Positive Economics and Normative Economics: Economics Is The Study of Choice
Positive Economics and Normative Economics: Economics Is The Study of Choice
Positive Economics and Normative Economics: Economics Is The Study of Choice
We now have an idea of what economics is about: people’s choices. But what is the reason 1.1
for studying choices? Part of the answer is that economists are just curious, but that’s only
a small part of the picture. Understanding people’s choices is practically useful for two key
reasons. Economic analysis: 1.2
1.
Describes what people actually do (positive economics).
2.
Recommends what people ought to do (normative economics).
1.3
The first application is descriptive and the second is advisory.
Normative Analysis and Public Policy Normative analysis also generates advice to
society in general. For example, economists are often asked to evaluate public policies, like
taxes or regulations. When public policies have winners and losers, citizens tend to have
opposing views about the desirability of the government program. One person’s migratory
bird sanctuary is another person’s mosquito-infested swamp. Protecting a wetland with
environmental regulations benefits bird-watchers but harms landowners who plan to
develop that land.
When a government policy has winners and losers, economists will need to make some
ethical judgments to conduct normative analysis. Economists must make ethical judgments
whenever we evaluate policies that make one group worse off so another group can be
made better off.
Ethical judgments are usually unavoidable when economists think about government
policies, because there are very few policies that make everyone better off. Deciding
whether the costs experienced by the losers are justified by the benefits experienced by the
winners is partly an ethical judgment. Is it ethical to create environmental regulations that
prevent a real estate developer from draining a swamp so he can build new homes? What if