MECO - Chapter 1 Ten Principles of Economics
MECO - Chapter 1 Ten Principles of Economics
MECO - Chapter 1 Ten Principles of Economics
of Economics
Core principles of economics Mankiw Chp 1
Understand with examples the ten principles of economics.
Equality means that those benefits are distributed uniformly among society’s members.
In
other words, efficiency refers to the size of the economic pie, and equality refers to
how the pie is divided into individual slices.
efficiency: the property of society getting the most it can from its scarce resources
equality: the property of distributing economic prosperity uniformly among the members
of society
Nonetheless, people are likely to make good decisions only if they understand the
options that are available to them.
The opportunity cost of an item is what you give up to get that item.
Economists use the term marginal change to describe a small incremental adjustment
to an existing
plan of action.
Keep in mind that margin means “edge,” so marginal changes are adjustments around
the edges of what you are doing. Rational people often make decisions by comparing
marginal benefits and marginal costs.
The reason is that a person’s willingness to pay for a good is based on the marginal
benefit that an extra unit of the good would yield. The marginal benefit, in turn, depends
on how many units a person already has.
Water is essential, but the marginal benefit of an extra cup is small because water is
plentiful. By
contrast, no one needs diamonds to survive, but because diamonds are so rare, people
consider the marginal benefit of an extra diamond to be large
A rational decision maker takes an action if and only if the marginal benefit of the action
exceeds the marginal cost.
When policymakers fail to consider how their policies affect incentives, they often end
up facing unintended consequences.
e.g. of taxes on fuel and car safety
If the policy changes incentives, it will cause people to alter their behavior.
Trade allows countries to specialize in what they do best and to enjoy a greater variety
of goods and services. The Chinese, as well as the French, Egyptians, and Brazilians,
are as much our partners in the world economy as they are our competitors.
These central planners decided what goods and services were produced, how much
was produced,
and who produced and consumed these goods and services. The theory behind central
In a market economy, the decisions of a central planner are replaced by the decisions of
millions of firms and households. Firms decide whom to hire and what to make.
Households decide which firms to work for and what to buy with their incomes. These
firms and households interact in the marketplace, where prices and self-interest guide
their decisions.
In his 1776 book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,
economist Adam Smith made the most famous observation in all of economics:
Households and firms interacting in markets act as if they are guided by an “invisible
hand” that leads them to desirable market outcomes. One of our goals in this book is to
understand how this invisible hand works its magic.
prices are the instrument with which the invisible hand directs economic activity.
Individuals are usually best left to their own devices, without the heavy hand of
government
guiding their actions.
In any market, buyers look at the price when determining how much to demand, and
sellers look at the price when deciding how much to supply.
As a result of the decisions that buyers and sellers make, market prices reflect both the
value of a good to society and the cost to society of making the good. Smith’s great
insight was that prices adjust to guide these individual buyers and sellers to reach
outcomes that, in many cases,
maximize the well-being of society as a whole.
Smith’s insight has an important corollary: When a government prevents prices from
adjusting naturally to supply and demand, it impedes the invisible hand’s ability to
coordinate the decisions of the households and firms that make up an economy. This
corollary explains why taxes adversely affect the allocation of resources: They distort
prices and thus the decisions of households and firms. It also explains the great harm
caused by policies that directly control prices, such as
rent control. And it explains the failure of communism. In communist countries, prices
were not determined in the marketplace but were dictated by central planners. These
planners lacked the necessary information about consumers’ tastes and producers’
costs, which in a market economy is reflected in prices. Central planners failed because
they tried to run the economy with one hand tied behind their backs—the invisible hand
of the marketplace.
The vigorous competition among producers makes a market work well for consumers.
That is why economists love Uber. A 2014 survey of several dozen prominent
economists asked whether car services such as Uber increased consumer wellbeing.
Yes, said every single economist. The economists were also asked whether surge
pricing increased consumer well-being. Yes, said 85 percent of them.
Surge pricing makes consumers pay more at times, but because Uber drivers respond
to incentives, it also increases the quantity of car services supplied when they are most
needed. Surge pricing also helps allocate the services to those consumers who value
them most highly and reduces the costs of searching and waiting for a car.
