Stretcher Transportation Services: Decision Guide For Choosing Appropriate Patient Transportation
Stretcher Transportation Services: Decision Guide For Choosing Appropriate Patient Transportation
Stretcher Transportation Services: Decision Guide For Choosing Appropriate Patient Transportation
Implementation Branch
Health System Performance and Accountability Division
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Introduction
• The objective of the MOHLTC Decision Guide is to provide a framework for the application of
current and emerging best practices for appropriately selecting between modes of transportation.
• The MOHLTC Decision Guide is intended as a provincial reference resource for hospitals to use
and adapt to their particular needs, resources, and patients when making arrangements for non-
urgent patient transportation by an ambulance or non-ambulance Stretcher Transportation Services
(STS) provider.
• The MOHLTC Decision Guide:
• Provides a synthesis of existing tools and guides.
• Includes a decision-making algorithm and supplementary guidance for consideration at each
step in the algorithm.
• Is not a substitute for clinical decision makingby the health care professionals responsible for
individual patients.
• Note that the focus of the MOHLTC Decision Guide is on non-ambulance transportation by
stretcher. LHINs and hospitals are encouraged to develop locally tailored guidelines addressing
non-stretcher modes of transportation for ambulatory and wheelchair-dependent passengers.
• Hospitals are encouraged to use the most appropriate cost effective mode of transport.
• Sources for current content are marked by footnotes, and footnoted sources are listed in
Attachment 3.
2
Algorithm for Choosing Appropriate Patient Transportation
YES
YES
NO
3
Q1: Does the person require a stretcher?
Situation: A person requires transport.
Task: The care team should determine whether the person requires a stretcher.
The following table lists examples of indicators of whether a stretcher is required. (Note: these lists are not exhaustive):
• The person may be medically unstable or at high risk of becoming • The person is fully mobile (even if the person has an assistive
medically unstable, such that a health care provider may require that device)1,2,3
the person be on a stretcher in order to provide medical
• The person has a fitness level to match the level of exertion required
interventions (See next slide).11
for the journey.11
• Theperson’sclinicalconditionrequiresthemtoberecumbentwhile
• The person is not restrained11
being transported.10,11
• Other indicators
• The person may be a danger to themselves, escorts or vehicle
attendants because of cognitive or mental health issues and may be
required to be restrained while on a stretcher.11 (Note – As noted on
page 5, chemical or physical restraint is an indicator suggesting
medical instability and the person may not be appropriate for STS)
• Person needs transport from bed-to-bed (may include transfer
assistance to an exam table).11
• The person requires a stretcher to transfer to/from the vehicle.1,2,3
• Other indicators
Action:
• If the person requires a stretcher, proceed to Q2.
• If the person does not require a stretcher, arrange for a non-stretcher transport provider (e.g. taxi, wheelchair accessible van, private vehicle).
• NOTE: Non-stretcher transport is outside the scope of the MOHLTC Decision Guide. An escort and/or equipment may be required by
persons using non-stretcher transport.
4
Q2: Is the person medically unstable?
Situation: A person requires a stretcher for transport.
Task: The care team, including the most responsible physician or physician-designated health care provider, should determine whether the person
who requires transport is medically unstable and requires, while being transported, the care of a physician, nurse, other health care provider, or
paramedic.
The following table lists examples of indicators of medical stability. (NOTE – the list is not exhaustive). The table is continued on the next page.
Indicators that suggest the person IS medically stable Indicators that suggest the person IS NOT medically stable
5
Q2: Is the person medically unstable? (continued)
• The table below is a continuation of the table from the previous page.
Indicators that suggest the person IS medically stable Indicators that suggest the person IS NOT medically stable
• If the medical stability of the person is in question, he or she should be sent by ambulance.
Action:
• If the person IS medically stable, proceed to Q3.
• If the person IS NOT medically stable and requires, while being transported, the care of a physician, nurse, other health care provider, or
paramedic, arrange for transport by ambulance.
6
Q3: Does the person require an escort to mitigate against a risk of clinical decline?
Situation: A person requiring stretcher transport has been determined to be medically stable but may require assistance and/or monitoring by an
escort during transport to mitigate against a risk of clinical decline.
