Red Brand Canners Case Study

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

RED BRAND CANNERS

CASE STUDY

Submitted by,

ABHI RAYNA HARRIS

JAYAVAMSHI NALLAPU SUDHAKAR

ABHISHEK MALU

ADIT CHOKSI

VENKATA SAI SRUJITH REDDYVARI


a) Verbal Structure of Problem:

The Vice President of Operations, Mr. Michell Gorden, along with the
Controller, Mr. William Copper, Sales Manager Mr. Charles Myers and
Production Manager Mr. Dan Tucker wanted to discuss on the amount of
tomato products to pack this season.

i. The amount of Tomato and their Quality was provided by the


Production Manager:

 The Company had purchased 3 million lbs. of Tomato Crop


 Crop has two types of Quality grades- “A” & “B”
 Grade “A” was 20% of crop
 20/100*30,000,000 lbs. = 600,000lbs. of Grade A crop
 Grade “B” was 80% of crop
 80/100*30,000,000 lbs. =24,000,000lbs. of Grade B crop

ii. The Demand forecast and Selling price was provided by the
Sales Manager:

 Selling prices were set in light of the long-term marketing strategy


of the company. Potential sales have been forecasted at these
prices.
 Three types of tomato products were to be produced- whole tomato,
tomato juice and paste.
 The demand forecast in cases, selling price per case, number of
pounds per case and the total pounds of tomato needed is
mentioned below.

Product Demand Selling Pounds of Total


Forecast Price tomato pounds of
(Cases) ( Per case (Per case) tomato
in USD$)
Whole 800,000 4 18 14,400,00
Tomato 0
Tomato Juice 50,000 4.50 20 1,000,000
Tomato Paste 80,000 3.80 25 2,000,000

iii. The Purchasing price & product profitability was provided by


the controller:

 Price of Tomato Crop is 6 cents/lb.


 The total price of Tomato purchased= 0.06*3,000,000= 180,000
 Quality Grade points of “A” & “B" is mentioned below:

Grade A Grade B
9 points 5 points

The minimum quality points required is mentioned in the below table:

Product Whole tomato Tomato Juice Tomato Paste


Minimum 8(with grade A 6(with grade A 5(without grade
Quality points and grade B) and grade B) A)
required

Products
Costs Whole Tomato Juice Tomato Paste
Tomatoes
Selling Price $4 $4.50 $3.80
(per case)
Variable Costs
Direct Labor $1.18 $1.32 $0.54
Variable $0.24 $0.36 $0.26
Overhead
Variable $0.40 $0.85 $0.38
Selling
Packaging $0.70 $0.65 $0.77
material
Fruit cost (per $1.08 $1.20 $1.50
case)
Total Variable $3.60 $4.38 $3.45
Cost
Contribution $0.40 $0.12 $0.35
Less Allocated $0.28 $0.21 $0.23
overhead
Net Profit (per $0.12 $0.09 $0.12
case)

 This method of approach to calculate the product mix is wrong, as


the fruit cost is also added to the variable cost, nonetheless the
fruits were already purchased so this is known as sunk cost.
 Allocated overhead involves fixed costs and it incurs before product
is produced and it is not a function of production output.

iv. Recomputed Marginal profit by Sales Manager:

Z=Cost per pound of A Tomatoes in cents


Y=Cost per pound of B Tomatoes in cents

1.(600,000 lbs. * Z) + (2,400,00 lbs.* Y) = (3,000,000 lbs.*6)


2. Z/9 = Y/5

Z= 9.32 cents per pound


Y=5.18 cents per pound

Products
Costs Whole Tomato Juice Tomato Paste
Tomatoes
Selling Price $4 $4.50 $3.80
(per case)
Variable Costs 2.52 3.18 1.95
(excluding
tomato cost)
SP-VC 1.48 1.32 1.85
Fruit cost 1.49 1.24 1.30

v. Decision Variables:

Let,

AW = Weight of Grade “A” Tomato in Canned Whole Tomato


BW = Weight of Grade “B” Tomato in Canned Whole Tomato
AJ = Weight of Grade “A” Tomato in Tomato Juice
B J = Weight of Grade “B” Tomato in Tomato Juice
AP= Weight of Grade “A” Tomato in Tomato Paste
BP = Weight of Grade “B” Tomato in Tomato Paste

vi. The Demand constraints are:

I. AW + BW <= 14,400,000 (Pre-determined because of quality of


fruit available- 800,000 cases *18 lbs/case)
II. AJ + BJ <= 10,00,000 (50000 cases * 20 lbs/case)
III. AP + BP <= 20,00,000 (80000 cases * 25 lbs/case)

vii. The Quality constraints:

For whole canned tomato;

9AW + 5BW >= 8(AW + BW)


Solving,
9AW + 5BW >=8AW + 8BW
I. 1AW – 3BW >= 0

For tomato juice;

9AW + 5BW >= 6(AW + BW)


Solving,
9AW + 5BW >= 6AW + 6BW
II. 3AW – 1BW >= 0

For tomato paste;

III. No constraints since paste is acceptable with B grade


fruits.

viii. The Quantity Constraints:

For “A” Grade Tomatoes:


AW + AJ + AP <= 6,00,000 (since only 600,000 lbs. available)

For “B” Grade Tomatoes


BW + BA + BP <= 24,00,000 (since 2,400,000 lbs. available)

ix. The Objective:

The Objective here is to maximize profit by optimally mixing the two


different grades of tomatoes (“A” & “B”) to produce the three different
tomato products (whole tomatoes, tomato juice and tomato paste) with
the minimum quality requirement.

b) Mathematical Formulation for objective function:

Contribution= Selling price - Variable cost (excluding tomato cost)

Contribution of WA = Contribution of WB = 1.48/18 = 0.0822


Contribution of JA = Contribution of JB = 1.32/20 = 0.066
Contribution of PA = Contribution of PB = 1.85/25 = 0.074

AW BW AJ BJ AP BP

CAW CBW CAJ CBJ CAP CBP

1 1 ≦ 14,400,000

1 1 ≦ 1,000,000

1 1 ≦ 2,000,000
1 1 1 ≦ 600,000

1 1 1 ≦ 2,400,000

1 -3 ≧ 0

3 -1 ≧ 0

i. Objective Function according to the Controller, William


Cooper’s Approach:

Max Z = 0.0822 AW + 0.822 BW + 0.066 AJ + 0.066 BJ + 0.074 AP+ 0.074


BP – 180,000;

WA + AJ + AP <= 600,000;

WB + BJ + BP <=2,400,000;

WA + AJ + AP + WB + BJ + BP <= 3,000,000;

AJ + BJ <=1,000,000; Demand for Juice

AP + BP <= 2,000,000; Demand for Paste

AW + BW <=1,800,000; Demand for Whole tomatoes

This method of calculating the Objective function is invalid because it


does not satisfy the quality constraints.

ii. Objective Function according to the Sales Manager, Charles


Myer’s Suggestion:

Objective function Max Z= -0.0055 AW – 0.0055 BW + 0.004AJ +0.004 BJ


+ 0.022 AP + 0.022 BP;

WA + AJ + AP <= 600,000;

WB + BJ + BP <=2,400,000;

WA + AJ + AP + WB + BJ + BP <= 3,000,000;

AJ + BJ <=1,000,000;
AP + BP <= 2,000,000;

AW + BW <=1,800,000;

This method of obtaining an objective function is invalid because Myer’s is


calculating the price of tomatoes separately.

iii. Objective function according to the Production Manager Dan


Tucker’s Approach:

Max Z = 0.0822 AW + 0.0822 BW + 0.066 AJ + 0.066 BJ + 0.074 AP+


0.074 BP – 180,000;

AW + AJ + AP <= 600,000;

BW + BJ + BP <=2,400,000;

AW + AJ + AP + BW + BJ + BP <= 3,000,000;

AJ + BJ <=1,000,000;

AP + BP <= 2,000,000;

AW + BW <= 800,000;

AW >= 3BW;

3AJ >= BJ;

c) Results and Optimum Solution:

Product Grade A Grade B Total Pound per Total no.


tomatoes tomatoes tomatoes case of cases
(Pounds) ( Pounds) (Pounds)
Whole 525,000 175,000 700,000 18 38,888.0
Tomatoes
Tomato 75,000 225,000 300,000 20 15000
Juice
Tomato 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 25 80000
Paste

The value of the maximum objective function is 45,340. The Production


Manager Dan Tucker’s Approach yield’s the maximum contribution
adhering to the various constraints.

You might also like