The Holocaust and The Responsibility of Its Survivors: Themes (Maus)
The Holocaust and The Responsibility of Its Survivors: Themes (Maus)
The Holocaust and The Responsibility of Its Survivors: Themes (Maus)
Art Spiegelman, the author and narrator of Maus, is the child of two Polish Holocaust
survivors: Vladek, his father, and Anja, his mother. Following a long estrangement
from Vladek following Anja’s unexpected death in 1968, Arthur — called Artie by
many close to him — has decided to collect his father’s memories of the Holocaust
and narrate them in a series of cartoons. The Holocaust, which occurred between
1941 and 1945, was a genocide perpetrated by the nation of Germany, then under
the leadership of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. During the five-year period before
their defeat to the Allied Forces, the Nazi Party murdered six million Jewish people,
along with five million others who were deemed “undesirable” in their society (these
victims included Roma people, homosexuals, and non-Jewish religious minorities,
among many others). Artie, whose Jewish family was almost completely annihilated
during the Holocaust, feels compelled to preserve his father’s memories out of
respect for the suffering Vladek endured, and in an effort to ensure that the horrors of
the Holocaust are not forgotten. On a more personal level, he uses Maus to explore
his own troubled relationship to his parents and his Jewish identity.
Artie understands that narrating his father’s experience of the Holocaust is an
enormous responsibility, and he struggles with the pressures of that responsibility —
and with the sense that he is not fit to tell Vladek’s stories —during hours of
interviews and years of work on the book that will become Maus. The visual
metaphor that defines Maus — Artie’s use of animal heads in place of human faces,
with a different animal representing each nationality or ethnic group — provides Artie
with a platform for investigating his anxieties about his project, acknowledging Artie’s
distance from the events of his father’s story while simultaneously binding him to the
people about whom he writes. Artie has never met many of the people from Vladek’s
life, and lacks sufficient information to create accurate representations of many of the
scenes he describes. Artie does not know, for example, what his paternal grandfather
or aunts looked like, since there are no surviving photographs of them. He struggles
to imagine the layout of the tin shop where Vladek worked during his time in
Auschwitz, and Vladek often draws Artie diagrams when trying to explain the layout
of a bunker or a concentration camp. All these gaps in his knowledge highlight the
limitations of Artie’s imagination and experience.
At the same time, Artie’s mouse head creates an undeniable connection between
him and all other Jewish people. Artie shares his rodent features with his parents and
other relatives; with the friends and neighbors in Europe who endured the war
alongside them; with Jews he meets in his day-to-day life; and with the hordes of
nameless dead he depicts standing in line in the ghettos, struggling for breath in
overcrowded cattle cars, and dying in torment in the gas chambers and mass graves
of Auschwitz. In drawing them all with the same mouse head, Artie unites the
identities and experiences of all Jewish people, tying them together across continents
and generations. Artie cannot relate to the horror of the Holocaust in the same
intimate way Vladek can, but he has been shaped by those events. He is the inheritor
of a tremendous intergenerational legacy shared by all Jewish people.
Yet in the moment where Artie struggles most with his decision to publish Vladek’s
story — where he feels overwhelmed by the pressures that accompany professional
success, and afraid of misrepresenting the horrors his parents’ generation endured
— he appears to the reader wearing a mouse mask over a human face, his human
ears and hair visible in profile. Just as the mouse head connects Jewish people
across different nationalities and generations, the notion that Artie is hiding his true
features — features that are different from those of his parents and other Jews —
shows his anxiety about profiting off a story that is not necessarily his to tell.
Even as he chronicles his father’s experience, Artie uses Maus to explore problems
about the morality of telling Holocaust stories at all. His therapist, a Czech Holocaust
survivor named Pavel, reminds Artie that “[l]ife always takes the side of life” — that
people always share stories of triumph and survival when talking about the
Holocaust, but in doing so erase the perspectives of the dead. Reverence for the
survivors of the tragedy is inherently disrespectful to those who died, Pavel suggests,
because reverence implies that the people who lived were somehow better or
smarter than those who died, and therefore more deserving of life. Vladek clearly
feels some trepidation around this problem as well. He dislikes the idea of Artie
writing about his life before the war: about his courtship of Anja, or the woman he
dated before meeting her. To write in a Holocaust narrative about things that have
nothing to do with the Holocaust itself “isn’t so proper, so respectful,” he tells Artie.