Task: The care team, including the most responsible physician or designated health care provider, should :
a) Assesstheperson’snatureandmagnitudeofriskforclinicaldeclineduringtransport;and
b) For persons at high risk, consider whether the person should be deemed to be medically unstable and transported by ambulance;
c) For persons at low to moderate risk, identify theperson’sclinicalcareneedswithrespecttomitigatingthatrisk,determinewhetherthe
stretcher transport provider can meet those needs, and, if not, determine which clinical escort and equipment the hospital can provide or
arrange for to best meet those needs; and,
d) For persons at negligible to low risk, proceed to Q4 to assess whether there are any other care needs that require an escort or equipment.
• Remember that:
• The person’sriskforclinicaldeclineduringtransportmustbe determined for both the outgoing and return legs of the journey. Take into
consideration the travel time of each leg.
• Patients who are coded by the ambulance dispatcher as Code 1 or 2 (non-urgent) may be deferred by EMS to allow the ambulance provider
to respond to code 3 and 4 (urgent) calls. Deferral can lead to delays in treatment, and the risks in connection with the potential for deferral
should beconsideredduringthedeterminationofwhetherapatient’srisk can be most appropriately managed by arranging for an
ambulance or for STS with a hospital escort and/or equipment.
• Your local stretcher transport provider(s) have specific services and skills.
• Stretcher transport providers are expected to call 911 if the clinical condition of their passenger worsens.
7
Q3: Does the person require an escort to mitigate against a risk of clinical decline? (continued)
The following table lists examples of indicators of risk of clinical decline during transport (NOTE – the list is not exhaustive).
Indicators that the person is at LOW risk for clinical decline Indicators that the person is at MODERATE risk for clinical
during transport decline during transport
• Hemodynamically stable9 • Acute deterioration not anticipated, however continuous supervision
required1,2,9
• Stable vital signs and airway1
• Abnormal or fluctuating but not acutely deteriorating neurological
• No expected threat to life or function1
status1,2,9
• Minimal monitoring required1
• Cardiovascular abnormalities but presently stable with potential for
• Expected that no interventions will be required during transport1 deterioration1
• IV locked or no IV1,7 • Respiratory compromise with adequate airway & no immediate
threat to life1
• Other indicators
• Interventions may be necessary during transport (i.e. intravenous
medications, other medication administration)1,2,9
• Invasive tubes2
• 3 lead EKG monitoring7,9
• Basic cardiac medications e.g. heparin, nitro7,9
• Recent seizure activity9
• Other indicators
To mitigate against the potential risk of clinical deterioration, an escort may be required to:
• Monitor, manage, discontinue IV
• Administer, adjust medication
• Monitor health status and respond to changes
• Respond to airway changes, suction
• Protect person from injury
Note – A person under Form 1 of the Mental Health Act requires an appropriately trained health care provider escort with or without a security
escort.
8
Q3: Does the person require an escort to mitigate against a risk of clinical decline? (continued)
Action:
• If the person is at MODERATE risk for clinical decline during transport:
• Identifytheperson’sclinicalcareneedswithrespecttomitigatingthatrisk;
• Determine whether the stretcher transport provider can meet those clinical care needs and if not, determine which clinical escort and
equipment can best provide those clinical care needs; and,
o See Attachment 2 for scopes of practice for some common health care provider escorts.
o Consideralsotheescort’strainingandexperienceofprovidingcareduringinter-facility transfers.
o Ensure the escort can competently intervene and use any equipment the hospital will provide.
• The care team must be aware of the skills and services of their local stretcher transport provider, the equipment provided by them in the
vehicles and any relevant hospital and stretcher transport policies and procedures. The tables below are intentionally left blank to allow
hospitals to identify the pertinent information for their staff.
• Make appropriate arrangements for transport with the stretcher transport provider with a clinical escort and equipment.
• If the person is at LOW risk for clinical decline during transport, proceed to Q4 to determine whether the hospital should provide an escort and
equipment to meet any other care needs the person may have during the journey.
Services and skills of my local stretcher transport provider(s) and Equipment provided by them in the vehicles
• <to be customized by each hospital>
• …..
• …..
• Etc.
