This document summarizes a court decision regarding a petition to change the sex and name listed on a birth certificate after undergoing sex reassignment surgery. The court denied the petition, finding that there is no law allowing changes to birth certificates for the purpose of sex reassignment. Specifically, the court found that while first names can be changed administratively through the local civil registrar for clerical errors, a judicial order is required for other name changes. The court also found that there is no law allowing changes to the sex designation for reasons of sex reassignment.
This document summarizes a court decision regarding a petition to change the sex and name listed on a birth certificate after undergoing sex reassignment surgery. The court denied the petition, finding that there is no law allowing changes to birth certificates for the purpose of sex reassignment. Specifically, the court found that while first names can be changed administratively through the local civil registrar for clerical errors, a judicial order is required for other name changes. The court also found that there is no law allowing changes to the sex designation for reasons of sex reassignment.
Original Description:
cscsc
Original Title
4. Silverio v. Republic, GR 174689, Oct 19, 2007 (Art 5)
This document summarizes a court decision regarding a petition to change the sex and name listed on a birth certificate after undergoing sex reassignment surgery. The court denied the petition, finding that there is no law allowing changes to birth certificates for the purpose of sex reassignment. Specifically, the court found that while first names can be changed administratively through the local civil registrar for clerical errors, a judicial order is required for other name changes. The court also found that there is no law allowing changes to the sex designation for reasons of sex reassignment.
This document summarizes a court decision regarding a petition to change the sex and name listed on a birth certificate after undergoing sex reassignment surgery. The court denied the petition, finding that there is no law allowing changes to birth certificates for the purpose of sex reassignment. Specifically, the court found that while first names can be changed administratively through the local civil registrar for clerical errors, a judicial order is required for other name changes. The court also found that there is no law allowing changes to the sex designation for reasons of sex reassignment.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29
G.R. No. 174689 October bamboo. "Oh North Wind!
22, 2007 North Wind! Please let us
out!," the voices said. She ROMMEL JACINTO DANTES pecked the reed once, then SILVERIO, petitioner, twice. All of a sudden, the vs. bamboo cracked and slit REPUBLIC OF THE open. Out came two human PHILIPPINES, respondent. beings; one was a male and DECISION the other was a female. Amihan named the man CORONA, J.: "Malakas" (Strong) and the woman "Maganda" When God created man, He (Beautiful). (The Legend of made him in the likeness of Malakas and Maganda) God; He created them male and female. (Genesis 5:1-2) When is a man a man and when is a woman a woman? In Amihan gazed upon the particular, does the law recognize bamboo reed planted by the changes made by a physician Bathala and she heard voices using scalpel, drugs and coming from inside the counseling with regard to a Dantes on April 4, 1962. His name person’s sex? May a person was registered as "Rommel successfully petition for a change Jacinto Dantes Silverio" in his of name and sex appearing in the certificate of live birth (birth birth certificate to reflect the result certificate). His sex was registered of a sex reassignment surgery? as "male." On November 26, 2002, petitioner He further alleged that he is a Rommel Jacinto Dantes Silverio male transsexual, that is, filed a petition for the change of "anatomically male but feels, his first name and sex in his birth thinks and acts as a female" and certificate in the Regional Trial that he had always identified Court of Manila, Branch 8. The himself with girls since petition, docketed as SP Case No. childhood.1 Feeling trapped in a 02-105207, impleaded the civil man’s body, he consulted several registrar of Manila as respondent. doctors in the United States. He underwent psychological Petitioner alleged in his petition examination, hormone treatment that he was born in the City of and breast augmentation. His Manila to the spouses Melecio attempts to transform himself to a Petines Silverio and Anita Aquino "woman" culminated on January An order setting the case for initial 27, 2001 when he underwent sex hearing was published in the reassignment surgery2 in People’s Journal Tonight, a Bangkok, Thailand. He was newspaper of general circulation thereafter examined by Dr. in Metro Manila, for three Marcelino Reysio-Cruz, Jr., a consecutive weeks.3 Copies of the plastic and reconstruction surgeon order were sent to the Office of in the Philippines, who issued a the Solicitor General (OSG) and medical certificate attesting that the civil registrar of Manila. he (petitioner) had in fact undergone the procedure. On the scheduled initial hearing, jurisdictional requirements were From then on, petitioner lived as a established. No opposition to the female and was in fact engaged