Executive Committee 2010-2011: Officers
Executive Committee 2010-2011: Officers
Executive Committee 2010-2011: Officers
Officers
President: Susan Martinovich, P.E., Nevada
Vice President: Kirk Steudle, P.E., Michigan
Secretary/Treasurer: Carlos Braceras, Utah
Regional Representatives
REGION I
George N. Campbell, Jr., New Hampshire
Beverley K. Swaim-Staley, Maryland
REGION II
Mike Hancock, Kentucky
Robert St. Onge, South Carolina
REGION III
Thomas K. Sorel, Minnesota
Vacant
REGION IV
Amadeo Saenz, Jr., Texas
Francis G. Ziegler P.E., North Dakota
Non-Voting Members
Executive Director: John Horsley, AASHTO
Region 1
Delaware Drew Boyce
Maryland Teri Soos
New Hampshire Keith A. Cota (Chair)
New York Richard D. Wilder
Region 2
Alabama Steven Walker (Vice-Chair)
Georgia Ben Buchan
Mississippi Steve Reeves
Louisiana Paul Fossier
Region 3
Iowa David Little
Kansas Rod Lacy
Missouri Joe Jones
Ohio Michael Bline
Region 4
Idaho Damon Allen
South Dakota Bernie Clocksin
Texas Aurora (Rory) Meza
California Kevin Herritt
Others
iv
Preface................................................................................................................................................... xxvii
vii
viii
ix
xi
xii
xiii
xiv
xv
xvi
Glossary................................................................................................................................................ G-1
Index..........................................................................................................................................................I-1
xvii
chapter 1
Figure 1-1. Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths and Deaths Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled, 1950–2008............................ 1-2
Figure 1-2. Percent Distribution of Fixed-Object Fatalities by Object Struck, 2008................................................................ 1-3
chapter 3
Figure 3-1. Roadway Geometry Features................................................................................................................................. 3-5
Figure 3-2. Clear Zone for Non-Recoverable Parallel Foreslope............................................................................................. 3-6
Figure 3-3. Suggested Design for Transverse Slopes............................................................................................................. 3-7
Figure 3-4. Median Transverse Slope Design.......................................................................................................................... 3-7
Figure 3-5. Alternate Designs for Drains at Median Openings................................................................................................ 3-8
Figure 3-6. Preferred Cross Sections for Channels with Abrupt Slope Changes................................................................... 3-9
Figure 3-7. Preferred Cross Sections for Channels with Gradual Slope Changes................................................................ 3-10
Figure 3-8. Design Criteria for Safety Treatment of Pipes and Culverts............................................................................... 3-15
Figure 3-9. Safety Treatment for Cross-Drainage Culvert...................................................................................................... 3-15
Figure 3-10. Inlet and Outlet Design Example for Parallel Drainage..................................................................................... 3-17
Figure 3-11. Alternate Location for a Parallel Drainage Culvert............................................................................................ 3-18
Figure 3-12. Safety Treatment for Parallel Drainage Pipe...................................................................................................... 3-18
chapter 4
Figure 4-1. Breakaway Support Stub Height Measurements.................................................................................................. 4-3
Figure 4-2. Wind and Impact Loads on Roadside Signs.......................................................................................................... 4-5
Figure 4-3. Impact Performance of a Multiple-Post Sign Support.......................................................................................... 4-5
Figure 4-4. Multidirectional Coupler......................................................................................................................................... 4-6
Figure 4-5. Typical Unidirectional Slip Base............................................................................................................................. 4-6
Figure 4-6. Slotted Fuse Plate Design....................................................................................................................................... 4-6
Figure 4-7. Perforated Fuse Plate Design................................................................................................................................. 4-7
Figure 4-8. Unidirectional Slip Base for Small Signs............................................................................................................... 4-9
Figure 4-9. Multidirectional Slip Base for Small Signs............................................................................................................ 4-9
Figure 4-10. Oregon 3-Bolt Slip Base..................................................................................................................................... 4-10
Figure 4-11. Example of a Cast Aluminum Frangible Luminaire........................................................................................... 4-11
Figure 4-12. Example of a Luminaire Slip Base Design......................................................................................................... 4-11
Figure 4-13. Example of a Frangible Coupling Design.......................................................................................................... 4-11
Figure 4-14. Prototype Breakaway Design for Utility Poles................................................................................................... 4-15
chapter 5
Figure 5-1(a). Comparative Barrier Consideration for Embankments (Metric Units) ............................................................ 5-5
Figure 5-1(b). Comparative Barrier Consideration for Embankments (U.S. Customary Units) ............................................. 5-6