Relevant Hospital and local stretcher transport provider(s) policies and procedures
9
Q4: Can the person’s care needs be met by the stretcher transport provider and receiving facility?
Situation: A medically stable person requiring transport is at LOW risk of clinical decline during transport, but still may require assistance during
transport and at the receiving facility.
Task: The care team should identifytheperson’sremainingcareneedsanddeterminewhethertheycanbemetbythestretcher transport provider
and receiving facility, or if the hospital should arrange to send an escort and equipment with the stretcher transport provider.
• Remember that:
• The team should identify the person’sneedsboth during transport (i.e. while travelling in the vehicle to and from the receiving facility) and at
the receiving facility.
• Family members may have the required skills and experience to accompany the person.
• Determine whether the stretcher transport provider can provide all needed care during transport (i.e. that the stretcher transport provider
attendants are qualified to provide all needed care and have all required skills and equipment)
• Determine whether the receiving facility can provide all needed care while the person is at the receiving facility (e.g. that it will provide PSW
support).
• For passengers with mental health issues, take into consideration potential gender conflict issues between the passenger and the stretcher
transport provider attendants
• Note – A person under Form 1 of the Mental Health Act requires an appropriately trained health care provider escort with or without a security
escort.
10
Q4: Can the person’s care needs be met by the stretcher transport provider and receiving facility?
(continued)
Action:
• If the care team determines that the person requires an escort and equipment:
1. Choosetheescortandequipmentrequiredtotheperson’scareneedsduringtransportandatthereceivingfacility
o See Attachment 2 for scopes of practice for some common health care provider escorts.
o Consideralsotheescort’strainingandexperienceofprovidingcareduringinter-facility transfers.
o Ensure the escort can competently intervene and use any equipment the hospital will provide.
2. Arrange transport with stretcher transport provider.
11
Attachment 1 – Q2: Examples of Life or Limb Conditions
Examples of Life or Limb Conditions
12
Attachment 1 – Q2: Examples of Life or Limb Conditions (continued)
Examples of Life or Limb Conditions (continued)
13
Attachment 2 – Escort Scope of Practice Overview
From critical care areas: e.g. ICU, Cardiac Care Standard practice:
• Ability to manage unpredictable patients – have appropriate • Provide care to patients that they would usually be assigned
training e.g. ACLS and the associated treatments as ordered by the MRP
• Cardiac monitoring, various infusions and fluid balance • The Three-Factor Framework (Client , Nurse, and
monitoring Environment) should be used to make a decision about which
• Airway assessment and support nursing category (RN or RPN) to match with the patient needs
• Utilize medical directives while on transfer (such as (College of Nurses Ontario)
defibrillation and transcutaneous pacing) − RPN are needed in more stable environments for less
complex, more predictable patients with a low risk for
From non-critical care areas: negative outcomes
• Provide care to patients that they would usually be assigned
and the associated treatments as ordered by the MRPs
14
Attachment 2 – Escort Scope of Practice Overview (continued)
Health Care Aid / Personal Support Worker Lay Person – e.g. Family, Taxi Driver, Volunteer
• Non-regulated • Non-regulated
Security Guard
• Regulated
• Must have a valid Ontario security guard licence
15
Attachment 3 – References
1. Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Decision Guide for Ambulance and Non-Ambulance Patient Transport (NAPT) Service – Adult Patient,
2011
2. St.Joseph’sHealthCentreDecisionGuideforAmbulanceandNon-Ambulance Medical Transfer Service, 2006
3. Champlain LHIN Non-urgent Patient Transportation Project (adopted from London Health Sciences Centre)
4. London Health Sciences Centre, Patient Transport (PT) Decision Guide – V. 3.3Hospital initiated patient transfers , May 9, 2013
5. Sudbury-Manitoulin Pilot, Patient Transport Decision Matrix
6. Stable for Transport Guidelines, Criteria Manual Chapter 5.4, California Department of Health Care Services, Government of California
7. Guide for Interfacility Patient Transfer, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
8. Life or Limb Policy – Implementation Guide, Critical Care Services Ontario
9. Leamington Hospital, Appendix D, in-patient transport protocol
10. Nottingham University Trust, NHS, Patient Transport Policy and Procedures, 2010
11. MOHLTC Stakeholder discussions, 2014
16