Sped 5401 Final
Sped 5401 Final
Sped 5401 Final
Brieanna Caillot
Temple University
5401 Final Project
The student that I worked with for this project is a third-grade boy named “Kaden.” He
attends Overbrook Educational Center, and I worked with him twice a week during his ELA
class. I spoke with his ELA teacher to get some background information before deciding what
would be best for him. I was informed that he was in the process of getting tested for an IEP
because he was not on a third-grade reading level. I also learned that his entire third grade class
missed a great deal of instruction due to staffing issues. “Kaden” and the rest of his classmates
had about three long term substitutes the year prior, and because of different teaching styles, the
students lacked some of the fundamentals that they needed for third grade. Keeping that in mind,
I had a conversation with “Kaden” about what he enjoys reading, and what skills he has
difficulty with. I learned that he enjoys reading about sports, and fiction books. “Kaden” also
mentioned that sometimes he struggled with some of the bigger words that he encounters in
books. I also chose to read a book with him that was considered to be on a third-grade reading
level.
The strategy I chose to introduce to “Kaden” was the phonological awareness strategy. I
noticed that “Kaden” was able to identify letters and sounds, but he had difficulty putting those
sounds together. This strategy had a series of pre-tests that the student was required to take
which included an initial letter sounds, pronunciation, segmenting, and blending. “Kaden” was
required to get at least a 70% on each of the strategies. There were some complications with my
placement in the beginning of the semester, so due to the lack of time, I allowed Kaden to move
on to the training portion of the strategy even though he scored a 60% on the blending pre-test.
For the initial letter sound he scored 100%, on the pronunciation portion “Kaden” received a
70%. On the segmenting portion he received an 85%. Although he received an 85% on the
segmenting portion, I noticed that one common sound he missed was the /k/ sound.
2
5401 Final Project
3
5401 Final Project
As you can see, “Kaden” knew majority of his letter sounds, but majority of the sounds he
missed were either the letter “C” that made the /K/ sound, or the letter “K”.
This strategy had four steps, which were: Stare at the unknown word, Tell myself each letter
sound, Open your mouth and say each letter sound, and Put the letters together to say the word.
“Kaden” and I worked on each step a couple of times before I decided to quiz him, and he got a
100% on the quiz four out the five times. Once “Kaden” understood each step of the strategy we
used the practice words to get accustomed to the strategy we would be working on, and then we
began to work on the weekly word lists. The weekly word lists required me to work with
“Kaden” twice a week, so during each session “Kaden” practiced ten words and two nonsense
words. The first session of each week included words that had either, three, four or five letters in
each word. Then the second session of each week included words that had between three and
seven words in it. I also made sure to model how “Kaden” should read the words off of the index
cards, and how to use the strategy if he gets stuck on a word. Unfortunately, due to the pandemic,
I was only able to complete eleven out of the twelve total sessions. The chart below shows the
real and nonsense words that “Kaden” got incorrectly (written in bold) and the word he ended up
In the first week, I noticed that “Kaden” was still having problems with his “C’s” that
made the /K/ sound. For the first three words in week one (scam, scan and scrap) I realized that
4
5401 Final Project
he completely disregarded the letter “C” and I noted that he has trouble with the “SC” blend. He
also did the same thing for “Clasp” and “ Scromp.” When it came to the word “cost”, “ Kaden”
assumed that the word included a long “O” sound instead of saying the short “O” sound and
made the word “coast.” During week two he continued to simplify words by not saying specific
letter sounds for the words “Pest,” “ Pet,” “Tropit” and “Trovet.” Over the course of the two
weeks, I had encouraged “Kaden” to use the STOP strategy when he was hesitating to say a
word. He ended up needing the prompt sheet so he could remember each of the steps. At some
points, I felt like using the strategy might have overwhelmed him instead of helped him.
During week three, “Kaden” didn’t make any progress, but instead he stayed consistent
and got seventeen out of the twenty-four words correctly. I continued to track which blending
sounds that he was struggling with, and I noted that he was not able to say the “Fr” blend.
Because this was the mid – point of the strategy training, I also looked back in my notes for other
similarities that I might have missed. I looked at the words that “Kaden” had simplified as he
was reading them out loud, and I noticed that he is replacing the given words with words that
contain the same starting and ending letter, or same starting and ending sounds.
*See the examples below that were taken from the chart*
Scam Sam, Scromp Stomp, Pest Pet, Clinic Clink (in this example
there were the same letter sounds, just different ending letters)
Below is the table that shows the words for weeks four through six that “Kaden” read
incorrectly (written in bold) , and the word he read out loud instead.
5
5401 Final Project
Before we began week four, I decided to work with Kaden on the STOP strategy again
because I felt like he wasn’t utilizing it to the best of his ability. We went through each of the
steps in the strategy, and I decided to just quiz him again before we went through the words. I
also gave him a sheet with the steps to refer back so it can eliminate him feeling overwhelmed.
