8, 2014. A
day before his last trip as a protectee, Time published an article describing Burisma’s
ramped up lobbying efforts to U.S. officials and Hunter’s involvement in Burisma’s
board. Before ending his protective detail, Hunter Biden received Secret Service
protection on trips to multiple foreign locations, including Moscow, Beijing, Doha, Paris,
Seoul, Manila, Tokyo, Mexico City, Milan, Florence, Shanghai, Geneva, London,
Dublin, Munich, Berlin, Bogota, Abu Dhabi, Nairobi, Hong Kong, Taipei, Buenos Aires,
Copenhagen, Johannesburg, Brussels, Madrid, Mumbai and Lake Como.
 Andrii Telizhenko, the Democrats’ personification of Russian disinformation, met with

Obama administration officials, including Elisabeth Zentos, a member of Obama’s
National Security Council, at least 10 times. A Democrat lobbying firm, Blue Star
Strategies, contracted with Telizhenko from 2016 to 2017 and continued to request his
assistance as recent as the summer of 2019. A recent news article detailed other
extensive contacts between Telizhenko and Obama administration officials.
 In addition to the over $4 million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden’s and Archer’s board
memberships, Hunter Biden, his family, and Archer received millions of dollars from
foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds.
 Archer received $142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan, purportedly for a car,
the same day Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy
Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in
Crimea.
 Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the
former mayor of Moscow.
5
 Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong to fund a $100,000 global
spending spree with James Biden and Sara Biden.
 Hunter Biden had business associations with Ye Jianming, Gongwen Dong, and other
Chinese nationals linked to the Communist government and the People’s Liberation
Army. Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow.
 Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern
European countries and who appear to be linked to an “Eastern European prostitution or
human trafficking ring.”
6
II. INTRODUCTION
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) and
the Senate Committee on Finance undertook this investigation into potential conflicts of interest,
and the involvement of the Biden family in foreign business ventures while Joe Biden was vice
president, following allegations that the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy could have been
affected by Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma, and that family members may have
improperly sought to benefit from their relationship with the vice president.
The first letter written regarding potential conflicts of interest was sent by Chairman
Grassley on Aug. 14, 2019, relating to the Henniges transaction. 3 That was an Obama-era
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved transaction which
gave control over Henniges, an American maker of anti-vibration technologies with military
applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation company and a China-based investment
firm with established ties to the communist Chinese government. One of the companies
involved in the Henniges transaction was a billion-dollar private investment fund called Bohai
Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was reportedly formed in November 2013 by a merger between the
Chinese government-linked firm Bohai Capital and a U.S. company named Rosemont Seneca
Partners. Rosemont Seneca Partners was reportedly formed in 2009 by Hunter Biden, the son of
then-Vice President Joe Biden, by Chris Heinz, the stepson of former Secretary of State John
Kerry, and by others. 4
The direct involvement of Hunter Biden and Heinz in the acquisition of Henniges by the
Chinese government creates a potential conflict of interest. Both are directly related to high-
ranking Obama administration officials. The Department of State, then under Mr. Kerry’s
leadership, is also a CFIUS member and played a direct role in the decision to approve the
Henniges transaction. The appearance of a potential conflict of interest in this case was
particularly troubling given Hunter Biden’s history of investing in and collaborating with
Chinese companies, including at least one that clearly poses significant national security
concerns. This history with China precedes and follows the 2015 Henniges transaction. This
report will discuss Hunter Biden’s and Devon Archer’s corporate entities and their links to the
communist Chinese government in more detail.
In 2019, newly released documents, made public as a result of Freedom of Information

Act (FOIA) requests and investigative reporting, brought fresh public attention and scrutiny to
3 See Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley Raises Concerns Over Obama Admin Approval of
U.S. Tech Company Joint Sale to Chinese Government and Investment Firm Linked to Biden, Kerry Families (Aug. 15, 2019),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/grassley-raises-concerns-over-obama-admin-approval-of-us-tech-company-
joint-sale-to-chinese-government-and-investment-firm-linked-to-biden-kerry-families.
4 Peter Schweizer, Inside the Shady Private Equity Firm Run by Kerry and Biden’s Kids, NEW YORK POST (Mar. 15, 2018),
https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/; Peter Schweizer, The

Troubling Reason Why Biden is so Soft on China, NEW YORK POST (May 11, 2019), https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-
reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/; Tom Llamas, et al., Biden Sidesteps Questions About His Son’s Foreign Business
Dealings but Promises Ethics Pledge, ABC NEWS (June 20, 2019), https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-sidesteps-questions-
sons-foreign-business-dealings-promises/story?id=63820806 (Stating that Hunter Biden was a managing partner at Rosemont
Seneca Partners.).
7
potential conflicts of interest with respect to Ukraine policy in the Obama administration. 5
Additionally, news reporting also raised questions about potential conflicts of interest with
respect to Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China, Ukraine and Russia while Joe Biden was
serving as vice president. 6 Accordingly, on Nov. 6, 2019, Chairman Grassley and Chairman
Johnson wrote a letter to the Department of State regarding potential conflicts of interest due to
Hunter Biden’s position on the board of the corrupt Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings
Limited while Vice President Biden was the “public face of the administration’s handling of
Ukraine.” 7 6F
The Committees’ investigation focused on determining whether Hunter Biden and Devon
Archer sought to benefit financially from their relationship with then-Vice President Joe Biden
or if they sought to influence U.S. policy in Ukraine on behalf of Burisma. Further, the
Committees reviewed and evaluated the Obama administration’s handling of Ukraine policy to
determine whether policy decisions related to Ukraine and Burisma were improperly influenced
by the employment and financial interests of family members of the administration.
For example, after joining Burisma’s board, Biden and Archer subsequently requested
meetings with senior State Department officials, including then-Secretary of State John Kerry
and then-Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken. 8 Further, a Democratic lobbying firm, Blue
Star Strategies, working on behalf of Burisma, also invoked Hunter Biden’s association with
Burisma while requesting a meeting with then-Under Secretary of State Catherine Novelli to
discuss matters of concern related to the Department of State’s position that Burisma was a
corrupt company. 9
In 2016, Ukraine’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, had an active and ongoing
investigation into Burisma and its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. 10 At the time, Archer and Hunter
5 See Alana Goodman, John Kerry’s son cut business ties with Hunter Biden over Ukrainian oil deal, THE WASHINGTON
EXAMINER (Aug. 27, 2019), https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/john-kerrys-son-cut-business-ties-with-hunter-biden-
over-ukrainian-oil-deal; see also John Solomon, These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden’s Ukraine story, THE HILL
(Sept. 26, 2019), https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-
ukraine-story; Jessica Donati, Firm Hired by Ukraine’s Burisma Tried to Use Hunter Biden as Leverage, Documents show, THE
WALL STREET JOURNAL (Nov. 5, 2019), https://www.wsj.com/articles/firm-hired-by-ukraines-burisma-tried-to-use-hunter-biden-
as-leverage-documents-show-11573009615.
6 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign; Joseph Simonson,

Hunter Biden arranged meeting between father and Chinese business partner during vice presidential visit: Report, THE
WASHINGTON EXAMINER (July 1, 2019), https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hunter-biden-arrangement-of-fathers-
meeting-with-chinese-business-partner-draws-scrutiny; Ben Schreckinger, Biden Inc., POLITICO (Aug. 2, 2019),
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/02/joe-biden-investigation-hunter-brother-hedge-fund-money-2020-campaign-
227407.
7 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Johnson, Grassley Call for State Department to Release
Documents on Hunter Biden and Burisma (Nov. 7, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/johnson-

grassley-call-state-department-release-documents-hunter-biden-and-burisma.
8 Emails between Hunter Biden and U.S. Dep’t of St. employees (May 2015) (on file with Comms.), Email between U.S. Dep’t
of St. employees (Mar. 2, 2016) (on file with Comms.).

9 John Solomon, Hunter Biden’s Ukraine gas firm pressed Obama administration to end corruption allegations, memos show,
(Nov. 4, 2019), https://johnsolomonreports.com/hunter-bidens-ukraine-gas-firm-pressed-obama-administration-to-end-

corruption-allegations-memos-show/.
10 Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump Allies,
THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html; Oleg Sukhov,
8
Biden continued to serve on Burisma’s board of directors. According to news reports, then-Vice
President Biden “threatened to withhold $1 billion in United States loan guarantees if Ukraine’s
leaders did not dismiss [Shokin].”11 After that threat, Ukraine’s Parliament fired Shokin.
10F
Pursuant to the scope of this investigation, the Committees requested relevant Obama
administration records from several U.S. federal government agencies and interviewed current
and former U.S. government officials with firsthand knowledge of the Obama administration’s
handling of U.S. policy in Ukraine. The Committees sent requests for information to the
Department of State, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Department of
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Secret Service, Department of the Treasury,
and the U.S. Democratic consulting firm Blue Star Strategies. 12 Accordingly, this investigation is
based on Obama administration federal government records and records from a Democrat lobby
shop, Blue Star Strategies.
Senate Resolution 70 gives HSGAC express authority “to study or investigate... the
efficiency and economy of operations of all branches of the government, including the possible
Powerful suspects escape justice on Lutsenko’s watch, KYIV POST (Apr. 13, 2018), https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-
politics/powerful-suspects-escape-justice-lutsenkos-watch.html?cn-reloaded=1.
11 Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump Allies,
THE NEW YORK TIMES(May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html; Glen Kessler,

Correcting a media error: Biden’s Ukraine showdown was in December 2015, THE WASHINGTON POST (Oct. 2, 2019),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/02/correcting-media-error-bidens-ukraine-showdown-was-december/
(Another report indicates that Vice President Biden made this threat in late 2015); Tim Hains, FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden
Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor, REALCLEARPOLITICS (Sept. 27,
2019),
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_t
o_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html. (Joe Biden was recorded, in a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign
Relations, bragging about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine in an attempt to force the Ukrainian government to fire
Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. Joe Biden is recorded bragging that in response to his threat to withhold the aid, “[w]ell son
of a bitch. [Viktor Shokin] got fired.”).
12 Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Se. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S.
Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 6, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-

06%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Sec.%20Pompeo%20re%20Burisma%20Inquiry.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.
Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of Just.
(Sep. 27, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09-
27%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20DOJ%20%28Ukraine%20DNC%29.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on
Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Nat’l Archives and Records
Administration (Nov. 21, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-
21%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Archivist%20Ferriero%20re%20Records%20Request.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson,
S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of Just.
and Fed. Bureau of Investigation (Nov. 22, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2019-11-
22%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Chalupa%20Records%29.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.
Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to Blue Star Strategies
(Dec. 3, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-12-
3%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Blue%20Star%20Strategies%20re%20Burisma.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.
Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Secret Serv. (Feb.
5, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2020-02-
05%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20Secret%20Service%20%28Biden%20Travel%29.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.
Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Apr.
30, 2020), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020-04-
30%20RHJ%20CEG%20to%20State%20(Ukraine%20Follow%20Up).pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on
Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 6, 2020),
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-
06%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Sec.%20Pompeo%20re%20Burisma%20Inquiry.pdf.
9
existence of… corruption or unethical practices… [and] conflicts of interest.” 13 The Committee
on Finance has broad jurisdiction over the United States government and, specifically, the
Department of Treasury and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which
includes oversight jurisdiction over potential financial crimes. 14
13 S. Res. 70, 116th Cong. at 30 (2018), https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres70/BILLS-116sres70ats.pdf.

14 See U.S. S. Comm. on Fin., Jurisdiction, https://www.finance.senate.gov/about/jurisdiction.
10
III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Federal regulation prohibits federal government employees from “us[ing] [] public office
for [] private gain … or for the private gain of … relatives.” 15 This regulation also seek “[t]o
ensure that the performance of [] official duties does not give rise to an appearance of the use of
public office for private gain or of giving preferential treatment[.]” 16 This regulation, however,
does not apply to the president or vice president. 17
Other federal regulations require only the “consideration” of an appearance of a conflict

of interest. “Where an employee … knows that a person with whom he has a covered
relationship [e.g.,] is or represents a party to [a particular matter involving specific parties], and
where the employee determines that the circumstances would cause a reasonable person with
knowledge of the relevant facts to question his impartiality on the matter, the employee should
not participate in the matter unless he has informed [a designated superior] and received
authorization[.]” 18
According to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), these rules and regulations help to
ensure that federal employees “fulfill[] their responsibility to endeavor to act at all times in the
public’s interest and avoid losing impartiality or appearing to lose impartiality in carrying out
their official duties.” 19 In the context of U.S. foreign policy, the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM)
sets forth the policies and procedures for State Department employees working abroad. The
FAM includes ethical regulations that take into account foreign policy considerations and treaty
and statutory obligations. 20 Specifically, when a U.S. citizen employee of the State
Department 21 is serving abroad and subject to the authority of that country’s Chief of Mission,
that employee’s family members may be prohibited from employment or other outside activity in
any foreign country if the Chief of Mission in that country determines it could damage the
interests of the United States. 22 The FAM also requires employees to bring any violations of the
FAM or any other applicable regulations to the attention of the appropriate official. 23
Although OGE’s authority to investigate and recommend solutions to most employees for
conflicts of interest issues is well-established, Congress did not extend this authority to the
president and vice president in OGE’s establishment statute. This does not mean there is an
absence of any authority to hold the President and Vice President accountable for conflict of
interest issues; rather, it demonstrates that the responsibility for holding the President and Vice
President responsible for conduct that implicates conflicts of interest lies elsewhere, namely,
with Congress and the American people.
15 5 C.F.R. § 2635.702.
16 Id. at § 2635.702(d).
17 Id. at § 2635.102.
18 Id. at § 2635.502.
19 Conflicts Analysis & Resolution, Office of Gov’t Ethics, https://www.oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/ethicsofficials_conflict-resolution.
20 3 FAM 4121.3.
21 The FAM rules referenced in this section apply to Foreign Service, Foreign Service National, and Civil Service employees. 3
FAM 4123.2-2; 3 FAM 4125.

22 3 FAM 4125.
23 3 FAM 4139.13.
11
In certain instances, like self-dealing, the harm is plain. In others, the harm — a loss or
apparent loss of impartiality — may be less concrete, but the effect is still the same. 24 When the
impartiality of decision makers is drawn into question, it creates a chilling effect on the
credibility of their decision-making processing and the ultimate decision. That, in turn, could
undermine the effectiveness of U.S. policy. Although these consequences may sometimes be
difficult to measure or quantify, they certainly have an effect, or else there would be little reason
to regulate them in the first instance. In the context of foreign affairs, because these subtleties
matter, the FAM provides the Chief of Mission with the discretion to make these assessments.
24The House of Representatives appears to think these issues matter. A House committee has been investigating President
Trump and his family for “undisclosed conflicts of interest that may impair [the President’s] ability to make impartial policy
decisions.” Trump v. Mazars, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (July 9, 2020) (Quoting Rep. Elijah Cummings, Chairman of the House Oversight
Committee.).
12
IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS
WERE AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER
BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.
a. Introduction
In early 2015, senior State Department official George Kent raised concerns to staff in
the Office of the Vice President about Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board. Kent testified
that he never heard anything back from the vice president’s office, and although Kent advised
that Hunter Biden should step down from Burisma’s board to avoid the perception of a potential
conflict of interest, his recommendation was not followed.
Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board continued to be an issue State Department

officials had to manage when executing U.S. / Ukraine policy. More than a year after Kent
reported his concerns to the vice president’s staff, he wrote to his superiors that Hunter Biden’s
role on Burisma’s board was “very awkward” to those on the front lines pushing anticorruption
efforts in Ukraine on a daily basis. 25 Kent testified that he felt the need to “prepar[e] everybody
for ‘what about-ism,’ because we’re pushing what’s right … and we have to be prepared for
people who are critics, are opponents, to say, ‘Well, what about? What about Hunter Biden?’” 26
Indeed, Kent testified further that he “would have advised any American not to get on the board
of Zlochevsky’s company.” 27 The Committees are also aware of at least one other senior State
Department official, Amos Hochstein, who raised concerns directly to Vice President Biden
about potential conflicts of interest relating to Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board. 28
Although Hochstein declined to testify about the substance of his conversation with Vice
President Biden, 29 the New Yorker reported that Hochstein “did not go so far as to recommend
that Hunter leave the board.” 30 The Committees found that neither the Office of the Vice
President nor the State Department ever took any action following these complaints.
b. In February 2015, Kent raised concerns about the perception of a conflict of interest
regarding Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board.
According to Kent, in early 2015 when he was still Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at
the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, he learned that Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma. 31 Kent
stated, “[s]oon after that, in a briefing call with the National Security staff in the Office of the
Vice President on other matters, in February 2015, I raised my concern that Hunter Biden’s
status as a board member could create the perception of a conflict of interest.” 32 Kent continued:
25 Transcript of Interview at 224, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of
George Kent (July 24, 2020). [Hereinafter George Kent Testimony].

26 George Kent Testimony at 221.
28 Transcript of Interview at 98, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Victoria
Nuland (Sept. 3, 2020). [Hereinafter Victoria Nuland Testimony].

29 Amos Hochstein Testimony at 52-58.
30 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, New Yorker (July 1, 2019),
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.
13
I said that I had learned that Hunter Biden had been appointed to a
board of this company, that I had just raised U.S. concerns about
the owner of the company, who we believed had been engaged in
money-laundering. … [T]he bottom line was, I said I believe
that this creates the perception of a potential conflict of
interest, given Vice President Biden’s role and his very strong
advocacy for anticorruption action, and that I thought that
someone needed to talk to Hunter Biden, and he should [step]
down from the board of Burisma. 33
When the Committees asked Kent who he spoke to in Vice President Biden’s office, he
stated, “I can’t remember, to be perfectly honest. I don’t remember who I spoke to.” 34 Kent told
3F
the Committees that, after raising this concern, he never heard anything back from the vice
president’s office. 3534F
c. Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma continued to be an “awkward” conflict of

interest State Department officials had to manage.
Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma appeared in numerous State Department

records, particularly when State officials discussed the company, its owner, and anticorruption
efforts in Ukraine. According to records reviewed by the Committees, in 2016, Kent mentioned
Hunter Biden when discussing Burisma with his colleagues. Kent told the Committees:
For me it’s preparing everybody for “what about-ism,” because

we’re pushing what’s right, and we do what’s right, and we have to
be prepared for people who are critics, are opponents, to say,
“Well, what about? What about Hunter Biden?”
So there was no time, as I’ve testified, that the U.S. government,

the U.S. embassy ever made a decision about Zlochevsky or
Burisma where we took the presence of a private citizen on the
board into account. We made the decision on the merits. But
others might think otherwise. And so everyone needed to be aware
of what we were dealing with as we made the right decisions. 36
The extent to which Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board affected U.S. policy toward
Ukraine is not clear. But what is clear from the records, however, is that State Department
officials, particularly Kent himself, regularly considered how Hunter Biden’s connection to
Burisma might affect the execution of U.S. policy. Moreover, as described previously, this
included having to respond to Russian actors attempting to exploit Hunter Biden’s position on
33 George Kent Testimony at 128-29 (emphasis added); see also George Kent Testimony at 110.
36 George Kent Testimony at 221 (emphasis added).
14
Burisma’s board to drive a wedge between Ukrainian and the U.S. in an effort to undermine U.S.
policy toward Ukraine.
For example, Kent raised Hunter Biden’s connection to Burisma during multiple
discussions over emails involving the Municipal Energy Reform Program (MERP). 37 In those
emails, Kent asked his colleagues, “[H]ow have we traditionally treated/engaged Burisma,
given the Zlochevsky connection, but also perhaps US involvement beyond Hunter Biden?” 38
In another email chain, Kent also pointed out that “[Zlochevsky] put Hunter Biden on the
board of his Burisma Energy company.” 39 When inquiring about the extent to which State
Department officials researched Burisma’s past, in order to determine whether to associate with
the company, Kent asked his colleagues whether any ‘“know your partner’ due diligence was
done” before the partnership between MERP and Burisma was established. 40 Kent then
described old news stories involving the company: “Zlochevsky as a corrupt mal actor was a
2014 story [and] his control of Burisma, and the very sticky wicket of the Hunter Biden
connection on Burisma’s board was circulating in 2015.” 41 As part of that same email chain,
40F
Kent asked his colleagues if the U.S. government continues its association with Burisma:
[W]ould we want an article on the front page of the Washington

Post (and in this case, the Kyiv Post, and on the FB pages of Sergiy
Leshchenko and Mustafa Nayyem) commenting about this public
private partnership with Burisma, the link to Hunter Biden,
and the link to Zlochevsky, who almost certainly paid off the
PGO in December 2014 (I had the then First deputy PG Danylenko
tell me the bribe was $7 million) to have the case against him
closed and his $23 million in assets frozen in the UK unfrozen? 42
37 Kent told the Committee that he mentioned Hunter Biden’s name in this context because he believed that “all U.S. Government
officials need to be aware of all the factors involved in an issue.” George Kent Testimony at 113. When asked why Kent did not
raise the names of other individuals on Burisma’s board he said, “the one American that I was aware of that was on the board [in
August 2016] was Hunter Biden.” George Kent Testimony at 114. The MERP was a program funded by the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID). According to State Department documents, the MERP and Burisma entered
into a Memorandum of Understanding on October 13, 2014. Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, et al.,
U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 12, 2016, 16:47:00), [STATE-2019-18-0000357] (attaching Memorandum of Understanding between the
MERP in Ukraine and Burisma Holdings Limited (Oct. 13, 2014), [STATE-2019-18-0000361-364]). Kent testified that, “in
2015, there had been a set of awards given by this program implementer that had been funded by Burisma. They were planning
another set of awards, a second set of awards in mid-September [. . . .] We pulled the plug and there was no second.” George
Kent Testimony at 124. USAID “withdrew its [MERP] cooperation with Burisma” in September 2016. Email from Redacted,
U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Dec. 6, 2016, 00:18:23 -0500), [STATE-2019-18-0001205] (attaching
Briefing Checklist: Ambassador Yovanovitch’s Meeting with Karen Tramontano, Blue Star Strategies [STATE-2019-18-
0001207]).
38 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Jeffrey Cole, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 13, 2016, 3:26 PM) [STATE-2019-
18-0000377-378].
39 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to John Herbst, Atlantic Council, and William Taylor, U.S. Inst. of Peace (Aug.
29, 2016, 11:23 AM) [STATE-2019-18-0000365-368] (emphasis added).

