Analysis My Father Goes To Court
Analysis My Father Goes To Court
Analysis My Father Goes To Court
Character Web:
Characterization:
Father- the main character of the story who was sent to court after being accused
of stealing the spirit of rich man’s food and wealth.
Mother- the wife of the father who was always bullied by her children.
Young narrator- the speaker in the story who witnessed all the happenings of the
life of his father.
Rich man- the man who accused the father of stealing his food and wealth
Rich man’s children- the undernourished children of the rich man
Judge- the presiding officer during the trial of the father to the court.
Plot:
1. Father’s family moved to a small town.
In 1918, one of the Philippine floods devastated the farm owned by the
young narrator's father which caused them to move to a small town of Luzon. In
there, they have a next door neighbor who is a very rich man whose sons and
daughters seldom came out of the house. Their house is very tall that they could
look at the people below. While the other kids in the town play outside, the children
of the rich man stayed inside their house and kept the windows closed.
2. Most of the time, the young narrator’s family stood outside the windows of the big
house to waft the smell of the rich man’s food.
The rich man’s servants were always frying and cooking something good
and the aroma of the food was wafted down to the house below which is the house
of the poor. One time, the servants roasted a chicken and the children of the father
wafted the smell of the fat of the chicken. While they are savoring the smell of the
viand, they quickly eat the rice as if they have a lot of food.
3. Some days, the rich man appears at the window and glowered down at them.
He looked at the people below one by one as if he were condemning them.
He is angry because the poor family was all healthy because they could go outside
everyday to shower themselves with sunlight and bathed cool waters of the river.
The people below are always happy from neighbor to neighbor.
4. One instance, one of the young narrator's son came home with a bundle of his as
if there is something to eat.
The brother threw the bundle into their mother’s lap. Everybody stood
around the bundle as their mother unveiled it. Suddenly, a black cat leaped out of
the bundle and ran around the house. Their mother chased their brother and
everybody burst into laughter. In this, the rich man could hear everything.
5. Another day, one of their sisters began screaming in the middle of the night
complaining to the mother and father.
Their mother reached for her and tried to calm her. Their father lifted the oil
lamp and asked the girl about her complaint. The girl said that she is pregnant. All
of the siblings put their hands to her belly and they were all shocked when they felt
that something is moving. When their mother asked the man, their sister opened
her blouse and released a bullfrog. Everybody laughed when they saw this. Their
mother fainted and their father spilled the oil lamp to the floor. A fire began to grow
however, father managed to extinguish it.
6. As time goes on, the rich man’s children became thin and anemic.
The poor kids became robust and healthy. Their faces became bright and
rosy while the rich man’s children grew paler and paler. The rich man became sick
that he coughed day and night and it got worse everyday. The poor family
wondered why, however, all they know is that the rich man always fries their food.
One day, the rich man stood at the window his house and saw the sisters of the
young narrator grew fat while the brothers grew strong like a molave tree. He
banged the window and locked everything from then on. However, they could still
smell the delicious food even if the house of the rich man is already locked.
c. Conflict:
Man versus Man (Father versus Rich man)
Figures of Speech:
Hyperbole: He looked at my sister who had grown fat with laughing.
Styles of the Author:
a. Symbolism
o Farm-simplicity
o Food- wealth and abundance
o Gavel-justice
o House- social status
o Straw hat- poverty
o Window- suspicion
o Coins- debt
Quotable Statements:
“We were always in the best of spirits and our laughter is contagious”
“There was plenty (of reasons) to make us laugh”
Themes:
Money cannot buy happiness.
Health is wealth.
Cultural Implication:
The Filipino culture of being happy despite the struggles is depicted in the story. It
was also depicted the social status and the behaviour of Filipinos that the rich people tend
to step down on the poor because they perceive themselves more powerful than the poor.
The case of the father who does not need any lawyer describes the justice system in the
Philippines wherein only rich people can afford to have lawyers.
Implication of the title:
In the Filipino context, this story favors the underprivileged families over affluent
ones. It is supported by the part at the end of the story where after the father gave back
the “spirit of wealth” through the jingling of the coins in the straw hat, the judge
immediately dismissed the case. While it is not really true in this day and age because
the poor has no fair fight against the rich, the idea behind it is not quite simple.
___________________________________________________
References:
Carlos Bulosan Centennial. Carlos Bulosan exhibit. Retrieved 6 March 2016 from
http://www.bulosan.org/
Nikki de Dios. My father goes to court. A Thousand Words of the Heart blog post.
Retrieved 6 March 2016 from https://nikkidedios.wordpress.com/tag/carlos-
bulosan-my-father-goes-to-court/
Marilyn Alquizola, & Lane Ryo Hirabayashi. (2011). Carlos Bulosan's The Laughter of My
Father: Adding Feminist and Class Perspectives to the “Casebook of
Resistance”. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 32(3), 64–91.
http://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.32.3.0064