We all rely on government-provided police and courts to enforce our rights over the
things we produce—and the invisible hand counts on our ability to enforce those rights.
Another reason we need government is that, although the invisible hand is powerful, it is
not omnipotent. There are two broad rationales for a government to intervene in the
economy and change the allocation of resources that people would choose on their
own: to promote efficiency or to promote equality.
That is, most policies aim either to enlarge the economic pie or to change how the pie is
divided.
Consider first the goal of efficiency. Although the invisible hand usually leads markets to
allocate resources to maximize the size of the economic pie, this is not always the case.
Economists use the term market failure to refer to a situation in which the market on its
own fails to produce an efficient allocation of resources.
As we will see, one possible cause of market failure is an externality, which is the impact
of one person’s actions on the well-being of a bystander. The classic example of an
externality is pollution. When the production of a good pollutes the air and creates
health problems for those who live near the factories, the market left to its own devices
may fail to take this cost into account.
Another possible cause of market failure is market power, which refers to the ability of a
single person or firm (or a small group) to unduly influence market prices. For example,
if everyone in town needs water but there is only one well, the owner of the well is not
subject to the rigorous competition with which the invisible hand normally keeps self-
interest in check; she may take advantage of this opportunity by restricting the output of
water so she can charge a higher
price. In the presence of externalities or market power, well-designed public policy can
enhance economic efficiency.
Now consider the goal of equality. Even when the invisible hand yields efficient
outcomes, it can nonetheless leave sizable disparities in economic well-being.
A market economy rewards people according to their ability to produce things that other
people are willing to pay for. The world’s best basketball player earns more than the
To say that the government can improve on market outcomes does not mean that it
always will. Public policy is made not by angels but by a political process that is far from
perfect.
Sometimes policies are designed simply to reward the politically powerful. Sometimes
they are made by well-intentioned leaders who are not fully informed. As you study
economics, you will become a better judge of when a government policy is justifiable
because it promotes efficiency or equality and when it is not.
What explains these large differences in living standards among countries and
over time?
The answer is surprisingly simple. Almost all variation in living standards is attributable
to differences in countries’ productivity—that is, the amount of goods and services
produced by each unit of labor input. In nations where workers can produce a large
quantity of goods and services per hour, most people enjoy a high standard of living; in
nations where workers are less productive, most people endure a more meager
1-3b Principle 9: Prices Rise When the Government prints too much
money
inflation: an increase in the overall level of prices in the economy
Because high inflation imposes various costs on society, keeping inflation at a low level
is a goal of economic policymakers around the world.
What causes inflation?
In almost all cases of large or persistent inflation, the culprit is growth in the quantity of
money. When a government creates large quantities of the nation’s money, the value of
the money falls. In Germany in the early 1920s, when prices were on average tripling
every month, the quantity of money was also tripling every month. Although less
dramatic, the economic history of the United States points to a similar conclusion: The
high inflation of the 1970s was associated with rapid growth in the quantity of money,
and the return of low inflation in the 1980s was associated with slower growth in the
quantity of money.
This line of reasoning leads to one final economy-wide trade-off: a short-run trade-off
between inflation and unemployment.
Although some economists still question these ideas, most accept that society faces a
short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment. This simply means that, over a
period of a year or two, many economic policies push inflation and unemployment in
opposite directions.
Policymakers face this trade-off regardless of whether inflation and unemployment both
start out at high levels (as they did in the early 1980s), at low levels (as they did in the
late 1990s), or someplace in between.
This short-run trade-off plays a key role in the analysis of the business cycle—the
irregular and largely unpredictable fluctuations in economic activity, as measured by the
production of goods and services or the number of people employed.
Policymakers can exploit the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment
using various policy instruments. By changing the amount that the government spends,
the amount it taxes, and the amount of money it prints, policymakers can influence the
overall demand for goods and services.
Changes in demand in turn influence the combination of inflation and unemployment
that the economy experiences in the short run. Because these instruments of economic