Project HEADWAY

Webinar Mark Mullaly is the host for

today’s webinar. Mark is a
management consultant with
more than 25 years of
project management
Thinking Agile in Traditional Projects experience.

He brings a wealth of
experience in managing
Mark Mullaly projects
p j in a broad array
y of
We will be starting at 3:00 PM EST sectors and industries.

1
Webinar Objectives

 Understand The Origins Of Traditional And Agile

Viewpoints

 Examing The Challenges Of Employing Truly

Agile Approaches

 Explore The Integration Of Agile And Traditional

Principles

2
Webinar Process – Things to Know

 GoToWebinar Presentation
• PowerPoint
• Computer-based audio stream
 Problems or Help?
• Heather - [email protected]
 Questions?
• Submit a question in the Question box on the right-hand side
• Questions will be answered during the Q&A session
• We may not be able to answer all questions
 This Presentation Will Be Recorded for Future Reference
 PDUs

3
Agenda

 Introduction
 Defining Our Terms
 Origins Of Traditional vs. Agile Approaches
 The Challenges Of Being Exclusively Agile
 Common-sense Strategies For Integration
 Question & Answer Session

4
Defining Our Terms

Agile

5
Agile

 Marked By A Ready Ability To Move With Quick

Easy Grace
g A Quick,, Resourceful And Adaptable
 Having p
Character

 Source: merriam-webster.com
• Definition taken 13 May 2013

6
Agile Software Development

 Agile
g software development
p is a group
g p of software
development methods
• Based on iterative and incremental development
• Where requirements and solutions evolve
• Evolution
E l ti is
i managed d through
th h collaboration
ll b ti between
b t self-
lf
organizing, cross-functional teams

 It promotes:
• Adaptive planning
• Evolutionary development and delivery
• A time-boxed iterative approach
• Rapid and flexible response to change

 Source: wikipedia.com
• Definition taken 13 May 2013
7
Agile (Project) Management

 An iterative method of determining

g requirements
q for
engineering and information technology development
projects
• In a highly flexible and interactive manner
• Requires empowered individuals from the relevant
business
• Also often involves supplier and customer input
 It iis a variant
i t off iterative
it ti life
lif cycle
l
• Deliverables are submitted in stages
• The delivery time in agile is in weeks rather than months

 Source: wikipedia.com
• Definition taken 13 May
y 2013

8
Origins Of Traditional Vs.
Vs Agile Approaches

9
Thinking About Traditional vs. Agile

 The Principle
p Of Agile
g (As( A Word)) Suggests
gg A Set Of
Principles
• Speed of reaction
• Adaptability
p y
• Resourcefulness

 All Of The Principles Are Entirely Desirable In A

Project Management Context

 None Of The Principles Presume Specific Actions Or

Processes
• They imply a way of thinking, not a prescribed means of
doing

10
Emergence Of Agile

 Began In Software Development Movement

• Based upon iterative approaches
• Driven by a desire for 'lightweight' development
practices

 Reaction To Percei
Perceived
ed Inadeq
Inadequacies
acies Of
Traditional Approaches
• Too bureaucratic
• Excessively micromanaging
• Emphasis on formality

11
What Prompted Agile

 Reaction To Practices As They Were Employed

• Excessively formal
• Unnecessarily rigid and unbending
• Prescriptive and non
non-value-adding
value adding

 Not Necessarily A Reaction To Practices As Defined

• Most methodologies imply some (or significant) adaptability
• Most practices ignore these guidelines

 On-going
On going Challenges Exist
• Some view agile practices as being very different
• Others view as extension of understanding
• 'Agile' seen by some as common-sense
common sense application of processes

12
Different Types Of Project

Planned Emergent

•Certainty •Uncertainty
•Control •Flexibility
•Predictability •Responsiveness
•Order
Od Ad t bilit
•Adaptability
•Structure •Fuzziness
•Rigour •Murphy's Law

C t l
Control L
Learning
i
13
Different Management Approaches

Planned Emergent
g
•Deliver planned results •Deliver desired Results
•Planning drives results •Results drive planning
Correct to baseline
•Correct •Correct to what's
what s possible
•Manage tasks •Manage relationships
•Employ robust
procedures •Employ guidelines and
Eli i t mistakes
•Eliminate i t k values
•Reward mistakes

