The document discusses the theory of separation of powers in government. It originated as a reaction against absolute monarchy and the idea that the monarch embodies the entire state. Aristotle first described the idea of separating government functions between a deliberative assembly, executive officials, and judicial bodies, though he acknowledged these could be held by the same person. John Locke later formulated the modern version, separating legislative, executive, and federative powers, with legislative being supreme. Charles Montesquieu further developed this in describing legislative, executive, and judicial powers that must be held separately. The Constitution of the United States was based on this theory, and it became an important principle in the evolution of modern governments worldwide.
The document discusses the theory of separation of powers in government. It originated as a reaction against absolute monarchy and the idea that the monarch embodies the entire state. Aristotle first described the idea of separating government functions between a deliberative assembly, executive officials, and judicial bodies, though he acknowledged these could be held by the same person. John Locke later formulated the modern version, separating legislative, executive, and federative powers, with legislative being supreme. Charles Montesquieu further developed this in describing legislative, executive, and judicial powers that must be held separately. The Constitution of the United States was based on this theory, and it became an important principle in the evolution of modern governments worldwide.
The document discusses the theory of separation of powers in government. It originated as a reaction against absolute monarchy and the idea that the monarch embodies the entire state. Aristotle first described the idea of separating government functions between a deliberative assembly, executive officials, and judicial bodies, though he acknowledged these could be held by the same person. John Locke later formulated the modern version, separating legislative, executive, and federative powers, with legislative being supreme. Charles Montesquieu further developed this in describing legislative, executive, and judicial powers that must be held separately. The Constitution of the United States was based on this theory, and it became an important principle in the evolution of modern governments worldwide.
The document discusses the theory of separation of powers in government. It originated as a reaction against absolute monarchy and the idea that the monarch embodies the entire state. Aristotle first described the idea of separating government functions between a deliberative assembly, executive officials, and judicial bodies, though he acknowledged these could be held by the same person. John Locke later formulated the modern version, separating legislative, executive, and federative powers, with legislative being supreme. Charles Montesquieu further developed this in describing legislative, executive, and judicial powers that must be held separately. The Constitution of the United States was based on this theory, and it became an important principle in the evolution of modern governments worldwide.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
REFERAT
Separation of powers in the state
The theory of the separation of powers appeared
in the century of Lights. It was a reaction against the absolute monarchy, considered by divine law. The absolute monarchy is a form of government in which the king concentrates in his hands the supreme power, considering the personification of the state from which and the famous formula of King Louis XIV: "the state is me" ("L'etat c'est moi") . It is considered that this theory has appeared in ancient times. Aristotle, in his work "Politics", speaks that in every state arrangement there are three parts. As things stand in each of these parts, so are things in the entire state order. [2] These parts are: - The general assembly that deliberates the public affairs; - The body of the magistrates (officials) to whom the command belonged; - The judicial body that had the mission of carrying out justice. Aristotle describes various forms of activity of state organs, but does not establish any division of functions between these organs, he admits that the same person exercises all three functions at the same time. The one who gave the first formulation of the modern doctrine of the separation of powers in the state was the English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704) in his essay "Essay on Civil Government". He attributed to the given theory the value of a general principle of state organization. In the given work, written in 1688, he distinguished in the state three powers: 1) legislative power; 2) executive power; 3) the federative power: the power to make war, peace and to conclude treaties. Among them, the supreme power is the legislative one, because it adopts generally binding norms. The executive power is limited in character and is entrusted to the monarch. According to its conception, the legislative and executive powers must be separated, that is to say they are entrusted to separate bodies. The executive and the federative power must be united in the same hands. John Locke does not mention the judiciary as a special power, but considers it dependent on the legislative one. Influenced by English doctrine, Charles Montesquieu (1689-1755) in his book "L´esprit des lois" resumed and deepened the problem of separation of powers. According to Montesquieu, in every state there are three distinct powers: legislative, executive and judicial. These three powers must be attributed to separate and independent bodies. The theory of separation of powers in the state is the basis of the Constitution of the United States of North America of 1787 and of the constitutions of the different states that make up this federation. Article 16 of the French Declaration of Human and Citizens' Law of August 26, 1789 raised it to the rank of essential principle of any constitution: "Any society in which the guarantee of rights is not ensured, nor the separation of powers determined, has no Constitution." This theory has played an important role in the evolution of the states of the world.
In its simplest form, the principle of separation of
powers in the state implies the exercise by the state of three of three main functions: - the legislative function, by which it is understood the elaboration and the adoption of the generally obligatory norms, destined to regulate the social relations; - the executive function: it ensures the application of these norms, with the power of the state to resort to the force of constraint; - Jurisdictional function: it includes the activity of solving the disputes arising in the company, in a public and contradictory procedure. Each of these functions of the state are delegated to distinct and relatively independent bodies from each other: - legislative function - parliament; - executive function - head of state and / or government; - jurisdictional function - judicial bodies. The constitutional regulation of the principle of separation of powers in the state The Constitution of the Republic of Moldova expressly proclaimed the separation and collaboration of powers in the state. Article 6 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova provides: "In the Republic of Moldova the legislative, executive and judicial powers are separate and collaborate in the exercise of their prerogatives, according to the provisions of the Constitution". National sovereignty belongs to the people of the Republic of Moldova, who exercise it directly and through its representative bodies. At the same time, the provisions of the Constitution establish the balance of powers in the state. The three powers are expressed in the supreme law: the legislative in the norms regarding the Parliament; the executive in the rules regarding the President of the Republic of Moldova and the Government; justice in the rules regarding the judicial authority. The provisions of the Constitution consecrate the relations between the three powers, granting them each a separate status. At the same time, it stipulates the system of mutual control between powers.