Stakeholders: IB Business Management
Stakeholders: IB Business Management
Stakeholders: IB Business Management
4
Stakeholders
IB Business Management
1.4 Stakeholders
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:
• Define the term stakeholders and identify internal and
external stakeholders for a given organization.
• Outline the main interests of internal and external
stakeholders.
• Explain possible areas of benefit and conflict between
stakeholders.
• Apply the power-interest model for stakeholder analysis.
¿What are Stakeholders?
• People, groups of people, and organizations who
affect or can be affected, directly or indirectly, by an
action done by an organization.
– They have an interest or concern (a stake) in a company’s
performance.
– The stake can be financial (profit) or non-financial (safety).
Internal stakeholders
Individuals or groups that work within the business
– Shareholders
– Employees
– Unions
Remember…
• Do not confuse the terms ‘stakeholder’ and ‘shareholder’.
CEO
• Achieve strategic objectives efficiently
Senior managers
• Achieve tactical objectives efficiently
Middle managers
• Achieve day-to-day objectives efficiently
Employees and unions
• Better working environment
• Better salary
• Promotions
• Training
Interests of external stakeholders
¿What do they (stakeholders) expect from the business?
Government
• Pay taxes
• Licences and certifications
Suppliers
• Stable commercial relationship
• Buy more supplies
• Better selling conditions
Community
• Business does not impact negatively
local area
• Create jobs
• Social responsibility
Financiers / Investors
• Returns over their investments
• Pay loan on time
Pressure groups
• Influence business in a specific issue
The media
• Information about the business
Internal and external stakeholders
Individuals might have multiple stakeholder interests.
Examples:
Employees
Owners
Suppliers Financiers
Pressure Media
groups Managers
Consumers
Local community
Power-interest model
• Another conceptual approach for mapping stakeholders
• Stakeholders are placed in groups in a matrix based on the level of
interest and the degree of power towards the organization
• The company can decide on likely strategies to manage potential
conflicts.
Level of interest
Low High
Group A Group B
Low
Minimal effort Keep informed
Degree
of
power
Group C Group D
High
Keep satisfied Key players
Group A: Minimal effort
• Stakeholders with minimal interest and limited power over the
business.
• Rarely a problem for the business.
• Owners and managers fairly ignore them, or at least devote limited
energy and attention to satisfy their interests.
Level of interest
Low High
Group A Group B
Low
Minimal effort Keep informed
Degree
of
power
Group C Group D
High
Keep satisfied Key players
Group B: Keep informed
• Stakeholders with a high interest and low degree of power over the
business.
• Making this group feel included is important.
• Newsletters, events, and other ways of conveying a sense of belonging
are important.
Level of interest
Low High
Group A Group B
Low
Minimal effort Keep informed
Degree
of
power
Group C Group D
High
Keep satisfied Key players
Group C: Keep satisfied
• Stakeholders with low interest and high degree of power over the
business.
• They have the power to influence other groups.
• The business must find ways to flatter the self-esteem of members of
this group to make them feel important.
Level of interest
Low High
Group A Group B
Low
Minimal effort Keep informed
Degree
of
power
Group C Group D
High
Keep satisfied Key players
Group D: Key Players
• Stakeholders with high interest and high degree of power over the business.
• Most important group. The business must communicate and consult them
before any major decisions are made.
• The business should focus on their needs in preference to the others.
• Failure to involve and satisfy these stakeholders can have very negative
consequences for the business.
Level of interest
Low High
Group A Group B
Low
Minimal effort Keep informed
Degree
of
power
Group C Group D
High
Keep satisfied Key players
Assignment
1. Case Study: Stake & Chips
The day of the relocation was hectic. Staff were carrying boxes to the various
vans hired to move the company to its new offices 50 miles away.
The move had been agreed six months ago. Paragon, a pottery manufacturer,
under pressure from shareholders to cut costs and improve profit margins, had been
faced with some tough decisions. Competition in the market was fierce; most businesses
in the industry had already moved production facilities to South East Asia and now had
significant cost advantages over Paragon. Paragon’s Managing Director had avoided the
inevitable for as long as possible, ‘we have a duty to our staff, the local community and
to the UK to remain here’, she argued 12 months ago. But, under increasing pressure
from shareholders, the company moved production to Vietnam and the factory and
offices were sold to a housing developer.
The majority of staff were made redundant; a small number would manage the company
from offices 50 miles from the original factory. The local newsagent and shop owner, who
had supplied the staff with refreshments for over 20 years, although obviously upset by
the move came out to wish everybody well.