Mera 1
Mera 1
Mera 1
BY
MIHRETU MELESE
JANUARY, 2018
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study
In human resource the term employee turnover is a measurement of how long your employee
stays with your company; how often you have to replace them. It has some significant effects on
organizations; new employees must be hired and trained, also need to consider the time required
for a new employee to be effectively productive. Staff turnover is a warning sign of low morale
and it is the amount of movement in and out of employees in an organization. Employees either
leave their jobs voluntarily by their own decision or forced to leave by the decision of the
employer. Employee turnover is one of the factors which affects the organization’s productivity;
which is considered to be one of the challenging issues in business nowadays (Aman.2008).
The impact of turnover has received considerable attention by senior management, human
resources professionals and industrial psychologists. It has proven to be one of the most costly
and seemingly intractable human resource challenges confronted by several organizations
globally. Turnover of employees consists of both voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary turnover
is a major problem for organizations in many countries (Aman, 2008; Syrett, 2003). (Aman,
2008; Porter and Steers (2001) suggested that the issue of meeting expectations was central to
the individual’s decisions to leave an organization. Each employee has his or her own set of
expectations upon entering an organization. Should these expectations not met, the individual
will become dissatisfied and leave. Aman, 2oo8; Mobley, (2oo4) suggested that a negative
evaluation of the present job leads to job dissatisfaction, thoughts of quitting, and an evaluation
of job seeking expectation utility and cost of quitting.
In today’s competitive business world, it is considered to be an important task to manage
employee turnover for any organization. Managing turnover has successfully been an essential to
achieve the organizational overhead goals. The significant amount of research has been
undertaken to understand the major causes of employee turnover and retentions mechanisms that
organizations should develop. Most of these studies were carried out by developed countries and
a few developing countries. Studies in the Ethiopian context indicated that every aspect of
organizations is employees because the turnover of employee leads to incurring of costs. High
turnover has become a problem for both private and governmental organizations. For instance,
Solomon has conducted his research on Ethiopian Rod Authority (ERA) in 2007 and concluded
that the turnover is affecting the organization in terms of productivity, money and time. Another
researcher, Yared conducted his study on an International rescue committee (IRC) and concluded
that the causes of turnover are a combination of factors which includes family problems, poor
leadership, dissatisfaction with the job, better opportunity in external markets, and dissatisfaction
with the work place.
Nevertheless , even though few studies conducted on ERA and IRC shows about turnover of
employees, there is no empirical studies conducted on public organizations employee turnover
that were supported by formal and published research. Therefore, the present study is to be done
on Sodo town education bureau (STEB) because of employee turnover is a big issue with the
organization. Currently, younger employees are leaving the organization due to unknown
reasons. Hence, this study will clearly identify identified the causes of emplyee turnover and
assesses its impact on organizational performance.
The organization became in compatible with other organization because of its disables and
failure to achive its objectives in profitable way. There foreunderstandingthe real problem with
regard to employee turn over is important issues.discussing the issue in the context of this
organization could insight the reader important lesson. Frequent turnover of employees, could
costing the bureau in terms of performance, money and time. Accordingly, this study primarily
focuses the problem that leads to employee turnover in the bureau. some study was conducted
with regarding to problems of employee to leave the organization before 3 years ago for example
biruk study was conducted only the cause of employee turn over and its mitigation to reduce rate
of employee turn over in the organization but this study is not sufficintbecauses the consequence
of employee turn over is not recommended .from this perspective the study initiates to conduct
this reaserch in wolaita sodo town education buearu due to high rates of employee turn over it
will asses the problem within the organization.
To identify and evaluate the actual reason for which employee turnover is prevailing in
the organization of the study
To analyze the impact of employee turnover on the organizational performance
To determine the possible mitigation strategies to reduce employee turnover in the
organization
LITERATURE REVIEW
Human resource management is defined as a strategic and coherent approach to the management
of an organization has most valued assets the people working there who individually and
collectively contribute to the achievement of its objectives (Armstrong, 2006).
John Storey (1989) cited in Armstrong, 2006), believes that Human resource management can be
regarded as a ‘set of interrelated policies with an ideological and philosophical underpinning’.
