People vs. Lol-Lo, G.R. No. L-17958
People vs. Lol-Lo, G.R. No. L-17958
People vs. Lol-Lo, G.R. No. L-17958
Lol-lo
G.R. No. L-17958
27 February 1922.
Facts:
● 2 boats left Matuta, a Dutch possession, for Peta, another Dutch possession. In
one of the boats was one individual, a Dutch subject, and in the other boat eleven
men, women, and children, likewise subjects of Holland.
● The second boat arrived between the Islands of Buang and Bukid in the Dutch
East Indies. There the boat was surrounded by six vintas manned by twenty-four
Moros all armed. The Moros first asked for food, but once on the Dutch boat,
took for themselves all of the cargo, attacked some of the men, and brutally
violated two of the women by methods too horrible to be described.
● All of the persons on the Dutch boat, with the exception of the two young
women, were again placed on it and holes were made in it, with the idea that it
would submerge, although as a matter of fact, these people, after eleven days of
hardship and privation, were succoured
● Taking the two women with them, and repeatedly violating them, the Moros
finally arrived at Maruro, a Dutch possession. Two of the Moro marauders were
Lol-lo, who also raped one of the women and Saraw.
● At Maruro the two women were able to escape.
● Lol-lo and Saraw later returned to their home in South Ubian, Tawi-Tawi, Sulu,
Philippine Islands. There they were arrested and were charged in the Court of
First Instance of Suhn with the crime of piracy.
● A demurrer was interposed by counsel de officio for the Moros, based on the
grounds that the offence charged was not within the jurisdiction of the Court of
First Instance, nor of any court of the Philippine Islands, and that the facts did
not constitute a public offence, under the laws in force in the Philippine Islands.
● After the demurrer was overruled by the trial judge, a trial found the two
defendants guilty and sentencing each of them to life imprisonment (cadena
perpetua), to return together with Kinawalang and Maulanis.
● All of the elements of the crime of piracy are present. Piracy is robbery or
forcible depredation on the high seas, without lawful authority and done animo
furandi, and in the spirit and intention of universal hostility.
● Pirates are in law hostes humani generis.
● Piracy is a crime not against any particular state but against all mankind. It may
be punished in the competent tribunal of any country where the offender may be
found or into which he may be carried. The jurisdiction of piracy unlike all other
crimes has no territorial limits.
● As it is against all so may it be punished by all. Nor does it matter that the crime
was committed within the jurisdictional 3-mile limit of a foreign state, "for those
limits, though neutral to war, are not neutral to crimes."
Issue:
Does the CFI in the Philippines have jurisdiction over Lol-lo and Saraw?
Ruling:
Yes. The CFI of Sulu has jurisdiction on the case. Pirates are in law hostes humani
generis(enemy of mankind).
Piracy is a crime not against any particular state but against all mankind. It may be
punished in the competent tribunal of any country where the offender may be found or
into which he may be carried. The jurisdiction of piracy unlike all other crimes has no
territorial limits. As it is against all so may it be punished by all. Nor does it matter that
the crime was committed within the jurisdictional 3-mile limit of a foreign state, "for
those limits, though neutral to war, are not neutral to crimes.”