to petition was made. be married. He then sought to have his name in his birth During trial, petitioner testified for certificate changed from "Rommel himself. He also presented Dr. Jacinto" to "Mely," and his sex Reysio-Cruz, Jr. and his American from "male" to "female." fiancé, Richard P. Edel, as witnesses. On June 4, 2003, the trial court Firstly, the [c]ourt is of the rendered a decision4 in favor of opinion that granting the petitioner. Its relevant portions petition would be more in read: consonance with the principles of justice and Petitioner filed the present equity. With his sexual [re- petition not to evade any law assignment], petitioner, who or judgment or any infraction has always felt, thought and thereof or for any unlawful acted like a woman, now motive but solely for the possesses the physique of a purpose of making his birth female. Petitioner’s misfortune records compatible with his to be trapped in a man’s body present sex. is not his own doing and The sole issue here is should not be in any way whether or not petitioner is taken against him. entitled to the relief asked for. Likewise, the [c]ourt believes The [c]ourt rules in the that no harm, injury [or] affirmative. prejudice will be caused to anybody or the community in granting the petition. On the in the Certificate of Birth of contrary, granting the petition [p]etitioner, specifically for would bring the much-awaited petitioner’s first name from happiness on the part of the "Rommel Jacinto" petitioner and her [fiancé] and to MELY and petitioner’s the realization of their dreams. gender from "Male" to FEMALE. 5 Finally, no evidence was presented to show any cause On August 18, 2003, the Republic or ground to deny the present of the Philippines (Republic), thru petition despite due notice the OSG, filed a petition for and publication thereof. Even certiorari in the Court of the State, through the [OSG] Appeals.6 It alleged that there is has not seen fit to interpose no law allowing the change of any [o]pposition. entries in the birth certificate by reason of sex alteration. WHEREFORE, judgment is hereby rendered GRANTING On February 23, 2006, the Court the petition and ordering the of Appeals7 rendered a Civil Registrar of Manila to decision8 in favor of the Republic. change the entries appearing It ruled that the trial court’s decision lacked legal basis. There The petition lacks merit. is no law allowing the change of either name or sex in the A Person’s First Name Cannot certificate of birth on the ground of Be Changed On the Ground of sex reassignment through Sex Reassignment surgery. Thus, the Court of Petitioner invoked his sex Appeals granted the Republic’s reassignment as the ground for petition, set aside the decision of his petition for change of name the trial court and ordered the and sex. As found by the trial dismissal of SP Case No. 02- court: 105207. Petitioner moved for reconsideration but it was Petitioner filed the present denied.9 Hence, this petition. petition not to evade any law or judgment or any infraction Petitioner essentially claims that thereof or for any unlawful the change of his name and sex in motive but solely for the his birth certificate is allowed purpose of making his birth under Articles 407 to 413 of the records compatible with his Civil Code, Rules 103 and 108 of present sex. (emphasis the Rules of Court and RA 9048.10 supplied) Petitioner believes that after This Civil Code provision was having acquired the physical amended by RA 9048 (Clerical features of a female, he became Error Law). In particular, Section 1 entitled to the civil registry of RA 9048 provides: changes sought. We disagree. SECTION 1. Authority to The State has an interest in the Correct Clerical or names borne by individuals and Typographical Error and entities for purposes of Change of First Name or identification.11 A change of name Nickname. – No entry in a is a privilege, not a civil register shall be changed right.12 Petitions for change of or corrected without a judicial name are controlled by order, except for clerical or statutes.13 In this connection, typographical errors and Article 376 of the Civil Code change of first name or provides: nickname which can be corrected or changed by the ART. 376. No person can concerned city or municipal change his name or surname civil registrar or consul without judicial authority. general in accordance with the provisions of this Act and Rules of Court, until and unless an its implementing rules and administrative petition for change regulations. of name is first filed and subsequently denied.15 It likewise RA 9048 now governs the change lays down the corresponding of first name.14 It vests the power venue,16 form17 and procedure. In and authority to entertain petitions sum, the remedy and the for change of first name to the city proceedings regulating change of or municipal civil registrar or first name are primarily consul general concerned. Under administrative in nature, not the law, therefore, jurisdiction over judicial. applications for change of first name is now primarily lodged with RA 9048 likewise provides the the aforementioned administrative grounds for which change of first officers. The intent and effect of name may be allowed: the law is to exclude the change of first name from the coverage of SECTION 4. Grounds for Rules 103 (Change of