Discipline And-WPS Office

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Discipline And Ideas in Social Sciences

1.How would Social Scienc help natural science,in what way?

According to Büchel (1992), the birth of natural science is marked by changing world views
introduced by Renaissance thinkers who questioned earlier explanations about the world and
turned to more systematic methods of investigation.The aim of the natural sciences is to
discover the laws that rule the world (Büchel, 1992).From here we can clearly conclude that
social science helps natural science,the society ask or find answers to every unusual natural
phenomenon of the world while the natural science unlocks it.Since,natural science aims to
discover the world's rule they need social science to base their ideas or to support their
hypothesis which means they need interaction and socialization because social science studies
the behavior of the society and as the time goes by changes happen from time to time.

It is also said that natural science is arose from the curiosity of the world.The more curiosity we
get the more knowledge we seek to gain.Natural science needs interaction and socialization to
their fellow being since it is physical world therefore they need to see what should be
research.For example, let's say that I am the one who invented Abaccus centuries ago my
reason to invent Abaccus is to perform basic arithmetic operation to make my life easy.How
does it become well known? Simply by introducing or exposing its importance and function to
the society.The acceptance of the society can help inventions and discoveries well known that
can make great impact to the natural sciences.

(http://www.collier.sts.vt.edu/sciwrite/pdfs/boutellier_2011.pdf)

2.What are the decisions made by two robbers which indicates the social reality and causal
reality? Support your answers.

When they choose to betray each other indicates causal reality whether they were associates
before the interrogation happend and they had the same set of choices the bottom line there is
they were interviewed separately.Even if they come up with the same answer it is still causal
reality because they were able to think or decide individually without consulting each other.

For instance,from Dave's point of view he thinks if Henry remains silent then dave can either
cooperate with henry but he think for himself and he's better off betraying Henry and the rest
of the gang to defect his self and to go free instead of consulting Henry about the decision he
made.

The situation indicates is social reality when they consider the decision of one another despite
of being interviewed separately they think first what will be the decision of the other
one.Considering someone that can affect while making decision of someone indicates social
reality.It can also be social reality if both of them agreed to cooperate in such situation.

For instance,both Henry and Dave agreed to remain silence to minimize their charge of loitering
the agreement they made is social reality they choose to consider each other upon making
decision therefore they may end up going jail minimum of one year each just as they agreed
upon.Considering someone is social reality.

(https://www.investopedia.com/terms)p/prisoners dilema.asp)

You might also like