5c.solid Waste
5c.solid Waste
5c.solid Waste
Collection
( > 12 m3 )
Large movable and stationary containers
Large stationary compactors (to form bales)
Container
Loaded
Empty
t1 t2
Truck FROM Truck TO
dispatch station dispatch station
s
Transfer Station, processing
station, or disposal site
(contents of container emptied)
Container
Loaded
Empty
t1
Truck with Haul empty
EMPTY container container originally
from dispatch at location 1 to
station – location 2
beginning of
daily route
Haul loaded
container from
location 1
Container
Container
Container
Container
Container
Container
Container
Container
Container
Loaded
Loaded
Empty
Loaded
Loaded
Loaded
Empty
Empty
Empty
Empty
t1
Empty collection
vehicle from
dispatch station
– beginning of
daily route (s)
Collection Route
Transfer Station or
disposal site
OR
Time spent driving to the next container after an empty container has been
deposited, time spent in picking up the loaded container and the time required
to redeposit the container after its contents have been emptied
PHCS PHCS
PHCS PHCS
OR
Time spent loading the collection vehicle from first to last container
PSCS PSCS
PSCS
OR
Time required to reach the location where the waste will be emptied, starting
when the container has been loaded on the truck and continuing through
unloading until the truck arrives at the location where the empty container is to
be redeposit.
OR
Time required to reach the location where the full vehicle will be emptied and
continuing until the truck arrives at the location where the first container will be
emptied for the next route.
Table 2: Typical data for computing equipment and labor requirements for
hauled and stationary container collection systems
Collection Pick up loaded Empty At- site time
container and contents of ,s
Vehicle Loading Compaction
deposit empty loaded (h/trip)
method ratio, r
container, h/trip* container,
h/container
HCS
system Mechanical 0.4 0.127
Tilt-frame Mechanical 2.0 – 4.0 0.4 0.133
Tilt-frame
SCS
system Mechanical 2.0 – 4.0 0.050 0.10
Compactor Manual 2.0 – 4.0 0.10
Compactor
Solid waste from a new industrial park is to be collected
in large containers (drop boxes), some of which will be
used in conjunction with stationary compactors. Based
on traffic studies at similar parks, it is estimated that the
average time to drive from the garage to the first
container and from last container to the garage each day
will be 15 and 20 minute, respectively. If the average time
required to drive between containers is 6 min and the
one- way distance to the disposal site is 25 km (speed
limit: 88 km/h), determine the number of containers that
can be emptied per day, based on an 8-h workday
Table 2: Typical data for computing equipment and labor requirements for hauled & stationary container collection systems
HCS system
Tilt-frame Mechanical 0.4 0.127
Tilt-frame Mechanical 2.0 – 4.0 0.4 0.133
SCS system
Compactor Mechanical 2.0 – 4.0 0.050 0.10
Compactor Manual 2.0 – 4.0 0.10
Nd
(1 W)H (t1 t 2 ) Nd(actual) = 5 trip/d
Phcs s a bx W = 0.15 (assume if not given)
t1 = 0.25h (Given 15 mins)
Nd
1 0.158 0.25 0.33 t2 = 0.33h (Given 20 mins)
1.2 H = 8 h/d (Given)
6.8 0.58 5.18trip/d THCS = 1.20 h/trip (from No. 2)
1.2
4. Determine the actual length of the day
H (actual) = 8 h/d
Nd
1 W H t1 t 2 W = 0.15 (assume if not given)
Phcs s a bx t1 = 0.25h (Given 15 mins)
t2 = 0.33h (Given 20 mins)
5
1 0.15H 0.58 Nd (actual) = 5 trip/day
1.2 THCS = 1.20 h/trip (from No. 2)
H 7.74 h/d (essentially 8 h) H=?
Containers size, C = 4 m3
Container utilization factor, f = 0.75
Average number of containers at each location, Nd or Np = 2
Collection - vehicle compaction ratio, r = 2.5
Container unloading time, uc = 0.1 h/container
Average drive time between container locations, dbc = 0.1 h
One-way haul distance, x = 30 km
Speed limit = 88 km/h
Time for garage to first container location, t1 = 0.33 h
Time from last container location to garage, t2 = 0.25 h
Number of trips to disposal site per day = 2
Length of workday, H = 8 h
h = a + bx
= haul time = distance / speed
=x/y
h
h = a + bx
Round trip distance (x) = 2 x 11 = 22 km
a = h/trip Round haul time = a + 22 b = (h/trip)
x
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EC221 BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONS.) CIVIL (INFRASTRUCTURE)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PULAU PINANG CEW543 ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
[email protected]
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EC221 BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONS.) CIVIL (INFRASTRUCTURE)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PULAU PINANG CEW543 ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
[email protected]
Design a solid waste curb collection system to service a
residential area with 1000 single-family dwellings. Two
manually loaded collection systems are to be evaluated.