Values Efficiency Values Effectiveness

14
The Challenge Of Being Exclusively Agile

15
Virtues Of Agile

 Embrace ((And Reinforce)) Responsiveness

p
• Emphasis on rapid development

 Focus On Stakeholders
• Close and collaborative engagement of customers

 Iterative Nature
• Particularly relevant in the face of unclear requirements

 Emphasis On Value
• Delivery of functional and useful deliverables
• Focus on what the customer cares about

16
Positive Practices

 Scrum
• Daily, brief meetings
• Emphasis on what is important right now

 Iterations
• Aversion to excessive, formal requirements definition
• Emphasis on recursive evaluation of prototypes

 Co-location Of Teams
• Emphasis on face-to-face, fully present communication

 Intense Collaboration
• F
Focus on on-going,
i direct
di t engagementt in
i deliverable
d li bl production
d ti

 Acceptance Of Change
• Seen as p
positive and valuable,, even at the eleventh hour

17
Challenges - Philosophical

 Viewed By Some As Ideological

• Started with principles and ideals
• Evolved to practices with as much rigour and emphasis
as those of more traditional approaches
• Corresponding rejection of adherence to those practices
as not doing
g 'real' agile
g

 Defined In Contrast To Traditional Views

• Characterized as 'high ceremony', 'big design up front',
'excess bureaucracy', 'micromanagement', 'opacity'
• Often
Oft pejorative
j ti terms,
t rather
th than
th constructive
t ti ones
18
Challenges - Practical

 Pair Programming
g g
• Intended to promote consistency and quality
• Often misuderstood and viewed as inefficient

 Expectation
E t ti Of Leadership
L d hi
• Integration of non-hierachical teams in hierarchical organizations

 Level Of Stakeholder Involvement

• Presumption of on-going, daily collaboration
• Far greater than many are prepared to commit

 Issues Of Clarity And Accountability

• Executives want to know exactly what they are buying
• There is an expectation of knowing who is in charge (or who to blame)

19
Common-Sense
Common Sense Strategies For Integration

20
Arguments Exist For Both

 Many Principles Of Agile Are Appealing

 Fully Agile Approaches Are Difficult For Some

Executives To Accept
• Wrong or right, they are still today's sponsors and
gatekeepers

 Most Projects Can Benefit From Both Aspects

• Consistency is perceived as valuable organizationally
• Flexibility
y and adaptability
p y is still important
p in individual
project contexts
21
Value Of Traditional Approaches

 Consistency
y
• Repeatability of process
• Common terminology and vocabulary
• Uniform definition of activities and structure
• Basis of improving planning and estimation reliability

 Clarity
• Most appropriate where requirements are well understood
• Definition of expected schedule, cost and outcomes

 Formality
• Emphasis on formal documentation
• Can be appropriate (or necessary) in contractual contexts
22
Value Of Agile Approaches

 Practicality
y
• Continuous testing of relevance, usefulness and value

 Involvement
• On-going feedback and refinement of expectations

 Responsiveness
• Rapid acceptance and incorporation of changing
requirements

 Scalability
• Focus on simplicity and relevance of solutions
• Rejection
R j ti off work
k that
th t does
d nott provide
id value
l
23
Integrating Viewpoints

 Assess How Well Understood The Project Is

• Clarity of requirements
• Articulation of deliverables
• Definition of process to deliver

 Evaluate How Much Stakeholder Can (And Want To) Be Involved

• Define the involvement necessary
• Assess its attainability

 Identify Formality That Is Required

• Should primarily be driven by contractual expectations
• Test degree to which what is asked for delivers value

 Define The Methods And Practices That Make Sense

• Avoid ideology
• Favour relevance
• I
Incorporate what
h makes
k sense

24
Applying – Rethink Status Meetings

 Think About How You Collaborate As A Team

• How often do you meet?
• How long does it take?
• How valuable are the sessions?
• Are we sharing the essential information people need?