Name) and Change of First Name or 108 (Cancellation or Correction of Nickname. – The petition for Entries in the Civil Registry) of the change of first name or nickname may be allowed in Petitioner’s basis in praying for the any of the following cases: change of his first name was his sex reassignment. He intended to (1) The petitioner finds the make his first name compatible first name or nickname to be with the sex he thought he ridiculous, tainted with transformed himself into through dishonor or extremely difficult surgery. However, a change of to write or pronounce; name does not alter one’s legal (2) The new first name or capacity or civil status.18 RA 9048 nickname has been habitually does not sanction a change of first and continuously used by the name on the ground of sex petitioner and he has been reassignment. Rather than publicly known by that first avoiding confusion, changing name or nickname in the petitioner’s first name for his community; or declared purpose may only create grave complications in the civil (3) The change will avoid registry and the public interest. confusion. Before a person can legally change his given name, he must present proper or reasonable proper remedy was administrative, cause or any compelling reason that is, that provided under RA justifying such change.19 In 9048. It was also filed in the addition, he must show that he will wrong venue as the proper venue be prejudiced by the use of his was in the Office of the Civil true and official name.20 In this Registrar of Manila where his birth case, he failed to show, or even certificate is kept. More allege, any prejudice that he might importantly, it had no merit since suffer as a result of using his true the use of his true and official and official name. name does not prejudice him at all. For all these reasons, the In sum, the petition in the trial Court of Appeals correctly court in so far as it prayed for the dismissed petitioner’s petition in change of petitioner’s first name so far as the change of his first was not within that court’s primary name was concerned. jurisdiction as the petition should have been filed with the local civil No Law Allows The Change of registrar concerned, assuming it Entry In The Birth Certificate As could be legally done. It was an To Sex On the Ground of Sex improper remedy because the Reassignment The determination of a person’s for a judicial order. In effect, RA sex appearing in his birth 9048 removed from the ambit of certificate is a legal issue and the Rule 108 of the Rules of Court the court must look to the correction of such errors.22 Rule statutes.21 In this connection, 108 now applies only to Article 412 of the Civil Code substantial changes and provides: corrections in entries in the civil register.23 ART. 412. No entry in the civil register shall be changed or Section 2(c) of RA 9048 defines corrected without a judicial what a "clerical or typographical order. error" is: Together with Article 376 of the SECTION 2. Definition of Civil Code, this provision was Terms. – As used in this Act, amended by RA 9048 in so far the following terms shall as clerical or typographical errors mean: are involved. The correction or change of such matters can now xxx xxx xxx be made through administrative proceedings and without the need (3) "Clerical or no correction must typographical error" refers involve the change to a mistake committed in of nationality, age, status the performance of or sex of the petitioner. clerical work in writing, (emphasis supplied) copying, transcribing or typing an entry in the civil Under RA 9048, a correction in register that is harmless the civil registry involving the and innocuous, such as change of sex is not a mere misspelled name or clerical or typographical error. It is misspelled place of birth a substantial change for which the or the like, which is visible applicable procedure is Rule 108 to the eyes or obvious to of the Rules of Court. the understanding, and The entries envisaged in Article can be corrected or 412 of the Civil Code and changed only by correctable under Rule 108 of the reference to other existing Rules of Court are those provided record or in Articles 407 and 408 of the Civil records: Provided, Code:24 however, That ART. 407. Acts, events and determination of filiation; (15) judicial decrees concerning voluntary emancipation of a the civil status of persons minor; and (16) changes of shall be recorded in the civil name. register. The acts, events or factual errors ART. 408. The following shall contemplated under Article 407 of be entered in the civil register: the Civil Code include even those that occur after birth.25 However, (1) Births; (2) marriages; (3) no reasonable interpretation of the deaths; (4) legal separations; provision can justify the (5) annulments of marriage; conclusion that it covers the (6) judgments declaring correction on the ground of sex marriages void from the reassignment. beginning; (7) legitimations; (8) adoptions; (9) To correct simply means "to make acknowledgments of natural or set aright; to remove the faults children; (10) naturalization; or error from" while to change (11) loss, or (12) recovery of means "to replace something with citizenship; (13) civil something else of the same kind interdiction; (14) judicial or with something that serves as a substitute."26 The birth certificate