The first involves the use of a side-loaded collection vehicle
with a one person crew; the second involves the use of a
rear-loaded collection vehicle with a two person crew.
Determine the
(i) size of collection vehicle required
(ii) compare the labor requirements for each collection
system
t t N d PSCS s a bx
H 1 2
PSCS= 2.30 h/trip
1 W t1 = 0.3 h (given)
t t N dTSCS
1 2
t2 = 0.4 h (given)
H = 8 h/d (given)
1 W W = 0.15 assume
[H(1 W) (t1 t 2 )] Nd = 2 trips/day (given)
PSCS
N d (s a bx) s = 0.1 h/trip (Table 2)
[8 (1 0.15) (0.3 0.4)] a = 0.016 h/trip (Table 1)
b = 0.018 h/mi (Table 1)
2 [0.10 0.016 0.018(35)] x = 35mi
2.30h/trip
Speed km/h Limit (mi/h) a, (h/trip) b, (h/km) (h/mi)
88 55 0.016 0.011 0.018
72 45 0.022 0.014 0.022
56 35 0.034 0.018 0.029
40 25 0.050 0.025 0.040
tp = 0.92 min/location
Note that even though a partial trip is computed, a full trip will have to be made to the
location where the contents of the collection vehicle will be unloaded.
Nw = 6.67 trips/week ; Nw (actual) = 7 trips/week (from no.6)
PSCS= 2.30 h/trip
s =0.10 h/trip (Table 2)
a = 0.016 h/trip (Table 1)
b = 0.018 h/mi (Table 1)
x = 35mi/trip (given)
W = 0.15 (assume)
H = 8h/d
Note that even though a partial trip is computed, a full trip will have to be made to the
location where the contents of the collection vehicle will be unloaded.
Nw = 4.90 trips/week ; Nw (actual) = 5 trips/week (from no.6)
PSCS= 2.30 h/trip
s =0.10 h/trip (Table 2)
a = 0.016 h/trip (Table 1)
b = 0.018 h/mi (Table 1)
x = 35mi/trip (given)
W = 0.15 (assume)
H = 8h/d
Herbicides/Pesticides/Batteries/Solvents/Chemicals
Computer
6 6 6 6
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6
2 2
6
12 12 12 12 12 12
6
2 2
6 6 6 6
12 6 6
2 2 2
2
12 6
12 12
6 6 6
2 2 2 2 2 2
6 6 6 6
1. Determine the number of residences
332 residences
Number of residences 6
16 2 2 10
= (10)(16) + (4)(36) + (1)(28) 6
= 332 residences
6
36 12 12 4
12
28 2 2 1
12
= (mass)/(density)
= 13014.4/325
= 40.044 m3/week
Lean hour
Start close to collection for Start at upper end
garage heavy traffic and work down
streets
Large quantities
Minimise left turns
first
6 6 6 6
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2
6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6
2 2
6
12 12 12 12 12 1
2 6
2 2
6 6 6 6
12 6 6
2 2 2
2
12 6
12 12
6 6 6
2 2 2 2 2 2
6 6 6
6
1st trip = (6)(16) + (2)(36) = 168 residences
2st trip = (4)(16) + (2)(36) + (1)(28) = 164 residences
Faculty of Civil Engineering
Universiti Teknologi MARA Pulau Pinang
Collection
Capacity requirement
Environment requirements
Storage Discharge 2
Waste are emptied either into a storage pit or onto a
platform from which they are loaded into transport vehicles
by various types of auxiliary equipment
Baling
Shredding
Hydraulic system
Collection
3
To recover resources
(usable materials)
Thermal Volume
Reduction – the volume of MSW can be reduced by more
than 90% by incineration
Reuse items
Recycle
Recover materials
Residual disposal
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EC221 BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONS.) CIVIL (INFRASTRUCTURE)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PULAU PINANG CEW543 ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
[email protected]
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EC221 BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONS.) CIVIL (INFRASTRUCTURE)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PULAU PINANG CEW543 ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
[email protected]
The next most cost effective means
of minimizing waste is to reuse
waste material in its same form.