40 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Deputy Mission Dir., U.S. Embassy Kyiv, et al. (Aug. 31, 2016, 21:55) [State-
2019-18-0000398-399].
2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).

2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).
15
So even though the total amount of time State Department officials spent accounting for
Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma is unclear, the records show that it was an issue that
had to be addressed repeatedly.
d. More than one year after Kent reported his concerns about Hunter Biden to the vice
president’s office, he once again raised the issue — this time to his superiors at the
State Department.
On Sept. 6, 2016, Kent wrote an email to senior State Department officials, including
Deputy Assistant Secretary Bridget Brink and U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, and offered
his contemporaneous view of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Kent wrote, “the
presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials
pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine.” 43 In testimony Kent expanded on this
42F
comment:
I meant that people who talk the talk need to walk the walk, and
for the U.S. government, collectively, when we talk about the need
to have high standards of integrity, again, as I’ve said, the presence
of [Hunter Biden] on the board created the perception of a
potential conflict of interest. 44
The Committees learned, through document requests, that Victoria Nuland, then-
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, also received a forwarded copy
of Kent’s September 2016 email outlining his concerns about Hunter Biden being on Burisma’s
board. Nuland testified that she “was always open to hearing the concerns of subordinates and
trying to address them in an open and transparent manner.” 45 Yet when the Committee asked
Nuland to explain what actions she took when she received Kent’s email, she said that Kent’s
concerns about Hunter Biden were “clearly, way deep down in an email, late in 2016” and “they
were not brought to my specific attention by George Kent, who is an old friend and had plenty of
opportunity to do so, had he so wanted.” 46 Despite senior State Department officials clearly
45F
being made aware of the situation, Kent’s concerns remained unaddressed.
e. Hochstein spoke to Vice President Biden about concerns relating to Hunter Biden’s
role on Burisma’s board because, according to Hochstein, Russians were using it to
advance disinformation.
According to testimony and public reports, Hochstein, then-U.S. Special Envoy and
Coordinator for International Energy Affairs, raised concerns about Hunter Biden’s role on
Burisma’s board directly to Vice President Biden. Nuland told the Committees:
43 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Bridget Brink, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 6, 2016, 09:55:14 -0400) [STATE-
2019-18-0000345-347] (emphasis added).
45 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 121.
46 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 121-22.
16
Amos Hochstein had had a conversation with the vice
president and his staff about this, and he also had another
conversation on the plane ride to Ukraine for that December 2015
trip. 47
Public reporting also confirms Hochstein’s discussion with Vice President Biden.
According to one report, “Amos Hochstein, the Obama Administration’s special envoy for
energy policy, raised the matter with Biden, but did not go so far as to recommend that Hunter
leave the board.” 48 When Hochstein testified before the Committees, he declined on advice of
counsel to testify about the substance of his conversation with Vice President Biden. 49 The New
Yorker, however, reported that Hochstein “did not go so far as to recommend that Hunter leave
the board.” 50 It is unclear how Vice President Biden responded to this conversation.
According to Hochstein, he raised this issue with Vice President Biden because he was
concerned that the Russians were using Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma to sow
disinformation. 51 Hochstein recounted that he spoke with Vice President Biden in the West
Wing of the White House in October 2015. 52 When asked why he decided to raise the issue of
Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board with Vice President Biden, Hochstein testified:
Hochstein: We were starting to think about a trip to Ukraine, and I wanted to make
sure that he [Vice President Biden] was aware that there was an
increase in chatter on media outlets close to Russians and corrupt
oligarchs-owned media outlets about undermining his message—to
try to undermine his [Vice President Biden’s] message and including
Hunter Biden being part of the board of Burisma. 53
Hochstein also raised his concerns about Russian disinformation with Hunter Biden.
Shortly after his conversation with Vice President Biden, Hunter Biden contacted Hochstein and
asked to meet. According to Hochstein, Hunter became aware of Hochstein’s West Wing
conversation with the Vice President, who had mentioned it to Hunter. 54 Hochstein described
what he and Hunter Biden discussed at this November 2015 meeting at a coffee shop in
Georgetown: 55
Question: And could you expand on that? Why did you discuss Burisma with him
[Hunter Biden]?

48 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),
50 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, New Yorker (July 1, 2019).
51 Transcript of Interview at 50, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Amos
Hochstein Testimony (Sept. 17, 2020). [Hereinafter Amos Hochstein Testimony].

52 Id. at 51.
53 Id. at 112-13. (emphasis added).
54 Id. at 117.
55 Id. at 118.
17
Hochstein: Well, he [Hunter Biden] asked me for a meeting. I think he wanted to
know my views on Burisma and Zlochevsky. And so I shared with him
that the Russians were using his name in order to sow
disinformation—attempt to sow disinformation among Ukrainians. 56
During the November 2015 conversation with Hunter Biden, Hochstein did not
recommend that Hunter leave Burisma’s board because he did not “believe that was my place to
have that discussion, one way or the other.” 57
f. Conclusion
Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board hindered the efforts of dedicated career-service
individuals who were fighting for anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Because the vice
president’s son had a direct link to a corrupt company and its owner, State Department officials
were required to maintain situational awareness of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma.
Unfortunately, U.S. officials had no other choice but to endure the “awkward[ness]” of
continuing to push an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine while the vice president’s son sat on the
board of a Ukrainian company with a corrupt owner, earning tens of thousands of dollars a
month. As Kent testified, he “would have advised any American not to get on the board of
Zlochevsky’s company.” 58 Yet even though Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board cast a
shadow over the work of those advancing anticorruption reforms in Ukraine, the Committees are
only aware of two individuals who raised concerns to their superiors. Despite the efforts of these
individuals, their concerns appear to have fallen on deaf ears.
56 Id. at 50 (emphasis added).

57 Id. at 117.
18
V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.
a. Introduction
On Dec. 8, 2019, a reporter asked former Secretary of State John Kerry about his
awareness of Hunter Biden on Burisma’s board during his time at the State Department. 59 Kerry
responded, “I had no knowledge about any of that. None. No.” 60 The reporter pressed for more
information and Kerry said, “What would I know about any—no. Why would I know about any
company or any individual? No. The answer is no. No communication. No nothing.” 61
Testimony and documents obtained by the Committees call into question the accuracy of Kerry’s
statement. On May 13, 2014, the day after Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board, Secretary
Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz — who was also Hunter Biden’s business partner — emailed
to inform Kerry’s chief of staff, and to distance himself, from that decision. Moreover, in May
2014, Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff, David Wade, briefed him about press inquiries specifically
relating to Heinz, Hunter Biden, and Burisma. Separately, State Department officials wrote that
they sent the secretary articles with the headlines, “Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas company’s
board,” “Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas producer board,” and “White House says no issue with
Biden’s son, Ukraine gas company.” 62 Accordingly, these records suggest that Kerry did, in
61F
fact, know about Hunter Biden and Burisma.
b. In May 2014, Wade, Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff, briefed him about press
inquiries relating to Heinz, Hunter Biden, and Burisma.
On May 13, 2014, State Department officials began fielding press inquiries relating to
Hunter Biden joining Burisma’s board and the extent to which Secretary Kerry’s stepson, Heinz,
was involved. That day Heinz emailed Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff about Burisma’s
announcement in an apparent attempt to distance himself from Hunter Biden’s decision. 63
Heinz wrote to Special Assistant Matt Summers and Chief of Staff Wade:
Apparently Devon [Archer] and Hunter [Biden] both joined the

board of Burisma and a press release went out today. I cant to
speak [sic] why they decided to, but there was no investment by
our firm in their company. 64
59 Amanda Golden (@amandawgolden), NBC NEWS, Twitter (Dec. 8, 2019 2:28 PM),
https://twitter.com/amandawgolden/status/1203758177726189574.
60 Id.
61 Id.
62 Emails between David Thorne and David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 13, 2014) [STATE-2019-18-0000733].
63 Christopher Heinz had business dealings with Hunter Biden and Devon Archer through their firm Rosemont Seneca.
According to Heinz’s spokesman he “strongly warned Mr. Archer that working with Burisma was unacceptable” and “[t]he lack
of judgment in this matter was a major catalyst for Mr. Heinz ending his business relationships with Mr. Archer and Mr. Biden.”
Paul Sonne, Michael Kranish, Matt Viser, The gas tycoon and the vice president’s son: The story of Hunter Biden’s foray into
Ukraine, THE WASHINGTON POST (Sept. 28, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-gas-tycoon-and-
the-vice-presidents-son-the-story-of-hunter-bidens-foray-in-ukraine/2019/09/28/1aadff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-
d943b4ed57e0_story.html.
64 Email from Chris Heinz to Matt Summers and David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 13, 2014),
https://www.scribd.com/document/433436789/CU-v-State-FOIA-Doc-Ukraine; see also Alana Goodman, John Kerry’s son cut
19
Wade testified that he did not recall receiving this email from Heinz, but he did, to the
best of his recollection, reach out to speak with Heinz the following day to “try to confirm since
we were being asked whether he, or that Rosemont Seneca was buying or investing in
Burisma.” 65 Wade testified that he spoke to Heinz on May 14, 2014, and confirmed, based only
on Heinz’s assurances, that “Rosemont Seneca was not involved” with Burisma. 66 65F
According to Wade, that same day he spoke to Secretary Kerry and “let him know that
Chris Heinz and Rosemont Seneca were not involved [with Burisma], that the media questions
[about Rosemont Seneca buying or investing in Burisma] were inaccurate, and that Chris Heinz
was not buying or investing in a Ukrainian natural gas company, but that my understanding was
that … Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, according to the stories, that that was accurate, that they
were … joining a board.” 67 Wade confirmed that Secretary Kerry learned about Hunter Biden’s
6F
association with Burisma through him:
Question: What was Secretary Kerry’s reaction to you informing him of these news
inquiries about Mr. Heinz and the additional information regarding Mr.
Archer’s [and] Mr. Hunter Biden’s connection and involvement with
Burisma?
Wade: He knew nothing about it.
Question: So he learned about this information from you?
Wade: I believe so, yeah.
Question: And when you told him that the information that you were able to confirm
with Mr. Heinz that Rosemont Seneca had … not invested or bought
Burisma, what was Mr. Kerry's reaction to that?
Wade: If I recall, his reaction was that he was comfortable answering a press
question if he got it.
....
Question: [T]hat he was comfortable answering the media question regarding what?
Wade: Regarding … Christopher Heinz or Rosemont Seneca investing in — in a

Ukrainian natural gas company or buying a Ukrainian natural gas
business ties with Hunter Biden over Ukrainian oil deal, THE WASH. EXAMINER (Aug. 27, 2019),
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/john-kerrys-son-cut-business-ties-with-hunter-biden-over-ukrainian-oil-deal.
65Transcript of Interview at 39, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of David
Wade (Aug. 3, 2020). [Hereinafter David Wade Testimony].

66 David Wade Testimony at 41.
20
company.
Question: And did you discuss with Mr. Kerry what his response to that type of
inquiry would have been?
Wade: I'm sure — I'm sure I did. I don't — I don’t … remember those details of
the conversation. 68
c. In May 2014, State Department staff sent news articles to Secretary Kerry relating
to Hunter Biden and Burisma.
David Thorne, who served as a senior adviser to Secretary Kerry, informed Wade that he
sent the following collection of press clips and articles to the secretary on May 14, 2014: 69
Thorne forwarded these clips to Wade and wrote, “I sent it to JK[.]” 70 Wade told the
Committees that “JK” stood for “John Kerry.” 71 The headlines of the articles that Thorne sent to
Kerry included, “Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas company’s board,” “Biden’s son joins
Ukrainian gas producer board,” and “White House says no issue with Biden's son, Ukraine gas
company.” 72 71F
68 David Wade Testimony at 50-51 (emphasis added).

69 Email from David Thorne, U.S. Dep’t of St., to David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 16, 2014, 20:52:30 +0000), [STATE-
2019-18-0000733].
70 Email from David Thorne, U.S. Dep’t of St., to David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 16, 2014, 20:52:30 +0000), [STATE-
2019-18-0000733].
72 Thorne’s email did not include the headlines of the articles, but it did contain links to the articles and a description of the article
including the publication date and the author’s name. Based on this information, the Committees were able to find the headlines
of the articles that Throne sent to Kerry. Emails between David Thorne, U.S. Dep’t of St., and David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St.
(May 16, 2014), [STATE-2019-18-0000733].
21
d. Conclusion
Former Secretary Kerry’s December 2019 denial of having any knowledge about Hunter
Biden or Burisma is inconsistent with the evidence uncovered by the Committees. Kerry was
briefed about Hunter Biden, Burisma and Heinz the day after Burisma announced Hunter Biden
joined its board. Additionally, Secretary Kerry’s senior advisor sent him press clips and articles
relating to Hunter Biden’s board membership. This appears to be yet another example of high-
ranking Obama administration officials blatantly ignoring Hunter Biden’s association with
Burisma.
22
VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED ZLOCHEVSKY AS A
CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS
ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION.
a. Introduction
The State Department clearly viewed Burisma and its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, as
corrupt, and did not want to have any association with either one. For example, as soon as
Deputy Chief of Mission George Kent learned of a de minimis USAID arrangement with
Burisma, and succeeded in severing that relationship. As U.S. officials pressed Ukrainian
officials to hold Zlochevsky accountable for his actions, Vice President Biden was “leading the
policy charge” of pushing anticorruption measures in Ukraine, which included confronting
oligarchs. 73 Yet as staff prepared talking points for Vice President Biden to answer questions
about whether he viewed Zlochevsky as corrupt, they suggested that he “not … get into naming
names or accusing individuals.” 74 Biden’s spokeswoman told reporters, “the vice president does
not endorse any particular company and has no involvement with this company.” 75 This stands
in stark contrast to the decision of then-Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt to call out Zlochevsky by
name as an example of corruption in a September 2015 speech. Biden’s unwillingness to
confront a man whom State officials considered to be an “odious oligarch” 76 demonstrated a lack 75 F
of leadership, but also raises a serious question about why Vice President Biden would avoid
linking Zlochevsky with corruption.
b. State Department officials viewed Zlochevsky and Burisma as corrupt.
According to testimony and documents obtained by the Committees, State Department

officials viewed Burisma and its owner, Zlochevsky, as corrupt. Insofar as the link between
Zlochevsky and corruption was not already clear to State Department officials, in early 2015
they learned that Zlochevsky likely bribed Ukrainian prosecutors to interfere in a United
Kingdom criminal proceeding against him, which was subsequently closed. (Section VII of this
report will describe this bribe and its consequences in more detail.) In short, State Department
officials’ understanding of Zlochevsky’s actions relating to the U.K. criminal case strongly
influenced their perspective of him and Burisma. Below are several examples of State
Department officials sharing their perspective of Zlochevsky and Burisma:
• “Zlochevsky was viewed as corrupt, not just in Ukraine but by the USG/FBI[.]” –
George Kent, Department of State, Sept. 2016 77
73 George Kent Testimony at 21; Victoria Nuland Testimony at 99.

74 Email from Kate Bedingfield, Off. of the Vice President, to Michael Carpenter, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Dec. 6, 2015,
6:04 PM) [STATE-2019-18-0000553-554].
75 James Risen, Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 8, 2015),
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html.
77 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Bridget Brink, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 6, 2016, 9:55:14 -0400), [STATE-
2019-18-0000345-347] (emphasis added).
23
• “[W]e have extensive concerns about corruption in Ukraine, and we believe Mr.
Zlochevsky is an example.” – Memo to then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie
Yovanovitch, Dec. 2016 78
• “Burisma's owner was a poster child for corrupt behavior[.]” – George Kent
Testimony to the Committees 79
• “I would have advised any American not to get on the board of Zlochevsky’s company.”
– George Kent Testimony to the Committees 80
• “The proliferation of Ukrainian companies clearly (and not so clearly owned/controlled

by odious oligarchs or those who outright stole assets and absconded (like
Zlochevsky) is likely a long one.” – George Kent, Department of State, Aug. 2016 81
• “Throughout 2015 and 2016, U.S. officials, particularly those at the U.S. Embassy in
K[y]iv, consistently pressed Ukrainian officials to hold Zlochevsky to account and
made clear our negative view about Burisma.” – George Kent Testimony to the
Committees 82
• “…our focus was on [Zlochevsky’s] corrupt acts as minister when he abused the office
to award national gas exploration contracts to companies that he controlled through shell
companies.” – George Kent Testimony to the Committees 83
• “[I]n the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had
seized $23 million in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people.” – Geoffrey
Pyatt, then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Sept. 2015 84
• The closing of the U.K. case against Zlochevsky was a “gross miscarriage of justice that
undermined months of U.S. assistance … [a]fter the FBI and MI5 spent months and
arguably millions working to try to put together the first possible asset recover case
(against former Minister of Ecology Zlochevsky)[.]” – George Kent, State Department,
Aug. 2016 85
78 Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Dec. 6, 2016, 00:18:23 -0500), [STATE-2019-18-
0001205] (attaching Briefing Checklist: Ambassador Yovanovitch’s Meeting with Karen Tramontano, Blue Star Strategies
[STATE-2019-18-0001206-1208]).
81 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Jeffrey Cole, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 13, 2016, 3:26 PM), [STATE-2019-
18-0000377-378] (emphasis added). When asked whether Kent considered Zlochevsky as an “odious oligarch,” he responded, “I
did.” George Kent Testimony at 104.
84 Remarks by U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt at the Odesa Financial Forum on September 24,
2015, Geoffrey Pyatt, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Remarks-by-US-

Ambassador-Geoffrey-Pyatt-at-the-Odesa-Financial-Forum-on-September-24-2015-ukraine.pdf (emphasis added).
85 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to William Taylor, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 29, 2016, 11:23 AM), [STATE-
2019-18-0000372-374] (emphasis added).
24
• “[The] U.S. and U.K. were cooperating on a case to seize [Zlochevsky’s] corrupt assets
overseas (which had passed through the U.S.).” – Geoffrey Pyatt, then-U.S. Ambassador
to Ukraine, Dec. 2015 86
• There is “a moral hazard associated with publicly associating/promoting our

assistance projects with companies/individuals seen in Ukrainian society as
corrupt/compromised.” – George Kent on whether any U.S. agency should cooperate or
associate with Burisma or Zlochevsky, Aug. 2016 87
• “[United States Government (USG)] cooperation on the project [with Burisma]

would make us look bad. Not to mention the [Members of Parliament] on the energy
committee and others would wonder how we speak about anti corruption [sic], but
work with those that were associated with corrupt practices.” – Redacted State
Department official in an email to colleagues, Sept. 2016 88
• “[There] is a clear link between the company and its primary owner. . . . From the
rumors that we hear in the energy sector, there is no sense that Burisma has changed
how it conducts its business. . . . I fall on the side of not having anything to do with
the company to avoid undermining our broader efforts to promote transparency and
[anticorruption].” – Redacted State Department official in an email to colleagues, Sept.
2016 89
c. State Department officials viewed Vice President Biden as a “warrior” and “leading
the policy charge” on anticorruption measures in Ukraine.
According to testimony, former State Department officials saw Vice President Biden as a
leading U.S. figure who pushed for anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Kent testified, “Vice
President Biden was leading the policy charge, pushing President Poroshenko and Prime
Minister Yatsenyuk to take more decisive anticorruption action.” 90 Ambassador Victoria Nuland
called Vice President Biden a “warrior” on this issue and said, “I was proud to work with Vice
President Biden on Ukraine policy and especially on trying to help the Ukrainian period [sic]
root out corruption in their country.” 91 90F
On December 9, 2015, Vice President Biden spoke in Ukraine in front of the parliament
of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, and told the members that they are facing a “test of courage”
86 Email from Geoffrey Pyatt, Ambassador to Ukraine, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Victoria Nuland, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Dec. 6,
2015, 11:13:00 -0500), [STATE-2019-18-0000325] (emphasis added).
87 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Jeffrey Cole, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 13, 2016, 3:26 PM), [STATE-2019-
18-0000377-378].
88 The project referenced in this email related to Burisma’s association with the MERP. Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St.,
to George Kent et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 1, 2016, 7:15 AM), [State-2019-18-0000505-506] (emphasis added). Kent would
later call the Burisma-MERP relationship as an “ill-advised USAID co-branding effort.” Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of
St., to Jorgan Andrew, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 22, 2016, 00:46:32 -0500), [State-2019-18-0000479].
89 Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 1, 2016, 7:46 AM), [State-2019-18-
0000505] (emphasis added).

25
and have an “obligation” to Ukrainians to reform their country to “build a united, democratic
Ukrainian nation that can stand the test of time.” 92 In doing so, Biden stated that Ukrainians
have “a historic battle against corruption.” 93 He said “[o]ligarchs and non-oligarchs must play
by the same rules.” 94 Biden called on the Rada to “[s]eize the opportunity. Build a better future
for the people of Ukraine.” 95 Biden’s speech, which pushed anticorruption measures, was,
according to Nuland, “very powerful and powerfully received by the Rada.” 96 Yet, while Vice 95F
President Biden called for members of the Rada to have courage to confront corruption in
Ukraine, the vice president’s staff was advising otherwise.
d. Vice President Biden’s staff recommended he not link Zlochevsky with corruption.
Nuland told the Committees that by confronting oligarchs, the U.S. would send an
anticorruption message. 97 Yet as Vice President Biden’s staff responded to press inquiries
relating to Burisma and Zlochevsky, one staffer wrote, “I am concerned about getting into
anything relating to Mr. Zlochevsky directly.” 98 Just a few days before the vice president gave
his December 2015 speech at the Rada pushing anticorruption measures, his staff prepared
talking points for him and included a response to the question: “Do you think Zlochevsky is
corrupt?” 99 His staff wrote:
98F
I’m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals.

We have been working consistently to push the Ukrainian
leadership to make meaningful changes in the Prosecutor General’s
office and across the government to help ensure that the Ukrainian
people are represented fairly and fully. 100
It is clear that members of Vice President Biden’s staff wanted to distance him from an
individual whom the State Department clearly believed was corrupt and an individual who
employed his son. This stands in stark contrast to then-Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, who
identified Zlochevsky by name as a corrupt actor during a September 2015 speech in Odessa,
Ukraine. But the Committees were not able to locate any public statements Vice President Biden
gave from 2014 to 2016 in which he called Zlochevsky corrupt. Instead, in December 2015,
92 Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada (Dec. 9, 2015), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-
office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada.
93 Id.
94 Id.
95 Id.
98 Email from Kendra Barkoff, Off. of the Vice President, to Michael Carpenter, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Oct. 23, 2015,
10:00 AM), [STATE-2019-18-0000339-340].