After finishing week four, I noticed that “Kaden” had made some improvement, and instead of
getting seventeen words correct for the week, he got eighteen words correct. He struggled with
identifying the difference between the long and short sounds for some letters. For example,
“dim” has a short “I” sound and “Kaden” read the word with a long “I” sound. He also managed
to do the same with “deck” and turned it into “deek,” by saying the long “E” sound. Week five
ended with the same results, eighteen words correctly out of twenty-four. I noticed that “Kaden”
wasn’t struggling with figuring out the difference between his long and short vowels. But he was
still replacing or simplifying the given words with words that had the same letters. After we
finished the second session of week five, I looked at the words that “Kaden” had gotten
incorrectly, and I noticed that four out of the six words that were incorrect were nonsense words.
“Kaden” had also asked me if all of the words that we worked on for the past few weeks were
real words, and just to ensure that he was not intentionally reading the words incorrectly I told
Due to the school closings, I was only able to get through my first weekly session for
week six. Although I wasn’t able to collect accurate data, I did notice that “Kaden” had
potentially made some improvement, because he only read one word incorrectly out of the
twelve he was given. Instead of saying “peck” he said “peek (or) peak.” This error was consistent
6
5401 Final Project
with his other errors in the past because he replaced the short “E” in the word peck, with a long
7
5401 Final Project
After reviewing all of “Kaden’s” results over the past few weeks, I noticed a very small
improvement close to the end of the strategy. For six out of eleven of the training sessions he had
gotten eight training words correctly, with one of those times being his baseline number. Then
for the last two sessions, they were higher than his baseline. As for the nonsense words, “Kaden”
got zero nonsense words correctly for five out of the eleven times. For three of the training
sessions he got one word correctly, and both words correctly for three other training sessions.
Based upon the results for the last two sessions, I would have predicted that his score for the
number of training words correct would have been a nine or ten, and possibly one nonsense word
correctly.
As far as the post tests, I could also see some potential progress in “Kaden’s” scores. I
think that his pronunciation could have gone from 70% to a possible 80-85%. I think this
because he would have been able to use the STOP strategy, and the post test is structured in the
same way that the training sessions were. When it comes to segmenting, I think that I would
have seen some improvement as well because this focuses on individual letter sounds. When
going through the training, I noticed that “Kaden” is able to identify his individual letter sounds.
However, when it comes to blending the sounds together to form a word, that is when “Kaden”
seems to struggle. The blending pretest results were a 60% , and I personally feel that if he was
given the test again, there’s a possibility that there would only be a 5 to 10% improvement.
If he ended up passing the post-tests, I think that the best way to support him would have
been through having maintenance sessions with him once a week instead of twice a week just so
that he doesn’t loose any of the skills he was working on during the strategy training. The
maintenance sessions could take place during an independent work time so that his instructors
could have tracked his progress without any distractions. If he was given the post tests and was
8
5401 Final Project
not able to pass them, I would have supported him by continuing to work with him twice a week
and choose different words. I also think it would be fun to have activities that include different
materials such as a fundations board. Fundations is something that I have used in the past and it
is a tool that was made by the Wilson reading program. This board can help students like
“Kaden” because it includes magnetic tiles for letters, and vowel teams and blends, and students
use these tiles to create words; he could learn how to successfully break down the words and
sound them out by using this fundations board. After the post-tests the manual requires the
student to read passages for the generalization phase. The passages are about 50 to 70 words
long, includes ten of the training words and two of the nonsense words. These passages are used
to test if the student can use the STOP strategy to help them as they read different pieces of
writing. I was also not able to do the generalization phase, but I personally feel as if “Kaden”
would have benefited from additional training before moving on to this phase. I think that he
should work on blending a bit more and more data should be collected.
As I mentioned before, “Kaden” was in the process of receiving an IEP, and he did not
get some of the fundamentals that were needed in the second grade. In the second grade, that is
the last year that students have sight words. Second grade also focuses on distinguishing long
and short vowels, correctly identifying and irregular (trick) words, and knowing the sounds of
common vowel teams. I feel that because of the three different instructors that “Kaden” had, he
was not able to meet those standards, and it affected his performance throughout the training. He
does need some work differentiating between his long and short vowels. Some sound that I
would consider working on with him are the “fr” “sc” and “st” blends.
The phonological awareness strategy is pretty helpful, and I think that the pre-tests are
very proactive. However, I feel like this strategy could use some changes. I would consider
9
5401 Final Project
having different word lists depending on the grade level of the student. This strategy is aimed for
students that are currently in the first through third grade, but I feel as if some of the words might
not be appropriate for all three grades. In “Kaden’s” case I think that he would have benefited
from a list of second grade sight words because it would have met his needs a bit better. The
STOP strategy is a clever, and it’s helpful to remember because STOP is a simple word. I
noticed that “Kaden” had some difficulties using the strategy in the beginning and middle of the
training sessions. It shifted his focus from the word he was stuck on to remembering the steps of
the strategy. For a student like “Kaden” who isn’t on the third grade reading level like he should
be, it might do more harm than good. I think that “Kaden’s” IEP should include some phonemic
awareness practice, and I think that if I was given the opportunity to work with him more, he
10