xviii
xix
Figure 5-40(a). Example Design Chart for a Flared Roadside Barrier................................................................................... 5-52
Figure 5-40(b). Example Design Chart for a Flared Roadside Barrier Installation (U.S. Customary Units).........................5-52
Figure 5-41(a). Example Design Chart for a Parallel Roadside Barrier Installation (Metric Units).......................................5-53
Figure 5-41(b). Example Design Chart for a Parallel Roadside Barrier Installation (U.S. Customary Units)........................ 5-53
Figure 5-42. Approach Barrier Layout for Opposing Traffic.................................................................................................. 5-54
Figure 5-43. Determination of Trailing End Guardrail Layout................................................................................................ 5-54
Figure 5-44. Suggested Roadside Slopes for Approach Barriers......................................................................................... 5-55
Figure 5-45. Example of Barrier Design for Bridge Approach............................................................................................... 5-56
Figure 5-46. Example of Barrier Design for Bridge Piers....................................................................................................... 5-57
Figure 5-47. Example of Barrier Design for Non-Traversable Embankments....................................................................... 5-58
Figure 5-48. Example of Barrier Design for Fixed Object on Horizontal Curve.................................................................... 5-59
Figure 5-49. Example Field Installation with Terminal........................................................................................................... 5-60
Figure 5-50. Possible Solution to Intersection Side Road Near Bridge................................................................................. 5-60
Figure 5-51(a). Guardrail Post Details in Rock Formation (Metric Units)............................................................................... 5-62
Figure 5-51(b). Guardrail Post Details in Rock Formation (U.S. Customary Units)............................................................... 5-63
Figure 5-52(a). Guardrail Post Details in Mow Strip Applications (Metric Units).................................................................. 5-64
Figure 5-52(b). Guardrail Post Details in Mow Strip Applications (U.S. Customary Units).................................................. 5-65
chapter 6
Figure 6-1. Guidelines for Median Barriers on High-speed, Fully Controlled-Access Roadways.......................................... 6-2
Figure 6-2. Weak-Post W-Beam Median Barrier....................................................................................................................... 6-5
Figure 6-3. Three-Strand Cable Median Barrier....................................................................................................................... 6-6
Figure 6-4. Brifen Wire Rope Safety Fence.............................................................................................................................. 6-7
Figure 6-5. The Cable Safety System (CASS) ......................................................................................................................... 6-8
Figure 6-6. NU-CABLE™ High-Tension Cable System ............................................................................................................. 6-8
Figure 6-7. Safence Cable Barrier System............................................................................................................................... 6-8
Figure 6-8. Gibraltar Cable Barrier System............................................................................................................................... 6-9
Figure 6-9. Box-Beam Median Barrier...................................................................................................................................... 6-9
Figure 6-10. Strong-Post W-Beam Median Barrier................................................................................................................. 6-10
Figure 6-11. Modified Thrie-Beam Median Barrier................................................................................................................ 6-11
Figure 6-12. New York Modification of Concrete Barrier....................................................................................................... 6-12
Figure 6-13. Concrete Safety-Shape Median Barrier............................................................................................................. 6-13
Figure 6-14. Single-Slope Concrete Median Barrier.............................................................................................................. 6-13
Figure 6-15. Standard Quickchange® Moveable Barrier System......................................................................................... 6-14
Figure 6-16. Barrier Termination at Permanent Openings..................................................................................................... 6-15
xx
chapter 7
Figure 7-1. Curb Type Glu-Lam Timber Railing........................................................................................................................ 7-4
Figure 7-2. Texas T-6 Railing..................................................................................................................................................... 7-4
Figure 7-3. Wyoming Two-Tube Bridge Railing........................................................................................................................ 7-5
Figure 7-4. Concrete F-Shaped Bridge Railing......................................................................................................................... 7-5
Figure 7-5. 1,067-mm [42-in.] Tall Concrete Safety-Shaped Bridge Railing............................................................................ 7-6
Figure 7-6. Texas Type TT Railing............................................................................................................................................. 7-6
Figure 7-7. End Treatment for Traffic Railing on a Bridge in Low-Speed Situations.............................................................. 7-9