11:13 AM), [STATE-2019-18-0000553-554].

6:04 PM), [STATE-2019-18-0000553-554] (emphasis added). Ambassador Pyatt recommended changing the last sentence of
that answer to “Something like ‘… begin rooting out the cancer of corruption that has done so much over the years to hold back
economic growth and sap the confidence of Ukrainians in those who govern them.’” Email from Geoffrey Pyatt, Ambassador to
Ukraine, to Kate Bedingfield, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Dec. 6, 2015, 11:13 AM), [STATE-2019-18-0000553].
26
Biden’s spokeswoman told reporters, “the vice president does not endorse any particular
company and has no involvement with this company.” 101 10 F
e. Conclusion
In his December 2015 speech at the Rada, Vice President Biden told members to have
courage to confront corruption and change the course of history for their country. Yet when it
came to calling out an individual whom the State Department viewed as a “corrupt” and “odious
oligarch,” Vice President Biden’s staff advised him to not accuse Zlochevsky of corruption. In
December 2015, while in Ukraine, Biden did not link Zlochevsky with corruption and did not
demonstrate the same level of courageousness that he encouraged Ukrainian political leaders to
pursue.
Several witnesses highlighted efforts by certain U.S. officials to enable a successful

investigation of Zlochevsky, and also noted that the U.S. decision to condition a $1 billion loan
guarantee was made in part because of the then-Ukrainian prosecutor general’s failure to pursue
a case against Zlochevsky. But at the end of the day, between 2014 through 2017, despite the
concerted effort of many U.S. officials, not one of the three different Ukrainian prosecutor
generals held Zlochevsky accountable.
101James Risen, Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 8, 2015),
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html.
27
VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S
OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO
UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE.
On May 12, 2014, Burisma trumpeted the addition of Hunter Biden to its board of
directors, stating, “Biden will be in charge of the [Burisma] Holdings’ legal unit and will provide
support for the Company among international organizations.” 102 In that same press release,
Hunter Biden stated, “As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting
the company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international
expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of
Ukraine.” 103 The company’s release went on to say that, Hunter was “a well-known public
figure,” but the release did not mention Hunter’s connection to a more well-known public figure,
his father, the vice president of the United States. 104
When Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board in May 2014, the prosecutor general of
Ukraine was Oleh Makhnitskyi. Makhnitskyi served as the acting prosecutor general for only a
few months before resigning from the post. 105 His resignation gave way to Vitaly Yarema, who
on June 19, 2014, became the prosecutor general of Ukraine. 106
George Kent, a career diplomat who served in a number of roles at the State Department
over his career, including several tours in Ukraine, did not hold Prosecutor General Yarema or
his team in high regard. In fact, he testified, “[Yarema’s] team failed to bring a single
prosecution over a seven-month period, and which allegedly took a bribe from [Burisma’s
owner] Zlochevsky to close the case against him and collapse our effort to recover the $23
million frozen in the United Kingdom” 107
a. Allegations that Zlochevsky bribed Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Office
In January 2015, Kent arrived in Kyiv and learned that the U.S. embassy was not
communicating with the Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office (PGO). 108 Shortly after his
arrival, Kent asked a Department of Justice (DOJ) official posted at U.S. Embassy Kyiv to set up
a high-level meeting with the PGO. According to Kent, the goal of this meeting was for U.S.
officials to raise the money-laundering case against Burisma’s owner, Zlochevsky. 109 Kent
102 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12, 2014),
https://web.archive.org/web/20140606004334/http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-the-team-of-burisma-holdings/.
103 Id.
104 Id.
105 Interfax-UKRAINE, Ukrainian president dismisses Makhnitsky as acting prosecutor general
(June 18, 2014), https://web.archive.org/web/20140714162034/http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/209973.html.

106Interfax-UKRAINE, MPs agree to Yarema's appointment as prosecutor general
(June 19, 2014), https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/210045.html.

107 Nicholas Fandos, Kenneth P. Vogel, and Michael D. Shear, Senior State Dept. Ukraine Expert Says White House Sidelined
Him, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Nov. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/us/politics/impeachment-george-kent-

state.html; George Kent Testimony at 24 (emphasis added).
109 George Kent Testimony at 128-29.
28
secured a Feb. 3, 2015, 110 appointment with the First Deputy Prosecutor General, who was the
“number two prosecutor in the country at the time, Anatoliy Danylenko.” 111
Kent testified that, during the Feb. 3, 2015 meeting with the PGO, he “confronted the
First Deputy Prosecutor General, Anatoliy Danylenko, demanding to know who had paid the
bribe and how much it was. I also demanded that the case against Zlochevsky be
resumed.” 112
During testimony, Kent provided the Committees additional insight into what occurred
during the Feb. 3, 2015, meeting at the PGO:
When I asked the question [to Danylenko], ‘How much was the
[Zlochevsky] bribe and who took it?’ [Danylenko] laughed and said,
‘That’s exactly what President Poroshenko asked us last week.’ And
I [Kent] said, ‘So what did you tell the President [Poroshenko]?’ and
[Danylenko] said, ‘Seven million dollars and last May [2014],
before we came into office.’ 113
Kent apparently did not believe that Zlochevsky’s bribe occurred in May 2014. He
responded to Mr. Danylenko,
“Nice try, but the letter that someone—some prosecutor in your

office [PGO] wrote was signed in late December [2014], six
months after you all [Yarema’s team] came into office.” 114
On Feb. 10, 2015, one week after Kent’s conversation with the PGO, President Poroshenko
dismissed General Prosecutor Yarema and other members of his team. 115
b. George Kent reporting of the Zlochevsky’s bribe allegation to U.S. officials
Kent told the Committees that after the meeting with Danylenko, the DOJ official at U.S.
Embassy Kyiv reported the allegation — that Zlochevsky paid the PGO a $7 million bribe — to
the FBI. 116 At this time, the Committees are seeking an explanation from the FBI about what, if
any, actions they took after receiving this information from U.S. Embassy Kyiv.
Kent testified that it was not until sometime after the Feb. 3, 2015, meeting with the PGO
that he became aware that Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma. 117

114 Id. (emphasis added).
115 Id.
29
After Kent learned of the alleged Zlochevsky bribe, he became aware of Hunter Biden’s
connection to Burisma. Soon after, Kent spoke with Vice President Biden’s office about his
concerns. This conversation occurred sometime between Feb. 3 and Feb. 14, 2015, when Kent
ended up on a phone call with a staffer from Vice President Biden’s office. 118 He could not
recall the exact date of the phone call, 119 and when asked whether he apprised the staffer for Vice
President Biden about Zlochevsky’s alleged bribe, Kent testified, “I can’t remember — to be
perfectly honest, I don’t remember who I spoke to.” 120 Kent told the Committees he did not
memorialize this February 2015 phone call with Vice President Biden’s office. 121
Despite not recalling whether he mentioned the alleged Zlochevsky bribe to Vice
President Biden’s office, or to a member of the Obama National Security Council, over the years,
Kent did mention his knowledge of the alleged Zlochevsky bribe to high-ranking State
Department officials. For example, on Aug. 31, 2016, Kent told State Department colleagues
that “[Zlochevsky] who almost certainly paid off the PGO in December 2014 (I had the then
First deputy PG Danylenko tell me the bribe was $7 million) to have the case against him closed
and his $23 million in assets frozen in the UK unfrozen?” 122
c. Conclusion
Based on Kent’s testimony, the alleged $7 million bribe from Zlochevsky to Ukraine’s
PGO likely occurred while Hunter Biden was on Burisma’s board. Hunter Biden has stated that
his position on the board was to “consult on matters of transparency, corporate governance and
responsibility[.]” 123 The Committees requested information from the FBI about what, if any,
12F
actions it took in regard to this allegation. 124 The FBI has not yet responded to that request.
123F

119 Id.
122 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Deputy Mission Dir., U.S. Embassy Kyiv, et al., (Aug. 31, 2016, 9:55 PM),
[State-2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).

123 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12, 2014),
https://web.archive.org/web/20140606004334/http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-the-team-of-burisma-holdings/.
124 Letter from Ron Johnson, Chairman, S, Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Charles Grassley, Chairman,
S. Comm. on Fin., to Hon. Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Dep’t of Justice. (Sep. 15, 2020).
30
VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A U.S. SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON
BURISMA’S BOARD
When Vice President Biden traveled overseas on Air Force Two, he was often
accompanied by members of his family. 125 Hunter Biden joined his father on a number of trips
and, as the son of the vice president, he could enroll as a protectee and receive armed protection
from the U.S. Secret Service (USSS). In an effort to determine how much of Hunter Biden’s
scheduled travel occurred as a protectee and whether that overlapped with his private business
dealings, the Committees requested and received documents from the USSS detailing Hunter
Biden’s scheduled travel as a protectee. 126
The Committees found that Hunter Biden scheduled travel as a protectee after joining
Burisma’s board in May 2014. 127 The Committees also determined that Hunter Biden declined
USSS protection after a scheduled July 8, 2014, trip to Michigan City, Ind. 128 At this time, the
Committees have not determined why Hunter Biden declined USSS protection after July 8, 2014.
a. Hunter Biden, USSS protectee
According to USSS records, Hunter Biden enrolled as a protectee starting in January

2009, after his father was elected vice president. 129 He remained a protectee for about 4.5 years,
and records indicate an extensive amount of scheduled foreign travel as a protectee. Although
the majority of his trips were domestic, the Committees identified nearly 70 trips that Hunter
Biden scheduled to foreign countries while he was a protectee. 130 Hunter Biden, here identified
by the USSS using his full name, Robert H. Biden, scheduled foreign travel as a protectee to a
wide array of foreign cities:
Arrival Date Departure Date City/Country Protectee

6/14/2009 6/19/2009 Addis Ababa, Robert H. Biden
Ethiopia
6/20/2009 6/22/2009 Mumbai, India Robert H. Biden

9/14/2009 9/17/2009 Buenos Aires, Robert H. Biden
Argentina
125 Josh Lederman, Biden’s trip to China with son Hunter in 2013 comes under new scrutiny, NBC NEWS (Oct. 2, 2019),
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-s-trip-china-son-hunter-2013-comes-under-new-n1061051.
126 Letter from Ron Johnson, Chairman, S, Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Charles Grassley, Chairman,
S. Comm. on Fin., to Mr. James M. Murray, Director, U.S. Secret Serv., Dep’t of Homeland Sec. (Feb. 5, 2020); Letter from
Faron K. Paramore, Assistant Dir., U.S. Secret Serv., U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., to Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on
Homeland Sec. and Gov. Affairs, and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin. (Apr. 6, 2020).
127 Protectee Visits Detail Reports for Robert H. Biden, U.S. Secret Serv., Date Range: January 1, 2008 - January 31, 2017. The
U.S. Secret Service cannot confirm that the trips occurred or if protection was provided for the entirety of the trip due to the age
of the records at issue.
128 Id.
129 Id.
of the records at issue. The nearly 70 trips to foreign countries includes travel to cities within one foreign country.
31
11/9/2009 11/12/2009 Madrid, Spain Robert H. Biden
5/5/2010 5/7/2010 Brussels, Belgium Robert H. Biden
8/9/2010 8/14/2010 Copenhagen, Robert H. Biden
Denmark
8/15/2010 8/24/2010 Johannesburg, South Robert H. Biden

Africa
4/16/2011 4/20/2011 Taipei, Taiwan Robert H. Biden

5/15/2011 5/16/2011 Monterrey, Mexico Robert H. Biden
10/19/2011 10/21/2011 Hong Kong Robert H. Biden
11/1/2011 11/4/2011 Bogota, Colombia Robert H. Biden
11/10/2011 11/14/2011 Abu Dhabi, UAE Robert H. Biden
2/15/2012 2/18/2012 Moscow, Russia Robert H. Biden
3/20/2013 3/22/2013 Dublin, Ireland Robert H. Biden
7/30/2013 8/1/2013 Milan, Italy Robert H. Biden
8/1/2013 8/6/2013 Florence, Italy Robert H. Biden
10/31/2013 11/5/2013 Abu Dhabi, UAE Robert H. Biden
12/2/2013 12/4/2013 Tokyo, Japan Robert H. Biden
12/5/2013 12/6/2013 Seoul, South Korea Robert H. Biden
12/6/2013 12/9/2013 Manila, Philippines Robert H. Biden
4/3/2014 4/6/2014 Lake Como, Italy Robert H. Biden
Joe Biden has been asked about his son, Hunter, joining him on foreign trips to China
while he was vice president. 131 In response to questions about whether this arrangement was a
conflict of interest, Joe Biden has told the media, “I have never spoken to my son [Hunter] about
his overseas business dealings.” 132 The USSS records indicate Hunter Biden scheduled at least
13F
six trips to China while a protectee, including a trip to Beijing in May 2014 right before he
joined Burisma’s board:
131 Josh Lederman, Biden’s trip to China with son Hunter in 2013 comes under new scrutiny, NBC NEWS (Oct. 2, 2019),
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-s-trip-china-son-hunter-2013-comes-under-new-n1061051.
132 Id.
32
4/6/2010 4/9/2010 Beijing, China Robert H. Biden
6/13/2013 6/14/2013 Shanghai, China Robert H. Biden
During his December 2013 trip to China, during which Hunter Biden flew on Air Force Two,
Hunter Biden admitted he met with a Chinese banker. 133 According to news reports, Hunter
Biden appeared to be conducting his own private business during this specific trip and was
working to secure a deal in the hopes of creating a Chinese equity fund. 134
b. Hunter Biden, USSS protectee and Burisma board member.
According to USSS records, Hunter Biden was a protectee at the time he joined
Burisma’s board in May 2014. 135 Hunter Biden scheduled at least seven trips after he joined
Burisma’s board on May 13, 2014. 136 These trips took him to the foreign cities of Doha, Qatar,
and Paris, France, and stateside to New York, Newark, N.J., and Michigan City, Ind.: 137

5/11/2014 5/14/2014 Doha, Qatar Robert H. Biden
5/27/2014 5/28/2014 New York, NY, USA Robert H. Biden
5/28/2014 5/28/2014 Newark, NJ, USA Robert H. Biden
5/29/2014 5/30/2014 Paris, France Robert H. Biden
6/7/2014 6/10/2014 Paris, France Robert H. Biden
6/21/2014 6/27/2014 Mich. City, IN, USA Robert H. Biden
6/29/2014 7/8/2014 Mich. City, IN, USA Robert H. Biden
133 Id.
134 Id.
of the records at issue.
136 Id.
137 Id.
33
The Committees did not determine why Hunter Biden declined USSS protection
following the July 8, 2014, trip in Michigan City. But it should be noted that, the day before his
last trip as a protectee, Time published an article describing Burisma’s ramped up lobbying
efforts to U.S. officials and Hunter’s involvement in Burisma’s board. 138 The Committees
requested additional information from the USSS about the lack of records after July 8, 2014.
The USSS did not provide greater detail other than Hunter Biden declined protection.
c. Conclusion
Hunter Biden scheduled hundreds of trips while he was a protectee. He was a Burisma
board member while a protectee. Whether Hunter Biden conducted additional private business
dealings while a protectee is unknown. Further, the Committees do not know why Hunter Biden
declined USSS protection, and whether or not media scrutiny was a factor for Hunter to decline
protection in July 2014.
138 Michael Scherer, Ukranian Employer of Joe Biden’s Son Hires a D.C. Lobbyist, TIME (Jul. 7, 2014).
https://time.com/2964493/ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-burisma/.
34
IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING
FIRM HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER
UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO.
a. Introduction
Despite claims from Ranking Member Peters, Ranking Member Wyden and Democrat
leadership, the Committees reject all assertions that this investigation has been influenced by
Russian disinformation. To be crystal clear, the Committees’ work has focused only on Obama
administration records from the State Department, National Archives and Records
Administration, Department of Justice, other federal agencies, and the U.S. consulting firm Blue
Star Strategies, as well as interviews with current and former U.S. government officials. The
Committees have spoken with one foreign national about his ties to the Obama administration, a
DNC operative, and Blue Star Strategies.
In 2016, Andrii Telizhenko was an official at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington. 139
In that position, Telizhenko met several times with Obama administration officials, a consultant
for the Democratic National Committee, 140 and the Democrat lobbying firm, Blue Star Strategies
(which later employed him from 2016 to 2017). Blue Star Strategies officials continued to
contact and request his assistance as recently as the summer of 2019.
b. Communication and meetings between Obama administration officials and

Telizhenko.
As far as the Committees are aware, the majority of Telizhenko’s interactions with
Obama administration officials occurred during 2015 and 2016. The Committees possess
records of some of these communications from their request to the National Archives. 141
According to documents, on July 19, 2013, Telizhenko attended a meeting at the White
House with two other Ukrainians to meet with Lyn Debevoise. 142 At that time, Telizhenko was
the counselor to a deputy of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s Parliament. 143 It is unknown what
was discussed at this meeting.
139 The Committees attempted to obtain Telizhenko’s Blue Star Strategies documents that are subject to a non-disclosure
agreement, but Democrat obstruction shielded Blue Star Strategies from providing these relevant documents.
140 Kenneth Vogel and David Stern, Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire, Politico (Jan. 11, 2017).
141 Letter from Ron Johnson, Chairman, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Charles Grassley, Chairman,
S. Comm. on Fin., to Hon. David S. Ferriero, Archivist, Nat’l Archives and Records Admin, (Nov. 21, 2019).
142 Email from Waves Request, U.S. Secret Serv. to Marisa Donelson (Jul. 11, 2013, 1:18 PM), [000064].
143 Email from Andrii Telizhenko, Counsellor to the Deputy of Verhovna Rada, to Lyn Debevoise (Aug. 5, 2013, 8:39 AM),
[000217].
35
On July 21, 2015, Telizhenko was scheduled to meet in the Old Executive Office
Building with Michael Carpenter, 144 who was a foreign policy advisor to Vice President
Biden. 145 It is unknown what was discussed at this meeting.
c. January 2016 Ukrainian delegation visit to Obama’s White House.
Telizhenko’s interactions with Obama administration officials became more frequent

starting in January 2016. According to a document with a DOJ logo, a Ukrainian delegation that
included senior-level Ukrainian prosecutors arrived in Washington on Jan. 18, 2016. The agenda
shows that their first official meeting was confirmed for Jan. 19, 2016, at the White House, from
11 a.m. to noon with “Eric Ciaramella, Elizabeth [sic] Zentos and others TBD, National Security
Council.” 146
145F
144 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Frances Castro (Jul. 21, 2015, 10:01 AM), [000140].
145 Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy & Global Engagement, Michael Carpenter, https://global.upenn.edu/penn-biden-
center/person/michael-carpenter. Michael Carpenter served in the White House as a foreign policy advisor to Vice President Joe
Biden as well as on the National Security Council as Director for Russia.
146 Email from Eric Ciaramella, Nat’l Sec. Council, to Catherine Croft, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 19, 2016, 7:26 PM), [001753]
(attaching Agenda for Examination of the U.S. Adversarial Criminal Justice System for senior-level Ukrainian prosecutors (Jan.
18, 2016 to Jan. 23, 2016), [001755]).
36
In the middle of the night on Jan. 19, 2016, Telizhenko contacted Elisabeth Zentos, a member of
the Obama administration’s National Security Council (NSC) asking to join the NSC-Ukrainian
delegation meeting scheduled at 11 a.m. that morning. 147 It is not known if Zentos responded to
Telizhenko’s email, but she did forward Telizhenko’s request to her colleague on the NSC, Eric
Ciaramella, after the Jan. 19, 2016, meeting. 148 According to Telizhenko’s email to Zentos,
Artem Sytnyk, Nazar Kholodnickiy, and David Sakvarelidze, among others, were listed as
participants in the meeting with the NSC. 149
147 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Jan. 19, 2016, 12:22 AM), [000074].
148 Email from Elisabeth Zentos, National Security Council to Eric Ciaramella, Nat’l Sec. Council (Jan. 19, 2016, 9:42 PM),
[000074].
149 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Jan. 19, 2016, 12:22 AM), [000074].
37
Over the next two days, Jan. 20-21, 2016, the Ukrainian delegation was scheduled to
meet with a slew of U.S. officials, including representatives of the DOJ Office of the Inspector
General, the DOJ, the FBI and the Department of State. 150
At this time, the Committees have not confirmed whether all the scheduled meeting
entries on the agenda occurred. Further, despite the Committees’ efforts, no U.S. officials have
confirmed what was discussed at any of these January 2016 meetings with the senior-level
Ukrainian prosecutors. 151
d. Interactions between Obama NSC official Elisabeth Zentos and Andrii Telizhenko.
The Committees interviewed Zentos and during that interview discussed her interactions
with Telizhenko. Zentos testified that she didn’t “remember exactly when [she] first
communicated with [Telizhenko], but [she] believe[s] it was while [she] was working at the U.S.
Embassy in Kyiv, so it would have been between 2012 and 2014.” 152 Zentos was less 15F
cooperative than any other witness the Committees interviewed. She refused to provide the
150 Email from Eric Ciaramella, Nat’l Sec. Council, to Catherine Croft, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 19, 2016, 7:26 PM), [001753]
(attaching Agenda for Examination of the U.S. Adversarial Criminal Justice System for senior-level Ukrainian prosecutors (Jan.
18, 2016 to Jan. 23, 2016), [001755-001756]).
151Transcript of Interview at 174-75, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of
Elisabeth Zentos (July 20, 2020), [Hereinafter Elisabeth Zentos Testimony].

