Intervensi Terapi Pada Sepsis PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 28

Monitoring Therapeutic Interventions

in Critically Ill Septic Patients


Prof. Dr. H. Soegeng Soegijanto, dr., SpA(K), DTM&H
Introduction
In recent decades, the reported incidence of sepsis has increased
dramatically.
The management of patients with sepsis is based largely on treating
or eliminating the source of infection, the use of appropriate antimicrobial
agents, and hemodynamic and other physiologic supportive measures.
Nutrition support plays an important role in the management of
patients with sepsis.
Monitoring the progress and response to treatment is an integral
component of the management of critically ill septic patients.

1
1. What is Critically ill septic patients ?

Sepsis is characterized by the excessive


production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a
marked increase in the release of norepinephrine
and epinephrine and glucagon and growth hormone.
The metabolic response to sepsis includes a
dramatic increase in the basal metabolic rate,
occurrence of stress hyperglycemia, and proteolysis.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Figure. 56.10 Cutaneous Changes in Meningococcal Infection

12
Figure. 56.11 Cutaneous Changes in Toxic

13
14
15
2. What kind of response to therapeutic
should be recognized ?
a). Hemodynamic response to therapy
White cell count are commonly used to monitor a
patient’s progress.
b). The use of global and regional markers of
tissue dysoxia as therapeutic end points in the
management of patients with sepsis
c). The use of specific biochemical market or “a
sepsis test” that reflects illness severity and the
response to treatment has attracted much attention.
16
Global Indices of Tissue Dysoxia

a). Blood lactate concentration.

b). Unchanged lactate/pyruvate ratio (L/P).

C). Mixed venous oxygen suturation (SmvO2).

17
Tissue Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring

1. Gastrointestinal dysoxia an “early warning of impending


trouble”.

2. Gastric tonometry and sublingual capnography are based on


the principle that tissue CO2 levels rise sharply in
conditions associated with poor tissue perfusion.

18
Gastric Tonometry
Gastric intramucosal hypercarbia has been
demonstrated to be a marker of gastric mucosal dysoxia an a
reliable predictor of morbidity and mortality in critically ill
patients.

Sublingual Capnometry

Sublingual PCO2 (PslCO2) that was closely related to


decreases in arterial pressure and cardiac index during
circulatory shock produced by hemorrhage and sepsis.
PslCO2 correlated well with microvascular perfusion
and that in was more responsive to therapy than the gastric
intramucosal pCO2.
19
Cytochrome aa3 Redox State and
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

NIR spectrophotometry has been used to detect


tissue dysoxia in skeletal muscle, the brain, and
the liver.

20
Biomarkers of Sepsis

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin

CRP is an acute-phase protein relesed by the liver after the onset


of inflammation or tissue damage.
CRP has both pro and anti-inflammatory effects. CRP plasma
concentrations >50 ml/L have been reported to discriminate the
inflammatory response to infection from other types of inflammation.

21
PCT ( pro-calcitonin )

PCT demonstrates a closer correlation with the dynamically


changing clinical course of infection that does CRP.
PCT rises up to 20 hours earlier than CRP, and whereas PCT level
normalizes as the patients improves, the CRP level may remain
elevated for several days, even when the infection has resolved.

22
Severity of Illness Scoring Systems

Severity of Illness Scoring Systems are frequently


used to monitor the progress of individual patients.

However, these scoring systems were not specifically


designed for this purpose, and their ability to track individual
patients or groups of patients over time has not been tested.

23
Table 1
Comparison of the multipurpose severity of illness scoring systems used to
evaluate critically ill patients
APACE II APACHE III SAPS MPM

Total number of variables 14 19 17 15

Number of physiological variables 12 17 12 3

Age Yes Yes Yes Yes

Chronic helath variables Yes Yes Yes Yes

Disease-specific coefficients Yes Yes Yes Yes

RankingÌ 1 2 3 4

ÌBy number of citations (122).


ÌAPACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SAPS,
Simplified Acute physiology Score; MPM, Mortality Probability Model.
24
Organ Failure Scores

The score that has been collected from data of the


sequential dysfunction and failure of several organ
systems.

25
3. What is Multiorgan dysfunction syndrome
(MODS) ?

MODS of the critically ill is caused by


inadequate oxygen delivery, often exacerbated by
microcirculatory changes and increased tissue
metabolic demands.

26
Table 2
The SOFA scoring system

SOFA Score 1 2 3 4
Respiration <400 <300 <200 <100
PaO2/FIO2 mm Hg With respitaroty With respiratory
support support
Coagulation <150 <100 <50 <25
Platelets x 103/mm3
Liver
Bilirubin mg/dl 1.2 – 1.9 2.0 – 5.9 6.0 – 11.9 >12
Cardiovascular Map <70 mm Hg Dopamine ≤5 or Dopamine >5 or Dopamine >15 or
Hypotension doburamine in any dose epinephrine ≤ 0.1 or norepinephrine >0.1 or
norepinephrine ≤0.1 norepinephrine >0.1
Central nervous system 13 – 14 10 – 12 6–9 <6
Glasgow Coma Scale
Score
Renal 1.2 – 1.9 2.0 – 3.4 3.5 – 4.9 >5.0
Creatinine mg/dl or Or <500 ml/day <200 ml/day
urine output

27
Conclusion

A number of different tools should be used for


prognostication and monitoring their response to
treatment.
This should be include indices of tissue dysoxia,
“septic biomarkers”, and quantitative measures of organ
function.

28

You might also like