Mergers & Acquisitions: The Ultimate Guide On
Mergers & Acquisitions: The Ultimate Guide On
Mergers & Acquisitions: The Ultimate Guide On
MERGERS &
ACQUISITIONS
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION TO M&A
TYPES OF M&A
FINANCING M&A
INTRODUCTION
TO M&A
Written by: Maciko Chan
TYPES OF M&A
Written by: Laura Johnson
Reverse M&A Definition: A private company acquires a public company to avoid the
process of going through an IPO (initial public offering).
Example: The New York Stock Exchange merging with Archipelago to
create NYSE Group Inc. in 2006.
Definition: A part of the business is split off from the rest of the
Spin Off company and made into a new entity.
Example: PayPal spinning off from eBay in 2017.
CHALLENGES
Wrong deal valuations and
miscalculations leads to overestimating
synergies, eventually destroying the
company value.
WHAT DO
LAWYERS DO IN
AN M&A PROCESS?
Written by: Lavania Xavier
WHAT DO
LAWYERS DO IN
AN M&A PROCESS?
FINANCING
M&A
Written by: Robert Iatan
Introduction
Cash Acquisition
Pros
Most straight-forward form of financing,
simply a transfer of capital in exchange
for shares in the target company.
Cons
Deals can be very expensive, acquiring
companies do not often have the funds
necessary to finance a full-cash deal.
Cash acquisitions are very risky, as the
acquiring company will be entitled to
little to none of the assets should the
target business fail, and will have
maximum exposure, losing all of the
capital.
PAGE | 07 THE BUSINESS UPDATE |
Selling Bonds
The acquiring company will sell corporate bonds that will give the
acquiring company the capital necessary to buy the shares to get
a controlling stake of the target company.
Pros
The acquiring company will not have to give away control of
its company in order to make the capital necessary for buying
shares.
Cons
Corporate bonds are riskier than government bonds, so a
company may face difficulty in getting customers for selling
bonds.
Will need to pay back those who bought their bonds, but with
a coupon price as well (coupon means the same as interest
but it is used for bonds).
Loan Financing
Under this type of financing, the acquirer will get a loan from a
bank to pay for the shares required to gain a controlling stage in
the target company. There are a number of different types of
debt financing, such as: secured - if the borrower defaults on the
loan, the bank seizes assets from the borrower (like in a
mortgage); unsecured - if the borrower defaults, the bank cannot
seize any assets from the borrower (usually come with a higher
interest rate); asset-backed - if the borrower defaults, the bank
seizes the target company’s assets (fixed assets, inventory,
intellectual property, receivables, etc.). In all circumstances the
bank will conduct due diligence on both the acquiring company
and the target company to assess their financial health, looking
at the companies’ cash flow, liabilities, and profit margins.
Pros
Cheapest form of M&A for the acquirer, lower capital cost
than equity.
Offers tax advantages, as the debt payments can be
deducted from profits.
Cons
Acquiring the company is burdened with paying back the loan
plus interest, which reduces profits and could reduce growth.
High amounts of debt will make raising equity more difficult.
| THE BUSINESS UPDATE PAGE | 08
Mezzanine Finance
Mezzanine financing is financing that involves a
mixture of both debt and equity, with the lender
having the right to convert that loan into equity if
the company defaults, but only after all senior debts
are paid off. These loans are unsecured, so the
lender will not receive assets should the company
default.
Pros
Mezzanine debt structure is often very flexible
for the acquiring company.
Cons
As these loans are risky, they often come with
high interest rates compared to normal loans.
Lenders may impose covenants (rules) on the
loan, to make up for the loan being unsecured,
which would limit what the company can do.
Pros
Gives the acquiring company more flexibility, as
the loan can be paid to the target company at a
later date.
Cons
VTBs are often more expensive than normal
loans from external sources, as the target
company will ask for alternative methods of
payment, which brings a further risk, therefore a
higher interest.
PAGE | 09 THE BUSINESS UPDATE |
Pros
By using a highly leveraged loan, the acquirer stands to make
a better return on their investment, compared to undertaking
the whole investment using the
Cons
Leveraged loans are often high-risk, and so will result in a
high rate of interest.
In order for the borrower to keep up with loan payments they need
to already have a very strong financial health in case of an
economic downturn, so this isn’t really suitable for new companies
and startups.
Stock Swaps
Pros
Shareholders in the target company could see the value of
their investment go up in the long-run if the acquiring
company makes an efficient use of the target company’s
resources and the acquirer sees an increase in share price.
Cons
If the acquiring company fails to properly integrate the target
company and to make use of their resources, the share price
will fall, and so the shareholders of the target company will
see the value of their investment fall.
| THE BUSINESS UPDATE PAGE | 10
Equity Financing
Pros
The capital raised does not need to be paid back
to investors, the investors gain ownership of the
company and dividends rather than being paid
back.
Money does not need to be paid back to
investors in case the company fails.
Cons
The acquiring company loses control in the way
that the company is being run by offering shares,
and will have to ask investors before making big
decisions.
The acquiring company might end up paying
more in dividends to investors compared to what
they would have paid back in loan payments.
Selling Assets
Pros:
The acquirer does not need to pay back the
capital needed to purchase the controlling stake,
as they would have done if they raised money
through debt.
Cons:
The acquirer has maximum coverage should the
deal not succeed, and will have lost all of the
capital raised through selling their assets, along
with the assets themselves.
PAGE | 11 THE BUSINESS UPDATE |
Details of Story:
In May 2020, the UK’s largest mobile network O2, announced
its intention to merge with Virgin Media to strengthen their
positions against competitors BT and Sky, and provide funds
for 5G investment. This is not O2’s first attempt to remedy
rising debt, with a sale to CK Hutchison (owner of Three)
blocked by the European Commission on competition grounds
Virgin & O2 in 2015, and an IPO deterred by Brexit uncertainty.
