HVPNL 220 KV Substation
HVPNL 220 KV Substation
HVPNL 220 KV Substation
Volume: 4 Issue: 1 44 – 48
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Analysis of Existing Losses of 220 kV Substation With Possible Suggestions Of
Reduction
Abstract— Every Power System consists of basic electrical assembly and end to end protection zone. But during the long lifetime operation of a
GSS possibility of faults and disoperation do exists. Majority of problems existing in these working stations remains same basic difference lies in
the suitability of preventive actions taken to cope up with those critical situations. Thus following research paper carries practical case study for
the existing losses of a real time 220 kV GSS. In the Indian Power System shunt capacitor banks have been installed at 33 kV voltage level at
EHV substations to compensate load reactive power demand. But the capacity of installed shunt capacitors does not match with load reactive
power demand which results in excessive reactive power flow on lines and transformers. Reflectively it results higher transmission losses,
increased loading and poor voltage profile of the network. In this research paper case study of Rajasthan power system has been studied to
evaluate the losses existing at 33 kV voltage level on transmission and other assemblies deployed. 220 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh located in Churu
district has been selected to carry out the detail studies. Actual system condition of 220 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh existing in September 2016 has
been simulated in Software. Impact of optimal reactive management at 33 kV voltage level has been analyzed on transmission losses, lines and
transformers loading and network voltage profile. From simulation studies it is found out that significant transmission loss at 33 kV voltage level
are obtained. Along with that various assemblies not in proper usages and dead conditions have been marked out along with their contribution in
losses. These measures could be taken as guideline for the utilities to prepare a manageable guidebook over preventive measures for loss
reduction at transmission level GSS.
Keywords— Reactive Power losses, Transformer Taps; Load flow studies; transmission loss reduction; voltage profile improvement.
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
45
IJFRCSCE | January 2018, Available @ http://www.ijfrcsce.org (ICATET 2018)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering ISSN: 2454-4248
Volume: 4 Issue: 1 44 – 48
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
As per information gathered on 10-9-2016 at 1 PM the 220 kV Bus 132 kV Bus 33 kV Bus
recorded load of 33 kV feeders at the substations is provided in 220 kV Sri Dungargarh 224 131 35
Table IV. 132 kV Sri Dungargarh 133 34
132 kV Dulchasar 128 33
TABLE IV LOAD DATA Nil
132 kV Riri 131 34
Recorded Load
S.No. Name of GSS 132 kV Upani 130 34
MW Power Factor
1 220 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh 29 0.85
2 132 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh 36 0.85
3 132 kV GSS Dulchasar 30 0.85 e) Line Power flow
4 132 kV GSS Riri 26 0.85
5 132 kV GSS Upani 28 0.85 Transmission Line power flows details to model the system
Total 149 0.85 as per actual recorded data is provided in Table VIII.
TABLE VIII TRANSMISSION LINE POWER FLOWS
b) Shunt Capacitor Bank Data
Power flow
Name of Line
Shunt Capacitor Banks are connected to 33 kV buses of MW MVAR
substations. Net capacity capacitors connected at various 132 kV S/C Sridungargarh-Riri-Upani Line 55.69 16.11
132 kV S/C Sridungargarh-Dulchasar Line 30.1 7.97
substations on 10.9.2016 at 1 PM are provided in Table V. 132 kV S/C Sridungargarh (132 kV GSS)-
37.09 8.31
TABLE V SHUNT CAPACITOR BANKS DATA Sridungargarh (220 kV GSS) Line
132 kV S/C Riri-Upani Line 28.3 4.029
Capacity of Shunt Capacitors
(MVAR) Due to some errors in the measurement and also some time
Name of GSS
Installed “ON”
(MVAR) capacitors difference of measurement, some deviations may be observed
220 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh 2x5.43 1x5.43 in measured values.
132 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh 3x5.43 3x5.43
f) Substation Power flow
132 kV GSS Dulchasar 2x5.43 2x5.43
132 kV GSS Riri 2x5.43 2x5.43 Substation power flows of MW and Mvar as per database
132 kV GSS Upani 2x5.43 2x5.43 recorded by system engineer is provided in Table IX.
