Essentialism As A Philosophy and As A PH PDF
Essentialism As A Philosophy and As A PH PDF
Essentialism As A Philosophy and As A PH PDF
Critical Analysis on
ED501 – Philosophy of Education
ESSENTIALISM:
As a Philosophy and as a Philosophy of
Education
Presented By:
Presented To:
Essentialism as a Philosophy
Essentialism as a Philosophy values the “essence” of each object. Essence can be defined as the
attribute, or set of attributes that make an object what it fundamentally is, and must have. This
essence describes a permanent, unalterable and eternal object. Without its essence, an object
For the idealists, the abstract property of the object is its essence.
For the realists, the essence of the object is the object per se. This essence categorized
these objects.
For the existentialists, the essence of the human nature is eternal, and unchangeable.
It is backed by the belief that there are certain basic skills, arts and science that are essential.
These set skills and knowledge are essential in the PAST and are likely essential as well in the
FUTURE.
The main proponent of essentialism was William Bagley, a professor of education at Columbia
University’s Teachers College. This idea of Bagley, emerged during the 30’s, as the state of
Bagley identified the cause of this problem was the emergence of progressivism, which he
described as “essentialy enfeebling”. Likewise, this idea again resurfaced during 1950’s such as
Bestor to criticize a new educational theory called “life edjustment” which focuses on personal and
Mastery of the subjects requires diligence and effort in the part of the learner.
SOCIETAL – The goal of the education is to produce students that can be responsible
enough to participate effectively in the society. For the essentialist, it agrees that the school
is an essential social institution BUT, it does not agree that societal changes should be
initiated by the school. However, the school should prepare the students to solve the
societal problems by providing literacy and skills from a “socially aware” teacher.
complex subjects. The essentialists focus on basic subjects which start from the basic,
CULTURAL – To preserve and transmit the essentials of the common culture, and develop
Patrimony.
Perennialism and Essentialism are much more interrelated to each other, since it both agrees that
schools should develop the students’ rational and moral powers (Salandanan, 2012). They mutually
believe that strategies should be teacher-centered, and does not allow students’ interest to dictate
teaching. With this, we can conclude that both of them are traditional, both in the What and Why’s
of teaching. The only difference, is that Perennialist focuses more on teaching the “Classics” and
more philosophical in nature, as compared to the Essentialist who gives stress on basic skills and
Existentialistm and Progresivism is far more different to each other. For progressivist, teachers
should not focus on teaching universal truths or a particular body of knowledge but must educate
the learners based on their interest (Salandanan, 2012). Thus, we can conclude that, on a
progressivist point of view, it is the learner who determines his/her own pace of learning, and is the
focus of the curriculum, while essentialism centers on the mastery of skills, regardless of the
interest of the learners. Teachers were viewed by the progressivist as facilitators of learning, and
the information should come from an actual experimentation (learning by doing). This contradicts
the idea of the essentialist which views the teacher as an expert of his/her field, who is the source
of knowledge by the students. Nonetheless, both philosophies accentuates that the goal of the
education is to produce citizens that can responsibly, and actively participate in the society, which
is, for the progressivist, is a democratic one, and for the essentialist, a disciplined one.
From its definition and terms, essentialism is indeed a very teacher-centered one. It stresses that
teachers should be the source of knowledge and that students are just passive receivers of
information (Ondego, ). Students are forced to learn a body of knowledge and are expected
to meet up with the standards set by the teacher. Furthermore, essentialism gives importance on
traditional basic subjects, minimizing contemporary and creative subjects. This poses a threat that
students trained under an essentialist point of view will lack creativity, since the learners were never
given a chance to express themselves. Learners, also tend to lack adaptability in a fast changing
On the positive side, essentialism brings stability in education (Ondego, ), since it focuses
on a conservative and consistent subject areas which are already stable. Moreover, since
essentialism focus on basic instruction, it gives the learner a stable and strong foundations of
knowledge needed in a more complex subject. This idea helped the curriculum developers to
structure the subject matter in a generative manner, starting from the basic education during the
primary years, it gradually improved to complex subject. Furthermore, essentialism does not
stressed only in basic skills and knowledge, but most importantly, Character, Discipline and
Nationalism. Education under the essentialist point-of-view would yield into disciplined and
responsible individuals who upholds the rule of law, and has a deep sense of nationalism in their
Gutek, G. L. (1990). Philosophical and Ideological Perspectives on Education. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Salandanan G. G., et. al (2012). The Teaching Profession. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing.
https://www.academia.edu/7740986/EDUCATION_AND_ESSENTIALISM_by_JOSEPH_OND