citizenship, civil interdiction, of petitioner contained no error. All judicial determination of filiation entries therein, including those and changes of name). These corresponding to his first name acts, events and judicial decrees and sex, were all correct. No produce legal consequences that correction is necessary. touch upon the legal capacity, status and nationality of a person. Article 407 of the Civil Code Their effects are expressly authorizes the entry in the civil sanctioned by the laws. In registry of certain acts (such as contrast, sex reassignment is not legitimations, acknowledgments of among those acts or events illegitimate children and mentioned in Article 407. Neither naturalization), events (such as is it recognized nor even births, marriages, naturalization mentioned by any law, expressly and deaths) and judicial or impliedly. decrees (such as legal separations, annulments of "Status" refers to the marriage, declarations of nullity of circumstances affecting the legal marriages, adoptions, situation (that is, the sum total of naturalization, loss or recovery of capacities and incapacities) of a person in view of his age, emancipation, marriage, nationality and his family divorce, and sometimes even membership.27 succession.28 (emphasis supplied) The status of a person in law includes all his personal A person’s sex is an essential qualities and relations, more factor in marriage and family or less permanent in nature, relations. It is a part of a person’s not ordinarily terminable at legal capacity and civil status. In his own will, such as his this connection, Article 413 of the being legitimate or illegitimate, Civil Code provides: or his being married or not. The comprehensive ART. 413. All other matters term status… include such pertaining to the registration matters as the beginning and of civil status shall be end of legal personality, governed by special laws. capacity to have rights in But there is no such special law in general, family relations, and the Philippines governing sex its various aspects, such as reassignment and its effects. This birth, legitimation, adoption, is fatal to petitioner’s cause. Moreover, Section 5 of Act 3753 birth or by either parent of the (the Civil Register Law) provides: newborn child. SEC. 5. Registration and In such declaration, the certification of births. – The person above mentioned shall declaration of the physician or certify to the following facts: midwife in attendance at the (a) date and hour of birth; birth or, in default thereof, the (b) sex and nationality of declaration of either parent of infant; (c) names, citizenship the newborn child, shall be and religion of parents or, in sufficient for the registration of case the father is not known, a birth in the civil register. of the mother alone; (d) civil Such declaration shall be status of parents; (e) place exempt from documentary where the infant was born; stamp tax and shall be sent to and (f) such other data as the local civil registrar not may be required in the later than thirty days after the regulations to be issued. birth, by the physician or midwife in attendance at the xxx xxx xxx (emphasis supplied) Under the Civil Register Law, a legislative intent. The words "sex," birth certificate is a historical "male" and "female" as used in record of the facts as they existed the Civil Register Law and laws at the time of birth.29Thus, the sex concerning the civil registry (and of a person is determined at even all other laws) should birth, visually done by the birth therefore be understood in their attendant (the physician or common and ordinary usage, midwife) by examining the genitals there being no legislative intent to of the infant. Considering that the contrary. In this connection, there is no law legally recognizing sex is defined as "the sum of sex reassignment, the peculiarities of structure and determination of a person’s sex function that distinguish a male made at the time of his or her from a female"32 or "the distinction birth, if not attended by error,30 is between male and immutable.31 female."33Female is "the sex that produces ova or bears When words are not defined in a young"34 and male is "the sex that statute they are to be given their has organs to produce common and ordinary meaning in spermatozoa for fertilizing the absence of a contrary ova."35 Thus, the words "male" and "female" in everyday For these reasons, while petitioner understanding do not include may have succeeded in altering persons who have undergone sex his body and appearance through reassignment. Furthermore, the intervention of modern "words that are employed in a surgery, no law authorizes the statute which had at the time a change of entry as to sex in the well-known meaning are civil registry for that reason. Thus, presumed to have been used in there is no legal basis for his that sense unless the context petition for the correction or compels to the contrary."36 Since change of the entries in his birth the statutory language of the Civil certificate. Register Law was enacted in the early 1900s and remains Neither May Entries in the Birth unchanged, it cannot be argued Certificate As to First Name or that the term "sex" as used then is Sex Be Changed on the Ground something alterable through of Equity surgery or something that allows a The trial court opined that its