Soil Report For RCC Building

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
Report No : GR/SEP/2019/44
NAME OF PROJECT :
Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey no:
44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district.
BH I
Client :
BH II
Soil Investigation carried out by :
Soil Testing - Stability Certificate - Load Test - Ground Improvement - Construction

No.09, Buddhar Street, V.S.A Nagar (Near villivakkam), Chennai-82.
Mobile – 98418 32444. Email : [email protected] www.grillage.in
Soil Investigation Report
Name of the Project :
Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no:
72, Survey no: 44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district.

Name of the Project :
Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey
no: 44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district.
CONTENTS
Sl.No Description
1 Report
2 Bearing Capacity Calculation
3 Consolidated Soil Test Results
4 Bore log
5 Bore Hole Location
6 Photos

Name of Project: Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey no:
44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district ‘Report no: GR44-19’
SOIL EXPLORATION REPORT
Name of Project: Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot
no: 72, Survey no: 44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district.
Date of test: 18-09-2019 Report No: GR44 -19
1. INTRODUCTION
Mr.A. AJJI MOHAIDEEN has proposed to Construct a G+2 Residential Building at Navalur.
For the construction of any structure a detailed soil investigation is essential for collecting the
relevant data required for preparing the design. The sub surface investigation reveals the
presence and the extent of soil and rock stratum in the region likely to be affected by the
proposed work and determines the nature of each stratum and engineering properties of soil
which may affect the design.
In this context the client required to have Preliminary soil investigations to understand the soil
conditions for construction of Residential Building. The data collected provide reliable,
specific and detailed information to facilitate a safe and economic design for the estimation of
the proposed structure.
This report contains the field and laboratory test results along with Design computations and
recommendations for suitable foundation systems.
1.1 Scope of Work
Sinking two Standard Soil investigation bore hole of 100mm diameter up to a depth of
10.00m below the existing ground level or where the SPT value is >100 or as directed
by the engineer-in-charge.
Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at regular depth intervals.
Collection of Split Spoon Samples or Disturbed Soil Samples.
Conducting relevant laboratory test results as instructed.
No. 09, Buddhar Street, V.S.A. Nagar (Near Villivakkam), Chennai – 82. Mobile – 9841832444,
1 Email: [email protected], Web: www.grillage.in
Assessing Safe bearing capacity and allowable bearing pressure based on the field
and laboratory test carried out in the soil stratum encountered.
The type and depth of foundation for the proposed structure has to be recommended
for estimation.
1.2 Structure of the Report
1. Introduction
2. Field Investigation Methodology & Lab Test
3. Sub-Surface Stratification
4. Foundation Systems
5. Recommendations
Annexure
Design Computations
Laboratory Test Results
Bore Logs
Field Test Location Drawing.
Photos
2. Field Investigation Methodology & Lab Test
2.1 Field Testing:

Penetration and sounding tests are the generally adopted field Tests. Standard
Penetration Test is performed as per I.S. 2131-1981 as an in-situ test especially for
cohesion less soils. The resistance is empirically correlated with some of the Engineering
properties of soil such as density index, consistency, bearing capacity, etc. These tests
are useful for general exploration of erratic soil profiles for finding depth to bedrock or hard
stratum and to have an approximate indication of the strength and other properties of
soils, particularly for cohesion less soil where it is difficult to obtain U.D.S.
The proposed site is situated in the developing area. The exploration was carried out
during rainfalls in the city. Two boreholes were made at the locations specified by the
client.
The locations of the boreholes are shown in site plan attached. The equipment used and
the methodology adopted to carry out the fieldwork is described below.
2.2 Equipment Used and Method of Drilling:
2.2.1 Equipment Used
The equipment used for performing the drilling operations is a Manual augers special
spiral and bucket shaped augers.
2.2.2 Methodology of drilling
In the soil strata, the drilling operations have been carried out using special spiral and
bucket shaped augers.
The soil exploration consists of three stages i.e., boring, sampling and testing which
includes both field and lab tests. Samples were collected at every 1.00 m up to 10m and
at every 1.5m up to 20m depth of the bore hole. Samples were properly labeled for Lab
tests. Bore log particulars and location of bore holes are annexed with this report.
2.3 In-Situ Strength Tests:
2.3.1 Standard Penetration Test:
In the field test the Standard Penetration Test sampler is driven by the free fall of a
hammer weighing 63.50kg dropped from a height of 76cm.The sampler is initially driven
through 15cm as a seating drive. It is further driven through 30cm. The number of blows
required to drive the sampler 30cm below the seating drive is termed the penetration
resistance ‘N’.
Standard penetration tests were conducted at the borehole locations, in accordance with
IS: 2131. The Samples were collected at every 1.00 m up to 10m depth and at every
1.5m up to 20m depth of the bore holes directed by the engineer-in-charge.
2.4. Collection of Samples:
2.4.1 Disturbed Soil Samples
The SPT-samples collected were used as disturbed soil samples. These samples were
used for visual and physical identification and for conducting laboratory classification tests
as per I.S.1498-1970.
2.5 Summary of Field Work
• Two boreholes were made up to 10.0m or N value > 100.
• Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at 1m depth intervals was conducted and