He suggests four aspects that constitute the meaningful version of human resource management:
A particular constellation of beliefs and assumptions;
A strategic thrust informing decisions about people management;
The central involvement of line managers;
Reliance upon a set of ‘levers’ to shape the employment relationship
ii. The characteristics of the job- some jobs are intrinsically more attractive than others. A
job's attractiveness will be affected by many characteristics, including its repetitiveness,
challenges, danger, perceived importance and capacity to elicit a sense of accomplishment.
iii. Demographics -empirical studies have demonstrated that turnover is associated in particular
situations with demographic and biographical characteristics of workers.
iv. The person- In addition to the factors listed above; there are also factors specific to the
individual that can influence turnover rates. These include both personal and trait-based factors.
Personal factors include things such as changes in family situation, a desire to learn a new skill
or trade or an unsolicited job offer. In addition to these personal factors, there are also trait-based
or personality features that are associated with turnover.
v. A bad match between the employee's skills and the job−Employees who are placed in jobs
that are too difficult for them or whose skills are under-utilized may become discouraged and
quit the job. vi. Substandard equipment, tools or facilities −If working conditions are
substandard or the workplace lacks important facilities such as proper lighting, furniture,
restrooms and other health and safety provisions, employees will not be willing to put up with
the inconvenience for long time. vii. Lack of opportunity for advancement or growth – If the
job is basically a dead- end proposition, this should be explained before hiring so as not to
mislead the 12employee. The job should be described precisely, without raising false hopes for
growth and advancement in the position.viii. Feelings of not being appreciated −since
employees generally want to do a good job, it follows that they also want to be appreciated and
recognized for their works. Even the most seasoned employee needs to be told what he or she is
doing right once in a while.
ix. Inadequate or lackluster supervision and training −Employees need guidance and
direction. New employees may need extra help in learning an unfamiliar job. Similarly, the
absence of a training program may cause workers to fall behind in their level of performance and
feel that their abilities are lacking. Unequal or substandard wage structures −Inequity in pay
structures or low pay is great causes of dissatisfaction and can drive some employees to quit.
Again, a new worker may wonder why the person next to him is receiving a higher wage for
what is perceived to be the same work.
• Competency screening
• Background checking
• Organizational fit
• Motivation
• Future goals
You need to discover whether the employee has the right skills, competency, and character are
they are good fit your organization and culture? Do they have a sufficient degree of motivating
do they have a capacity to keep learning in the role? What are this long term career goals?
Research Methodology
1.15. Description of Study Area
This study will be conducted on Sodo town education bureau . Sodo is the administrative center of
Wolaita zone in south nation, nationalities and peoples region; located 6054’ North latitude and 37045’
East longitudewith an elevation between temple convert above sea level . It was part of the former Sodo
woreda. Sodo is also the set of the roman catholic apostolic Vicariate of sodo-hosaena.
The usage of both quantitative and qualitative research approach is justified by the recognition of the fact
that every method in each approach has its limitations and that the use of both methods can be
complementary to each other.
z 2 pq
n=
e2
where n is sample ¿ ¿
z is the abscissa of the normal curve that cutoff an area α at the tails
T h e value for z is found ∈the statistical tables which contains the areaunder the normal curve
Therefore,
1.96 2∗0.95∗0.05
n=
0.052
¿ 73
3.1.2. Sample Technique
Given the above calculated number of samples from the target population, 73, a multistage sampling
technique will be adopted to draw representatives from the population. In the first stage, the total
employees of the organization would be sorted into three strata; top management, middle level
management and operational staffs. The number of employees in each stratum would be indicated. In the
second stage, proportional to size sampling technique would be adopted whereby each stratum will have
representative participants in the study depending upon their total number of employees. At this stage the
number of samples from each stratum will be therefore be determined. Finally, the simple random
sampling technique would be employed to select actual representatives. To that end, the names of all
employees across the stratum would be written on a piece of paper. The researcher will then blindly pick
and choose the required number of participants from each stratum. It is therefore those, finally picked
employees who will be approached to fill the survey questionnaire developed for the study purpose. The
proportional to size sample from each stratum is shown in the below table.
The data collected would be subjected to a rigorous analytical task, involving both quantitative and
qualitative flair. Firstly the data would be processed manually using both field and in-house editing. Then
categorizing the data under respective specific objective and coding would be done. Categorized and
coded data would be entered into a statistical package for social science (SPSS).