grant post-operative male-to-female of the petition was in consonance transsexual to be included in the with the principles of justice and category "female." equity. It believed that allowing the petition would cause no harm, grant the changes sought by injury or prejudice to anyone. This petitioner will substantially is wrong. reconfigure and greatly alter the laws on marriage and family The changes sought by petitioner relations. It will allow the union of will have serious and wide-ranging a man with another man who has legal and public policy undergone sex reassignment (a consequences. First, even the trial male-to-female post-operative court itself found that the petition transsexual). Second, there are was but petitioner’s first step various laws which apply towards his eventual marriage to particularly to women such as the his male fiancé. However, provisions of the Labor Code on marriage, one of the most sacred employment of women,39 certain social institutions, is a special felonies under the Revised Penal contract of permanent Code40 and the presumption of union between a man and a survivorship in case of calamities woman.37 One of its essential under Rule 131 of the Rules of requisites is the legal capacity of Court,41 among others. These the contracting parties who must laws underscore the public policy be a male and a female.38 To in relation to women which could be substantially affected if legislative guidelines becomes petitioner’s petition were to be particularly important in this case granted. where the claims asserted are statute-based. It is true that Article 9 of the Civil Code mandates that "[n]o judge or To reiterate, the statutes define court shall decline to render who may file petitions for change judgment by reason of the silence, of first name and for correction or obscurity or insufficiency of the change of entries in the civil law." However, it is not a license registry, where they may be filed, for courts to engage in judicial what grounds may be invoked, legislation. The duty of the courts what proof must be presented and is to apply or interpret the law, not what procedures shall be to make or amend it. observed. If the legislature intends to confer on a person who has In our system of government, it is undergone sex reassignment the for the legislature, should it privilege to change his name and choose to do so, to determine sex to conform with his what guidelines should govern the reassigned sex, it has to enact recognition of the effects of sex legislation laying down the reassignment. The need for guidelines in turn governing the Court recognizes that there are conferment of that privilege. people whose preferences and orientation do not fit neatly into the It might be theoretically possible commonly recognized parameters for this Court to write a protocol on of social convention and that, at when a person may be recognized least for them, life is indeed an as having successfully changed ordeal. However, the remedies his sex. However, this Court has petitioner seeks involve questions no authority to fashion a law on of public policy to be addressed that matter, or on anything else. solely by the legislature, not by The Court cannot enact a law the courts. where no law exists. It can only apply or interpret the written word WHEREFORE, the petition is of its co-equal branch of hereby DENIED. government, Congress. Costs against petitioner. Petitioner pleads that "[t]he unfortunates are also entitled to a SO ORDERED. life of happiness, contentment and [the] realization of their dreams." No argument about that. The Puno, C.J., Chairperson, Manoa, Hawaii, U.S.A. Rollo, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Azcuna, p. 48. Garcia, JJ., concur. 2 This consisted of "penectomy [surgical removal of penis] bilateral oschiectomy Footnotes [or orchiectomy which is the surgical excision of the testes] 1 Petitioner went for his penile skin inversion elementary and high school, vaginoplasty [plastic surgery as well as his Bachelor of of the vagina] clitoral hood Science in Statistics and reconstruction and Master of Arts, in the augmentation mammoplasty University of the Philippines. [surgical enhancement of the He took up Population Studies size and shape of the Program, Master of Arts in breasts]." Id. Sociology and Doctor of 3 Philosophy in Sociology at the On January 23, 2003, University of Hawaii, in January 30, 2003 and February 6, 2003. 4 10 Penned by Judge Felixberto An Act Authorizing the City T. Olalia, Jr. Rollo, pp. 51-53. or Municipal Civil Registrar or 5 the Consul General to Correct Id., pp. 52-53 (citations a Clerical or Typographical omitted). Error in an Entry and/or 6 Docketed as CA-G.R. SP Change of First Name or No. 78824. Nickname in the Civil Register Without Need of a Judicial 7 Special Sixth Division. Order, Amending for the 8 Purpose Articles 376 and 412 Penned by Associate Justice of the Civil Code of the Arcangelita M. Romilla-Lontok Philippines. with Associate Justices Marina L. Buzon and Aurora 11 Wang v. Cebu City Civil Santiago-Lagman Registrar, G.R. No. 159966, concurring. Rollo, pp. 25-33. 30 March 2005, 454 SCRA 9 155. Resolution dated September 14, 2006, id., pp. 45-46. 