Disturbed Soil Samples were collected.
• The locations of the boreholes are shown in site plan attached.
• The soil profiles obtained at each location is shown in the tables attached.
2.6 Laboratory Testing:

2.6.1 Coarse Grained Samples:
2.6.1.1 Grain size Analysis Tests:
On the coarse-grained samples, grain size distribution tests were conducted as per
I.S.2720 (Part 4)-1985, to know the gradation characteristics and to classify them.
These results are presented in Laboratory Test Results.
2.6.2 Fine Grained Samples:

2.6.2.1 Index Property – Free Swell Tests:
Atterberg’s Limits were carried out on fine grained soil samples to evaluate the limits of
different consistency states. Generally Liquid limits, Plastic limits and Shrinkage Limits
tests were conducted as per I.S.2720 (Part-5)-1985 and I.S.2720 (Part 6)-1972. On
such type of strata encountered at the investigation locations, such tests were
conducted and the test results are presented in tables.
3. SUB-SURFACE STRATIFICATION
3.0 Preamble
The details of soil conditions encountered at the Bore Hole locations are presented in this
chapter based on visual identification, laboratory testing and other engineering
characteristics derived from SPT-value which are having correlation with strength
parameters.
The stratigraphy of the soil in BH1 is comprised of Silty Sand layer in the top 2m and from
4.0m to 10.0m. Clayey Sand layer is present from 2.0m to 4.0m.
The stratigraphy of the soil in BH2 is comprised of Silty Sand layer in the top 2m and from
5.0m to 10.0m. Clayey Sand layer is present from 2.0m to 5.0m.
The top soil is having differential free swell of 21% to 33% based on the free swell index
carried out according to IS: 2720 (Part. XL)-1977. As per the appendix A under clause
3.1(b) of IS 2911 (Part III) -1980, the qualitative indication of the degree of expansiveness
of the soil is Moderate. The relative compaction of the sandy stratum is Loose to Medium
Dense.
Water Table
Water level was at the depth of 1.0m during the borehole operations.
4. FOUNDATION SYSTEM
4.0 Preamble
The foundation system design is an interface between super structure and the sub soil
bearing strata characteristics. A sound foundation system should be safe against bearing
strata shear response under the super structure load intensity. Similarly, the stability of
the foundation system is governed by the bearing strata deformation response under the
super structure load intensity. In addition, as a combined system of super structure and
foundation, the overall stability is also governed by the super structure arrangement.
Considering the above aspects of foundation design, suitable type of foundation system
with respect to the sub soil conditions encountered at the borehole locations is presented
in the subsequent sections.
4.1 Bearing Strata Characteristics
At the investigation locations, it can be observed that the sub-soil strata are uniformly
stratified with some variation. The sub-soil stratum at the location of borehole is Sandy at
the shallow depths.
4.2 Proposed Foundation System
Considering the sub soil conditions encountered at the investigation locations, the
foundation system discussed below is technically viable solution and depending upon the
relative economics and construction feasibility the foundation system discussed below can
be adopted.
The top layer up to 3.00 m is considered for shallow foundation. The water table is
considered to be at the ground level in worst conditions. The bearing capacity has been
assessed as per the IS 6403: 1981 based on the field test (SPT) conducted at site as per
IS 2131:1981. The allowable bearing pressure is calculated as per IS 8009(Part I)-1976

(Reaffirmed 1998). Since the field test was conducted under water table, a factor of safety
of 3 has been adopted to arrive at the safe bearing capacity.
The calculated allowable bearing pressure for isolated footing is listed in the table for the
maximum footing size of 3.0m x 3.0m at the depth of 2.0m and 3.0m from the existing ground
level.
ISOLATED FOOTING Calculated Safe Total settlement by

BH No allowable bearing
Schmertzmann method
Assumed Size Depth pressure
3.0m x 3.0m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 24 mm

BH 1
3.0m x 3.0m 3.0m 140 kN/m2 35 mm
3.0m x 3.0m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 21 mm