Wider Factors:
With increasing competition in the sector, offering packaged
deals (using O2’s mobile network and Virgin Media’s TV and
broadband services) will be attractive to customers seeking
simplicity and may give the merged company an edge.
Details of Story:
Amazon’s £442m investment into Deliveroo was approved by
the CMA as the only way to ensure Deliveroo would remain
solvent (with a number of the restaurants it works with closing
due to COVID-19). This merger could see a combination of
the companies’ ultra-faced UK delivery network, providing the
opportunity to undercut competitors such as Uber Eats and
Amazon & Just Eat Takeaway.
Wider Factors:
There has been a lot of activity and consolidation in the food
delivery sector, with Amazon’s investment in Deliveroo
andJust Eat Takeaway’s recently announced intention to
acquire US-based Grubhub for £5.75bn.
Details of Story:
Plans to create a global law firm with revenues of £2.4bn
emerged in April 2018 but were eventually called off in
September 2019. Negotiations faltered over the valuation of
the two businesses (especially considering the fluctuations in
the price of sterling and the dollar as a consequence of
A&O Brexit), governance and how to match the different
remuneration structures.
O'Melveny
Wider Factors:
This attempted merger highlights the difficulty for UK firms to
break into the US legal market (a challenge US firms do not
seem to experience when establishing a UK presence).
Further failed attempts include Ashurst’s planned merger with
Sidley Austin (2013) and Freshfields’ combination with
Debevoise & Plimpton (2002). Although it is not impossible,
with Hogan Lovells (2010), Norton Rose Fulbright (2017) and
BCLP (2018) examples of successful US-UK mergers.
PAGE | 13 THE BUSINESS UPDATE |
UK M&A SWOT
ANALYSIS
Written by: Annie Tam
M&A in the UK involves national M&A and cross-border M&A from (outbound) and into
(inbound) England. The UK has traditionally been an active place for M&A activities.
Evern with the political uncertainty of Brexit, the UK M&A market has been demonstrated
to be resilient.
Strengths
Think of the various purposes of M&A. A company uses M&A activities to achieve the
following strategic objectives:
Profitable growth to increase business breadth or depth through revenue growth
Skill strengthening to acquire the necessary talent to remain competitive, including
personnel, technology, capability, geographies
Portfolio management to maximise existing and evolving capabilities, reduce risks or
reposition a business
Defensive action to prevent potential takeover attempts
Opportunistic posture to capitalise on a unique market/ competitive opportunity or a
developing business formula
Globalisation: to expand market share and sales in international venues
PAGE | 15 THE BUSINESS UPDATE |
Strengths
Point 3: Talents
A lot of the relevant professionals on the buy-or sell-
side are based in London. Hence, even when UK
M&A itself is quiet, the M&A professionals based in
London still tend to be busy dealing with global or
pan-European deals (whether or not the relevant
assets are wrapped in a UK corporate).
Weakness
Point 1: Volatility
The volatility in the market has delayed the mergers
and acquisitions that almost all investors want to see
across the shale patch. Cumulative impact of the
lack of confidence around high valuation, of
regulatory scrutiny, of macroeconomic uncertainty
and the coronavirus are making people more
conservative.
Quick facts:
January 2020 marks the quietest month for M&A
activity in almost 7 years (since April 2013)
Threats
Point 1: Recession
The UK, along with much of the rest of the work, is thought to
be heading into the worst recession for decades. This means
there will be an increased likelihood of businesses entering
into insolvency proceedings, instead of seeking strategic
growth through M&A.
Point 2: Brexit
Br-what?
COVID has delayed Brexit deal negotiations and postponed
the clarity that the market craves. In addition, some
dealmakers and back-office operations have relocated to the
continent or Ireland, threatening the M&A activities in the UK.
Point 3: Uncertainty
Geopolitical uncertainty: US China trade war, tension
between China, US and Australia. These have all shakened
confidence among board members and executives in blue-
chip companies.
Threats
Point 5: Government interventions in foreign Following the outbreak of the pandemic, the
direct investment trend towards protectionism has only
increased. Governments have sought to
Quick facts: move quickly to protect businesses from
The National Security and Infrastructure opportunistic acquisition by foreign buyers.
Investment Review in October 2017 introduced
sensitive sectors. What this means:
The UK government has been consulting on a The chances of a ‘foreign’ buyer achieving a
new regime under which it would have increased hostile offer for a UK company appear
powers to scrutinise M&A transactions on increasingly remote. Although there are no
national security grounds. enacted foreign direct investment rules, the
Enterprise Act and the unpredictability of
Other grounds that may put FDI or a M&A deal government means even recommended
on halt include, financial stability, media plurality, deals may need early government buy-in.
standards (these are known as public interest
grounds) The proposed system would be based on
voluntary notifications, with the government
There are special public interest grounds as well. having powers to call in transactions for
They concern the development/production of review where it has a reasonable suspicion
military or dual-use items, certain computing that the transaction may give rise to a risk to
hardware technologies and quantum national security. This could affect deal
technologies (the “sensitive sectors”), or media timetables and on some deals, depending
companies with a 25% or more share of their on the target sector, increase execution risk.
relevant media (e.g., newspapers or
broadcasting) Effects:
Public companies – especially large ones
Why: Politicians in the UK could not see the that are subject to a takeover by a foreign
upside in supporting M&A unless it is a UK acquirer – will be subject to increased
company acquiring a foreign company. This is scrutiny from politicians.
making big ticket M&A harder especially for
foreign buyers.
THANK YOU FOR
READING OUR GUIDE
@TheBusinessUpdate