1. The document discusses the role of feelings in moral decision-making according to philosophers like Hume and Scheler.
2. Hume believed that feelings are as important as reason in morality, as feelings serve as signals to adjust behavior and help us learn from mistakes.
3. While feelings can influence decisions in detrimental ways by causing doubt or acting on prejudice, they also play an important role in initial moral intuitions before reasoning. Feelings must be considered along with reason.
1. The document discusses the role of feelings in moral decision-making according to philosophers like Hume and Scheler.
2. Hume believed that feelings are as important as reason in morality, as feelings serve as signals to adjust behavior and help us learn from mistakes.
3. While feelings can influence decisions in detrimental ways by causing doubt or acting on prejudice, they also play an important role in initial moral intuitions before reasoning. Feelings must be considered along with reason.
1. The document discusses the role of feelings in moral decision-making according to philosophers like Hume and Scheler.
2. Hume believed that feelings are as important as reason in morality, as feelings serve as signals to adjust behavior and help us learn from mistakes.
3. While feelings can influence decisions in detrimental ways by causing doubt or acting on prejudice, they also play an important role in initial moral intuitions before reasoning. Feelings must be considered along with reason.
1. The document discusses the role of feelings in moral decision-making according to philosophers like Hume and Scheler.
2. Hume believed that feelings are as important as reason in morality, as feelings serve as signals to adjust behavior and help us learn from mistakes.
3. While feelings can influence decisions in detrimental ways by causing doubt or acting on prejudice, they also play an important role in initial moral intuitions before reasoning. Feelings must be considered along with reason.
SELF – PACED LEARNING PLAN ETHICS TITLE OF CONTENT OF THE LESSON/SHORT SELF-LEARNING ANSWERS TO GUIDE OBJECTIVES GUIDE QUESTIONS TOPIC READINGS/EXPLANATION ACTIVITIES QUESTIONS CHAPTER 2 1. Differentiate Hume and the Philosophy of Mind 1. In what way are 1. Students will be divided 1. According to Hume Lesson 1: responses based Put himself in opposition to ancient feelings important into 5 groups. As a and Scheler, feelings are Feelings in on reason and and modern philosophers with his in moral decision- group, they will come up important in moral Relation to those based on take on emotions making according with a scenario where a decision-making for it Moral feelings. Put forth his 4 theses stating that to Hume and person based on his or serves as signal for us emotions are just as significant to Scheler? her decisions on to adjust our behavior. Dilemmas 2. Capture and reason: feelings. They will act It can also help us learn analyze their Reason alone cannot be a motive to 2. In what way is a out what they deduce from our mistakes. And feelings in their the will, but rather is the “slave of the feeling detrimental could happen when a emotional responses moral experiences. passions”. in moral decision- person based on his or can be reshaped as time 1. Moral Distinctions are not making? her decisions on feelings pass by. derived from reason. alone. 2. Moral distinctions are derived 2. There are many from the morals sentiments: possible ways that our feelings of approval (esteem, feelings becomes praise) and disapproval (blame) detrimental in our felt by spectators who moral decision-making. contemplate a character trait or But one thing is for action. sure, a human feeling or 3. While some virtues and vices are emotion can giv the natural, others are (including person second thoughts and what if's. Those Justice) are artificial. doubts will cause the 4. For Hume, “Passions” (which he weakening of his stand used to refer to emotions and on his morality. And feelings) are categorized into two: those feelings might Direct and Indirect. cause him to do the Scheler and the Philosophy of Feelings exact opposite decisions Max Ferdinand Scheler was a German from what he might Ethical Philosopher distinguished for actually must do. his contribution in phenomenology, ethics, and philosophical Anthropology (Davis and Steinbach, 2016). For him, emotions are the most important aspect of human existence (Dy, 1986). Scheler asserted that emotions/feelings are, inherent, objective, and it exists even if you have not experience it before (a priori). He rejected the idea that feelings re in the subconscious and asserted that it is actually the purest sphere of human consciousness. (Tymieniecka, 1993) Scheler presented four strata of feelings. He claimed that these strata or levels are constant and it follows and exacts order of importance. He called these levels of feelings as the “Stratification model of emotive life” 1. Sensual Feelings 2. Vital Feelings 3. Psychic Feelings 4. Spiritual Feeilngs Difference Between Responses based on Reason and on Feelings On the opposite side of the discussion about the role of feelings in making moral decision are those who argued on the use of reason over feelings. Philosopher and Professor Dr. James Rachels asserted that moral reasoning, you could not rely on your feeling no matter how powerful these feelings may be. Feelings can be irrational and merely a product of your prejudice, selfishness, or cultural conditioning. The Morally right thing to do is one that is supported by rational argument if: a. The facts are correct. b. The moral principles are correctly applied. c. Each individual’s well being is treated equally important. What is the role of feelings in Decision- Making • Reason plays a role in making a moral decision. Philosophers encourage the use of reason in making moral decisions. However, it should be noted be noted too that our moral compasses are also powerfully influenced by feelings. • On several instances, reasoning in moral decisions is preceded by an initial intuition or gut-feeling. 20th century Philosopher Alfred Jules Ayer described two elements in moral judgement: a. “emotive” – expresses positive feeling towards a particular act. b. “prescriptive” – is an instruction or prescription of a particular behavior. Why feeling can be obstacles to making the right decisions • There are three central features as to why emotions can be obstacles in making the right decisions: 1. Its non-deliberate nature 2. Its partial nature 3. It is capricious The Non-deliberate Nature Of Feelings • Deliberate means the act was intentional, planned, with conscious effort, while non- deliberate is the contrary term that denotes spontaneous actions. • Philosopher Aaron Zeev summarized the non-deliberate nature of feelings as follows: 1. Responsibility entails free choice; if we are not free to behave in a certain manner, then e are not responsible for this behavior. 2. Free choice entails an intellectual deliberation in which alternatives are considered and the best one is chose. Whithout such consideration, we clearly cannot understand the possible alternatives and are not responsible for preferring onr of them. 3. Since intellectual deliberation is absent from emotions, we cannot be responsible for our emotions. The Partial Nature of Feelings • Emotions notoriously play favourites. • There are two aspects in the partial nature of emotions: 1. Decisions based on feelings focus on a narrow area 2. It reflects personal and self- interest perspective The Capricious Nature of Feelings • The problem with emotions is that it rises up for arbitrary reason. For example you did not give money to and old beggar asking for alms simply because she tugged at your shirt and startled you. Aspects or situations could rile up your emotion, and situations that have nothing to do in moral situations could rile up your emotion, and this will certainly influence your subsequent moral judgement (Pizarro, 2000). How Emotions Help in Making the Right Decisions • There are three ways in which feelings, especially negative ones, help in making the right decisions: 1. It signals the need to to adjust behavior 2. It can help us learn from our mistakes 3. Emotional responses can be reshaped as time pass by • Psychologist have long acknowledged that emotions serve as red flags. Emotions signal that something is happening and that it needs our attention (Arnold, 1960). Studies have shown, that negative emotions are integral to our ability to learn. The surge of negative emotions trigger “counterfactual thinking”. Counterfactual Thinking is a psychological concept about the human tendency to create possible alternative scenarios other that what had actually happened.
Prepared by: Noted: Approved:
ROSELO L. CADULDULAN JR. ELVIE D. DURAN, Ed, D DR. FRANCIS ANN R. SY Name & Signature of Faculty/Staff Director, Institute of Arts and Sciences Concerned VP/Campus Director