Technological University of the Philippines

Ayala Blvd., Ermita, 1000 Manila, Philippines

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
FINAL REQUIREMENTS ON TD 512 / EA 511

CASE STUDY NO. 1: PHILIPPINE READINESS

Submitted by:
Engr. John Joseph A. Tolentino
MSEE – Power System Engineering

Submitted to:
Eng’r. Cherry Gaviola Pascion
 CASE STUDY NO. 1:
PHILIPPINE READINESS FOR
THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

Junmo Kim, Ador R. Torneo, and Seung-Bum Yang

INTRODUCTION

Industrial revolutions happen when a new method of process and production

offers substantial changes to the different sectors such as economics, politics, business

and society. The world has accordingly been through three industrial revolutions (Drath

& Horch, 2014; Stearns, 2013), and currently transitioning to its fourth one. These

industrial revolutions did not only affect production but also affect the humanity’s way of

living in so many different ways including how they relate to each other, how they are

governed, how they think, and even how they understand themselves (Steams, 2013).

Hence, industrial revolutions are not only about innovative production methods, but also

how the innovation affects our way of living.

According to Schumpeter (2003, p.83), “the process of creative destruction is…

the essence of capitalism… It is what capitalism consists of and what every capitalist

concern has got to live in.” and industrial revolutions exhibit this characteristic of

“destructive creativity”. The launching of new markets and development from the

scratch to the manufacturing undergo the same process of “industrial mutation” that

“incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within” by unceasingly

destructing the old one and unceasingly developing a new one.

More efficient, more productive, and more valuable methods of production are

effectively valued and developed as they take the place of the older methods, according
to the logic of the free market that always strive towards equilibrium and is by nature,

competitive. The World Economic Forum (2015) report on future technologies named

six “megatrends” that are most likely to affect society in the fourth industrial revolution:

people and the internet; computing, communications, and storage everywhere; the

internet of things; artificial intelligence (AI) and big data; the sharing economy and

distributed trust, and lastly, the digitization of matter.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

It is difficult at this time to tell that a developing country in the periphery like the

Philippines will benefit from FIR in the same way as the developed and industrialized

countries at the core will do. The industrial profile of the Philippines (Table 1 and Table

2) shows that manufacturing and industrial sectors are relatively small and

underdeveloped unlike developed countries, contributing only around 21-23% of the

GDP. As well, the economy of the Philippines is largely dependent on its ability to

provide skilled and unskilled labor. The country survey of most urgent survey in Table 3

also showed that the top priorities for the Philippines are addressing poverty and

governance.
Table 1
 Table 2

Table 3

There are structural barriers the prevent the Philippines from becoming truly

ready for the FIR. Just as the Philippines, and the rest of the developing world,

participated in the third industrial revolution in a manner that is distinct from first-world
countries, it would be more reasonable to expect that the Philippines will participate in

the FIR in a different, possibly unpredictable manner, particularly if re-shoring does take

place and cheap labor can no longer be used by developing countries as an avenue for

advancement.

METHODOLOGY

The question of how the FIR will affect the developing world is an important one.

This is also an important question for the Philippines. Given that the concept of FIR was

initially conceived with developed and industrialized countries in mind, there is

understandably a lack of research on how FIR will affect the developing world. A

cursory observation of the world today shows that the distributions of wealth,

productivity, and technology are not uniform. It is therefore reasonable to expect that the

FIR will also affect the world in an uneven manner.

The potential impacts of FIR can be viewed from the perspective of world-

systems theory, in which the world is separated according to core and periphery. In the

world economy, core countries depend on and dominate the periphery and semi-

periphery countries. The core countries own the means of production (even some of

those physically located in the periphery and semi-periphery countries through

intellectual property) while obtaining labor from periphery and semi-periphery countries.

For this study, world-systems theory is simplified into the following conceptual

framework: The world economy is a supply chain of countries which links those that

produce the most for the least return to countries that produce the least with the most

return.
 This framework shows that the uneven economic distribution of the world

economy is not only a contingent order but is, in fact, a structural necessity. Moreover,

the FIR as it is described by Schwab (2016), is a description of the future for the core

countries or countries that produce the least for the most return. The question of how

the other parts of the supply chain will be shaped by FIR remains open. This article

seeks to answer this question with a focus on the Philippines. Data on the different

sectors of the economy that are affected and are likely to be affected by FIR are

presented from various sources (including the Observatory of Economic Complexity, the

Philippine Overseas Employment Administration, the World Bank, and other studies) to

provide context to the discussion. It is intended as a starting point for investigating how

developing countries might participate in such a future and the role that it would play.

CONCLUSION

The study presented an optimistic view of the future, given recent advances in

computer, medical technology, as well as the corresponding advances in economics

and politics. However, there are several compelling reasons why we may be skeptical of

his claims and the promises of the FIR in general. First, claims regarding the world-

changing effects of emerging technologies do not sufficiently take into account the role

of the developing world. This gap in the account of the future is sufficiently significant to

warrant a skeptical response to the overwhelming positive predictions for the future. The

role of the developing world is an important element in any system that hopes to

describe the future, and the failure of accounts of the FIR to sufficiently account for the

role of the developing world in the upcoming revolution points to a deficiency in

optimistic projections.

Inequalities in terms of development are self-evident and a necessary

consideration for assessing the present and the future. Some nations have not yet

reached the so-called industrial revolution, for example, even though the developed

world has moved far beyond it. The question regarding the FIR is therefore not only a

question of what will take place in the future but exactly who is included in this version

of the future. For example, although the third industrial revolution in the form of the

Internet and globalization manifested in the developed world as connectedness,

consumerism, significant increases in technological advancement, and so on, it

manifested in a different form for the developing world: Cheap off-shore labor and

outsourcing.

The analysis of the FIR in the Philippines presented above present an alternative

account to the claim that the world is ready to enter the FIR. The results show that the

Philippines will have a different experience of the FIR, at least initially. The findings

merit further studies on how the FIR may affect the developing world.

RECOMMENDATION

The enthusiasm as the Fourth Industrial Revolution emerges undeniably as it

also means new exciting high-technology gadgets and devices. Most of us rely on this

technology for fun and leisure, or for daily needs to make our life easier and fun. But

looking at the bigger picture which is the impact of FIR to our country, Philippines, it is
pretty much alarming. The question of readiness of the Philippines is presented in this

study, and unfortunately, the answer is no. This problem is indeed alarming but

analyzing the country’s need based on the survey in Table 3, there are more urgent and

pressing problems and issues that should be addressed immediately. The researcher

believes that we should focus more in those problems, and by “we”, that means, the

government, the citizen, and researcher. Researchers are encouraged to conduct more

study and research to hopefully analyze the needs, discover other problems, and more

importantly provide suggestion and solution to mitigate or completely get rid of our

country’s problem.

REFERENCES:

Drath, R., & Horch, A. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Hit or hype? IEEE Industrial Electronics
Magazine, 8(2), 56–58. doi:10.1109/MIE.2014.2312079
Philippine Board of Investments. (2018). Manufacturing value added by sector.
Retrieved from: http://boi.gov. ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Manufacturing-
Value- Added_Share-to-GDP-2008-2017.xlsx
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2016). Employment situation [Data file]. Retrieved from
http://www.psa.gov.ph/
Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY:
Routledge.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World
Economic Forum.
Stearns, P. N. (2013). The industrial revolution in world history (4th ed.). Philadelphia,
PA: Westview
World Bank. (2016). World Bank Group country opinion survey [Data file]. Retrieved
from http://www.worldbank. org/
World Economic Forum. (2015). Deep shift: Technology tipping points and societal
impacts. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.