152 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony 182.
38
names of officials to whom she directly reported, nor would she name individuals who reported
to her, either at the NSC or the State Department. 153
In relation to her meetings and communications with Telizhenko, starting in January

2016, Zentos testified that she met and communicated with Telizhenko as “he was a
representative of the Ukrainian Government. Part of my job was to be in touch with the
Ukrainian Government.” 154 During the spring of 2016, records indicate, Zentos and Telizhenko
would meet at coffee shops, among other venues, around Washington, and they met at least one
time while in Ukraine. Overall, records indicate that they would meet a number of times during
the first half of 2016. For example, on Feb. 9, 2016, less than a month after the White House
meeting, Zentos and Telizhenko met at Cosi in Washington. 155 It is not known what was
discussed at this meeting. In addition, on Feb. 23, 2016, Telizhenko and Zentos emailed about
meeting. In her reply, Zentos asked, “Ok if I bring my colleague Eric, who works on Ukraine
with me?” She ended the email by asking, “[D]id you get Trump’s autograph for me?” 156 15F
153 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 34 and 38.

154 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 187.
155 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Feb. 9, 2016, 2:07 PM), [000021].
156 Emails between Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council, and Andrii Telizhenko (Feb. 23, 2016), [000058].
39
On March 1, 2016, Zentos and Telizhenko agreed over email to meet on March 3, 2016, at a
Washington bar called The Exchange. Before the planned meeting, Zentos told Telizhenko, “I’ll
see if my colleague Eric is up for joining.” When asked whether “Eric” was Ciaramella, Zentos
declined to answer. This meeting ultimately occurred on March 4, 2016, but it is unclear what
was discussed. 157 156F
Additional meetings between Zentos and Telizhenko included:
• March 4, 2016: Zentos and Telizhenko met at Swing’s coffee house in Washington. 158
Telizhenko emailed Zentos after the meeting and discussed how an individual was
seeking a meeting with Obama NSC official Charles Kupchan.
157 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Mar. 1, 2016), [000113-000114].
158 Emails between Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council, and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 4, 2016), [000018-000019].
40
• March 10, 2016: Telizhenko emailed Zentos asking to meet that afternoon for five
minutes. Based on the email, it appears they met at 5 p.m. that day at Cosi. 159 Despite
this email, Zentos testified, “I do not remember if this occurred. As you can probably see
from the email, Mr. Telizhenko likes to ask me to meet. I don’t remember if this specific
meeting happened.” 160
• April 13, 2016: Zentos and Telizhenko apparently met. 161 When asked about this
meeting, Zentos testified, “I do not recall when any specific meeting was with Mr.
Telizhenko.” 162 Zentos said this despite her own email to Telizhenko saying, “No
worries! Just got here. See you soon.” 163
• May 4, 2016: Zentos and Telizhenko apparently met. 164
• July 9, 2016: Zentos emailed Telizhenko suggesting they meet. The email suggested
that Zentos was in Ukraine at this time, and Zentos testified that she joined Secretary
Kerry’s delegation to Ukraine around this time. 165 Zentos does not recall if she met
Telizhenko while she was in Ukraine despite emails indicating she planned to see
Telizhenko and he was “downstairs in the lobby” on the next day. 166
159 Emails between Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council, and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 10, 2016), [000043-000045].
161 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Apr. 13, 2016), [000161].
163 Id.
164 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (May 4, 2016), [000109-000111].
166 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (July 9, 2016), [000275-000276].
41
e. Blue Star Strategies’ relationship with Andrii Telizhenko.
Burisma hired Blue Star Strategies, a Democrat lobbying firm, in November 2015. 167 Blue
Star was founded by Chief Executive Officer Karen Tramontano and Chief Operating Officer
Sally Painter. Both Tramontano and Painter interacted with Telizhenko when he was an official
at the Ukraine embassy, and Blue Star eventually employed Telizhenko starting in July 2016. 168
Telizhenko’s contract with Blue Star overlapped with the firm’s representation of Burisma. 169
Blue Star refused to provide Telizhenko’s documents from his time as a contractor to the
Committees, and it refused the Committees’ request to release Telizhenko from his non-
disclosure agreement.
167 Transcript of Interview at 17, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Karen
Tramontano (Aug. 28, 2020). [Hereinafter Karen Tramontano Testimony].
168 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 57.
169 Transcript of Interview at 151, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Sally
Painter (Aug. 31, 2020). [Hereinafter Sally Painter Testimony].
42
March 2016 was a pivotal month for Blue Star and its work for Burisma. In response to
calls for his termination by then-Vice President Biden, Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was
about to be removed, and Blue Star increased its outreach to, and meetings with, both U.S.
officials and Ukrainian officials. 170 On March 21, 2016, a Blue Star employee emailed State
Department official Amos Hochstein to request a meeting with CEO Tramontano, COO Painter,
and John Buretta, a private attorney, to discuss “a sensitive energy matter ahead of [Ukraine]
President Poroshenko’s upcoming visit to DC next week.” 171 170 F
The next day, on March 22, 2016, Vice President Biden called President Poroshenko
about U.S. loan guarantees. 172
As Blue Star officials waited for a response from Hochstein, they met with Ukrainian
officials. Specifically, Tramontano testified that she and Painter met with Ukrainian officials on
March 22, 2016 at the Ukraine embassy. 173 Telizhenko joined this meeting, and Tramontano
testified that Burisma was a topic of discussion:
Question: So at this point in this discussion you referenced with Mr. Telizhenko, you
had not brought up Burisma specifically?
Tramontano: Oh. No, we had — I’m sorry. To be clear, yes, we had brought up
Burisma, and my — we did not bring up, you know, specific cases that
were pending.
Question: I understand. And did you just bring up Burisma to Mr. Telizhenko, or did
this come up in your meeting with Ms. [Oksana] Shulyar?
Tramontano: It came up in our meeting [March 22, 2016] with Ms. Shulyar that
Mr. Telizhenko attended. We had the meeting to inform them of the
clients we had, including Burisma, and the meetings that we were seeking.
So, yes, it [Burisma] came up in that discussion. 174
170 Tramontano told the Committees that Blue Star Strategies engaged in “government relations assistance” for Burisma. Oddly,
Painter said the exact opposite. See, Karen Tramontano Testimony at 39; Sally Painter Testimony at 39. Moreover, when
questioned whether Blue Star Strategies engaged in “government relations assistance” in Ukraine on behalf of Burisma, Painter
implied that it did: “I mean, we were engaging with the government, yes.” Sally Painter Testimony at 40. In addition, both
Tramontano and Painter denied that they lobbied the U.S. Government on behalf of Burisma and denied that they intended to
influence U.S. policy with respect to Burisma; however, that testimony is contradicted by Amos Hochstein’s. See Karen
Tramontano Testimony at 48 (“We didn’t lobby the U.S. government.”) and 49 (“In our representation of Burisma, we did not try
to influence U.S. policy with respect to Ukraine.”) and Sally Painter Testimony at 43 (Question: “When meeting with U.S.
government officials, did you intend to influence U.S. policy towards Burisma?” Answer: “No.”) and 167 (“I do not consider
them to be lobbying. I consider that to be exploring to understand the position of the U.S. government.”) compared to Amos
Hochstein’s Testimony at 138 (“They did not like my answer, and they tried to convince me otherwise.”).
171Email from Sean Keeley, Blue Star Strategies, to Amos Hochstein, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Mar. 21, 2016), [STATE-2019-18-
0001124].
172 Press Release, The White House Off. of the Vice President, Readout of Vice President Biden’s Call with President Petro
Poroshenko of Ukraine (Mar. 22, 2016), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/03/22/readout-vice-

president-bidens-call-president-petro-poroshenko-ukraine.
174 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 124-25 (emphasis added).
43
According to documents, after their meeting at the Ukraine embassy, Tramontano replied
to Telizhenko, asking him about scheduling a meeting with the Prosecutor General for
Ukraine. 175 Her email also informed Telizhenko that Buretta, an attorney and former DOJ
official, planned to be in Ukraine for a day. 176
Additionally, the day after their meeting, Painter sent Shulyar and Telizhenko an email
with the subject line: “Many Thanks.” Painter’s March 23, 2016, email noted, “As Karen said,
please think of us as an extension of your team. We are available to be helpful in any way.” 177
Further, Painter said that Blue Star was working with “Morgan Williams on their piece of the
[Ukrainian] President’s visit and would be honored to help set up something for Mr. Lozhkin 178 17F
with Denis McDonough, the President’s Chief of Staff, or with anyone else he is interested in
meeting.” 179 Blue Star did not produce these company records to the Committees; instead, the
178F
Committees received them from Telizhenko. 180 179F
175 Karen Tramontano Testimony at Exhibit 9.

176 Id.
177 Email from Sally Painter, Blue Star Strategies, to Oksana Shulyar and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 23, 2016).
178 “Mr. Lozhkin” most likely refers to Boris Lozhkin who served as the Head of the Presidential Administration for Ukraine
from June 2014 to August 2016. See World Jewish Congress, Boris Lozhkin, https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/bio/boris-
lozhkin.
179 Email from Sally Painter, Blue Star Strategies, to Oksana Shulyar and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 23, 2016).
180 Id.
44
On March 24, 2016 — three days after Blue Star requested a meeting to “discuss a
sensitive energy matter” and two days after meeting with Telizhenko and Shulyar —Painter and
Buretta met with Hochstein at the State Department. 181 According to Painter, during this March
180F
2016 meeting with Hochstein, she provided him a summary of Blue Star’s December 2015
meeting with Ambassador Pyatt. 182 She also told the Committees that Buretta provided
18F
Hochstein a briefing on the U.K. court case. 183 Hochstein testified that he decided to meet with
182 F
Blue Star officials, “Because until that meeting I was still under the impression from the first
meeting that they were looking to conduct a report. I was – I didn’t have an issue with meeting
with them again and hearing where they were in their process.” 184 He did not recall Blue Star
183F
providing him a report but they gave him a verbal view of where they stood and they also tried to
“convince” him to change his position. 185 184F
181 Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Amos Hochstein, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Mar. 22, 2016, 10:43:00 -0400), [STATE-
2019-18-0001125].
182 Sally Painter Testimony at 116.
185 Amos Hochstein Testimony at 132-33, 138.
45
f. Blue Star takes Telizhenko’s recommendation to remove Burisma’s name to secure
a June 2016 meeting with the PGO.
While strategizing about how to secure a June 2016 meeting with Ukraine’s Prosecutor
General’s Office, Blue Star officials and Telizhenko discussed how they should craft the meeting
request to the PGO. Blue Star sought this meeting to discuss the ongoing PGO cases against
Burisma and Zlochevsky. On June 7, 2016, Telizhenko offered his advice in an email to
Tramontano:
I wanted to recommend to, in the official request letter, to take away

Mr. Zlochevsky’s company name and his name. Just request a
meeting an [sic] put just the topics you wanted to discuss, expect
[sic] Zlochevsky. I will brief you more when you come to Kiev, but
because the President [Poroshenko] does not really like Zlochevsky
(he has personal issues), Mr. Lutsenko will deny the meeting if his
name stays in the letter. You can raise the issue during the meeting,
but on the official letters I would recommend to remove it. I spoke
to the chief of staff. He is ready to meet, but please take off the name
of the company and his name. 186
On June 10, 2016, Tramontano replied to Telizhenko, saying, “Thank you for your assistance. I
hope you received the revised letter.” 187 186F
Tramontano testified that some of Telizhenko’s recommendations were adopted: 188
Question: Did Blue Star make the changes to the letter that was sent to the
Prosecutor General that Mr. Telizhenko recommended?
Tramontano: John Buretta made the changes.
Question: And what changes did Mr. Buretta make?
186 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 136-37.

188 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 139-140.
46
Tramontano: As I recall, and I believe this document is in the submission, he changed
the agenda items to take the name of the company [Burisma] off the
agenda items. 189
On June 22, 2016, Tramontano, Buretta and Burisma’s Vadym Pozharskiy met with Prosecutor
General Lutsenko. 190
g. Blue Star official communicates with Telizhenko in 2019.
Blue Star’s contract with Telizhenko ended in May 2017, yet Blue Star officials
continued to communicate with Telizhenko.
Tramontano testified that after ending the contract with Telizhenko, “we remained in
contact, I would say, you know, from time to time. When he came to Washington, he would, you
know, let us know. But I haven’t talked to him in quite some time, I would say.” 191 When asked
if this was the same for Painter, Tramontano replied, “I would think it’s the same.” 192 Further,
when Tramontano was asked whether Painter communicated more with Telizhenko, she
responded, “I don’t even know how to answer that question. I’m sorry[.]” 193 192F
When the Committees interviewed Painter, she explained how she communicated with
Telizhenko:
Question: How did you communicate with Mr. Telizhenko?
Painter: We communicated by email and on the telephone.
Question: By telephone, you mean phone calls?
Painter: Yes. 194
At that point of the interview, Painter failed to mention that she communicated via WhatsApp
with Telizhenko. 195 The Committees have obtained some images of WhatsApp messages
between Painter (white colored boxes) and Telizhenko (green colored boxes) starting in April
2019 and ending in August 2019. These texts show that Blue Star and Telizhenko maintained
consistent contact even after he left their employment and that Blue Star continued to rely on his
advice.
189 Id. (emphasis added).

192 Id.
193 Id.
195 Sally Painter failed to produce any WhatsApp communications to the Committees, and the communications were provide by
Andrii Telizhenko.
47
Messages exchanged between Sally Painter (white background) and
Andrii Telizhenko (green background) 196
196 WhatsApp messages between Sally Painter, Blue Star Strategies, and Andrii Telizhenko (on file with Comms.).
48
197 Id.
49
198 Id.
50
199 Id.
51
When the Committees presented these WhatsApp messages to Painter, she confirmed that these
messages were authentic:
Question: Did you text with Andrii Telizhenko?
Painter: I believe so, yes.
Question: Do these appear to be messages between yourself and Mr.

Telizhenko?
Painter: Yes.
Question: How often do you text with Mr. Telizhenko?
Painter: I can't quantify. I don't recall the number. 200
Painter did not provide these WhatsApp messages to the Committees despite repeated requests.
When asked whether she still possessed these messages with Telizhenko, Painter testified, “I do
not keep my WhatsApp messages.” And when questioned why she doesn’t keep the messages,
Painter said, “I like to get rid of them. It makes me know that I finished a task. So I get rid
of my texts and my WhatsApp and any of my traffic like that. I like to have a clean file.” 201 20F
When asked why she was communicating with Telizhenko in July 2019, Painter testified,
“We had a fine rapport, and he would communicate with me periodically.” 202 201F
According to these messages, on April 30, 2019, Painter told Telizhenko to “please Take
[sic] blue star off resume.” The Committees asked Painter about this message:
Question: It sounds like you're ordering him to do that [Remove Blue Star from his
resume]. No?
Painter: As I stated before — this will be the third time — Mr. Telizhenko was
working more and more with Mr. Giuliani, and we had a conversation
about whether it would hurt him with the Republicans if he had Blue Star
on his résumé. So this is not a characterization of our conversation.
Question: So is that connected to the message you sent above on April 26, 2019, that
says, “Have you seen what Solomon has written about what you said?”
Painter: I don't think the — I can't comment on that because I don't think this is an
accurate representation of the chain of events.
200 Sally Painter Testimony at 153-54 (emphasis added).

201 Sally Painter Testimony at 157 (emphasis added).
202 Sally Painter Testimony at 158 (emphasis added).
52
Question: So you’re advising Mr. Telizhenko how to better work with Rudy Giuliani
and Republicans?
Painter: Ironically, Mr. Telizhenko was asking my advice. 203
In another message, on June 18, 2019, Painter messaged Telizhenko, “Complaint filed.” The
Committees asked Painter about this message and she explained:
Question: On June 18th, 2019, you wrote “Complaint filed.” What is this reference
to?
Painter: I don't recall.
Question: You have no recollection?
Painter: I do not.
Question: Why would you have to tell Mr. Telizhenko that a complaint was filed?
Painter: I don't recall. 204
h. Conclusion
The Obama administration and the Democrat lobby shop Blue Star Strategies had
consistent and extensive contact with Andrii Telizhenko over a period of years. Yet despite
these well-documented contacts with Democratic officials, Democrats have attempted to impugn
this investigation for having received some Blue Star-related records from him. Some
Democrats have even (incorrectly) identified Telizhenko as the Committees’ “star witness.” 205
Although he produced a small number of Blue Star-related records to the Committees, the
Committees never interviewed him as part of this investigation. 206 Nonetheless, Democrats have
claimed that Telizhenko is involved in a Russian disinformation campaign. Even though almost
all of the Committees’ records are from U.S. agencies and U.S. officials or persons, Democrats
have repeatedly misconstrued the facts of this investigation. In doing so, they conveniently have
ignored their own long history of meeting with Telizhenko and his year-long work for a
Democrat lobby shop. If Democrats are concerned that Telizhenko presents any risk of
advancing disinformation, it is notable that the Ranking Members have not expressed any
curiosity about his work with the Obama administration or Blue Star Strategies.

205Ranking Member Ron Wyden, Wyden Takes to Senate Floor to Address Russian Disinformation in Flawed Congressional
Investigation, 2020 Election (Sept. 16, 2020), https://www.finance.senate.gov/wyden-takes-to-senate-floor-to-address-russian-

disinformation-in-flawed-congressional-investigation-2020-election.
206 The Committees received a small number of records from Telizhenko related to his communications with and subsequent
work for Blue Star Strategies. Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden have access to these records but have
refused to receive or review them. Had they done so, they would have observed that the State Department, National Archives,
and Blue Star Strategies (after it received a subpoena) produced most of the same records to the Committees. They also would
have noticed the emails and text messages that Blue Star failed to produce to the Committees.
53
54
X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A
RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO
INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.
a. Introduction
Since the majority began its investigation, the Ranking Members have attempted to
mischaracterize its scope in an effort to cast doubt on its eventual findings. They have done so,
in part, by spreading an unfounded conspiracy theory rooted in a foreign-sourced influence
campaign publicly identified by the Intelligence Community (IC). 207 Specifically, Democrats,
not just the Ranking Members, relied upon materials and statements from foreign nationals who
are attempting to influence U.S. politics to levy unsupported and demonstrably inaccurate
allegations linking the majority’s investigation to those same unreliable foreign nationals.
As part of their efforts, Democrats laundered their unclassified speculation through

classified analysis of intelligence reporting to fabricate a veneer of credibility in an effort to
shield their claims from public scrutiny. Those false claims were then leaked to friendly media
outlets, which reported them as fact. Together, these networks of Democratic offices and liberal
press outlets have worked to weave fact with fiction in order to construct a false narrative
designed to undercut and discredit the Chairmen’s investigation and its eventual findings. In the
process, Democrats relied upon and disseminated disinformation from foreign sources, such as
Ukrainian official Andriy Derkach, whom the IC has publicly warned are actively seeking to
influence U.S. politics. 208 Thus the Democrats, specifically the Ranking Members, have
engaged in a disinformation campaign, not Chairmen Grassley or Johnson.
b. Beginnings of the investigation, early leaks, and unequal information sharing
On Nov. 15, 2019, Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson wrote a non-public letter to
the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), seeking
Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) on individuals and entities, including Hunter Biden,
Burisma Holdings (Burisma), and others. Although most of the letters sent during the
investigation have been released to the public shortly after being transmitted, this letter was not
released at the time because of the sensitive nature of the underlying records and the need to
ensure the integrity of the investigation with respect to those records. SARs often contain
evidence of potential criminal activities, such as money laundering and fraud, and at the time,
there was no evidence that SARs existed for the individuals mentioned in the request. 209 The
letter was, however, shared with Ranking Member Peters’ office. Just one week later, on Nov.
207 See Press Release, Off. of the Dir. of Nat’l Intelligence, Statement by NCSC Director William Evanina: Election Threat
Update for the American Public (Aug. 7, 2020), https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2139-statement-

by-ncsc-director-william-evanina-election-threat-update-for-the-american-public; see also, Opening Statement of Joshua Flynn-
Brown, Deputy Chief Investigative Counsel for Chairman Grassley (Sept. 17, 2020).
208 See id.
209 See Off. of the Comptroller of the Currency, Suspicious Activity Reports (2013),
https://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/supervision-and-examination/bank-operations/financial-crime/suspicious-activity-reports/index-
suspicious-activity-reports.html.
55
22, 2019, a copy of the letter was leaked to Reuters, which published an article containing a link
to a full and unredacted copy of the letter. 210 According to the Treasury, the department’s
protocol requires stamping the document, which the leaked version did not contain.
The next major leak came in February 2020, just one day after the Committees sent a
public letter to the Secret Service requesting Hunter Biden’s travel records. 211 The Committees
had requested the travel records in order to assess claims that Hunter Biden may have used
government-sponsored travel to conduct private business. The leaks were unrelated to the Secret
Service letter but they were designed to undermine the Treasury request. For example, these
disclosures to the media included the fact that the Treasury had been producing information
responsive to the Committees’ requests as well as the approximate date when the Treasury had
begun its production to the Committees. 212 The Yahoo News article also stated, “[t]he senators’
requests to the Treasury have borne fruit, according to the ranking Democratic senator on the
Finance Committee, Ron Wyden of Oregon[.]” 213 Senator Wyden’s spokesperson was also
quoted as saying, “the Treasury Department [is] rapidly complying with Senate Republican
requests — no subpoenas necessary — and producing ‘evidence’ of questionable origin.” 214 The
Yahoo News article stated that the Department of Treasury had “complied with Republican
senators’ requests for highly sensitive and closely held financial records about Hunter Biden and
his associates[.]” 215 Further, on the same day the Yahoo News article published, Buzzfeed News
214F
reported that the Committees had begun coordinating interviews with potential witnesses. 216 215F
Contrary to the allegation that the Chairmen have not included the Ranking Members in
the Chairmen’s investigation, Ranking Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters are not a
party to the majority’s investigation. However, Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson have
included them in all document productions and interviews even though the Ranking Members
have failed to abide by the same principles of inclusion with respect to their investigations. 217
As one example, on July 1, 2020, Ranking Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters released
a COVID-19 report that included non-public government information that was not shared with
210 See Richard Cowan and Valerie Volcovici, U.S. Republican Senators ask Treasury for any Reports on Hunter Biden, REUTERS
(Nov. 22, 2019), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-biden/u-s-republican-senators-ask-treasury-for-
suspicious-activity-reports-on-hunter-biden-idUSKBN1XW254.
211 See Letter from Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and
Governmental Aff., to U.S. Secret Serv. (Feb. 5, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2020-02-

