Plate Girder Design Example
Plate Girder Design Example
Plate Girder Design Example
Web Slenderness
[Step 1] Check whether member is classified as plate girder
h E Yes
≤ 3.76 Use [F2; F3]
tw Fy
No
h E Yes
≤ 5.70 Use [F4] or [F5]
tw Fy
No
Use [F5]
Plate Girder
a Yes h E
≤ 1 .5 ≤ 11.7
h tw Fy
332 for Fy = 36 ksi
No 282 for Fy = 50 ksi
Yes h 0.42 E
Stiffened web? ≤
tw Fy
338 for Fy = 36 ksi ???
No 244 for Fy = 50 ksi
h
≤ 260
tw
Flange
< Fcr Fcr Lateral
Buckling
prevented Flange
yc
C.G. Local
Ineffective Buckling
in flexure
C.G.
yt
Flexural strength is computed based on Stability limit states for compression flange
elastic stress distribution
Yes
Lb ≤ L p LTB does not control
No
⎡ ⎛ Lb − L p ⎞⎤
L p < Lb ≤ Lr Yes
Fcr = Cb ⎢ Fy − (0.3Fy )⎜ ⎟ ≤ Fy
⎜ L − L ⎟⎥
⎣⎢ ⎝ r ⎥
p ⎠⎦
12.5M max
No Cb =
2.5M max + 3M A + 4 M B + 3M C
π2 E
Fcr = Cb ≤F E E
(Lb rt )2 y L p = 1.1rt Lr = πrt
Fy 0.7 Fy
b fc
rt =
⎛ h0 1 h2 ⎞
⎜
12⎜ + aw ⎟⎟
⎝ d 6 h d
0 ⎠
Yes
λ ≤ λp FLB does not control
No
⎡ ⎛ λ − λ pf ⎞⎤
λ p < λ ≤ λr Yes
Fcr = ⎢ Fy − (0.3Fy )⎜ ⎟⎥
⎜λ −λ ⎟
⎣⎢ ⎝ rf pf ⎠⎦⎥
No 4
kc = and 0.35 ≤ k c ≤ 0.76
h tw
0.9 Ekc
Fcr = b fc
λ2 λ=
t fc
E kc E
λ pf = 0.38 λ rf = 0.95
Fy 0.7 Fy
aw ⎛h ⎞
where: R pg = 1 − ⎜ c − 5.7 E ⎟ ≤ 1.0
1200 + 300a w ⎜⎝ t w Fy ⎟⎠
a w = hc t w b fc t fc ≤ 10
a Yes
> 3. 0 kv = 5
h
No
2
a ⎛ 260 ⎞ Yes
>⎜ ⎟
h ⎜⎝ h tw ⎟⎠
No
5
kv = 5 +
(a h )2
h kE Yes
≤ 1.10 v Cv = 1.0
tw Fy
No
h kE Yes 1.10 kv E Fy
≤ 1.37 v Cv =
tw Fy h tw
No
1.51kv E
Cv =
(h tw )2 Fy
h kE Yes
≤ 1.10 v Vn = 0.6 Fy Aw
tw Fy
No
No
⎛ 1 − Cv ⎞
Vn = 0.6 Fy Aw ⎜ Cv + ⎟
⎜ 1.15 1 + (a h ) ⎟⎠
2
⎝
Note:
Design is performed independently for flexure and shear. Interaction between flexure and
shear need not be checked.
100"×7/16"
a a Girder Cross-Section
Cross-Sectional Properties
• Check web slenderness
h 100 E
= = 229 > λ r = 5.70 = 162 → Web is slender
t w 7 / 16 Fy
E
< 11.7 = 282 → Meets limit for a/h ≤ 1.5
Fy
0.42 E
< = 244 → Meets limit for a/h > 1.5
Fy
< 260 → Transverse stiffeners may not be needed
Flexural Strength
• Flexural strength Mn is determined by the smallest of the following four limit states:
(1) Compression flange yielding M n = S xc R pg Fy
(2) Lateral-torsional buckling M n = S xc R pg Fcr
(3) Compression flange local buckling M n = S xc R pg Fcr
(4) Tension flange yielding M n = S xt Fy
λ rf = 0.95
kc E
= 0.95
(0.35)(29000) = 16.2
0.7 Fy 0.7(50)
Therefore, the critical stress is controlled by flange local buckling and Fcr = 42.2 ksi
• Compute φMn
φM n = φS xc R pg Fcr = (0.9)(2 ,966)(0.90)(42.2) = 101,460 k·in = 8,455 k·ft
Shear Strength
Say we need to determine the stiffener spacing at a location (some distance along the length)
where Vu = 400 kips. This location is away from any end.
