Writingin College, by Joseph M. Williams and Lawrence Mcenerney 2: Preparingto Write and Drafting The Paper
Writingin College, by Joseph M. Williams and Lawrence Mcenerney 2: Preparingto Write and Drafting The Paper
Writingin College, by Joseph M. Williams and Lawrence Mcenerney 2: Preparingto Write and Drafting The Paper
We do not have the space here to discuss the process of reading critically and selecting data,
thinking about what you have gathered, analyzing it, and discovering the point or claim that you
want to make and support. Every assignment will ask you to look at your readings in a different
way, and every text you read will raise its own problems of interpretation and analysis. In fact,
that is what most of your classes are about: selecting and analyzing data, and arriving at a
plausible conclusion about them.
• Go through your readings once and mark with a highlighter everything you think plausibly
relevant to answering the assignment.
• So that you can get a sense of it all, go through a second time, skimming what you have
highlighted.
• Go through a third time, marking passages that seem most central to your assignment. Try
to assign to each passage a key word that will help you sort them later.
• Now try to categorize those passages according to how they might support different points.
Which ones support one point, which ones support another point. (Spend the time it takes to
find data that might support different, even opposing, points. You need such data so that you
can critically balance one point against another.)
• On a piece of paper, jot down what you think are the central concepts that emerge from this
analysis.
• To these central concepts attach subsidiary concepts. Use some sort of symbol to represent
the kinds of relationshipsthat the subsidiary concepts have to the central concepts and to one
another: cause and effect, similarity, contrast, more important-less important, earlier-later in
time, and so on. Spend time playing with these relationships. Make lists of the central
concepts, order and re-order them, find categories and subcategories.
• Then create a working outline around topics suggested by your categories of evidence.
At this point, you may have a fairly clear idea about the point you want to make; more often, you
won't. Either way, if you have even a dim idea about the shape of your general point, prepare to
start your first draft.
But almost everyone profits from at least a scratch outline that focuses your attention on particular
aspects of your paper and in a particular order:
If you can formulate a complete sentence that captures the central idea in each section, so much
the better. But it is likely that you will discover those sentences in the act of drafting, as well.
It is useful to spend more than a moment or two thinking about even this first draft introduction
because it has a way of so entrenching itself in your paper that you will have a hard time getting
rid of it when you get to your last draft. You may be resolved to get rid of your first draft
introduction later, but such a resolution can fade as your deadline approaches--especially if sunrise
is approaching at the same time. It is not a bad idea even from the beginning to take some steps
to avoid last minute trouble.
First, here are some introductory strategies to avoid even in first drafts. If they survive into your
last draft, you can be sure that your instructor will judge them amateurish.
• Don't simply echo the language of the assignment. If the assignment says "Discuss the
logical structure of the Declaration of Independence, particularly those assumptions on which
Jefferson based his argument," do not start with something like, "In the Declaration of
Independence, Jefferson based his argument on assumptions that are part of its logical
structure." You're very likely to need some of the language from the assignment, but you
should leave room, even in your first draft, for language of your own, so your readers will
understand your unique approach to the question.
• Avoid offeringa history of your thinking about the assignment. Don't begin, "In
analyzing the logical structure of the Declaration of Independence, it is first necessary to
define the assumptions that Jefferson worked with. In my analysis, I found that Jefferson
began with one assumption, which was that . . . ." Such a discussion of your own thought
processes forces readers to wait a bit too long to find out what the paper will actually be
about.
How should a draft introduction begin? One way to focus your own thinking is to begin with a
kind of sentence that you must change in the final draft:
I am addressing the issue of [-------fill in your topic here] in order to show why/how/ what/
who/ whether [fill this in with subject and verb]
For example,
I am addressing the issue of the relationship between Jefferson's assumptions and evidence in
order to show how he depended on assumptions that he could not prove but needed in order
to use the evidence he had.
That kind of sentence focuses your attention not on what you are writing about, but on what you
are trying to do. The indirect question such as, ". . . show how . . . " or " . . . explain why . . . "
helps you identify something that you do not know but are trying to find out.