12 Id. 13 K v. Health Division, SECTION 7. Duties and Department of Human Powers of the Civil Resources, 277 Or. 371, 560 Registrar General. – xxx P.2d 1070 (1977). xxx xxx 14 Under Section 2 (6) of RA Where the petition is 9048, "first name" refers to a denied by the city or name or nickname given to a municipal civil registrar or person which may consist of the consul general, the one or more names in petitioner may either addition to the middle names appeal the decision to the and last names. Thus, the civil registrar general or term "first name" will be used file the appropriate here to refer both to first name petition with the proper and nickname. court. 15 16 The last paragraph of SECTION 3. Who May File Section 7 of RA 9048 the Petition and Where. – Any provides: person having direct and personal interest in the correction of a clerical or typographical error in an entry petition may be filed, in and/or change of first name or person, with the local civil nickname in the civil register registrar of the place where may file, in person, a verified the interested party is petition with the local civil presently residing or registry office of the city or domiciled. The two (2) local municipality where the record civil registrars concerned will being sought to be corrected then communicate to facilitate or changed is kept. the processing of the petition. In case the petitioner has Citizens of the Philippines already migrated to another who are presently residing or place in the country and it domiciled in foreign countries would not be practical for may file their petition, in such party, in terms of person, with the nearest transportation expenses, time Philippine Consulates. and effort to appear in person before the local civil registrar The petitions filed with the city keeping the documents to be or municipal civil registrar or corrected or changed, the the consul general shall be processed in accordance with this Act and its implementing is competent to testify to the rules and regulations. matters stated. The petitioner shall state the particular All petitions for the clerical or erroneous entry or entries, typographical errors and/or which are sought to be change of first names or corrected and/or the change nicknames may be availed of sought to be made. only once. 17 The petition shall be SECTION 5. Form and supported with the following Contents of the Petition. – documents: The petition shall be in the form of an affidavit, (1) A certified true subscribed and sworn to machine copy of the before any person authorized certificate or of the page by the law to administer of the registry book oaths. The affidavit shall set containing the entry or forth facts necessary to entries sought to be establish the merits of the corrected or changed; petition and shall show affirmatively that the petitioner (2) At least two (2) public preceding paragraph. In or private documents addition, the petition shall be showing the correct entry published at least once a or entries upon which the week for two (2) consecutive correction or change shall weeks in a newspaper of be based; and general circulation. Furthermore, the petitioner (3) Other documents shall submit a certification which the petitioner or the from the appropriate law city or municipal civil enforcement agencies that he registrar or the consul has no pending case or no general may consider criminal record. relevant and necessary 18 for the approval of the Republic v. Court of petition. Appeals, G.R. No. 97906, 21 May 1992, 209 SCRA 189. In case of change of first 19 name or nickname, the Supra note 11. petition shall likewise be 20 supported with the documents Id. mentioned in the immediately 21 28 In re Ladrach, 32 Ohio Salonga, Jovito, Private Misc.2d 6, 513 N.E.2d 828 International Law, 1995 (1987). Edition, Rex Bookstore, p. 22 238. Lee v. Court of Appeals, 29 419 Phil. 392 (2001). This, of course, should be 23 taken in conjunction with Id. Articles 407 and 412 of the 24 Co v. Civil Register of Civil Code which authorizes Manila, G.R. No. 138496, 23 the recording of acts, events February 2004, 423 SCRA and judicial decrees or the 420. correction or change of errors including those that occur 25 Id. after birth. Nonetheless, in 26 such cases, the entries in the Id. certificates of birth are not be 27 Beduya v. Republic of the corrected or changed. The Philippines, 120 Phil. 114 decision of the court granting (1964). the petition shall be annotated in the certificates of birth and 39 shall form part of the civil These are Articles 130 to register in the Office of the 138 of the Labor Code which Local Civil Registrar. (Co v. include nightwork prohibition, Civil Register of facilities for women, Manila, supra note 24) prohibition on discrimination 30 and stipulation against The error pertains to one marriage, among others. where the birth attendant 40 writes "male" or "female" but These include Article 333 the genitals of the child are on adultery, Articles 337 to that of the opposite sex. 339 on qualified seduction, 31 simple seduction and acts of Moreover, petitioner’s lasciviousness with the female anatomy is all man- consent of the offended party made. The body that he and Articles 342 and 343 on inhabits is a male body in all forcible and consented aspects other than what the abduction, among others. physicians have supplied. 41 32 Section 3(jj)(4). Black’s Law Dictionary, th 8 edition (2004), p.1406.
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford
December Term, 1856.