05%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20Secret%20Service%20%28Biden%20Travel%29.pdf; see also Emma Loop, Here’s What’s
Happening In Republicans’ Biden Ukraine Investigation, BUZZFEED NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmaloop/republicans-biden-ukraine-investigation; Luppe B. Luppen, Treasury
Department Sent Information on Hunter Biden to Expanding GOP Senate Inquiry, YAHOO NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),
https://news.yahoo.com/treasury-department-sent-information-on-hunter-biden-to-expanding-gop-senate-inquiry-
161846826.html.
212 See id.
213 Luppe B. Luppen, Treasury Department Sent Information on Hunter Biden to Expanding GOP Senate Inquiry, YAHOO NEWS
(Feb. 6, 2020), https://news.yahoo.com/treasury-department-sent-information-on-hunter-biden-to-expanding-gop-senate-inquiry-

161846826.html.
214 Id.
215 Id.
216 Emma Loop, Here’s What’s Happening In Republicans’ Biden Ukraine Investigation, BUZZFEED NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmaloop/republicans-biden-ukraine-investigation.
217 Email correspondences between Majority and Minority Staff (on file with Comms.).
56
Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson or their staff. 218 The Ranking Members failed to
include the Chairmen and their staff in all document production requests related to this review. 219
Moreover, Ranking Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters provided Chairmen’s staff
with a draft of this report that totaled 30 pages in length and represented that it was the final
version, to be publicly released. 220 Days later, the Ranking Members made public the “final”
report, which was 98 pages in length, not the 30 pages that was represented to the Chairmen and
their staff. 221
20F
As another example, Ranking Member Wyden conducted a year-long investigation into

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma with the House
Committee on Energy and Commerce, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the
minority on the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. On Sept. 9, 2020,
at 6:16 p.m., Ranking Member Wyden’s staff notified Chairman Grassley’s staff that the report
would be issued the following morning. 222 Ranking Member Wyden’s staff did not include
Chairman Grassley’s staff in any document productions, witness interviews, report drafts, or
communications relating to that investigation.
Further, the Ranking Members have repeatedly made public previously undisclosed and
non-public information pertaining to the majority’s investigation. On Feb. 11, May 6, and July
7, 2020, Ranking Member Wyden used the majority’s investigation to request sensitive materials
from the State Department relating to Ukraine. 223 In doing so, the May 6 and July 7 letters also
made unauthorized releases of previously non-public information, including details regarding the
number of documents produced by the State Department in response to Committees’ requests,
information which they would not have known if they were not included in the document
productions. 224 News outlets used that information to report that the administration was
responding to the Chairmen’s requests with unusual speed, which was false. 225
Moreover, staff for the Chairmen and Ranking Members had a phone call with Victoria
Nuland’s attorneys on Aug. 29, 2020. During the course of that phone call, staff for Ranking
218 See Press Release, Spec. Comm. on Aging, Casey, Peters, Wyden Release New Report Detailing Trump Administration’s
Failure to Protect Nursing Home Residents and Workers From COVID-19 (July 1, 2020), https://www.aging.senate.gov/press-
releases/casey-peters-wyden-release-new-report-detailing-trump-administrations-failure-to-protect-nursing-home-residents-and-
workers-from-covid-19-.
220 Id. (on file with Comms.).
221 See S. Rep., COVID-19 IN NURSING HOMES How the Trump Administration Failed Residents and Workers, Spec. Comm.
on Aging (July 2020), https://www.aging.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/COVID-

19%20in%20Nursing%20Homes%20Final%20Report.pdf.
223 See Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Feb. 11, 2020),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/021120%20Wyden%20Letter%20to%20Mike%20Pompeo%20RE%20Ukraine%
20Follow%20Up.pdf; Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 6, 2020),
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883366-Wyden-to-Pompeo-05-06-2020.html; Letter from Ranking Member Ron
Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (July 7, 2020),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/070720%20Wyden%20to%20Pompeo%20Third%20Ukraine%20Request.pdf.
224 See id.
225 See Luppe B. Luppen, Treasury Department Sent Information on Hunter Biden to Expanding GOP Senate Inquiry, YAHOO
NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020), https://news.yahoo.com/treasury-department-sent-information-on-hunter-biden-to-expanding-gop-senate-

inquiry-161846826.html.
57
Member Wyden attempted to disclose to Nuland’s counsel the transcribed testimony of another
witness. The Chairmen’s staff immediately interceded to stop the communication and made
clear that such a disclosure would negatively affect the integrity of the investigation. In addition,
the Ranking Members’ staff have had contact with counsel for the witnesses without the
Chairmen’s staff present; in the context of an investigation conducted by only the Chairmen and
opposed by the Ranking Members, this unilateral contact raises concerns about any
communications, purposeful or inadvertent, that might harm the integrity of the investigation.
House Democrats have also tried to involve themselves in this inquiry. On May 21,
2020, Representative Eliot Engel, who serves as Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign
Affairs, wrote to the State Department to request that the documents provided to the Senate
Committees be provided to his committee as well. 226 (Of course, Ranking Member Wyden and
Ranking Member Peters received contemporaneous productions of all records provided to the
Committees.) Citing Ranking Member Wyden, Chairman Engel did not request the materials in
connection with any investigation of his own. 227 Instead, he merely requested all records that
have been produced to the Committees. 228 His inadequately predicated request appears to be
another effort to gather information for the purpose of running political interference. Further,
Chairman Engel has subpoenaed records and, in an attempt to strong-arm Secretary Pompeo into
turning over documents, has threatened to initiate contempt proceedings against him. 229 Based
on communications with the State Department, Chairman Engel’s actions have directly interfered
with the State Department producing records to the Chairmen. On Sept. 18, 2020, the State
Department provided copies of records produced to the Committees to Chairman Engel without
providing any prior notice to the Chairmen.
c. Conspiracy theory claims
On July 13, 2020, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senator Mark Warner, Speaker
Nancy Pelosi, and Representative Adam Schiff sent a letter, with a classified attachment, to the
FBI to express a purported belief that Congress is the subject of a foreign disinformation
campaign. 230 In that letter, which was publicly released on July 20, 2020, they requested a
defensive briefing on foreign efforts to interfere in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. 231 The
classified attachment included unclassified elements that, among other things, attempted — and
failed — to tie the joint Committees’ investigation to foreign disinformation.
226 Letter from Chairman Elliot Engel, U.S. H.R. Comm. on Foreign Aff., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 21, 2020),
https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/_cache/files/5/7/577bfdef-657a-48d7-b8e9-1b91229daf5d/ 404E6B8B9F59DED
DBA792009808D9C91.5-21-2020.ele-letter-to-pompeo.pdf.
227 See id.
228 See id.
229 See Press Release, Chairman Elliot Engel, U.S. H.R. Comm. on Foreign Aff., Engel Announces Contempt Proceedings against
Pompeo (Aug. 28, 2020), https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2020/8/engel-announces-contempt-proceedings-against-pompeo.

230 Letter from Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Vice Chairman Mark Warner, S. Select Comm. on Intelligence, Speaker
Nancy Pelosi, and Chairman Adam Schiff, H. Select Comm. on Intelligence, to Fed. Bureau of Investigation (July 13, 2020),
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20200713_big_4_letter_to_fbi_director_wray_-_defensive_briefing_signed.pdf.
231 Letter from Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Vice Chairman Mark Warner, S. Select Comm. on Intelligence, Speaker
Nancy Pelosi, and Chairman Adam Schiff, H. Select Comm. on Intelligence, to Fed. Bureau of Investigation (July 13, 2020),
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20200713_big_4_letter_to_fbi_director_wray_-_defensive_briefing_signed.pdf; see
also Press Release, Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Warner Send Letter to FBI Director Requesting
Defensive Counterintelligence Briefing for All Members (July 20,2020), https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/72020-2.
58
One of those elements was an unclassified paragraph that summarized an open source
document created by Russia-aligned Ukrainian Andriy Derkach, which mentions the Chairmen
along with other Republican senators and administration officials. In that document, the
Chairmen are labeled as individuals who are fighting against Ukrainian corruption and under
their pictures is an envelope icon. The Democrats speculated that the envelope icon possibly
suggests that the Chairmen might have received information from this Ukrainian national.
Liberal media outlets picked up that reference, clearly from a leak, even though the Chairmen
had not received any information from that Ukrainian national, including any alleged tapes.
Those media outlets reported that the Chairmen had in fact received information from Derkach,
which is false. 232 Indeed, clicking on the envelope icon in the document produces a collection of
public letters the Chairmen have sent during the investigation, not any additional documents that
Derkach allegedly sent to them. Although the Democrats’ letter and attachment from July 13
targeted the Chairmen’s investigation, they were not copied on the letter and were not granted
access to the classified portion until two weeks after it was sent to FBI and one week after
portions of it were publicly reported.
On July 16, mere days before the Democrats’ July 13 letter became public, Ranking
Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden wrote to the Chairmen to request a briefing from
the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and other relevant members of the IC on matters related
to the Committees’ investigation. 233 On July 28, 2020, the Chairmen responded to the Ranking
Members and reminded them that in March 2020, the FBI and relevant members of the IC had
briefed the Committees regarding the investigation and provided assurances at that time that
there was no reason that the Committees should not continue their investigation. 234 Those
assurances were provided with knowledge of public reporting that Andrii Telizhenko provided
records to the Committees. Notably, Telizhenko had extensive and consistent contact with
Obama administration officials and a DNC consultant, and worked for the U.S.-based Democrat
firm Blue Star Strategies on matters relevant to the Committees’ investigation. As such, the only
records he provided to the Committees related to his work for Blue Star Strategies and his
interactions with Obama administration officials. Additionally, during that briefing, the agencies
made clear to the Committees’ staff that they did not have any additional information to provide
and that the relevant written products, which members have had access to for months, speak for
themselves. Subsequently, on Aug. 6, 2020, Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson received
another briefing from the FBI on behalf of the IC, in which the FBI stated that it is not
attempting to “quash, curtail, or interfere” in the investigation in any way.
232 See Natasha Bertrand, Andrew Desiderio, and Kyle Cheney, Democrats: Packets sent to Trump allies are Part of Foreign Plot
to Damage Biden, POLITICO (July 23, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/23/democrats-letters-to-trump-allies-are-
foreign-plot-to-damage-biden-380217; As the Chairmen have repeatedly said, they and their staff have not received, relied upon,
or solicited information from Derkach.
233 Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., and Ranking Member Gary Peters, S. Comm. on Homeland
Sec. and Governmental Aff., to Chairman Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec.
and Governmental Aff. (July 16, 2020),
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/200716_Letter_PetersWyden_IntelligenceBriefingRequest.pdf.
234 Letter from Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and
Governmental Aff., to Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., and Ranking Member Gary Peters, S. Comm. on
Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. (July 28, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07-28%20RHJ-
CEG%20Letter%20to%20Peters-Wyden%20%28Defensive%20Briefing%29.pdf.
59
On July 20, 2020, Politico reported on the contents of the Democrats’ July 13, 2020
letter. 235 Unnamed sources for the article alleged that the classified attachment cited the
investigation into Hunter Biden and others as “one of the sources of … concern.” 236 A
subsequent Politico article, again citing unnamed sources, reported that in 2019, Derkach
allegedly sent information to several members of Congress, including the Chairmen and Ranking
Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters. 237 The article then further suggested that these
weak parallels reinforced the “suspicions” of some Democrats that the Committees’ investigation
was ‘“laundering’ a foreign influence campaign to damage Biden.” 238 The Politico article also
suggested that Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs George
Kent and several other individuals have been the subject of Committee information requests. 239 238F
The Chairmen repeatedly rejected claims that they had any engagement with Derkach. In
August 2020, Derkach was publicly identified by the IC as a proponent of a foreign-sourced
influence campaign to influence the 2020 election. He was later sanctioned by the U.S.
Department of Treasury for the same activity. 240 Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson
239F
praised the Treasury for imposing those sanctions. 241 240F
Since the offices of Chairman Johnson and Chairman Grassley did not receive, and were
unaware of, the information that Derkach had allegedly sent, it is impossible that Derkach’s
efforts could have shaped the Committees’ investigation in any way. Furthermore, it should now
be clear that Derkach’s core claims are in no way a part of the Committees’ investigative work.
For example, according to media reports, Derkach is responsible for spreading allegations that
Burisma made direct payments to Joe Biden in the amount of $900,000, which were allegedly
funneled to Biden through his son’s consulting firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners, and marked for
“consultative services.” 242 This claim about direct payments made to Joe Biden is not evaluated
241F
in the Committees’ report of investigation, nor has it ever been cited as a predicate for any of the
Committees’ information requests. However, during the Chairmen’s staff interview of George
Kent, Ranking Member Peters’ staff inserted into the interview record the same Derkach-created
235 See Natasha Bertrand, Kyle Cheney, and Andrew Desiderio, Dem leaders demand FBI briefing on 'foreign interference
campaign' targeting lawmakers, POLITICO (July 20, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/20/democrats-fbi-briefing-
foreign-interference-campaign-373134.
236 See id.

foreign-plot-to-damage-biden-380217. As the Chairmen have repeatedly said, they and their staff have not received, relied upon,
or solicited information from Derkach.
238 See id.

foreign-plot-to-damage-biden-380217.
240 See Press Release, Off. of the Dir. of Nat’l Intelligence, Statement by NCSC Director William Evanina: Election Threat
Update for the American Public, (Aug. 7, 2020), https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2139-statement-

by-ncsc-director-william-evanina-election-threat-update-for-the-american-public; see also Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of the
Treasury, Treasury Sanctions Russia-Linked Election Interference Actors (Sept. 10, 2020),
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm1118.
241 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley, Johnson Praise Trump Admin Actions Against
Foreign Disinformation & Election Interference (Sept. 10, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-

johnson-praise-trump-admin-actions-against-foreign-disinformation.
242 Mark Moore, Giuliani claims Ukrainian company paid Joe Biden $900,000 in lobbying fees, NEW YORK POST (Oct. 10, 2019),
https://nypost.com/2019/10/10/giuliani-claims-ukrainian-company-paid-joe-biden-900000-in-lobbying-fees/.
60
document that Democrats relied on in their July 13 letter to falsely accuse the Chairmen of
relying on disinformation. 243 Kent described Derkach’s document as disinformation, but
Ranking Member Peters’ staff used it anyway. 244 Thus, the Ranking Members introduced
disinformation into the record, not the Chairmen. 245
In summary, the Democrats’ July 13, 2020, letter relied on foreign disinformation to
create a false and harmful innuendo about the Chairmen’s oversight work. That innuendo was
then wrapped in a classified attachment in an apparent effort to fabricate a veneer of credibility
and shield their analysis from public scrutiny before being disseminated to news media, which
reported their speculation as fact. Ironically, the Democrats relied on and disseminated foreign-
sourced disinformation to falsely accuse Republicans of relying on that same foreign-sourced
disinformation.
Despite its inaccuracies, the Democrats’ false narrative has continued to be picked up,
amplified and circulated by a broad network of Democrat-friendly media outlets and Democratic
members of Congress. MSNBC has reported extensively on the Derkach allegations. 246
Further, on Aug. 7, 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal published an op-ed in The Washington
Post in which he repeated many of these baseless allegations as if they were fact. 247 He wrote:
[I]t now appears that … disinformation and deception are gaining a

toehold in Congress as well: On Wednesday, The Post reported that
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee, is moving ahead with an
investigation into presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe
Biden’s family using documents provided to the senator by the son
of a former KGB officer. Johnson’s actions are of such concern to
the CIA, according to news reports, that the agency has refused to
brief him. Think of it: Congress may become a forum for debunked
conspiracy theories peddled by Kremlin proxies. There is no excuse
for perpetuating Russian disinformation in the U.S. Senate, just as
there is there is no excuse for barring the American public from
learning more about the genuine foreign threats to the November
election. 248
Senator Blumenthal’s reference to documents provided by a former KGB officer is a reference to

the debunked conspiracy theory that Derkach sent documents to the Chairmen. His reference to
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) briefing relates to false allegations spread in an Aug. 5,
2020, Politico article that suggested that the CIA has refused to cooperate with an offer to brief

246 See Steve Benen, Dems fear foreign influence campaign is using Ron Johnson probe, MSNBC (July 21, 2020),
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/dems-fear-foreign-influence-campaign-using-gop-s-ron-johnson-n1234509.
247 See Sen. Richard Blumenthal, The threat to U.S. elections is real, and frightening. The public has a right to know, THE
WASHINGTON POST (Aug. 7, 2020), https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-threat-to-us-elections-is-real-and-frightening-

the-public-has-a-right-to-know/2020/08/07/366dba0e-d8dd-11ea-930e-d88518c57dcc_story.html.
248 Id.
61
the Committees because its officers have “deep skepticism of the probe[.]” 249 In reality, the CIA
declined to provide a briefing because it considers any additional briefings to be unnecessary.
The FBI is the lead agency for the IC in matters related to foreign election interference, and the
FBI already has repeatedly briefed the Committees on behalf of the IC. As previously noted, at a
March 2020 briefing, which included the Ranking Members’ staff, the FBI informed the
Committees that there was no reason they should not continue with their investigation. On Aug.
6, 2020, the FBI reiterated the same to the Chairmen.
The Chairmen responded to Senator Blumenthal, as well as Senator Chris Van Hollen’s
false statements regarding the investigation. 250 In their response, the Chairmen reasserted that
they have not received any information from Derkach and that their focus is on government
records from the Obama administration and records from a Democrat lobby shop. The Chairmen
also noted to both senators that for years the senators peddled and pushed the now-debunked
Russian collusion narrative and used the “Steele dossier” — a Democrat bought-and-paid-for
document filled with Russian disinformation — to do so. 251 Senators Blumenthal and Van
Hollen never responded to the Chairmen.
d. Ongoing leaks
While these false narratives have developed and spread, leaks to the media have
continued. The same team of writers responsible for the above-referenced July 23, 2020,
Politico article have published several other pieces that contained leaked Committee information
related to the Ukraine investigation. On July 16, 2020, Politico published the names of
individuals who the Committees requested to interview, including David Wade, Antony Blinken,
Amos Hochstein, Victoria Nuland and Catherine Novelli. 252 The article detailed areas of interest
for the investigation and stated that subpoenas could be issued as soon as July 22, 2020. 253 None
of this information was made public by the Chairmen. Although the sources for the leaked
information contained in the article are unknown, the article states that a spokesman for
Chairman Johnson declined to comment on ongoing discussions with witnesses and Chairman
Grassley has not confirmed to the media any interviewees, whether potential or actual. 254 On
July 22, Politico published an article stating that the Committees had secured an interview with
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent. 255 The
article contained non-public scheduling details and indicated that Kent could be interviewed as
249 See Andrew Desiderio and Natasha Bertrand, CIA Steers Clear of Senate Republican Probe into Bidens, POLITICO (Aug. 5,
2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/05/cia-biden-senate-probe-391479.
250 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley, Johnson to Colleagues: Stop Spreading Foreign-
Sourced Falsehoods (Aug. 20, 2020), https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/grassley-johnson-to-colleagues-stop-

spreading-foreign-sourced-falsehoods.
251 See Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., IG Footnotes: Serious Problems with Dossier Sources
Didn’t Stop FBI’s Page Surveillance (Apr. 15, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/ig-footnotes-serious-

problems-dossier-sources-didn-t-stop-fbi-s-page-surveillance.
252 Natasha Bertrand and Andrew Desiderio, Senate Republicans Eye Subpoenas of Biden Advisers in Burisma Probe, POLITICO
(July 16, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/16/joe-biden-advisers-burisma-subpoenas-366358.

253 Id.
254 Id.
255 Natasha Bertrand, Senate Republicans Secure Impeachment Witness who Flagged Concern about Hunter Biden, POLITICO
(July 22, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/22/republicans-impeachment-witness-hunter-biden-378495.
62
early as July 24, 2020. 256
e. Preferential treatment
Throughout this investigation, the Ranking Members have tried to create the narrative
that the Chairmen have received preferential treatment from the executive branch. The Ranking
Members have asserted that the executive branch has been too quick and too thorough in its
responses to Committee information requests. 257 Ranking Member Wyden has made this
allegation repeatedly and has said they are legitimate efforts to raise awareness of a “double
standard of Trump administration cooperation with Congress.” 258 The suggested implication is
257F
that the Trump administration is working to quickly release information to the Committees
because the investigation includes Hunter Biden, the son of Joe Biden, President Trump’s
political opponent in the 2020 presidential election.
Allegations suggesting the existence of a double standard ring hollow. By no stretch has
the Trump administration responded to all of the Committees’ requests in a timely manner. The
Chairmen have dozens of outstanding requests related to the investigation, and on literally
hundreds of occasions, the Chairmen’s staff have had to remind the executive branch,
particularly the State Department, to comply with their requests. 259 Indeed, in some cases, the
Committees have received relevant records from the administration after interviewing witnesses
who could have been asked about the information. That is the absence of cooperation.
Finally, recently released emails show that in the past, Democrats have exhibited the very
type of behavior they are now accusing Republicans of engaging in. These documents show
officials in the Obama administration scrambling to produce highly sensitive documents in
response to requests made by Democrat offices on Capitol Hill during the final days of the
Obama administration and before President Trump assumed office. In one email on Jan. 13,
2017, a State Department staffer pointedly remarked, “The clock is ticking.” 260 That same day,
another urged, “Both Senators [Cardin and Warner] want the package by Thursday Jan. 19.” 261 260F
256 Id.
257 See Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 6, 2020),
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883366-Wyden-to-Pompeo-05-06-2020.html; Letter from Ranking Member Ron
Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (July 7, 2020),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/070720%20Wyden%20to%20Pompeo%20Third%20Ukraine%20Request.pdf;
Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to Fed. Bureau of Investigation (Aug. 17, 2020),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/download/081720-wyden-wray-fbi-letter; Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm.
on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of Just. (Aug. 24, 2020),
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/082420%20Wyden%20Letter%20to%20AG%20Barr%20RE%20Halkbank%20F
ollow-up.pdf.
258 See Emma Loop, Here’s What’s Happening In Republicans’ Biden Ukraine Investigation, BUZZFEED NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmaloop/republicans-biden-ukraine-investigation.
259 See Letters from Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec.
and Governmental Aff., to U.S. Dep’t of St., U.S. Dep’t of Just., Fed. Bureau of Investigation, Off. of the Dir. of Nat.
Intelligence, and Cent. Intelligence Agency (July 28, 2020) (on file with Comms.) (Each letter indicates that there is a number of
outstanding requests for records and information from each respective department.).
260 Email from Naz Durakoglu, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Kerem Bilge, Eric Green, and Maria Germano, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 13,
2017, 10:56 a.m. EST) (on file with Comms.).