If you have even a tentative answer to your question, state it at the end of your introduction. That
will launch you into the body of your paper with some sense of direction. If you do not have a
tentative answer, make up some sentence that uses most of the key terms you came up with
when you were assembling, organizing, and analyzing your data. (Not sure how to fit those key
words into a sentence? Feel free to use question marks, ellipses or just blank space to reflect your
uncertainty: "The evidence that Jefferson most relies on are specific acts of tyranny (injustice?),
which caused him to rely on unproven assumptions . . . fundamental purpose of government." You
can come back to this sentence after you've written the draft to fill in the missing pieces.)
If you can get some key terms into your draft introduction, you will help yourself focus on
developing those concepts.
Remember, after you've completed your paper draft, you'll need to revise this first try at an
introduction. We offer some suggestions in a later section on revising introductions, but you'll be
better able to follow them after you've drafted the whole paper.
But perhaps the most common problem that first year students have with their papers is that they
take this summary of their subject, tack on a half-page conclusion and then turn the essay in.
They may spend an hour or two tinkering with spelling and punctuation, but essentially, once
they've written a summary of what they've read, and then added a short conclusion, they're done.
It is a pattern of behavior that many students fall into without even noticing. Remember: if you
feel you have to summarize, start drafting at least three or four days before the paper is due. Give
yourself time not only to write the summary, but to transform it into an argument.
There are others, though, who cannot work with such "sloppy" methods, but only "word-by-
perfect-word," "sentence-by-polished-sentence." They cannot start a new sentence, until the one
they are working on is dead right. If this sounds like you, if you cannot imagine a quicker but
rougher style of drafting, do not fight it. But remember: the more you nail down each small piece,
the fewer alternativesyou have thereafter. For this reason, if you are a "sentence-by-sentence"
drafter, you must have a detailed outline that tells you where you are going and how you will get
there.
Neither of these styles is "the" correct one; both can lead to excellent papers. Both also have
built-in pitfalls of which you must be aware. The faster style can lead to careless errors in the
final draft if you fail to proofread rigorously, and it may also degenerate into a history of your
thought process rather than a carefully structured argument if you fail to revise it with readers'
needs in mind. The slower style can become overly focused on sentence-level correctness and
neglect the paper's overall structure; you must therefore use outlines and frequent rereadings to
remind yourself of the role each part should play in the whole.
Whichever style is yours, establish a ritual for writing and follow it. Ritualistically straighten up
your desk, sit down, sharpen your pencils or boot up your computer, get the light just right,
knowing that you will sit there for an absolute minimum time. If you sit staring, not an idea in your
head, write a summary: So far, I have these points . . . . Or look at the last few paragraphsyou
wrote, and treat some important bit of evidence as a claim in a subordinate argument.
At the moment you finish writing something, who knows more about it than you do? When you
re-read your own writing, you aren't really reading it; you're only reminding yourself of what you
wanted to mean when you wrote it. That means two things:
1. The longer you can set aside something you have written before you revise it, the more
you will have forgotten what you were thinking when you wrote it. This amnesia is a blessing:
it will enable you to read what you have written more quickly.
2. Even then, you will still know too much. In the next section, we offer some ways to
analyze, diagnose, and revise your own writing in a way that sidesteps your too-good
memory of it. To see our suggestions for revision, go to "A strategy for analyzing and
revising a first draft."
Lawrence McEnerney is Director of the University of Chicago Writing Program. Joseph M. Williams (1933-2008)
was Professor of English Language and Literature and the founder of the University of Chicago Writing Program.
T H E U N I V E R S I T YO F C H I C A G O W R I T I N G P R O G R A M
1 1 1 6 E A S T 5 9T H S T R E E T
C H I C A G O, I L 6 0 6 3 7
S T U A R T 3 3 0 | (7 7 3) 8 3 4-4 6 9 1 | (7 7 3) 7 0 2-2 6 5 8
W R I T I N G-P R O G R A M@U C H I C A G O.E D U