Figure 7-8. Terminating a Traffic Barrier on Bridge with End Terminal................................................................................. 7-10
Figure 7-9. Iowa Concrete Block Retrofit Bridge Railing........................................................................................................ 7-12
Figure 7-10. Delaware Thrie-Beam Retrofit............................................................................................................................ 7-13
Figure 7-11. Metal Post-and-Beam Retrofit............................................................................................................................ 7-14
Figure 7-12. Thrie-Beam Transition to Modified Concrete Safety Shape............................................................................. 7-15
chapter 8
Figure 8-1. Trailing End W-Beam Guardrail Anchorage........................................................................................................... 8-3
Figure 8-2. Grading for Flared Guardrail Terminal................................................................................................................... 8-5
Figure 8-3. Grading for Tangent Guardrail Terminal................................................................................................................ 8-6
Figure 8-4. Three-Strand Cable Terminal................................................................................................................................. 8-8
Figure 8-5. CASS™ Cable Terminal (CCT)................................................................................................................................ 8-8
Figure 8-6. W-Beam Guardrail Anchored in Backslope......................................................................................................... 8-10
Figure 8-7. Eccentric Loader Terminal (ELT)........................................................................................................................... 8-11
Figure 8-8. Modified Eccentric Loader Terminal (MELT)........................................................................................................ 8-12
Figure 8-9. Flared Energy-Absorbing Terminal (FLEAT™)..................................................................................................... 8-13
Figure 8-10. Slotted Rail Terminal (SRT-350™)....................................................................................................................... 8-13
Figure 8-11. X-Tension Guardrail End Terminal...................................................................................................................... 8-14
Figure 8-12. Extruder Terminal (ET-Plus™)............................................................................................................................. 8-15
Figure 8-13. Sequential Kinking Terminal (SKT-350™)........................................................................................................... 8-16
Figure 8-14. Brakemaster® 350.............................................................................................................................................. 8-17
Figure 8-15. Crash Cushion Attenuating Terminal (CAT-350™)............................................................................................. 8-18
Figure 8-16. FLEAT Median Terminal (FLEAT-MT™).............................................................................................................. 8-19
Figure 8-17. X-Tension™ Median Attenuator System (X-MAS)............................................................................................. 8-19
Figure 8-18. Wyoming Box-Beam End Terminal (WY-BET™)................................................................................................ 8-20
Figure 8-19. Bursting Energy Absorbing Terminal (BEAT™)................................................................................................. 8-21
Figure 8-20. Bullnose Guardrail System................................................................................................................................. 8-24
xxi
chapter 9
Figure 9-1. Iowa Temporary Concrete Barrier.......................................................................................................................... 9-5
Figure 9-2. Rockingham Precast Concrete Barrier................................................................................................................... 9-6
Figure 9-3. J-J Hooks Portable Concrete Barrier..................................................................................................................... 9-7
Figure 9-4. Modified Virginia DOT Portable Concrete Barrier................................................................................................. 9-7
Figure 9-5. California K-Rail Portable Concrete Barrier............................................................................................................ 9-8
Figure 9-6. GPLINK® Pre-Cast Temporary Concrete Barrier.................................................................................................... 9-9
Figure 9-7. Georgia Temporary Concrete Barrier................................................................................................................... 9-10
Figure 9-8. Idaho 6.1-m [20-ft] New Jersey Portable Barrier................................................................................................. 9-11
Figure 9-9. Oregon Pin-and-Loop Barrier............................................................................................................................... 9-11
Figure 9-10. Ohio DOT 3-m [10-ft] Long New Jersey Profile Temporary Concrete Barrier.................................................. 9-12
Figure 9-11. New York DOT Portable Concrete Barrier.......................................................................................................... 9-13
Figure 9-12. Iowa DOT Tie-Down Steel H-Section Temporary Barrier.................................................................................. 9-14
xxii
chapter 10
Figure 10-1. Lateral Offset for Objects at Horizontal Curves on Curbed Facilities................................................................ 10-4
Figure 10-2. Enhanced Lateral Offsets at Merge Points......................................................................................................... 10-5
