How Banks Can Ease The Pain of Negative Interest Rates
How Banks Can Ease The Pain of Negative Interest Rates
How Banks Can Ease The Pain of Negative Interest Rates
© by wildestanimal/Getty Images
February 2020
By significantly reducing interest rates, central The impact on banks of negative-interest-rate
banks in Europe, Japan, and the United States have policies varies according to the bank’s business
sought to stimulate economic activity, stabilize model. Smaller banks focused on domestic loans
banking systems suffering from nonperforming and deposits are often hurt more than larger
loans, and manage exchange rates. A few have banks, which tend to be more diversified across
even pushed reference rates toward zero and below, currencies and have a larger share of fee business.
while also undertaking quantitative easing in the Banks of all sizes should prepare for the long-term
form of bond-buying programs, to push down term effects of negative interest rates and quantitative
rates as well. Against this background, central banks easing by adopting a comprehensive program of
are contemplating broader and more intensive countermeasures. Treasurers will be instrumental in
implementation of negative rates in case of a designing and implementing these measures.
severe downturn.
1
Christian Weistroffer, “Ultra-low interest rates: How Japanese banks have coped,” DB Research, Deutsche Bank, June 10, 2013, dbresearch.com.
2
The exception is Sweden, which has experienced healthy economic growth since 2014 with a robust mortgage market. Net-interest margins in the
banking sector increased in Sweden during this period, and at the end of 2019, the Riksbank decided to lift its key reference rate (seven-day repo
rate) back to zero (the rate for daily marginal deposits was set at –0.10 percent). See Qianying Chen, Mitsuru Katagiri, and Jay Surti, Banking in a
steady state of low growth and interest rates, International Monetary Fund working paper, Number 18/192, August 2018, imf.org; Kerstin Bernoth
and Alexander Haas, “Negative interest rates and the signalling channel,” European Parliament, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and
Quality of Life Policies, Monetary Dialogue, September 2018, europarl.europa.eu.
³ The largest part of central-bank reserves receives negative interest rates although a minimum amount may be exempted. The tiering can be set as
a multiple of the minimum reserve requirements or discretionally for an individual bank. Many government bonds, the most suitable alternative to
central-bank cash, exhibit negative yields due to quantitative easing.
⁴ E xamples for regulatory term-funding requirements are the net stable funding ratio and the minimum requirements to issue eligible bail-in debt.
Exhibit 1
Net-interest margins mainly declined in economies subject to negative-interest-rate policies.
Net-interest margins 2015–19, basis points
160
Eurozone –10
140
120
Sweden +1
100 Switzerland –7
80 Denmark –28
Exhibit 2
The three major components of net-interest margins are structural elements, margin on
assets, and margin on liabilities.
3 major components of net-interest margins, %
Breakdown of structural elements, %
Margin Own
on assets 40–60 funds 20–40
Structural Interest-
elements 15–35 rate risk 20–40
Margin on Liquidity
5–25 10–20
liabilities risk
Credit
10–20
risk
5
Selva Demiralp, Jens Eisenschmidt, and Thomas Vlassopoulos, Negative interest rates, excess liquidity and retail deposits: banks’ reaction to
McKinsey 2020 unconventional monetary policy in the euro area, European Central Bank working paper 2283, May 2019, ecb.europa.eu.
6
Florian Heider, Farzad Saidi, and Glenn Schepens, Life below zero: bank lending under negative policy rates, European Central Bank working
Negative Interest paper
Rates2173, August 2018, ecb.europa.eu.
Exhibit 3 of 5
7
Carlo Altavilla, Lorenzo Burlon, Mariassunta Giannetti, and Sarah Holton, Is there a zero lower bound? The effects of negative policy rates on
banks and firms, European Central Bank Working Paper 2289, June 2019, ecb.europa.eu.
8
For similar results, see “Results of the 2019 LSI stress test,” BaFin, September 23, 2019, bafin.de; see also “Sensitivity Analysis of IRRBB – stress
test 2017,” European Central Bank, February 28, 2017, bankingsupervision.europa.eu.
Exhibit 3
The projection for unmanaged development of net-interest margins over the next five years for
banks in the eurozone shows a decline of eight to 16 basis points.
Net-interest margins, basis points (bp)
160
150
2020–24 estimated
unmanaged
140 net-interest margins
assuming stable
rates –8
130
2020–24 estimated
unmanaged
net-interest margins
assuming +50 bp
120 rates –16
Exhibit 4
To stabilize the client-related components of net-interest margins (assets and liabilities),
Denmark, Japan, Sweden, and Switzerland temporarily increased loan-to-deposit ratios.
Net-customer-loan volumes, € billion Loan-to-deposit ratios, %
–5
percentage
Eurozone 13,819 +3% 14,269 Eurozone 124 119
points (pp)
650 625
596 675
1,016 1,406
Exhibit 5 of 5
Exhibit 5
Treasurers can implement measures to mitigate projected depletion of net-interest margins.
Mitigating measures, basis points
8 2
144 2 144
3 Asset–liability
management
Structure
1 balance sheet
Reprice
Projected Optimize deposits
depletion, liquidity
2020–24 reserve
Net-interest Projected
margin, 2019 net-interest
margin, 2024
Andreas Bohn is a partner in McKinsey’s Frankfurt office, Olivier Plantefeve is a partner in the Paris office, Thomas
Poppensieker is a senior partner in the Munich office, where Sebastian Schneider is a partner.