261 Email from Naz Durakoglu, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Elizabeth Lawrence, Hera Abbasi, Kerem Bilge, Katherine Harris, Eric
Green, Christopher Robinson, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 18, 2017, 3:10 p.m. EST) (on file with Comms.).
63
As the deadline for President Trump’s inauguration approached, on Jan. 18, one of the same
individuals wrote, “Is it possible for me to act as the courier and drop [the information] off to the
Hill tomorrow? There is a time sensitivity to these docs.” 262 261F
f. Conclusion
Many of the allegations Democrats have made against Republicans — that they are
relying on foreign disinformation, that they are carrying out a politicized investigation in an
effort to bring down their political opponents, and that they are working covertly with the
executive branch to quickly release sensitive information for political reasons — reflect the very
patterns of behavior that Democrats themselves have engaged in, and continue to engage in, on a
regular basis.
Let us not forget how the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton
campaign paid for the Steele dossier, which was created by a foreign national, a former MI6
employee, and is based on Russian government sources. 263 Some of those Russian government
sources were part of the Russian presidential administration and supported Hillary Clinton. 264
Moreover, in January 2017 and February 2017, the FBI received reporting, some from the IC,
that assessed portions of the Steele dossier were the product of a Russian disinformation
campaign. 265 That’s no surprise, since the Russian Intelligence Services were also aware of the
dossier in early 2016 before the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane. Thus, the Steele dossier was
the perfect vehicle for disinformation to affect multiple elections and to sow discord and chaos.
Yet Democrats had no qualms about disseminating information from the dossier far and wide,
reading parts of the dossier into the congressional record, and using its allegations as the basis
for years of investigations and false claims against the Trump administration. Moreover, since
the Chairmen made public in April 2020 the fact that the Steele dossier contained Russian
disinformation, it does not appear that any Democrats have commented upon this revelation or
expressed concern about their previous reliance on Russian disinformation. Here, the Democrats
are again relying on unverified foreign disinformation to falsely accuse their political rivals of
doing the same.
Congressional oversight can and should be nonpartisan. It should be focused on exposing

wrongdoing regardless of who is involved and on ensuring transparency and accountability in
government on behalf of the American people. Efforts to discredit legitimate oversight,
especially using foreign disinformation to sow discord, only serves to benefit our foreign
adversaries at the expense of our own democratic institutions.
262 See Email from Julia Frifield, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Hera Abbasi, Anthony Wier, Rori Kramer, Lauren Gillis, Zachary Schram,
et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 5, 2017 9:52 a.m. EST) (on file with Comms.).
263 See Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., IG Footnotes: Serious Problems with Dossier Sources
Didn’t Stop FBI’s Page Surveillance (Apr. 15, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/ig-footnotes-serious-

problems-dossier-sources-didn-t-stop-fbi-s-page-surveillance.
264 See id.
265 See id.
64
XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH
UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH, AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE
CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS.
Hunter Biden was paid as much as $50,000 per month to serve on the board of Burisma, a
Ukrainian natural gas company with a corrupt owner, while his father was the public face of the
Obama administration’s Ukraine policy. 266 But Burisma was not the only example of Hunter
Biden seeking to monetize his family name. During the course of our investigation, Chairman
Grassley and Chairman Johnson uncovered additional examples of Hunter Biden, other family
members, and their business associates pursuing financial arrangements with foreign nationals in
various parts of the world.
The Treasury records acquired by the Chairmen show potential criminal activity relating
to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian,
Russian, Kazakh and Chinese nationals. In particular, these documents show that Hunter Biden
received millions of dollars from foreign sources as a result of business relationships that he built
during the period when his father was vice president of the United States and after. In addition
to providing new and descriptive details about the nature, origin and extent of payments from
Burisma Holdings to Hunter Biden, the documents acquired by the Committees also shed light
on a much broader array of questionable financial transactions involving Hunter Biden, other
members of the Biden family, and their associations with foreign nationals. These foreign
nationals have questionable backgrounds that have been identified as being consistent with a
range of criminal activities, including but not limited to organized prostitution and/or human
trafficking, money laundering, fraud, and embezzlement. 267
The following transactions are designed to illustrate the financial associations between
and among subjects in the inquiry. Much has been reported about Hunter Biden and Devon
Archer and their corporate entities and foreign and domestic financial associations. The
transactions discussed below do not illustrate the full extent of the material the Committees
possess. The transactions discussed below are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some
questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious
counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family. The
Committees will continue to analyze the records in their possession.
266 Paul Sonne, Michael Kranish, and Matt Viser, The gas tycoon and the vice president’s son: The story of Hunter Biden’s foray
into Ukraine, THE WASHINGTON POST (Sept. 28, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-gas-tycoon-

and-the-vice-presidents-son-the-story-of-hunter-bidens-foray-in-ukraine/2019/09/28/1aadff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-
d943b4ed57e0_story.html; Polina Ivanova, Maria Tsvetkova, et al., What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy
company Burisma, REUTERS (Oct. 18, 2019), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine/what-hunter-biden-did-on-
the-board-of-ukrainian-energy-company-burisma-idUSKBN1WX1P7.
267 There is extensive public reporting concerning Hunter Biden’s alleged involvement with prostitution services. Records on file
with the Committees do not directly confirm or refute these individual reports. However, they do confirm that Hunter Biden sent
thousands of dollars to individuals who have either: 1) been involved in transactions consistent with possible human trafficking;
2) an association with the adult entertainment industry; or 3) potential association with prostitution. Some recipients of those
funds are Ukrainian and Russian citizens. The records note that it is a documented fact that Hunter Biden has sent funds to non-
resident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they
have received from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine. The records also note that some of these
transactions are linked to what “appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.”
65
a. Burisma Holdings Limited
On April 15, 2014, Burisma Holdings (Burisma), a Ukrainian private oil and gas
company owned by corrupt Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, sent two wires totaling
$112,758.15 to Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC. 268 Rosemont Seneca Bohai is an apparent shell
entity owned by Hunter Biden’s long-time business associate, Devon Archer, which was first
registered in Delaware on Feb. 13, 2014. 269
According to Real Clear Politics, on the following day, April 16, 2014, Archer visited
Vice President Biden at the White House. 270 One week later, on April 22, 2014, Vice President
Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian
legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in Crimea. 271 That same day, Burisma announced
that Archer had joined its board of directors. 272 In the wake of Vice President Biden’s visit, the
press described him as “the public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” 273
The earliest payment from Burisma related to Hunter Biden appears to have been made to
Boies, Schiller, and Flexner LLP (Boies Schiller), the Washington law firm where he was
employed as a counsel in 2014. 274 On May 7, 2014, mere weeks after Vice President Biden took
lead of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy, Burisma sent Boies Schiller a payment of
$250,000. 275 Approximately one week later, on May 12, 2014, Hunter Biden joined Archer on
Burisma’s board of directors. 276 Burisma made a second payment to Boies Schiller on Sept. 16,
2014, in the amount of $33,039.77. 277 Both the May 7 and Sept. 16 payments state in the
transaction notes that they were “for Legal and Consulting Services.” 278
268 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 1 (on file with Comms.).

269 See id.
270 Betsy McCaughey, Joe Biden Must Explain His Ukraine Dealings, REAL CLEAR POLITICS (Jan. 29, 2020),
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/01/29/joe_biden_must_explain_his_ukraine_dealings_142255.html.
271 Press Release, The White House Off. of the Vice President, Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden at a Meeting with Ukrainian
Legislators (Apr. 22, 2014), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-vice-president-joe-

biden-meeting-ukrainian-legislators; see also Press Release, The White House Off. Of the Vice President, Remarks to the Press
by Vice President Joe Biden and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk (Apr. 22, 2014),
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-press-vice-president-joe-biden-and-ukrainian-prime-
minister-arse.
272 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, US Financier and Board Member Devon Archer on Maximizing Growth for Burisma
Holdings (Apr. 22, 2014), https://burisma-group.com/eng/news/us-financier-and-board-member-devon-archer-on-maximizing-

growth-for-burisma-holdings/.
273 Susan Crabtree, Joe Biden emerges as Obama’s trusty sidekick, WASHINGTON EXAMINER (Apr. 25, 2014),
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/joe-biden-emerges-as-obamas-trusty-sidekick.
274 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.); see also George Mesires, A Statement on behalf of Hunter Biden, dated
October 13, 2019, MEDIUM (Oct. 13, 2019), https://medium.com/@george.mesires/a-statement-on-behalf-of-hunter-biden-dated-

october-13-2019-d80bc11087ab.
275 Id.
276 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12,
2014), https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD984.pdf.
278 Id.
66
Payments from Burisma to Boies Schiller have been the subject of past news reporting. 279
According to Hunter Biden’s attorney, George Mesires, at Biden’s urging, Boies Schiller
performed the following services for Burisma:
[E]ngaged Nardello & Co., a leading global investigative firm, to

assess, among other things, Burisma’s corporate structure and
government practices. Burisma agreed to pay the legal expenses of
Boies Schiller to support Hunter in developing corporate reform
initiatives. 280
However, according to statements made at the time by both Hunter Biden and Burisma, these
were Hunter Biden’s responsibilities as a member of Burisma’s board of directors. In a press
release issued on May 12, 2014, Biden stated:
I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters

of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility,
international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the
economy and benefit the people of Ukraine. 281
Alan Apter, the chairman of Burisma’s board of directors, also said “[t]he company’s strategy is
aimed at the strongest concentration of professional staff and the introduction of best corporate
practices, and we’re delighted that Mr. Biden is joining us to help us achieve these goals.” 282
It is unclear whether any of the funds sent from Burisma to Boies Schiller were used to
pay for services that Hunter Biden was supposed to provide to Burisma as a member of the
board. Additionally, if Burisma was paying Boies Schiller for consulting services provided by
third-party firm Nardello & Co, as Mesires has indicated, it remains unclear why Hunter Biden
did not provide or arrange those services himself, on his own time, in exchange for the
compensation he was receiving from Burisma as a member of the board.
Between May 15, 2014 and Feb. 12, 2016, Burisma sent another 48 wires to Rosemont
Seneca Bohai, totaling $3,489,490.78. 283 Of the 48 transactions, 39 are described as “Consulting
Services” and 39 of the 48 are in the amount of $83,333.33, with the last of the payments
occurring on Feb. 12, 2016. 284 Between June 5, 2014, and Oct. 5, 2015, Rosemont Seneca Bohai
sent 38 wires totaling $701,979 to three of Hunter Biden’s bank accounts. 285 These transfers
279 See Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and
Allies, THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html.

280 George Mesires, A Statement on behalf of Hunter Biden, dated October 13, 2019, MEDIUM (Oct. 13, 2019),
https://medium.com/@george.mesires/a-statement-on-behalf-of-hunter-biden-dated-october-13-2019-d80bc11087ab.
281 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12,
2014), https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD984.pdf.
282 Id.
283 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 1 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 3 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL
DOCUMENT 4 (on file with Comms.).

284 Id.
67
may represent the final step in the flow of funds from Burisma to Rosemont Seneca Bohai to
Biden during this period.
The nature of the payment arrangement between Biden and Burisma appears to have
changed over time. In May 2016, Hunter Biden’s business partner, Archer, and five others were
arrested and criminally charged in a scheme to defraud investors and a tribal entity of millions of
dollars. 286 Starting Jan. 25, 2016, Burisma began sending regular payments for Biden to his
Washington law firm, Owasco PC (Owasco). 287 Owasco was incorporated on Jan. 19, 2006, lists
an agent address in Washington, and lists its executing officer and governor as Robert Hunter
Biden. 288
Payments from Burisma to Owasco continued throughout most of 2016 and ceased eight
days after Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the Nov. 8, 2016 presidential election. 289
Between Jan. 25, 2016, and Nov. 16, 2016, Burisma sent nine wires totaling $752,054.99 to
Owasco with each of the nine transactions listing “Owasco, PC/Robert Biden” as the recipient. 290
Of the nine, two payments were for $83,333.33, five were for $83,333 one was for $84,992.33,
and one was for $83,731. 291 The records acquired by the Committees show the last documented
payment was made on Nov. 16, 2016. 292 Biden continued to serve on Burisma’s board of
directors until April 2019. 293
In addition to being the owner of Burisma, Zlochevsky made at least two large cash
transfers to Burisma during the time that Archer and Biden served on its board of directors. 294
On April 30, 2014, around the dates when Archer and Hunter Biden first joined Burisma’s board
of directors, Zlochevsky wired $12.3 million from another one of his companies, Brociti
Investments Limited (Brociti), to Burisma. 295 Brociti is based in Kyiv, Ukraine, and is registered
in Limassol, Cyprus. 296 Zlochevsky sent another wire from Brociti to Burisma on April 20,
2015, in the amount of $212,000. 297 It’s unclear exactly how much, if any, of the funds wired by
Zlochevsky on April 30, 2014, and April 20, 2015, were used to cover the payments made from
Burisma to Rosemont Seneca, Owasco, and Boies Schiller. However, these transactions,
286 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Seven Defendants Charged In Manhattan Federal Court With Defrauding A Native
American Tribe And Investors Of Over $60 Million (May 11, 2016), https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/seven-defendants-
charged-manhattan-federal-court-defrauding-native-american-tribe-and.
288 See Owasco P.C., OpenCorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_dc/EXTUID_2684079. Owasco P.C. was
incorporated in January 2006; Eric Schwerin was a governor and executing officer, and Hunter Biden was an agent. In December
2019, both Schwerin and Hunter Biden rescinded those affiliations with Owasco. See Events for Owasco P.C., OpenCorporates,
https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_dc/EXTUID_2684079/events.
290 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 5 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).
291 Id.
293 Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and
Allies, THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html.

295 Id.
296 Lobbying registration, ML Strategies, https://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=C4C8E1E0-
861C-4F02-B73E-0FE6578BD4D8&filingTypeID=1.
68
including those to Biden and his companies, were identified for potential financial criminal
activity.
b. Russia
Hunter Biden and his associate, Archer, had a financial relationship with Russian
businesswoman Elena Baturina. Baturina is the former wife of the late Yuri Luzhkov, who was
the mayor of Moscow and was fired in 2010 by then-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev over
corruption allegations. 298 Baturina became Russia’s only female billionaire when her plastics
company, Inteko, received a series of Moscow municipal contracts while her husband was
mayor. 299 According to reporting, “Luzhkov used his position as mayor to approve over 20 real
estate projects that were built by a Baturina-owned construction company and ultimately
generated multibillion-ruble profits for his family.” 300 In addition, a Russian investigation led to
a criminal case against the former head of the Bank of Moscow, Andrey Borodin, who “allegedly
used money from the Moscow City Budget to lend money to shell companies, which ultimately
transferred $443 million to Baturina.” 301
On Feb. 14, 2014, Baturina wired $3.5 million to a Rosemont Seneca Thornton LLC
(Rosemont Seneca Thornton) bank account for a “Consultancy Agreement DD12.02.2014.” 302
Rosemont Seneca Thornton is an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden that was
incorporated on May 28, 2013 in Wilmington, Del. 303 According to The Financial Times,
Rosemont Seneca Thornton is a consortium that consists of Rosemont Seneca Partners and the
Thornton Group, a Massachusetts-based firm. 304 In June 2009, Biden co-founded Rosemont
Seneca Partners with Archer and Christopher Heinz. 305 The Thornton Group’s website states
that it has offices in Boston and Beijing, lists Rosemont Seneca Partners among its list of
alliances and clients, and includes photographs from multiple events attended by Hunter
Biden. 306
298 David Filipov, Yuri Luzhkov, transformative Moscow Mayor, dies at 83, THE WASHINGTON POST (Dec. 10, 2019),
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/yuri-luzhkov-transformative-moscow-mayor-dies-at-83/2019/12/10/158ed11c-
1b3f-11ea-8d58-5ac3600967a1_story.html; Christian Eriksson and Margot Gibbs, Russia’s richest woman quits role at London
Mayor’s charity after Finance Uncovered investigation, FINANCED UNCOVERED (Sept. 26, 2019),
https://www.financeuncovered.org/investigations/yelena-baturina-be-open-mayors-fund-for-london-sadiq-khan-corruption.
299 Id.
301 Id.
302 Id.
303 Rosemont Seneca Thornton, LLC, OpenCorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/5341255; see also Aime
Williams, Sun Yu, and Roman Olearchyk, Hunter Biden’s web of interests, FINANCIAL TIMES (Oct. 9, 2019),
https://www.ft.com/content/3904f888-e8ef-11e9-a240-3b065ef5fc55.
304 Aime Williams, Sun Yu, and Roman Olearchyk, Hunter Biden’s web of interests, FINANCIAL TIMES (Oct. 9, 2019),
https://www.ft.com/content/3904f888-e8ef-11e9-a240-3b065ef5fc55.
306 Contact, Thornton Group, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/contact.html; Alliances/Clients, Thornton Group,
http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html; Press Release, Thornton Group, Thornton Group brings Rosemont Seneca
executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry executives (Apr. 12, 2010),
http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282; Press Release, Thornton Group, Thornton Group meets with
senior financial holding executives from Taiwan (May 24, 2011),
http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=288; CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 6 (on file with Comms.).
69
Separately, between May 6, 2015 and Dec. 8, 2015, Baturina sent 11 wires in the amount
of $391,968.21 to a bank account belonging to BAK USA LLC (BAK USA). 307 Nine of the 11
transactions, totaling $241,797.14 were sent from Baturina’s accounts to a Rosemont Seneca
Thornton bank account, which then transferred to the money to BAK USA. 308 The 11
transactions all listed “Loan Agreement” in the payment details section. 309 BAK USA was a
startup technology company headquartered in Buffalo, N.Y., that produced tablet computers in
cooperation with unnamed Chinese business partners. 310 BAK USA filed for bankruptcy on
March 29, 2019, with a reported loss of $39 million. 311 These transactions were identified
because of Baturina’s reported criminal activity.
c. Kazakhstan
On April 22, 2014, Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister
Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in
Crimea. 312 The same day, Novatus Holding PTE. LTD. (Novatus Holding), a private holding
company in Singapore, used a Latvian bank to wire $142,300 to Archer’s company, Rosemont
Seneca Bohai. 313 The currency transaction report states, “For Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC, …
For a Car.” 314
According to a Securities and Exchange Commission report, Kenges Rakishev of

Kazakhstan is the sole shareholder of Novatus Holding and has a business address associated
with a company in Kazakhstan called SAT & Company. 315 Rakishev is the son-in-law of now-
retired Kazakhstan politician, Imangali Tasmagambetov. 316 At the time that Rakishev sent the
money to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, Tasmagambetov was serving as the mayor of Astana (now
called Nur-Sultan), the capital city of Kazakhstan. 317 Tasmagambetov is reportedly a longtime

308 Id.
309 Id.
310 Samantha Christmann, Microsoft contract is a boon for Buffalo tablet-maker BAK USA, BUFFALO NEWS (Mar. 16, 2016),
https://buffalonews.com/business/local/microsoft-contract-is-a-boon-for-buffalo-tablet-maker-bak-usa/article_a31de7bd-81c1-
5646-89dc-032333a9c9cd.html.
311 Local News, Former tablet maker BAK USA reports more than $39 million loss in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing, WKBW
BUFFALO (Apr. 11, 2019), https://www.wkbw.com/news/local-news/former-tablet-maker-bak-usa-has-more-than-39-million-loss.