Subsequently, various mathematical and statistical analysis will be employed to conduct univariate,
bivariate and multivariate analysis. The uni-variate analysis will include frequency tables for the
categorical data, measures of central tendency and dispersion for the ratio and interval data. Bivariate
analysis will use Pearson’s correlation to determine the association between employee turnover rates and
organizational performance. Multiple regression model will be used to determine the relationship (linear
and non-linear) between turnover rate and organizational performance, the number of significant
variables, the size and the significance of the slope parameters of the variables. Hence, multiple linear and
non-linear regression will be used to identify the best model and significant independent variables that
predict the dependent variable.
Simultaneously, further analysis will be undertaken to test the validity of the model and data
characteristics, assumptions and include model structure, multicolinearty, residual patterns as well as the
effect of outliers.
Analytical Specifications
In the first instance, literature identified conventional reasons for employee turnover would be evaluated
against the employee turnover causes in the study organization. This will enable to sort the rationales for
employee turnover in the organization. The following table depicts an identified reasons of turnover to be
evaluated in the course of the study.
N Reasons
o
1 Retention strategy
2 Employee motivation
3 Career development
4 Work load
5 Work environment
6 Incentive schemes
7 Pay level
8 Management system
9 Other challenges
An identified performance indicators would be analyzed in liaison to how they are impacted due to the
existence of the employee turnover in the organization. Hence, on one hand the result would reveal the
correlation between the employee turnover and the performance indicators identified. On the other hand,
the study will reveal how the overall organization’s performance is impacted by the effect of employee
turnover on each indicator of organizational performance. Thus, organizational performance would be the
dependent variable whose outcome is to be estimated from the multiple regression model. The
performance indicators will make up the independent variables. It is therefore from the effect of employee
turnover on these performance indicators that the magnitude of overall organizational performance is to
be estimated.
No Mitigation strategies
1 Adopt winning retention strategies
2 Motivate employees
3 Administer training and development
4 Establishing favourable working environment
5 Improve management system
6 Improve pay level and incentice schems
NO ACTIVITY Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun.
Brooke PP, Price JL (1989). "The determinants of employee absenteeism: An empirical test of a causal
model". J. Occup. Psychol. 62:1-19.
Brooke PP, Russell DW, Price JL (1988). "Discuss validation of measures of job satisfaction, job
involvement and organizational commitment", J. Appl. Psychol. 73 (2): 139-145
Cantrell N, Sarabakhsh M (1991). "Correlates of non-institutional food service turnover". FIU Hosp. Rev.
pp.52-9.
CARSTEN, J.M. and Spector P.E.: Unemployment, Job Satisfaction, and Employee Turnover: A Meta-
Analytic Test of the Machesney Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72: 374-381.
Catherine M Gustafson (2002). “Staff turnover: Retention”. International j. contemp. Hosp. manages. 14
(3): 106-110.
CLARK-RAYNER, P. and HARCOURT, M.: The Determinants of Employee Turnover Behavior: New
Evidence from a New Zealand Bank. Research & Practice in Human Resource Management, 2000, 8: 61-
71. 45
Costen, W., & Salazar, J. (2011). The impact of training and development on employee job satisfaction,
loyalty, and intent to stay in the lodging industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism,
10(3), 273-284.
Couger DJ (1988). "Motivators vs. demotivators in the IS environment", J. Syst. Manage. 39 (6) :36-41.
David Loquercio(2006): Turnover and retention: General summary prepared; for People in Aid
DeMicco FJ, Giridharan J (1987). "Managing employee turnover in the hospitality industry", FIU Hosp.
Rev. Pp.26-32.
Denvir A, McMahon F (1992). “Labour turnover in London hotels and the cost effectiveness of
preventative measures", Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 11 (2) : 143-54.
Dess GD, Shaw JD (2001). “Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance", Acad.
Manage. Rev. 26 (3): pp 446-56.
Dyke TV, Strick S (1990). “Recruitment, selection and retention of managers in the hotel and restaurant
industry", FIU Hosp. Rev. pp.1-9.
Garden AM (1989). "Correlates of turnover propensity of software professionals in small high tech
companies", R&D Manage. 19 (4):325-34.
Griffeth, R.W. and P.W. Hom, 2001. Retaining Valued Employees, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Hackman, JR, Oldham GR (1975). “Development of the job diagnostic survey” J. Appl. Psychol. 60: 159-
70.
Hana U., and Lucie L., 2011. Journal of Competitiveness | Issue 3/2011
Hogan JJ (1992). "Turnover and what to do about it", The Cornell HRA Quarterly. 33 (1):40-45.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnover_(employment)
John Sutherland (2000). “Job-to-job turnover and job to-non- employ- ment movement” Personnel Rev.