As a survivor, tied to those who have died through bonds of love and guilt, Vladek
feels compelled to construct a story worthy of what has happened; one that takes
seriously his responsibilities to those who cannot speak for themselves.
Maus acknowledges that the core narrative of the Holocaust — of rabid persecution
and dehumanizing violence — is morally unambiguous, and Artie clearly portrays the
cruelty of guards and collaborators. But condemning their actions is not the core
project of the book. Instead, Maus explores difficult questions of moral witness, and
considers the responsibilities inherited both by the survivors and the generations that
follow them. Artie and Vladek both hold the power of authorship; in sharing their
stories, they contribute to a larger narrative of the Holocaust, and to the multi-
generational struggle to make sense of that tragedy. However, that power is not
unambiguously good. As Pavel points out, the fact that the dead will never be able to
tell their stories creates a troubling imbalance: the memories of the living persist, but
the dead have no power to influence the narrative those memories create. Through
their collaboration, Artie and Vladek bring forward a story of moral consequence, for
which they must both take responsibility. That burden weighs heavily on both men,
and each struggles throughout the act of telling to navigate his own difficult
relationship with the reality that has shaped him.
Vladek tells Artie that he has spent years trying to rid himself of memories of the war
and the Holocaust, but he recounts his story in remarkable detail, recalling the names
and eventual fates of almost every person who crossed his path during those years.
Though his descriptions are straightforward and unflinching, he has clear emotional
reactions to many of the events about which he speaks — he cries when he
remembers four of his friends being hanged in Sosnowiec for dealing goods on the
black market, and talks with passionate sadness about his dead son, Richieu. Love
and compassion are what make Vladek’s memories of the war so painful. But, just as
he and Anja keep the photograph of Richieu hanging in their bedroom, he keeps
those memories as tokens of the people he has lost, even when they prove to be a
heartbreaking burden.
The memory of Artie’s mother, Anja, hovers over every conversation between Artie
and Vladek, as does their mutual uncertainty about how best to deal with the reality
of her death. Anja committed suicide in 1968, when Artie was a young man. Though
Vladek’s stories suggest that Anja struggled with depression throughout her life, her
death seems to have been completely unexpected. She does not leave a suicide
note, and so Artie has very little insight into her reasons for choosing to end her life.
While Artie tries to confront the complex feelings attached to his grief — to represent
the anger he feels about his mother’s suicide, as well as his continued love for her —
Vladek does everything he can to preserve the best possible version of his wife,
ignoring all the difficult and painful aspects of their relationship in the story he
presents for Artie. He covers his desk with photographs of Anja, which
prompts Mala to compare the desk to a shrine, and he tells Artie: “Everywhere I look
I’m seeing Anja … always I’m thinking on Anja.” Vladek’s displays of uncomplicated
devotion contrast with the Artie’s tense silence on the subject of his mother. Except in
“Prisoner on the Hell Planet” — a comic he drew and published shortly after her
suicide, which resurfaces during his interviews with Vladek many years later — Artie
avoids talking about his relationship with Anja. He treats her as simply another
character in the long narrative of Vladek’s survival, albeit a more important one than
many.
Vladek’s desire to protect Anja’s memory sometimes has disastrous consequences.
Artie learns partway through his interviews with Vladek that Anja left a series of
diaries telling her side of their story, and that Vladek burned these diaries shortly
after her death. When Artie learns what his father has done, he calls Vladek a
“murderer” — he equates the destruction of Anja’s voice and memories with an act of
violence. Though Artie’s anger seems justified, it is also clear that burning Anja’s
diaries was a way for Vladek to shield her from unsympathetic scrutiny. By seizing
control of her narrative, he guarantees that his gentler-than-life version of Anja and
their relationship will be the one to survive; that her legacy is in the hands of
someone who loves her and has her best interest at heart.
While scholars and activists often treat remembrance as a moral imperative —
arguing that to forget the Holocaust would be an additional act of violence against
those who suffered and died — Maus interests itself in the idea of remembrance also
as an act of generosity and compassion.