312 Press Release, The White House Off. of the Vice President, Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden at a Meeting with Ukrainian
Legislators (Apr. 22, 2014), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-vice-president-joe-

biden-meeting-ukrainian-legislators; see also Press Release, The White House Off. Of the Vice President, Remarks to the Press
by Vice President Joe Biden and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk (Apr. 22, 2014),
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-press-vice-president-joe-biden-and-ukrainian-prime-
minister-arse.
314 Id.
315 U.S. SEC. AND EXCH. COMM’N, Schedule 13D, Net Element International, Inc.,
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1499961/000119312512418766/d422610dsc13d.htm.
316 Olzhas Auyezov, Kazakh Leader Promotes Daughter, Confident in Reshuffle, REUTERS (Sept. 13, 2016),
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kazakhstan-president-daughter/kazakh-leader-promotes-daughter-confidant-in-reshuffle-
idUSKCN11J1JR; see also Dmitry Solovyov and Mariya Gordeyeva, Kazkommertsbank finalizes deal to buy stake in BTA Bank,
REUTERS (Feb. 6, 2014), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kazkommertsbank-btabank-idUSBREA150VD20140206.
317 Joshua Kucera, Kazakhstan’s Defense Minister Fired After Six Months On Job, EURASIANET (Oct. 24, 2014),
https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstans-defense-minister-fired-after-six-months-on-job.
70
confidant of then-President Nursultan Nazarbayev. 318 Tasmagambetov has since served as prime
minister of Kazakhstan as well as Kazakh ambassador to Russia. 319
At the time of Vice President Biden’s visit to Kyiv, there were divided opinions in
Kazakhstan over Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the international situation had produced
tension in the region generally. 320 Nazarbayev’s government reportedly shifted positions over
time, and Nazarbayev reportedly made some statements supportive of Russia’s actions. 321 Given
Rakishev’s close connection to political leadership in Kazakhstan, the tense political situation,
Hunter Biden’s longstanding relationship with Archer and involvement in transactions with
Rosemont Seneca Bohai, and the fact that the payment was timed perfectly with Vice President
Biden’s visit to Kyiv to discuss U.S. sanctions against Russia for the invasion of Crimea, the
April 22, 2014 payment from Rakishev to Rosemont Seneca Bohai raises serious questions. It is
unclear why a foreign company, Novatus Holding, would purchase a $142,300 car for Rosemont
Seneca Bohai when the company does not deal in vehicles.
d. China
Hunter Biden and Devon Archer engaged in numerous financial transactions with
Chinese nationals who had deep connections to the Communist Chinese government. These
Chinese nationals included Ye Jianming, founder of CEFC China Energy Co. Ltd (CEFC) and
chairman of the board for its subsidiary, the China Energy Fund Committee (CE Fund). They
also included Gongwen Dong, who was Ye Jianming’s associate and reportedly executed
transactions for his companies. Ye’s connections to the Communist government are extensive
and, as explained below, he has been previous affiliations with the People’s Liberation Army.
Based on the information received by the Committees, Ye was also financially connected to Vice
President Biden’s brother, James Biden. Thus, there exists a vast web of corporate connections
and financial transactions between and among the Biden family and Chinese nationals.
i. Hunter Biden Has Extensive Financial Connections to the Chinese

Government.
Hunter Biden has extensive connections to Chinese businesses and Chinese foreign
nationals that are linked to the Communist government. Those contacts bore financial fruit when
his father was vice president and after he left office. For example, in June 2009, Hunter Biden
had co-founded Rosemont Seneca Partners with Archer and Heinz. 322 During 2010-2011, as a
representative of Rosemont Seneca, Hunter Biden networked with representatives from
Chinese state-owned enterprises and representatives of the Boston-based Thornton Group,
318 Olzhas Auyezov, Kazakh Leader Promotes Daughter, Confident in Reshuffle, REUTERS (Sept. 13, 2016),
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kazakhstan-president-daughter/kazakh-leader-promotes-daughter-confidant-in-reshuffle-
idUSKCN11J1JR.
319 Galiya Khassenkhanova, Kazakh President reshuffles key government positions, THE ASTANA TIMES (Dec. 19, 2019),
https://astanatimes.com/2019/12/kazakh-president-reshuffles-key-government-positions/.
320 Ryskeldi Satke, Kazakhstan Opposition Fears Ukraine’s “Russian Spring”, THE DIPLOMAT (Apr. 12, 2014),
https://thediplomat.com/2014/04/kazakhstan-opposition-fears-ukraines-russian-spring/.
321 Id.
71
which today describes itself as “a cross-border capital intermediary.” 323 On its current
website, the Thornton Group includes among its alliances and clients a variety of Chinese
state-owned enterprises, including actors linked to Ye Jianming and his associates. 324
Ye Jianming is a Chinese businessman and a frequent figure in Hunter Biden’s financial

dealings in China. Based on public reports that were available in 2015, when his contact with
Biden began to ramp up, Ye was a founder of CEFC China Energy Co. Ltd (CEFC) and served
as chairman of the board for its subsidiary, the China Energy Fund Committee (CE Fund). 325
CEFC had a reported income estimated at $33.4 billion, according to 2013 figures that were
available at the time. 326 Although CEFC reportedly remained a private company until state-
owned enterprises assumed control of it in 2018, reporting in 2017 indicated that it received
financing from the China Development Bank, “hired a number of former top officials from state-
owned energy companies” and had “layers of Communist Party committees across its
subsidiaries — more than at many private Chinese companies.” 327 Thus, it had significant
connections to the Communist government and its subsidiaries had associations with the
Thornton Group. For example, according to the Thornton Group’s website, its list of Chinese
partners currently includes:
the Agricultural Bank of China, the Bank of Beijing, the China

Council for the Promotion of International Trade, the Chinese
People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs, the CAIFC, the China
Electricity Council, CITIC Group, China Life, the China State
Construction Engineering Corporation, the China Railway
Construction Corporation, the Council for Industrial and
Commercial Development, the Chinese International Economy
Cooperation Association, the China Mining Association, the
government-owned Founder Group, the Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China Limited, and Peking University. 328
A Thornton Group press release dated April 12, 2010, provides an example of an early event
in China involving Rosemont Seneca Partners and the Thornton Group. It states the
following:
Thornton Group and its US partner Rosemont Seneca Chairman

Hunter Biden (the second son of the US Vice President Joe Biden)
and other high-level officials visited Chinese financial institutions
323 See About Us, Thornton, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html; see also Press Release, Thorton Group, Thornton
Group brings Rosemont Seneca executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry executives (Apr. 12, 2010),
http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282; Press Release, Thorton Group, Thornton Group meets with
senior financial holding executives from Taiwan (May 24, 2011),
http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=288.
324 See Alliances/Clients, Thornton, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html.
325 See J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463.
326 See id.
327 Chen Aizhu and Jan Lopatka, China’s CEFC has big ambitions, but little known about ownership, funding, REUTERS (Jan. 12,
2017), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cefc-china/chinas-cefc-has-big-ambitions-but-little-known-about-ownership-funding-
idUSKBN14X0B5; see CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).
328 Alliances/Clients, Thornton, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html.
72
and fund companies from April 7th to 9th. Including China
Investment Co., Ltd., National Council of Social Security Funds,
China Life Asset Management Co., Ltd., Postal Savings Bank of
China, Hillhouse Capital and Founder Group, etc., aiming to further
deepen mutual understanding and explore the possibility of
commercial cooperation and opportunity. The Chinese companies
and financial institutions visited expressed a warm welcome to
Thornton Group and Rosemont Seneca, and hoped to strengthen
exchanges, in-depth discussions and reach cooperation.
The delegation was led by James Bulger, Chairman of Thornton

Group, and Lin Junliang, Chief Executive Officer, to visit and meet
Chinese personnel including: Gao Xiqing, General Manager and
Chief Investment Officer of China Investment Corporation, Equity
Assets Department (Industrial Investment Department) of the
National Council of Social Security Fund person in charge Ji
Guoqiang, Vice President Cui Yong of China Life Asset
Management Co. Ltd., Peng Zuogang, General Manager of Postal
Savings Bank of China, Zhang Lei, Founder of Hillhouse Capital,
Wei Xin, Chairman of Founder Group, and Xia Yangjun, Vice
President of Founder Group. 329
Pictures from the event posted by the Thornton Group show Hunter Biden standing with
the chairman of the Founder Group, general manager of the China Investment Corporation, the
vice president of the China Life Asset Management Company, the general manager of the Postal
Savings Bank, and others. 330
In 2012, Archer and Biden reportedly spoke with Jonathan Li of the Chinese private
equity fund Bohai Capital about the possibility of forming a company, Bohai Harvest RST
(Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Co. (BHR), that would invest Chinese capital
in companies outside of China. 331 BHR was eventually formed as an investment fund and is
reportedly “controlled and funded primarily by large Chinese government-owned shareholders”
and is 80% controlled by Chinese entities. 332 That list of entities includes the government’s
postal savings bank, with which Hunter Biden had networked in 2011, its main development
bank, as well as the Bank of China. 333 Hunter Biden served on its board of directors and
329 Press Release, Thornton Group, Thornton Group brings Rosemont Seneca executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry
executives (Apr. 12, 2010), http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282. (Translation provided by
Google.).
330 See id.
332 See James T. Areddy, What We Know About Hunter Biden’s Dealings in China, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 2019),
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403.
333 See James T. Areddy, What We Know About Hunter Biden’s Dealings in China, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 2019),
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403; see also Press Release,

Thornton Group, Thornton Group brings Rosemont Seneca executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry executives (Apr. 12,
2010), http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282.
73
“joined based on his interest in seeking ways to bring Chinese capital to international
markets.” 334 He served unpaid but reportedly acquired a 10% stake in the company in 2017. 335
Prior to its creation, in December 2013 and one month after the shareholders signed contracts
relating to the creation of the company, Hunter Biden reportedly flew aboard Air Force Two with
then-Vice President Biden to Beijing. 336 While in China, Hunter Biden reportedly helped
arrange for Li to “shake hands” with Vice President Biden. 337 Afterward, Hunter Biden met with
Li for what was reportedly a “social meeting.” 338 After the China trip, BHR’s business license
was reportedly approved. 339
In September 2014, BHR had become a private equity shareholder in Sinopec

Chemical Commercial Holding Company Limited, a subsidiary of Sinopec. 340 Sinopec is
reportedly the second largest oil and gas company in China and the largest refiner of oil in
Asia. 341 In 2016, Ye announced at a board meeting that he wanted CEFC “to become a
second Sinopec … by acquiring global assets and consolidating ‘teapot’ [independent]
refineries.” 342 Hunter Biden’s position of influence and connections to Chinese business
interests, which were further strengthened while his father was vice president, most likely
appealed to Ye, a man who The New York Times has since described as “[wanting] access to
the corridors of power in Washington.” 343
BHR’s extensive connections to Chinese government intertwined its existence with the
decision-making of Communist party rulers. For example, the China Development Bank
(CDB) is one member of a consortium that controls 30% of BHR. 344 Other members of that
particular consortium are the government’s postal savings bank and the Bank of China. 345
Importantly, the CDB appears to have been connected to Ye Jianming’s CEFC. Records
acquired by the Committees note that, according to reports, after CEFC and Ye fell out of
favor with the Chinese government in 2018, “at the orders of President Xi Jinping, China
Development Bank abruptly pulled its lines of credit on offshore bonds for CEFC[.]” 346
Moreover, the former chairman of the CDB, Hu Huaibang, was accused in a 2018 court case
of helping a CEFC subsidiary to obtain billions in financing during his time at the CDB and of
334 Katie Glueck, Hunter Biden to Leave Chinese Company Board, Addressing Appearance of a Conflict, THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Oct. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/13/us/politics/hunter-biden-china.html.

335 Id.
337 Id.
338 Id.
339 Sharon LaFraniere and Michael Forsythe, What We know About Hunter Biden’s Business in China, THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Mar. 6, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/us/politics/hunter-biden-china.html.

340 Team, BHR Partners, https://web.archive.org/web/20180404080538/http://en.bhrpe.com/newsitem/276817011.
341 Chen Aizhu, China's CEFC courts 'teapots' for first domestic refinery acquisition, REUTERS (Mar. 10, 2017),
https://de.reuters.com/article/us-china-m-a-cefc-idUSKBN16H0G4.
342 Id.
343 Alexandra Stevenson, David Barboza, Matthew Goldstein, and Paul Mozur, A Chinese Tycoon Sought Power and Influence.
Washington Responded., THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 12, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/business/cefc-biden-
china-washington-ye-jianming.html.
344 James T. Areddy, What We Know About Hunter Biden’s Dealings in China, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 2019),
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403.
345 See id.
74
channeling bribes on behalf of Ye while serving in a previous position at the Bank of
Communications, another Chinese government entity. 347
Hunter Biden’s business associations in China were not limited to investment funds like
BHR and those additional connections created questionable associations with Communist
government elements. For example, in 2015, while his father was vice president, Hunter Biden
reportedly met with an aide to Ye. 348 In addition to the Communist government, Ye also had
reported connections and affiliations to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). 349 For example,
from 2003 to 2005, Ye reportedly served as deputy secretary general of the China Association
for International Friendly Contacts (CAIFC), which is the public name for the PLA General
Political Department’s International Liaison Department. 350 Additionally, in 2014, under
Ye’s leadership, CE Fund had co-organized events with the China Huayi Broadcasting
Corporation (CHBC), a company incorporated by the PLA General Political Department. 351
The CEO of CHBC, Wang Shu, was commander of the PLA General Political Department
base “[a]t the forefront of applied psychological operations and propaganda directed against
Taiwan,” which was managed by a training center that was funded by a subsidiary of
CEFC. 352 The general manager of that subsidiary, Lan Huasheng, was deputy secretary
general of Ye’s CE Fund. 353 Wang reportedly attended the 2014 CE Fund and CHBC event
along with Xu Jialu, a man who was associated with the PLA’s CAIFC as well as CE Fund
and China’s Confucius Institutes. 354 Huasheng served as executive director of CE Fund’s
China Institute of Culture Limited (CIOC), “a nationally supported organization in charge of
‘promoting Chinese culture.’” 355 Accordingly, Ye and his associates had robust relationships
with China’s military units, some of which were involved in matters in direct opposition to
U.S. policy in the region.
347 Tony Munroe, Cheng Leng, Engen Tham and Min Zhang, Ex-chairman of China Development Bank under probe by graft-
buster, REUTERS (July 31, 2019), https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-china-corruption/ex-chairman-of-china-development-bank-
under-probe-by-graft-buster-idUKKCN1UQ0M3.
Washington Responded., THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 12, 2018),

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/business/cefc-biden-china-washington-ye-jianming.html. (The name of Ye’s aide and the
exact date of the meeting have not been publically reported. The aforementioned meeting, and another meeting between Hunter
Biden and Ye that took place in May 2017, were confirmed by “people with direct knowledge of the meetings who were not
authorized to speak publicly because the meetings were private.”).
349 J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),
350 See J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463; see also International Liaison

Department [China Association for International Friendly Contacts] General Political Department, FEDERATION OF AMERICAN
SCIENTISTS (Nov. 26, 1997), https://fas.org/irp/world/china/pla/gpd_ild.htm.
352 Id.
353 Id.
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463. (According to records on file with the

Committees, it appears that Gongwen Dong, a mutual associate of Ye Jianming, James Biden, Sara Biden, and Hunter Biden,
recently contributed to the Confucius Foundation Inc. On July 29, 2019, there was a wire for $5,000 from a Golden Coast Asset
Management LLC account that is linked to both Gongwen Dong and Shan Gao to the Confucius Foundation Inc. with memo,
“Gongwen Dong.”) CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 8 (on file with Comms.).
75
It is unclear whether Hunter Biden was aware of Ye’s close relationship with the PLA
or involvement in efforts to develop and spread Chinese propaganda at the time of his 2015
meeting with Ye’s associate. However, public reporting did make those connections. 356
Hunter Biden’s connections with Ye continued into the summer of 2017, when he met
with Ye while soliciting donations for World Food Program USA in his capacity as a member of
its board of directors. 357 At the time, Ye continued to operate the CE Fund, which has since been
found to have engaged in criminal activities. 358 During their interactions in 2017, Hunter Biden
reportedly agreed to assist Ye by using his contacts to help Ye locate potential investments for
CEFC in the United States. 359 In keeping with that agreement, after meeting Ye, Hunter Biden
stated that he began working on a deal for Ye that involved a $40 million investment in a natural
gas project on Monkey Island in Louisiana that reportedly fell through the following year. 360
Around the same time that Hunter Biden began this work, Ye raised concerns with Hunter Biden
that one of his associates, Patrick Ho, was under investigation by U.S. law enforcement. 361
Hunter Biden subsequently agreed to represent Ho. 362
On Sept. 8, 2017, a $9.1 billion deal was announced whereby Ye’s company, CEFC,
would acquire a stake in the state-owned Russian energy company, Rosneft. 363 Ye’s efforts to
acquire a stake in Rosneft appear fully consistent with his vision of turning CEFC into a “second
Sinopec” with holdings across the world. 364
ii. Hunter Biden and his Family had Extensive Financial Connections to Ye
Jianming, Gongwen Dong and other Chinese Nationals.
On the same day that the impending Rosneft deal was announced, Hunter Biden and
Gongwen Dong, a Chinese national who has reportedly executed transactions for limited liability
companies controlled by Ye Jianming, applied to a bank and opened a line of credit under the
business name Hudson West III LLC (Hudson West III). 365 Hunter Biden, James Biden, and
James Biden’s wife, Sara Biden, were all authorized users of credit cards associated with the
356 See id.

357 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),
358 See Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Former Head of Organization Backed by Chinese Energy Conglomerate Sentenced to
Three Years in Prison for International Bribery and Money Laundering Offenses (Mar. 25, 2019),
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-sentenced-three-years-prison.
359 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),
360 Id.
361 Id.
362 Id.
363 Olesya Astakhova and Chen Aizhu, China invests $9.1 billion in Rosneft as Glencore, Qatar cut stakes REUTERS (Sept. 8,
2017), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-cefc-glencore/china-invests-9-1-billion-in-rosneft-as-glencore-qatar-cut-stakes-
idUSKCN1BJ1HT.
364 See Chen Aizhu, China's CEFC courts 'teapots' for first domestic refinery acquisition, REUTERS (Mar. 10, 2017),
https://de.reuters.com/article/us-china-m-a-cefc-idUSKBN16H0G4.
365 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 9 (on file with Comms.); see also Katherine Clarke, A Top Chinese Oilman Vanishes, and a
Manhattan Buying Binge Ends, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 25, 2018), https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-top-chinese-oilman-
vanishes-and-a-manhattan-buying-binge-ends-1540478781.
76
account. 366 The Bidens subsequently used the credit cards they opened to purchase $101,291.46
worth of extravagant items, including airline tickets and multiple items at Apple Inc. stores,
pharmacies, hotels and restaurants. 367 The cards were collateralized by transferring $99,000
from a Hudson West III account to a separate account, where the funds were held until the cards
were closed. 368 The transaction was identified for potential financial criminal activity. The
Committees prepared the following chart which displays transactions related to the line of credit:
Gongwen Dong (Individual) Hudson West III LLC (Investment Holding Company)
Subject Type: Purchaser/Sender City/Country: New York, NY
Accounts: One Bank Account Subject Type: Payee/Receiver
Accounts: Two Bank Accounts and Four Credit Cards
Robert Hunter Biden (Individual) On 09/08/2017 a line of credit was opened for
Subject Type: Both Purchaser and Payee $99,000.00 via an online application by Robert Hunter Biden (Individual)
Accounts: One Bank Account Subject Type: Both Purchaser and Payee
Gongwen Dong & Hunter Biden
Accounts: Two Bank Accounts and One Credit Card
05/25/2018 date of final payment of
$101,291.46
James B. Biden (Individual)
via cashiers check payable to
Role: Subject
Hudson West III & Robert H. Biden Accounts: Two Credit Cards
Sara Jones Biden (Individual)

Role: Subject
Accounts: One Credit Card
Notes: On 09/08/2017, Hunter Biden and GongWen Dong applied online to Cathay
Bank and opened a line of credit under the business name Hudson West III, LLC. The cards
were collateralized by transferring $99,000.00 from a Cathay Bank account to the Hudson
West III business account where the funds were held until the cards were closed. The
authorized users of these credit cards include Hunter Biden, James Biden and Sara Biden
and each used the cards around the world to purchase $101,291.46. worth of extravagant
items to include airline tickets, multiple purchases at Apple Stores and pharmacies, as well
as hotels and restaurants.
Hudson West III was incorporated on April 19, 2016, more than a year before the credit
cards were issued. 369 Hudson West III, which is now dissolved, changed ownership at some
unknown point. 370 After that change, ownership was divided between Hunter Biden’s law firm,
Owasco PC (50%) and Coldharbour Capital LLC (50%). 371 Although ownership in Coldharbour
Capital is equally divided between two individuals, Mervyn Yan and Tian Zhang, it has a
business address identified as the address of Gongwen Dong. 372 According to records on file
with the Committees, Hudson West III checking accounts were opened on Aug. 3, 2017, and
Sept. 6, 2017, with Yan and Robert Hunter Biden. 373 Gongwen Dong was a former signer,
which suggests that at one time he was associated with Hudson West III’s bank accounts and
finances. 374

368 Id.
369 See Hudson West III, LLC, OpenCorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/6020436.
371 Id.
372 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.); see also
Coldharbour Capital, LLC, Opencorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/4703700.

374 Id.
77
On Aug. 4, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment (US) LLC, a subsidiary of Ye
Jianming’s CEFC China Energy Company that listed Gongwen Dong as its director, sent Hunter
Biden’s law firm, Owasco, a payment for $100,000. 375 This transaction was identified for
potential criminal financial activity. 376 One of the investment entities of CEFC Infrastructure
Investment is reportedly Shanghai Huaxin Group, a Chinese state-owned enterprise “engaged in
petroleum products.” 377 That company is owned by CEFC Shanghai International Group Ltd.,
which is controlled by Shanghai Guosheng Group, another state-owned enterprise. 378 According
to reporting, CEFC Shanghai was a CEFC subsidiary linked to the aforementioned corruption
allegations involving the head of the China Development Bank. 379 These examples further
illustrate the deep financial connections between Biden, Owasco, and the Chinese government.
On Aug. 8, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $5 million to the bank account
for Hudson West III. 380 These funds may have originated from a loan issued from the account of
a company called Northern International Capital Holdings, a Hong Kong-based investment
company identified at one time as a “substantial shareholder” in CEFC International Limited
along with Ye. 381 It is unclear whether Hunter Biden was half-owner of Hudson West III at that
time. However, starting on Aug. 8, the same day the $5 million was received, and continuing
through Sept. 25, 2018, Hudson West III sent frequent payments to Owasco, Hunter Biden’s
firm. 382 These payments, which were described as consulting fees, reached $4,790,375.25 in just
over a year. 383
There are conflicting explanations for an additional $1 million sent to Hudson West III by
CEFC Limited Foundation (CEFC Limited) on Nov. 2, 2017, that appears to have been refunded
to CEFC Limited on Nov. 21, 2017 with a memo marked “refund.” 384 According to records on
file with the Committees:
[Records indicated that] ‘CEFC paid the consultation fee to HW III

for the purpose of conducting a market investigation of [a] natural
gas project; however, the project was deemed unnecessary at the
time so CEFC Limited decided to postpone the market investigation.
Therefore, HW III provided the refund to CEFC Limited’. In
another email correspondence dated 4/2/2018, Mr. Biden stated that
the incoming wire amounting to $1MM on 11/2/2017 from CEFC
Limited foundation should have gone to Owasco LLC, however, he
provided the wrong wire instructions, and due to the large amount
375 Id.
378 Id.
379 Zdravko Ljubas, China Development Bank’s Ex-Chief Suspected of Graft, ORGANIZED CRIME AND CORRUPTION REPORTING
PROJECT (Aug. 1, 2019), https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/10378-china-development-bank-s-ex-chief-suspected-of-graft.

384 Id.
78
the transactions was not corrected until 3/22/2018, which consisted
of an outgoing wire for the same amount benefiting Owasco LLC. 385
On March 22, 2018, a $1 million payment was sent from Hudson West III to Owasco with a
memo line for “Dr Patrick Ho Chi Ping Representation.” 386 In his alternative explanation,
Hunter Biden indicated that the misdirected $1 million was related to his representation of Ye’s
associate, Patrick Ho. 387 These transactions illustrate the financial connections between
Gongwen Dong’s Hudson West III, Ye Jianming’s CEFC, and Hunter Biden’s Owasco. Biden
stated that:
Boies Schiller Flexner is co-counsel for Dr. Patrick Ho’s case.

