Eco Exam
Eco Exam
Eco Exam
114116024
C Yashwant kumar
2. (b) Total value of market-traded goods and services produced and consumed in the
economy in a given year.
3. (a) 2007
4. (a) Slowdown in the rate of GDP growth over the course of a year
5.(b) GDP
8. (b) Positive
9. (b) False
10. (c) 4%
Economics has science side where its based with facts and statistics and an art side
where its based on opinions based approach. The side is called the positive economics
and its objective and facts based. This a scientific approach. Positive economics
statements need not be always true but they do need to be validated as correct or
incorrect. Positive economics uses step by step procedure to validate statement in a
similar way to the physical sciences.
Conclusions drawn from positive economics analyses can be tested and supported by data
Positive economics tells you exactly how it is, was or will be, while normative economics
expresses value regarding economic fairness or what policymakers’ goals and outcomes
should be or should have been
• There are two sources of air pollution – continuous and episodic. Continues
sources are those that emit all-round the year like transport, power plants etc.
Episodic sources are those that emit a certain time of the year like crop burning,
Diwali etc.
• The fact that emissions are continuous does not mean that damages are also
continuous.
• Control groups are often easier to carry out when emission are not subject to large
scale fluctuations.
• Many pollutants are emitted on an episodic basis. -E.g. accidental oil or chemical
spills.
• The policy problem here is to design and manage a system so that the probability
of accidental discharges is reduced.
• To measure the probability of episodic emissions we have to have data on actual
occurrences over a long time period, or we have to estimate them from
engineering data and similar information.
• Spatially differentiated: emissions of a pollutant have a different impact on
ambient environmental quality depending on where they are released.
• Uniformly mixed: emissions of a pollutant have the identical impact on ambient
environmental quality independent of where they are released.
15. Mention and elaborate two incentives that can help reduce environmental
degradation.
One simplistic incentive-type statement that one often hears is that pollution is a result of
the profit motive. According to this view, in private enterprise economies such as the
Western industrialized nations, people are rewarded for maximizing profits, the
difference between the value of what is produced and the value of what is used up in the
production process. Furthermore, the thinking goes, the profits that entrepreneurs try to
maximize are strictly monetary profits. In this headlong pursuit of monetary profits,
entrepreneurs give no thought to the environmental impacts of their actions
By “institutions” we mean the fundamental set of public and private organizations, laws,
and practices that a society uses to structure its economic activity. Markets are an
economic institution, for example, as are corporations, a body of commercial law, public
agencies, and so on because it “does not pay.” Thus, in this uncontrolled striving for
monetary profits, the only way to reduce environmental pollution is to weaken the
strength of the profit motive.
An economic incentive is something in the economic world that leads people to channel
their efforts at economic production and consumption in certain directions. We often
think of economic incentives as consisting of payoffs in terms of material wealth; people
have an incentive to behave in ways that provide them with increased wealth. But there
are also nonmaterial incentives that lead people to modify their economic behavior; for
example, self-esteem, the desire to preserve a beautiful visual environment, or the desire
to set a good example for others.
There are a lot of subdivisions of natural resources, they include the source of origin, the
state of development, and the renewability of the resources.
The most common subdivision is based on renewability of resources
• Renewable natural resources: these are resources that can be replenished.
Examples of renewable resources include sunlight, air, and wind. They are
available continuously and their quantity is not noticeably affected by human
consumption. However, renewable resources do not have a rapid recovery rate and
are susceptible to depletion if they are overused.
• Non-renewable natural resources: these resources form extremely slow and do not
naturally form in the environment. A resource is considered to be non-renewable
when their rate of consumption exceeds the rate of recovery. Examples of non-
renewable natural resources are minerals and fossil fuels.
Some pollutants which tend to accumulate in the environment. Radioactive waste, for
example, decays over time but at such a slow rate in relation to human life spans that for
all intents and purposes it will be with us permanently, it is a strictly cumulative type of
pollutant. Another cumulative pollutant is plastics. So far plastic is a substance that
decays very slowly by human standards thus, what we dispose of will be in the
environment permanently. Many chemicals are cumulative pollutants; once emitted they
are basically with us for a very long time.
Emission standards are not to exceed levels applied to the quantities of emissions coming
from pollution sources, normally expressed in terms of the mass of material per some unit
time. As with ambient quality standards continuous emission streams such as gas
emissions may be subject to two averages, a short term and a long term average. It is
important to realize that meeting emission standards does not necessarily result in
meeting ambient quality standards.
Once a given quantity and quality of residuals have been introduced into a particular
environmental medium, it is the physical, chemical, biological, meteorological, and so
on, processes of the natural system that determine how the residuals translate into
particular ambient quality levels.
11. What is the moral approach to environmental degradation?
21. Suppose a factory is located in a village. This factory produces steel. This village
has fertile land on which good crops can be cultivated. The slug from the factory is
discharged on the soil. In light of this express your views on how an environmental
economist would come up with a solution to this problem?
First of all risk assessment should be done and the accurate measurements must be taken
to see how much pollution is happening and what type of pollutants are affecting the soil.
Soil analysis should also be done to gather data on how the soil is affected
The factory must make sure the slug is not released onto the soil directly without being
treated. The government should be notified to take action against the factory, There are
numerous laws and policies against pollution control.
If the factory doesn’t listen to the local village community a law suit must be filed against
the factory so that the village will be compensated for the pollution caused by the factory
There are a few things the factories must do for sure after correcting the waste disposal
Factories must provide workers and people in the communities around the factory with:
• information on the chemicals and materials used in the plant, and how they are
disposed of.
• results of regular government or independent testing of waste disposal through
smokestacks, ventilation systems, pipes, burial pits, and other methods.
• proof that machinery and installations in the factory are safe, in good condition,
and that evacuation plans and resources for the area are ready in case of natural
disaster or serious accident.
Other ways of getting factories in the future to not pollute are by providing the factory
with tax incentives to treat the waste before disposing it and it should be made sure that
the waste is disposed very safely so that it doesn’t affect the environment