Figure 10-3. Enhanced Lateral Offsets at Driveways............................................................................................................. 10-6
Figure 10-4. Landscape and Rigid Object Placement for Buffer Strip Widths ≤1.2 m [4 ft].............................................. 10-10
Figure 10-5. Landscape and Rigid Object Placement for Buffer Strip Widths >1.2 m [4 ft].............................................. 10-10
Figure 10-6. A Transit Shelter Located Curbside................................................................................................................. 10-13
chapter 11
Figure 11-1. Typical Single Mailbox Installations................................................................................................................... 11-2
Figure 11-2. Examples of Hazardous Single Mailbox Installations....................................................................................... 11-2
Figure 11-3. Examples of Hazardous Multiple Mailbox Installations.................................................................................... 11-3
xxiii
chapter 12
Figure 12-1. Single Vehicle Roadway Departure Fatalities on Two Lanes, Undivided, Noninterchange,
Nonconjunction Roads by Roadway Classification in 2009 ................................................................................................. 12-2
Figure 12-2. Distribution of Single-Vehicle ROR Crashes between Tangent and Curved Sections..................................... 12-3
Figure 12-3. Reinforcing Steel Grate...................................................................................................................................... 12-5
Figure 12-4. Typical Low-Volume Rural Roadway.................................................................................................................. 12-6
Figure 12-5. Typical Low-Volume Rural Bridge...................................................................................................................... 12-7
xxiv
chapter 3
Table 3-1. Suggested Clear-Zone Distances in Meters (Feet) from Edge of Through Traveled Lane ................................... 3-2
Table 3-2. Horizontal Curve Adjustment Factor....................................................................................................................... 3-4
chapter 4
Table 4-1. Objectives and Strategies for Reducing Utility Pole Crashes............................................................................... 4-14
Table 4-2. Objectives and Strategies for Reducing Crashes with Trees................................................................................ 4-16
chapter 5
Table 5-1(a). MASH Crash Test Matrix for Longitudinal Barriers ............................................................................................ 5-2
Table 5-1(b). NCHRP Report 350 Crash Test Matrix for Longitudinal Barriers........................................................................ 5-3
Table 5-2. Barrier Guidelines for Non-Traversable Terrain and Roadside Obstacles.............................................................. 5-9
Table 5-3. Roadside Barriers and NCHRP Report 350 Approved Test Levels....................................................................... 5-12
Table 5-4. MGS Design Applications with Pickup Truck Impact Performance ..................................................................... 5-20
Table 5-5. Selection Criteria for Roadside Barriers................................................................................................................ 5-32
Table 5-6. Summary of Maximum Deflections ...................................................................................................................... 5-34
Table 5-7. Suggested Shy-Line Offset (LS) Values ................................................................................................................. 5-41
Table 5-8(a). Example Bumper Trajectory Data (Metric Units).............................................................................................. 5-47
Table 5-8(b). Example Bumper Trajectory Data (U.S. Customary Units) .............................................................................. 5-47
Table 5-9. Suggested Flare Rates for Barrier Design ............................................................................................................ 5-48
Table 5-10(a). Suggested Runout Lengths for Barrier Design (Metric Units) ....................................................................... 5-50
Table 5-10(b). Suggested Runout Lengths for Barrier Design (U.S. Customary Units) ....................................................... 5-50
chapter 6
Table 6-1. Crashworthy Median Barrier Systems..................................................................................................................... 6-4
chapter 7
Table 7-1. MASH Test Matrix for Bridge Railings..................................................................................................................... 7-3
chapter 8
Table 8-1. Terminals for Cable Barrier Systems....................................................................................................................... 8-7
Table 8-2. Terminals for W-Beam Guardrail Systems ............................................................................................................. 8-9
Table 8-3. Terminals for Median W-Beam Guardrail Systems .............................................................................................. 8-17
Table 8-4. Terminals for Box-Beam Guardrail Systems......................................................................................................... 8-20
Table 8-5. Sacrificial Crash Cushions ..................................................................................................................................... 8-23
Table 8-6. Reusable Crash Cushions ..................................................................................................................................... 8-28
Table 8-7. Low-Maintenance and/or Self-Restoring Crash Cushions ................................................................................... 8-31
Table 8-8. Sand Barrel Systems ............................................................................................................................................. 8-37
xxv
chapter 9