31(6): 710-721.
Johnson J, Griffeth RW, Griffin M (2000). "Factors discrimination functional and dysfunctional sales
force turnover", J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 15 (6): 399-415.
Kanungo R (1982). “Measurement of job and work involvement", J. Appl. Psychol. 67: 341-349
Keller T, Dansereau F (1995). "Leadership and empowerment: a social exchange perspective". Hum. Rel.
48 (2):127-146. 46
LEE, T. & MITCHELL,T: Control Turnover by Understanding its Causes Handbook of Principles of
Organizational Behavior. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2000, p. 90-104.
Locke E (1976). “The nature and causes of job satisfaction", in Dunnette. MD (Eds). Handbook of
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 1297-1349.
Loquercio, et al, 2006, Understanding and Addressing Staffs Turnover in Humanitarian Agencies
Meaghan Stovel, Nick Bontis(2002), Voluntary turnover: knowledge management-friend or foe? J.
intellect. Cap. 3 (3): 303-322
MOBLEY, W.H.: Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee
turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62: 238.
Montana, P. and Charnov, B., 1993. Management: A Streamlined Course for Students and Business
People Hauppauge, New York: Barron’s Business Review Series
OWWDSE, 2012. Business Process Reengineering Document and manual of the Enterprise
OWWDSE, 2013. Annual report of Oromia Water Works Design and Supervision Enterprise
Parden, RJ (1981)“The manager’s role and high mobility of technical specialists in the Santa Clara
Valley” IEE Transactions on enginee- ring management, 28(1): 2-8.
Petrillose, M. J. , 1998. “Improving Bottom-line Results by Managing Turnover and Absenteeism.” The
Bottom Line. 13 (5), 20-23
Phillips DJ (1990). "The price tag on turnover", Pers. J. pp. 58-61.
Porter LW, Steers RM (1973). Organizational work and personal factors in employee turnover and
absenteeism. Psychol. Bull., 80: 151-176.
Porter LW, Steers RM, Mowday RT, Boulian PV (1974). "Organizational commitment, job satisfaction,
and turnover among psychiatric technicians", J. Appl. Psychol. 59: 603-609
Price, J.L (1977). The study of turnover, 1st edition, Iowa state university press, IA pp10-25.
Sherman JD (1986). "The relationship between factors in the work environment and turnover propensities
among engineering and technical support personnel", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,
33: 72-78. 47
Schultz, S. E. 2006. Psychology and work today: an introduction to industrial and organizational
psychology, New Jersey: Pearson Education International
SHAW, J., DELERY, J., JENKINS, G. and GUPTA, N.: An Organization- Level Analysis of Voluntary
and Involuntary Turnover. Business School Research Series, January 2001, ISBN 1 85901 169 1.
Solomon A. (2007). Skilled Manpower Turnover and Its Management: The Case of Ethiopian Roads
Authority
Surline, T., 1999. Staff Retention Strategies. Credit Union Executive Journal. 28-
31.
Teixeira, R., Koufteros,X. and Peng X.D., 2012. Organizational Structure, Integration, and Manufacturing
Performance: A Conceptual Model and Propositions, Journal of Operations and Supply Chain
Management 5 (1), pp 69 – 81
Tor Guinmaraes JE Owen (1997). “Assessing employee turnover intentions before and after TQM”
International J. Qual. Reliability manage. 14 (1): 46-63. Trevor C (2001). “Interactions among actual ease
– of – movement determinants and job satisfaction in prediction of voluntary turnover", Acad. Manage J.
44 (6): 621-638.
Wasmuth WJ, Davis SW (1983). "Managing employee turnover: why employees leave", The Cornell
HRA Quarterly, pp. 11-18.
Williams LJ, Hazer JT (1986). “Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in
turnover models: a reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods”, J. Appl. psychol. 71
(2):219-231
Woods, R. (2006). Turnover, Discipline, and Exits. In P. Woods (Eds). Managing Hospitality Human
Resources (4th ed.) (pp. 431). Lansing, MI. American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute.
Yang, J.T., Wan, C.S., & Fu, Y.J. (2012). Qualitative examination of employee turnover and retention
strategies in international tourist hotels in Taiwan. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 31.
837-848.
Yared D. (2007). Staff Turnover in International Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs): A Case
Study of International Rescue Committee (IRC)