Hudson West III LLC has no involvement with Patrick Ho Chi
Ping[’]s case and won[’]t expect further transaction related to Dr.
Patrick Ho Chi Ping trail [sic] for Hudson West III LLC. Owasco
LLC and co- Counsel Boies Schiller Flexner will represent Dr.
Patrick Ho Chi Ping [at] trial. 388
During the same period, there is also evidence that Hunter Biden moved large sums of
money from his firm, Owasco, to James Biden’s consulting firm, the Lion Hall Group. 389
Between Aug. 14, 2017 and Aug. 3, 2018, Owasco sent 20 wires totaling $1,398,999 to the Lion
Hall Group, a consulting firm that lists James Biden and his wife, Sara Biden, on the bank
account. 390 This transaction was identified for potential criminal financial activity. These
transfers began less than one week after CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $5 million to
Hudson West III and Hudson West III sent its first payment of $400,000 to Owasco. 391 Most of
the payments from Owasco to the Lion Hall Group had vague notes in the memo lines, 15 of
which simply indicated that they were for further credit to James Biden; however, the memo line
for one of the payments read “HW3,” which indicates some of the transferred money could be
from Hudson West III. 392 When the bank contacted Sara Biden regarding the overall wire
activity, she stated that the Lion Hall Group and Owasco provide international and business
consulting and that the Lion Hall Group was assisting Owasco with an international client
through a contract that had since terminated. 393 Sara Biden told the bank that she would not
provide any supporting documentation, and she also refused to provide additional information to
more clearly explain the activity. 394 Consequently, the bank submitted the account for
closure. 395 The Committees created the following chart with respect to this transaction.

386 Id.
387 Id.
388 Id.
390 Id.
393 Id.
394 Id.
395 Id.
79
Owasco PC (Finance & Insurance Industry) The Lion Hall Group LLC (Consulting Organization)
City/Country: Merion Station, PA
Owner: R Hunter Biden
Role: Subject
Accounts: Two Bank Accounts Accounts: One Bank Account
(20) wires ranging from James B. Biden (Individual)

$21,000.00 to $165,000.00 totaling Role: Subject
$1,398,999.00 Accounts: One Bank Account
From 08/14/2017 – 08/03/2018
Sara Jones Biden (Individual)
Role: Subject
Accounts: One Bank Account
Notes:
-15 of the 20 transactions list, “FFC JAMES BIDEN

PAYMENT” in the Originator to Beneficiary Information
section.
Hudson West III also sent funds directly to the Lion Hall Group. According to records
on file with the Committees, James B. Biden is the principal contact for the Lion Hall Group, and
between January 2018 and October 2018, Hudson West III sent the Lion Hall Group outgoing
wires totaling $76,746.15 with the memo, “office expense and reimbursement.” 396 These
transactions illustrate a direct financial link between Hudson West III (which was connected to
CEFC, the Chinese government, and Gongwen Dong) and James Biden.
On Aug. 17, 2017, three days after the first transfer from Owasco to The Lion Hall
Group, it was publicly announced that Ye’s CEFC Energy was in talks to purchase a stake in the
Russian state-owned energy company Rosneft, which, as noted, later fell through. 397
Around the same time, there were also outgoing wires from Hudson West III to various
accounts associated with Ye and Gongwen, including CEFC Infrastructure Investment,
Coldharbour Capital (located at Gongwen Dong’s address), Gongwen’s personal bank account, a
separate bank account for Hudson West V, and Bo Jian Group Investment Company (a company
with a complex ownership structure controlled by Ye in which Gongwen Dong is also reportedly
a part owner). 398 These transactions and the transacting entities begin to paint a mosaic of the
complex corporate structure that existed between entities linked to Hunter Biden and his
associates and family and Chinese companies linked to the Communist government.
iii. Financial Transactions by these Companies Illustrate a Complex Web of

Corporate Entities, Money Transfers and Potential Criminal Financial Activity.
The Committees were able to confirm that Hunter Biden’s associate, Gongwen Dong, is
connected to seven of the eight numbered Hudson West corporate entities. The exception is

397 Kane Wu, Exclusive: China’s CEFC in early talks to buy Rosneft stake- sources, REUTERS (Aug. 17, 2017),
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-m-a-china/exclusive-chinas-cefc-in-early-talks-to-buy-rosneft-stake-sources-
idUSKCN1AX1CP.
80
Hudson West II; however, that entity shares a permanent mailing address with Hudson West V,
which has a bank account that is connected to Gongwen. Thus, it appears that Hudson West II is
most likely connected to him. The Hudson West entities are important entities in the flow of
funds among and between Ye, Gongwen, and Hunter Biden and his associates. There are
frequent fund transfers across these numbered Hudson West entities, and transactions involving
all eight have been identified for potential criminal financial activity. For example, Hudson
West III was not the only Hudson West entity associated with CEFC, Ye’s business. According
to reporting, Hudson West V maintains an ownership interest in CEFC Infrastructure Investment,
a subsidiary of CEFC. 399 By extension, this means Hudson West V is linked to Ye and the
aforementioned $5 million payment to Hudson West III on Aug. 8, 2017. 400 Hudson West V
also reportedly had ownership in a series of other companies: Hudson West Partners LLC,
Hudson West Aggregator LLC, Hudson West VIII LLC, and Hudson West VII LLC which
begins to show the complex corporate structure at play. 401
Between July 2017 and November 2018, Hudson West V received wires totaling
$20,310,396.79 with $20,893,505.07 leaving that same account. 402 All but $259,845 of the total
amount transferred out of the account went to U.S. bank accounts for various LLCs, most of
which were documented to be involved in the business of real estate investment and
management. 403 Several of those LLCs are also tied to Gongwen. 404
Twenty million dollars of the $20,310,396.79 going into the aforementioned Hudson
West V US account was transferred into that account from another Hudson West V account at
the Bank of China. 405 Between Feb. 9, 2017, and April 12, 2017, a Hudson West V Bank of
China account received three incoming wires totaling $27,917,665.45 from an entity called
Kaiyan US Fund III LP and one wire for $100,000 from a company called Foxwood Asset
Management Co. Limited. 406 Both Kaiyan US Fund III LP and Foxwood Asset Management Co
Limited have addresses in Beijing. 407 On March 19, 2018, Kaiyan US Fund III LP also sent one
wire for $50,551.79 directly to a different account for Hudson West V, which is included in the
aforementioned $20,310,396.79 total of incoming wires for that account. 408
These transactions offer a window into a much larger web of transactions carried out
among a vast network of corporate entities, many with complex ownership structures, variously
owned and operated by Gongwen Dong, Ye Jianming, an individual named Shan Gao, and other
individuals associated with CEFC China energy, Chinese state-owned enterprises, and unknown
399 Id.
400 See id.
401 Id. Records indicate that the ownership structures of Gongwen Dong’s companies are extraordinarily complex, and
sometimes unknown, and that many of his corporate entities have shifted over time. The same is true of Ye Jianming’s corporate
entities. The complexities illustrate the challenges in fully knowing the depth and extent of potential criminal activity.
403 See CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); see also CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.);
CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 13 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 14 (on file with Comms.).
404 Id.
407 Id.
81
individuals based primarily in China. 409 Little is known about Shan Gao, other than the fact that
banks found her, through complex ownership structures, to be the owner of multiple entities
involved in the transactions. 410 For multiple entities involved in these transactions, banks were
not able to determine ownership at all. 411
As an example of the size and scope of the networks involving Gongwen, between Oct.
23, 2017, and Dec. 20, 2018, Hudson West I, for which Gongwen is also listed as an account
signer, received incoming wires totaling over $114 million and sent outgoing wires totaling over
$113 million. 412 Between Jan. 25, 2018, and Dec. 28, 2018, Hudson West Aggregator, another
LLC associated with Gongwen that was involved in three transactions with Hudson West V,
received incoming transfers totaling more than $3 million and sent outgoing transfers totaling
more than $13 million. 413 Records examining these transactions by Gongwen and his associates
explained:
We opt to include wires, which appear to be conducted for

investment purposes, as we believe that fund movement is
ultimately conducted in an effort to layer funds. Conclusion:
Unusual movement of funds between various entities with a
complex ownership structures, at times involving funds originating
from Chinese [state-owned enterprises] SOE, Chinese based entities
registered with [a] high-risk tax heaven country, and [politically
exposed persons] PEPs. It is to note that fund movement appears to
be an effort to introduce foreign funds from unknown sources into
in [sic] the U.S. by investing in large projects and by purchasing
luxury goods and properties. Total [] filing amounts to
$902,200,297. 414
Certain transactions involving Hudson West III, CEFC Infrastructure, and Hudson West V were
among those identified as potential efforts to layer funds. 415
410Id. According to records on file with the Committees, Shan Gao is a resident of New York State whose permanent/mailing
address matches the address of Gongwen Dong. CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 8 (on file with Comms.).
413 Id. (In addition to the aforementioned numbered Hudson West entities and Hudson West Aggregator, Hudson West Partners
LLC is another Hudson West entity with a bank account that is connected to Gongwen Dong.).
82
iv. Chinese Nationals Linked with Hunter Biden Faced Criminal Probes.
In November 2017, Ye Jianming’s associate and Hunter Biden’s reported client, Patrick
Ho, was arrested and charged with violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, international
money laundering, and conspiracy to commit both. 416 The first call that he reportedly made was
to James Biden, who reportedly referred him to Hunter Biden. 417 Ho was convicted in March
2019 on charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and violations of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and was sentenced to three years in U.S. prison for his role in a multimillion-dollar
scheme to bribe officials in Chad and Uganda in exchange for business advantages for CEFC,
Ye’s company. 418 Department of Justice documents describe Ye as Patrick Ho’s boss and, again,
note that Ye’s company supplied funding to the China Energy Fund Committee. 419 Ho worked
as the secretary-general of the committee during the period when he was carrying out his illegal
schemes. 420
In February 2018, it was reported that Ye was also under investigation in China for
“suspected economic crimes.” 421 Ye was subsequently detained, and to date, there have been no
reports of his release.
Shortly thereafter, on May 4, 2018, there were reports that the deal for CEFC to purchase
a stake in Rosneft had fallen through. 422 The credit cards used by the Bidens for the $100,000
spending spree were closed the same month, and the last payments for the account were made on
May 25, 2018. 423 It is not clear who made the fund transfer payments that were used to cover the
charges. 424
After Ye was detained by the Chinese government in February 2018, there were reports
that Shanghai Guosheng Group, a Chinese agency reportedly controlled by Shanghai’s municipal
government, had taken over management and daily operations at CEFC. 425 Additionally, in
416 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Head of Organization Backed By Chinese Energy Conglomerate And Former Foreign
Minister of Senegal, Charged with Bribing High-Level African Officials (Nov. 20, 2017), https://www.justice.gov/usao-
sdny/pr/head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-and-former-foreign-minister.
Washington Responded., THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 12, 2018),

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/business/cefc-biden-china-washington-ye-jianming.html.
418 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Patrick Ho, Former Head Of Organization Backed By Chinese Energy Conglomerate,
Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison For International Bribery And Money Laundering Offenses (Mar. 25, 2019),
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/patrick-ho-former-head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-sentenced-3.
419 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Former Head of Organization Backed by Chinese Energy Conglomerate Sentenced to
Three Years in Prison for International Bribery and Money Laundering Offenses (Mar. 25, 2019),
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-sentenced-three-years-prison.
420 Id.
421 Benjamin Kang Lim, China’s CEFC chairman investigated for suspected economic crimes: source, REUTERS (Feb. 28, 2018),
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cefc-probe-idUSKCN1GD3O9.
422 Javier Blas and Elena Mazneva, Qatar Steps In to Buy Rosneft Stake After China Deal Collapses, BLOOMBERG (May 5, 2018),
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-04/china-s-cefc-won-t-buy-rosneft-shares-from-glencore-led-group.
424 Id. (The funds used to collateralize the account were returned in the form of a check payable to Hudson West III and Robert
H. Biden and deposited back into the same account from which they were initially withdrawn.).
425 Josephine Mason and Aizhu Chen, China’s CEFC taken over by Shanghai government agency: SCMP report, REUTERS (Mar.
2, 2018), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cefc-probe/chinas-cefc-taken-over-by-shanghai-government-agency-scmp-
report-idUSKCN1GE0X3.
83
March 2018, it was announced that the Chinese state-owned enterprise Citic Group was
negotiating to take a stake of up to 49 percent in CEFC’s European unit. 426 Again, Citic is listed
among the Chinese partners and alliances of the Thornton group. 427 Following these Chinese
government takeovers, the payments from Hudson West III to Owasco appear to have continued
through September 2018. 428
e. Conclusion
The records acquired by the Committees show that Hunter Biden and his family were
involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign
governments across the globe. Hunter Biden and Archer, in particular, formed significant and
consistent financial relationships with the corrupt oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky during their time
working for Burisma and their firms made millions of dollars from that association while Joe
Biden was vice president and the public face of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy.
Rosemont Seneca Thornton, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, received $3.5
million in a wire transfer from Elena Baturina, who allegedly received illegal construction
contracts from her husband, the former mayor of Moscow. Moreover, Archer’s apparent receipt
of money for a car from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan while Vice President Biden was in
Kyiv is especially concerning in light of the timing. And finally, Biden and Archer’s work with
Chinese nationals connected to the Communist regime illustrate the deep financial connections
that accelerated while his father was vice president and continued after he left office.
Biden and Archer found willing partners in Chinese nationals connected to the
Communist regime. Their work in China began at least in 2009, with the creation of Rosemont
Seneca Partners with Heinz, Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson. Then, several years later,
Biden and Archer formed BHR with Bohai Capital and received their business license approval
in China shortly after Biden visited China with his father, Vice President Biden.
Hunter Biden’s connections and financial associations appear to have accelerated

significantly after he associated himself with Ye Jianming, who had deep connections with the
Communist regime and PLA. However, that didn’t seem to have any impact on Hunter Biden,
who made millions from the relationship. Indeed, Hunter Biden and his family, to include James
and Sara Biden, associated with other Chinese nationals such as Gongwen Dong. In one case,
the three of them went on a $100,000 global spending spree after Gongwen Dong and Hunter
Biden opened a joint account. In addition, Hunter Biden received millions of dollars over a
period of years from Gongwen Dong’s companies. According to records acquired by the
Committees, many of these transactions involved potential criminal financial activity.
The records acquired by the Committees show consistent, significant and extensive
financial connections among and between Hunter Biden, James Biden, Sara Biden, Devon
Archer, and Chinese nationals connected to the Communist regime and PLA as well as other
foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds. These connections and the vast amount of
426 Chen Aizu, CITIC Group in talks for up to 49 percent stake in CEFC unit, REUTERS (Mar. 20, 2018),
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cefc-citic-group/citic-group-in-talks-for-up-to-49-percent-stake-in-cefc-unit-
idUSKBN1GW0I8.
427 Alliances/Clients, Thornton Group, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html.
84
money transferred among and between them don’t just raise conflicts of interest concerns, they
raise criminal financial, counterintelligence and extortion concerns. The Committees will
continue to evaluate the evidence in their possession.
85
XII. CONCLUSION.
As the Chairmen’s report details, Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board negatively
impacted the efforts of dedicated career-service individuals who were fighting to push for
anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Because the vice president’s son had a direct link to a
corrupt company and its owner, State Department officials were required to maintain situational
awareness of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Unfortunately, U.S. officials had no
other choice but to endure the “awkward[ness]” of continuing to push an anticorruption agenda
in Ukraine while the vice president’s son sat on the board of a Ukrainian company with a corrupt
owner. As George Kent testified, he “would have advised any American not to get on the board
of Zlochevsky’s company.” 429 Yet, even though Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board
428 F
cast a shadow over the work of those advancing anticorruption reforms in Ukraine, the
Committees are only aware of two individuals who raised concerns to their superiors. Despite
the efforts of these individuals, their concerns appear to have fallen on deaf ears.
Former Secretary Kerry’s December 2019 denial of having any knowledge about Hunter
Biden or Burisma is inconsistent with the evidence uncovered by the Committees. Kerry was
briefed about Hunter Biden, Burisma and Christopher Heinz the day after Burisma announced
Hunter Biden joined its board. Additionally, Secretary Kerry’s senior advisor sent him press
clips and articles relating to Hunter Biden’s board membership. This appears to be yet another
example of high-ranking Obama administration officials blatantly ignoring Hunter Biden’s
association with Burisma.
Several witnesses highlighted efforts to enable a successful investigation of Zlochevsky,

and also noted that the U.S. decision to condition a $1 billion loan guarantee was made in part
because of the then-Ukrainian prosecutor general’s failure to pursue a case against Zlochevsky.
But at the end of the day, between 2014 through 2017, despite the concerted effort of many U.S.
officials, not one of the three different Ukrainian prosecutor generals held Zlochevsky
accountable.
The Obama administration and the Democrat lobby shop Blue Star Strategies had
consistent and extensive contact with Andrii Telizhenko over a period of years. Yet despite
these well-documented contacts with Democratic officials, Democrats have attempted to impugn
this investigation for having received some Blue Star-related records from Telizhenko. Some
Democrats have even (incorrectly) identified Telizhenko as the Committees’ “star witness.” 430
Although he produced a small number of Blue Star-related records to the Committees, the
Committees never interviewed him as part of this investigation. 431

430Ranking Member Ron Wyden, Wyden Takes to Senate Floor to Address Russian Disinformation in Flawed Congressional
Investigation, 2020 Election (Sept. 16, 2020), https://www.finance.senate.gov/wyden-takes-to-senate-floor-to-address-russian-
disinformation-in-flawed-congressional-investigation-2020-election.
431 The Committees received a small number of records from Telizhenko related to his communications with and subsequent
work for Blue Star Strategies. Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden have access to these records but have
refused to receive or review them. Had they done so, they would have observed that the State Department, National Archives,
and Blue Star Strategies (after it received a subpoena) produced most of the same records to the Committees. They also would
have noticed the emails and text messages that Blue Star failed to produce to the Committees.
86
Even though almost all of the Committees’ records are from U.S. agencies and U.S.
officials or persons, Democrats have repeatedly misconstrued the facts of this investigation and
have smeared it as a Russian disinformation campaign. In doing so, they conveniently have
ignored their own long history of meeting with Telizhenko and his yearlong work for a Democrat
lobby shop. If Democrats are concerned that Telizhenko presents any risk of advancing
disinformation, it is notable that the Ranking Members have not expressed any curiosity about
his work with the Obama administration or Blue Star Strategies.
The records acquired by the Committees also show that Hunter Biden and his family
were involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign
governments across the globe. Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, in particular, formed significant
and consistent financial relationships with the corrupt oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky during their
time working for Burisma, and their firms made millions of dollars from that association while
Joe Biden was vice president and the public face of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy.
Rosemont Seneca Thornton, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, received $3.5
million in a wire transfer from Elena Baturina, who allegedly received illegal construction
contracts from her husband, the then-mayor of Moscow. Moreover, Archer’s apparent receipt of
money for a car from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan while Vice President Biden was in Kyiv is
especially concerning in light of the timing. And finally, Biden and Archer’s work with Chinese
nationals connected to the Communist regime illustrate the deep financial connections that
accelerated while Joe Biden was vice president and continued after he left office.
The Chairmen’s investigation has faced many obstacles from the minority and from
executive agencies that have failed to comply with document requests. Accordingly, there
remains much work to be done.
87

Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact On U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact On U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact On U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of the investigation?

What is the purpose of the investigation?

What were the significant events involving the Bidens in Ukraine in 2014?

What were the significant events involving the Bidens in Ukraine in 2014?

Hunter Biden, Burisma,

U.S. Senate Committee on Finance

III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO

VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED MYKOLA ZLOCHEVSKY AS A

VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S

VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S

IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING FIRM

X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A

XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH

https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/; Peter Schweizer, The

 Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma’s board (supposedly consulting on corporate

 Andrii Telizhenko, the Democrats’ personification of Russian disinformation, met with

In 2019, newly released documents, made public as a result of Freedom of Information

https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/; Peter Schweizer, The

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign; Joseph Simonson,

Documents on Hunter Biden and Burisma (Nov. 7, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/johnson-

of St. employees (Mar. 2, 2016) (on file with Comms.).

(Nov. 4, 2019), https://johnsolomonreports.com/hunter-bidens-ukraine-gas-firm-pressed-obama-administration-to-end-

THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html; Oleg Sukhov,

THE NEW YORK TIMES(May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html; Glen Kessler,

Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 6, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-

13 S. Res. 70, 116th Cong. at 30 (2018), https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres70/BILLS-116sres70ats.pdf.

Other federal regulations require only the “consideration” of an appearance of a conflict

FAM 4123.2-2; 3 FAM 4125.

Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board continued to be an issue State Department

George Kent (July 24, 2020). [Hereinafter George Kent Testimony].

Nuland (Sept. 3, 2020). [Hereinafter Victoria Nuland Testimony].

c. Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma continued to be an “awkward” conflict of

Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma appeared in numerous State Department

For me it’s preparing everybody for “what about-ism,” because

So there was no time, as I’ve testified, that the U.S. government,

[W]ould we want an article on the front page of the Washington

29, 2016, 11:23 AM) [STATE-2019-18-0000365-368] (emphasis added).

2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).

2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).

being made aware of the situation, Kent’s concerns remained unaddressed.

47 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 98.

Hochstein Testimony (Sept. 17, 2020). [Hereinafter Amos Hochstein Testimony].

56 Id. at 50 (emphasis added).

fact, know about Hunter Biden and Burisma.

Apparently Devon [Archer] and Hunter [Biden] both joined the

https://www.scribd.com/document/433436789/CU-v-State-FOIA-Doc-Ukraine; see also Alana Goodman, John Kerry’s son cut

association with Burisma through him:

Wade: He knew nothing about it.

Question: So he learned about this information from you?

Wade: I believe so, yeah.

Wade: Regarding … Christopher Heinz or Rosemont Seneca investing in — in a

Wade (Aug. 3, 2020). [Hereinafter David Wade Testimony].

68 David Wade Testimony at 50-51 (emphasis added).

b. State Department officials viewed Zlochevsky and Burisma as corrupt.

According to testimony and documents obtained by the Committees, State Department

73 George Kent Testimony at 21; Victoria Nuland Testimony at 99.

2019-18-0000345-347] (emphasis added).

• “The proliferation of Ukrainian companies clearly (and not so clearly owned/controlled