• Use [Table 3-17b (Tension Field Action Included)] to find required stiffener spacing a/h
φVn Vu 400
Required ≥ = = 9.14 ksi
Aw Aw (100)(7 16)
1.10
kv E
= 1.10
(8.47 )(29,000) = 77.1
Fy 50
1.37
kv E
= 1.37
(8.47)(29,000) = 96.0
Fy 50
h kE
> 1.37 v → Use Eq. (G2-5) —— Elastic shear buckling controls
tw Fyw
1.51kv E 1.51(8.47 )(29,000)
Cv = = = 0.142
(h tw )2 Fy (229)2 (50)
Shear at elastic buckling:
φVn = 0.9(0.6 Fy AwCv ) = 0.9(0.6 )(50 )(43.75)(0.142) = 168 kips < Vu = 400 kips
φVn ⎛ 1 − Cv ⎞
= 0.9(0.6 Fy )⎜ Cv + ⎟ = 16.73 ksi
Aw ⎜ 2 ⎟
1.15 1 + (a h ) ⎠
⎝
—— computed value agrees with reading from [Table 3-17b]
• If the same shear force acts at an end panel? —— tension-field action CANNOT be used
φVn h
Again ≥ 9.14 ksi and = 229
Aw tw
[Table 3-17a (Tension Field Action NOT Included)] indicates that for a/h ≈ 0.57 is required
to achieve φVn/Aw = 10.5 ksi.
Choose a = 48 in.
2
a 48 ⎛ 260 ⎞ a
= = 0.48 ≤ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 1.29 and ≤ 3.0 OK
h 100 h
⎝ w⎠t h
5 5
kv = 5 + = 5+ = 26.7 → Much greater kv value than previous
(a h )2
(0.48)2
1.10
kv E
= 1.10
(26.7 )(29,000) = 137
Fy 50
1.37
kv E
= 1.37
(26.7 )(29,000) = 171
Fyw 50
h kE
> 1.37 v → Use Eq. (G2-5) —— Elastic shear buckling controls
tw Fyw
1.51kv E 1.51(26.7 )(29,000)
Cv = = = 0.448
(h tw )2 Fy (229)2 (50)
φVn = φ(0.6 Fy AwCv ) = 0.9(0.6)(50)(43.75)(0.448) = 529 kips > Vu = 400 kips
φVn
= 0.9(0.6 Fy )(Cv ) = 13.4 ksi (between 12.0 ksi and 15.0 ksi)
Aw
—— computed value agrees with reading from [Table 3-17a]
• Observations
The buckling strength is much greater than φVn = 168 kips (excluding tension-field action)
computed for a = 120 in.
Effect of using small stiffener spacing: a/h ≤ 0.5
o Large buckling strength —— larger kv and consequently, larger Cv
o Relatively small post-buckling
Stiffener Design
• Transverse stiffeners
Location of transverse stiffeners is determined while designing for shear strength
Transverse stiffeners must meet three requirements: (a) Area
(b) Local buckling
(c) Moment of inertia
(a) Area requirements
Fy ⎡ Vu 2⎤
Ast ≥ ⎢0.15 Ds ht w (1 − Cv ) − 18tw ⎥ ≥ 0
Fyst ⎣ φVn ⎦
Use single-sided stiffeners → Ds = 2.4
50 ⎡ ⎛7⎞ ⎤
2
⎛7⎞ 400
Ast ≥ ⎢0.15(2.4)(100)⎜ ⎟(1 − 0.142) − 18⎜ ⎟ ⎥
50 ⎣⎢ ⎝ 16 ⎠ 732 ⎝ 16 ⎠ ⎦⎥
Try bst = 10 in. and tst = 3/4 in. (Ast = 15.0 in.2)
bst 10 CL
= = 13.3 < 13.5 OK
t st 0.75 7/16”
3/4”
(c) Moment of inertia requirements
We have: h = 100 in. a = 120 in. tw = 7/16 in.
2.5 10”
j= − 2 ≥ 0.5 → j = 0.5
(120 100)
(I st )req = (120)(7 16)3 (0.5) = 5.02 in.4
⎛3⎞
⎜ ⎟ (10 )
3
4
Ist = ⎝ ⎠ = 250 in.4 C
3 L
I st > (I st )req OK 7/16”
1/2” 1/2”
3
⎛ 1 ⎞⎛ 7⎞
⎜ ⎟⎜ 6 × 2 + ⎟
2 16 ⎠
I st = ⎝ ⎠⎝ = 80.2 > 5.02 in.4 I st > (I st )req OK
12
• Bearing stiffeners
Provide bearing stiffeners at supports and concentrated loads
Same as for transverse stiffeners, bst < 11.8 → Try bst = 11 in.
Bearing stiffeners transferring compression should extend
approximately to the edge of flange plates