Table 9-1. Example of Clear-Zone Widths for Work Zones ..................................................................................................... 9-2
Table 9-2. Temporary Longitudinal Barriers ............................................................................................................................ 9-3
Table 9-3. Crashworthy Portable Concrete Barriers................................................................................................................. 9-5
Table 9-4. Suggested Priorities for Application of Protective Vehicles and Truck-Mounted Attenuators .......................... 9-28
Table 9-5. Example of Guidelines for Spacing of Shadow Vehicles...................................................................................... 9-30
chapter 10
Table 10-1. Design Strategies for Curb Treatment ................................................................................................................ 10-8
Table 10-2. Design Strategies for Channelized Islands and Medians................................................................................... 10-8
Table 10-3. Design Strategies for Gateways ......................................................................................................................... 10-9
Table 10-4. Design Strategies for Roadside Grading ............................................................................................................ 10-9
Table 10-5. Design Strategies to Protect Pedestrians in Motor Vehicle Crashes ............................................................... 10-11
Table 10-6. Design Strategies for Bicycles .......................................................................................................................... 10-12
Table 10-7. Design Strategies for On-Street Parking .......................................................................................................... 10-12
Table 10-8. Design Strategies for Urban Mailbox Use ........................................................................................................ 10-12
Table 10-9. Design Strategies for Street Furniture Use ...................................................................................................... 10-13
Table 10-10. Design Strategies for Vertical Roadside Treatment and Hardware ............................................................... 10-15
chapter 11
Table 11-1. Suggested Guidelines for Lateral Placement of Mailboxes ............................................................................... 11-6
xxvi
This Roadside Design Guide was developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Subcommittee on Design through the Technical Committee for Roadside Safety (TCRS) under the chairmanship of Keith Cota, P.E.
This book presents a synthesis of current information and operating practices related to roadside safety and is written in dual units—
metric and U.S. Customary. This edition supersedes the 2006 AASHTO publication, which included the update of the Median chapter.
The roadside is defined as that area beyond the traveled way (i.e., driving lanes) and the shoulder (if any) of the roadway itself. Con-
sequently, roadside delineation, shoulder surface treatments, and similar on-roadway safety features are not extensively discussed.
Although safety can best be served by keeping motorists on the road, the focus of this guide is on safety treatments that minimize the
likelihood of serious injuries when a driver does run off the road.
A second noteworthy point is that this book is a guide. It is not a standard, nor is it a design policy. It is intended to be used as a re-
source document from which individual highway agencies can develop standards and policies. Although much of the material in the
guide can be considered universal in its application, several recommendations are subjective in nature and may need modification to
fit local conditions. However, it is important that significant deviations from the guide be based on operational experience and objec-
tive analysis.
To be consistent with AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, design speed has been selected as the basic
speed parameter to be used in this guide. However, because the design speed often is selected based on the most restrictive physical
features found on a specific project, reasonable and prudent drivers may exceed that speed for a significant percentage of a project
length. There will be other instances in which roadway conditions will prevent most motorists from driving as fast as the design speed.
Because roadside safety design is intended to minimize the consequences of a motorist leaving the roadway inadvertently, the designer
should consider the speed at which encroachments are most likely to occur when selecting an appropriate roadside design standard
or feature.
The 2011 edition of the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide has been updated to include hardware that has met the evaluation criteria
contained in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety
Performance Evaluation of Highway Features and begins to detail the most current evaluation criteria contained under the Manual for
Assessing Safety Hardware, 2009 (MASH). For the most part, roadside hardware tested and accepted under older guidelines that are
no longer applicable has been included in this edition.
The TCRS is currently working through a National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) research project to update the
Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) with the development of a “window-friendly” version. The RSAP update will be “beta”
tested in 2011 and is expected to be available through AASHTO in early 2012, and will be available through a link on the web-based
format of this publication.
As mentioned, design values are presented in this document in both metric and U.S. Customary units. The relationship between these
values is neither an exact (i.e., soft) conversion nor a completely rationalized (i.e., hard) conversion. The metric values are those that
would have been used had the guide been presented exclusively in metric units, while the U.S. Customary values are those that would
have been used if the guide had been presented exclusively in U.S. Customary units. Therefore, the user is advised to work entirely in
one system and not to attempt to convert directly between the two.