 The Principle Of Scrum Has Some Useful Features

• Meetings are fast and informal
• Meetings are where people work
• Meetings focus on what matters today
• Meetings are usually
s all oover
er in 15 min
minutes
tes
25
Applying – Rethinking Planning

 Think About How You Plan

• How well do you understand the requirements?
• How much potential is there for change?
• How well can you anticipate what it will take to deliver?

 Agile Focusses On Bite Sized Chunks (Sprints)

• Focus on what you know you can deliver now
• Make sure each deliverable is relevant and usable
• Prioritize work based on doing what is most important
first
• Plan early learning to answer questions that are
unknown
26
Applying – Rethinking Participation

 Think About How You Involve Your Stakeholders

• When are they involved and consulted?
• How integral are they to the on-going delivery of the
project?
j t?
• What is the extent of on-going consultation?

 Agile Is Built Around A Philosophy Of On-going

Collaboration
• Wh
Where in
i your projects
j t would
ld it be
b helpful
h l f l to
t have
h further
f th
input?
• How can you keep your stakeholders regularly involved?
• What would it mean to continually check in on relevance?
27
Applying – Thinking About Control

 Think About How You Control Your Project?

• What is the focus of your project control process?
• How important is delivery to plan?
• How important is delivery of effective solutions?

 Agile Focusses On Delivery Of Functionality

Functionality, Not
Activities
• Track delivery of requirements, not tasks
• Monitor progress of learning – what is now known and
answered, what is still unknown and uncertain?
• What would it mean to periodically release (or share) in-
progress deliverables
d li bl for
f feedback
f db k or use? ?
28
Integrating Viewpoints

 Assess How Well Understood The Project Is

• Clarity of requirements
• Articulation of deliverables
• Definition of process to deliver

 Evaluate How Much Stakeholder Can (And Want To) Be Involved

• Define the involvement necessary
• Assess its attainability

 Identify Formality That Is Required

• Should primarily be driven by contractual expectations
• Test degree to which what is asked for delivers value

 Define The Methods And Practices That Make Sense

• Avoid ideology
• Favour relevance
• I
Incorporate what
h makes
k sense

29
In Conclusion…
Conclusion

30
In Conclusion…

 Agile
g And Traditional Approaches
pp Are Often Viewed
Through Ideological Lenses
• Tendency to promote one at the expense of the other
 Rational
at o a Arguments
gu e ts Exist
st For
o Both
ot
• Both definitions allow for adaptation and flexibility
• Few practitioners keep in mind this perspective
 The Focus Is On Delivering Solutions That Work
• Question is the degree of requirements clarity
• Work approach needs to adapt to this clarity
• Emphasis need to be on the approach that is most efficient
and effective
 Each Approach Can Benefit From The Other
• Common sense application is critical
31
Q&A

Thinking Agile in Traditional Projects

32
Questions?

 Quick Review: Process to Pose a Question

 Questions?

Mark E. Mullaly, PMP

What Is project HEADWAY?

 projectmanagement.com s Process For Project

projectmanagement.com’s
Management
 Designed to Provide
• O
Organizations
i ti
• Project managers
• Project teams
With the Processes to Manage Projects and Programs
Within a project Framework
 Simple and Straight-forward
 Open to “Premium Plus” and “Corporate” Members

34
PMI PDU Information

 To Claim PDU For This Webinar

• Go to “My Account” on the projectmanagement.com
website
• Click on “PDU’s Awarded” link
• View the PDU award certificate
• It will contain all the corresponding information you
require to claim your PDU on the PMI website
 Problems: [email protected]

35
Webinar Survey

 Feedback Survey
• A feedback survey will be forwarded to you by email
• Please input your feedback and give us an idea of what
you think
• It takes about 3 min to complete

36
Mark Your Calendars!

Project HEADWAY

When Do You Need A Consultant? When Don’t

You?

Thursday, 20 June 2013

@3 3:00
00 PM EST
S

37
 The End
Mark Mullaly is the host for
Questions for the Presenter? today’s webinar. Mark is a
management consultant with
Mark Mullaly more than 25 years of
project management
[email protected] experience.

He brings a wealth of
Interested in project HEADWAY? experience in managing
projects
p j in a broad array
y of
Gi Jones
Gina J sectors and industries.
[email protected] 38