Total 59.73 54.30
TABLE IX SUB-STATION POWER FLOWS
One 5.43 MVAR capacity shunt capacitor bank is out of Power flow
service at 220 kV GSS Sri Dungargarh due to damage of Name of GSS Particulars
MW MVAR
circuit breaker and RVT. 132 kV side 144.08 44.22
220 kV Sri Dungargarh
33 kV side 28.81 14.12
c) Transformer TapPosition 132 kV Sri Dungargarh 33 kV side 36.06 5.537
Substation operators vary the tap position of transformers to 132 kV Dulchasar 33 kV side 29.67 8.65
control the LV bus voltage. Tap position of transformers at 132 kV Riri 33 kV side 25.9 3.86
132 kV Upani 33 kV side 28.27 5.7
various substations on 10.9.2016 at 1 PM is abstracted in the
followingtable:-
g) Swing Bus Data
TABLE VI TRANSFORMERS TAP POSITION DETAILS
220 kV bus of 220 kV GSS Sridungargarh is represented as
Transformers Tap Details swing bus. Actual bus voltage and power drawal from
Name of Min.Tap / Max.Tap /
Nomi.Tap / Actual Rajasthan grid by 220 kV GSS Sridungargarh on 10.9.2016 at
GSS MVA Min.Tap Max.Tap 1 PM is tabulated here under
Nomi.Tap Tap
Capacity Voltage Voltage
Voltage (kV) Position
(kV) (kV) TABLE X SWING BUS DATA
100 1/187 21/242 9/220 11
100 1/187 21/242 9/220 11 Swing Bus Voltage (kV) MW flow MVAR flow
220 kV Sri Particulars
40/50 1/138 17/112 5/132 9 224 145 57
Dungargarh
20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 9
132 kV Sri 40/50 1/138 17/112 5/132 8 V. SIMULATION OF ACTUAL SYSTEM CONDITION
Dungargarh 20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 8 Test system has been modeled in the MiPower software and
132 kV 20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 9
system condition of 10.9.2016 at 1.0 PM has been
Dulchasar 20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 9
20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 9 simulated.This case is identified as Case-I. IEEE data format of
132 kV Riri test system is placed at Appendix-1. Load flow study has been
20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 9
132 kV 20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 8 carried out using Newton Raphson method. Results of load
Upani 20/25 1/138 17/112 5/132 8 flow study of Case-I are plotted at Fig-3. Results of load flow
study are near to actual values.
Table VI also denotes the actual transformer tap setting.
d) Bus Voltage
220 kV GSS and 132 kV GSS bus voltages were obtained and
provided in Table VII.
TABLE VII BUS VOLTAGE
Name of GSS Bus Voltage (kV)
46
IJFRCSCE | January 2018, Available @ http://www.ijfrcsce.org (ICATET 2018)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering ISSN: 2454-4248
Volume: 4 Issue: 1 44 – 48
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
220/132 kV Transformers at 220 kV Sri Dungargarh 155.44
132/33 kV Transformers at 220 kV Sri Dungargarh 31.37
132/33 kV Transformers at 132 kV Sri Dungargarh 36.77
132/33 kV Transformers at 132 kV Dulchasar 30.76
132/33 kV Transformers at 132 kV Riri 26.34
132/33 kV Transformers at 132 kV Upani 28.63
132 kV S/C Sri Dungargarh(220 kV GSS)-
36.77
Sri Dungargarh(132 kV GSS) Line
132 kV S/C Sri Dungargarh-Dulchasar Line 31.11
132 kV S/C Sri Dungargarh-Riri Line 55.63
132 kV S/C Riri -Upani Line 29.04
REFERENCES
[1] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, Tata
McGraw Hill publications, New Delhi, 2007.
[2] http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS
[3] MI-Power simulation software “Developed by PRDC Pvt.
Ltd., Bangalore”, [Online]
http://www.prdcinfotech.com/products.html.
[4] [Online]: http://energy.rajasthan.gov.in, Energy Portal
Government of Rajasthan,
[5] Yan Xu, Zhao Yang Dong, Kit Po Wong, Evan Liu, Benjamin
Yue, “Optimal Capacitor Placement to Distribution
Transformers for Power Loss Reduction in Radial
Distribution Systems”, Published in IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, Volume:28, Issue:4, Nov.2013
[6] Young Jin Kim, James L. Kirtley, Leslie K. Norford, “
Reactive Power Ancillary Service of Synchronous DGs in
Coordination With Voltage Control Devices”, Published in
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,Sept.2015, Issue 99.
[7] Z.Hu, X. Wamg, H. Chen, G.A. Taylor, “ Volt/VAr control in
distribution systems using a time-interval based approach”,
Published in IEE Proceedings- Generation, Transmission and
Distribution, Vol: 150, Issue:5, 15 Sept. 2003, Pages 548-554.
[8] A.A. Sallam, M. Desouky, “Shunt capacitor effect on
electrical distribution system reliability”, published in IEEE
Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 43, Aug.,2002, P.No. 170-
176.
[9] G.Vamsi Krishna Kartheek, “An improved system operation
for better voltage stability and reduced losses”, Published in
Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-India, 2011 IEEE PES,
1-3 Dec. 2011.
[10] Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission Grid Code,
Jaipur, (As per Electricity Act, 2003), [ Online]:
http://www.rvpn.co.in/aboutus/GridCode-01.pdf.
[11] B.R.Gupta, “Power System Analysis and Design”.
48
IJFRCSCE | January 2018, Available @ http://www.ijfrcsce.org (ICATET 2018)
_______________________________________________________________________________________