The reader is cautioned that roadside safety policy, criteria, and technology is a rapidly changing field of study. Changes in the road-
side safety field are certain to occur after this document is published. Efforts should be made to incorporate the appropriate current
design elements into the project development. Comments from users of this guide about suggested changes or modifications that
result from further developmental work or hands-on experience will be appreciated. All such comments should be addressed to the
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Engineering Program, 444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 249,
Washington, DC 20001.
xxvii
Roadside safety design, as one component of total highway design, is a relatively recent concept. Most of the highway design funda-
mentals were established by the late 1940s. Additional refinements were made in the 1950s and 1960s with the development of the
Interstate system. These components included horizontal alignment, vertical alignment, hydraulic design, and sight distance to name
some of the more common highway design elements. These elements have been revised and refined over the years through experience
and research. However, the highway design components themselves have remained about the same for several decades.
Roadside safety design did not become a much discussed aspect of highway design until the late 1960s, and it was the decade of the
1970s before this type of design was regularly incorporated into highway projects. The purpose of this guide is to present the concepts
of roadside safety to the designer in such a way that the most practical, appropriate, and cost-effective roadside design can be accom-
plished for each project.
Roadside design might be defined as the design of the area outside the traveled way. Some have referred to this aspect of highway
design as off-pavement design. A question commonly asked revolves around whether spending resources off the pavement is really
beneficial given the limited nature of infrastructure funds. Perhaps some statistics can bring the potential of crash reduction and road-
side safety into focus.
In 2009, 33,808 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes in the United States—the lowest number of deaths since 1950 (7). During
the same time period, the number of vehicle-kilometers [vehicle-miles] of travel each year has increased by approximately six and one
half times from 0.7 (0.5) billion to 4.8 (3.0) billion. Consequently, the traffic fatality rate per 100 million vehicle-kilometers [vehicle-
miles] of travel has decreased approximately 85 percent from 4.58 (7.38) in 1950 to 0.71 (1.13) in 2009 (the latest year available for
data on vehicle-kilometers [vehicle-miles] of travel). Figure 1-1 shows the number of fatalities and fatality rate from 1950 to 2009.
This significant reduction is due to several factors. Motor vehicles are much safer today than they have been in the past. Protected
passenger compartments, padded interiors, occupant restraints, and airbags are some features that have added to passenger safety dur-
ing impact situations. Roadways have been made safer through improvements in features such as horizontal and vertical alignments,
intersection geometry, traversable roadsides, roadside barrier performance, and grade separations and interchanges. Drivers are more
educated about safe vehicle operation as evidenced by the increased use of occupant restraints and a decrease in driving under the
influence of alcohol or drugs. All these contributing factors have reduced the motor vehicle fatality rate.
Figure 1-1. Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths and Deaths Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled, 1950–2008 (6)
According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI), the proportion of motor
vehicle deaths involving collisions with fixed objects has fluctuated between 19 and 23 percent since 1979 (4). Almost all fixed-object
crashes involve only one vehicle and occur in both urban and rural areas. Figure 1-2 shows the percentage distribution of fixed-object
fatalities by the object struck in 2008. Trees were by far the most common object struck, accounting for approximately half of all
fixed-object fatal crashes. Utility poles were the second most common objects struck, accounting for 12 percent of all fixed object
crashes, followed by traffic barriers with 8 percent. Furthermore, for 2008, 18 percent of fixed-object crashes involved vehicles that
rolled over, while 18 percent involved occupant ejection. More detailed crash statistics are available from the following website at
http://www.nhtsa.gov/FARS.
In 1967, the American Association for State Highway Officials (AASHO; currently the American Association for State Highway and
Transportation Officials [AASHTO]) released its Highway Design and Operational Practices Related to Highway Safety (1), the first
official report that focused attention on hazardous roadside elements and suggested appropriate treatment for many of them. This
guide, also known as the AASHTO “Yellow Book,” was revised and updated in 1974 with the introduction of the forgiving roadside
concept. In 1989, AASHTO published the first edition of the Roadside Design Guide.
In 1998, AASHTO approved their Strategic Highway Safety Plan (3), which provides objectives and strategies for keeping vehicles on
the roadway and for minimizing the consequences when a vehicle does encroach on the roadside. The National Cooperative Highway
Research Program (NCHRP) also has published a series of guides, called the NCHRP Report 500 (9), to assist state and local agencies
in their efforts to reduce injuries and fatalities in targeted emphasis areas. These guides correspond to the emphasis areas outlined in
AASHTO’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The Strategic Highway Safety Plan and associated NCHRP Report 500 guides are avail-
able from the AASHTO website at http://safety.transportation.org/guides.aspx.