BH 2
3.0m x 3.0m 3.0m 140 kN/m2 26 mm
The calculated allowable bearing pressure for strip raft foundation is listed in the table for the
maximum footing size of 1.2 m x 10.00m at the depth of 2.0m and 3.0m from the existing
ground level.
STRIP RAFT FOUNDATION Calculated Safe Total settlement by

BH No allowable bearing
Schmertzmann method
Assumed Size Depth pressure
1.2m x 10m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 10 mm

BH 1
1.2m x 10m 3.0m 120 kN/m2 12 mm
1.2m x 10m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 11 mm

BH 2
1.2m x 10m 3.0m 120 kN/m2 9 mm
Based on the above assessment the conclusion and recommendation are furnished below
5. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Foundation Type – I: (Isolated footing)
• The recommended safe bearing capacity considering Isolated Foundation for the
assumed foundation size of 3.00m X 3.00m is 100 kN/m2 at the depth of about
2.0m from the existing lowest ground level.
• Under the recommended bearing pressure, the settlements of the bearing strata
based on Schmertzmann method is within the permissible limits for isolated column
footing as per I.S: 1904.
5.2 Foundation Type – II: (Strip Foundation)
• For higher load carrying capacity requirement Strip Raft may be adopted. The
recommended safe bearing capacity considering Strip Foundation for an assumed
foundation size of 10.00m X 1.2m is 100 kN/m2 at the depth of about 2.0m from the
existing lowest ground level.
• Under the recommended bearing pressure, the settlements of the bearing strata
based on Schmertzmann method is within the permissible limits for Strip footing.
5.3 General Recommendations:
1. The calculations are theoretical and have to be confirmed by conducting Plate load
test on foundation soil as per relevant standards.
2. For back filling the foundation trench, non-swelling soil may be used with proper layer
by layer compaction. The floor may also be raised using non-cohesive material.
3. The foundation and grade beam may be placed over a minimum 300mm thickness of
compacted CNS soil layer (Cohesive Non-Swelling) spreading at least 0.25m in
excess on all sides.
4. Proper shuttering arrangements are required during foundation construction work for
the stability of excavation cut and the nearby structure.
5. During construction, If the ground water level is raised higher than the foundation level
due to rain, then continuous dewatering has to be done with proper design to keep the
water level 2m below the foundation level.
6. Care shall be taken in locating the foundation system such that the ultimate bearing
strata are very dense sandy strata (weathered rock) with “N value” more than 10.
This recommendation is based on the stratum available at the borehole locations. When
excavations or drilling for foundation are made during execution, it may be verified whether the
same stratum is available almost at all the locations. If any change in stratum is observed, it
may be brought to our notice for further suggestion or modification of report.
BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
Model Bearing capacity calculations based on IS : 6403-1981 & Settlement by Schmertmann method
Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey no: 44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur,
Name of work :
Kanchipuram district.
Design particulars
Assumed Foundation size and depth Isolated column footing
Depth of foundation (D) = 1.00 m 2.00 m 3.00 m 4.00 m 5.00 m
Foundation width (B) = 3.00 m 3.00 m 3.00 m 3.00 m 3.00 m
Foundation Length (L) = 3.00 m 3.00 m 3.00 m 3.00 m 3.00 m
Foundation Shape = Square Square Square Square Square
Shear strength parameters Data from BH: 1
Design N 18 20 17 16 15
angle of internal friction correlated/measured (Φ) = 32 ⁰ (deg) 33 ⁰ (deg) 32 ⁰ (deg) 32 ⁰ (deg) 31 ⁰ (deg)
Cohesion correlated/measured = kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
Density of soil (У) = 15.0 kN/m3 16.4 kN/m3 15.3 kN/m3 15.8 kN/m3 15.8 kN/m3
Depth of water table from EGL (Dw) = 0.00 m 0.00 m 0.00 m 0.00 m 0.00 m
Shear failure criterion Interpolation Interpolation Interpolation Interpolation Interpolation Sc/Sq/Sy
Bearing capacity factors Nc and Dc 26.77 1.12 28.71 1.25 25.86 1.36 24.99 1.48 24.15 1.59 1.30
Nq and Dq 15.97 1.06 17.65 1.12 15.19 1.18 14.45 1.24 13.74 1.30 1.20
Ny and Dy 19.37 1.06 22.07 1.12 18.14 1.18 16.99 1.24 15.90 1.30 0.80
UBC = CNcScDc+q(Nq-1)Dq+0.5ByNyDyRW' (General) or (2/3)CN'cScDc+q(N'q-1)Dq+0.5ByN'yDyRW' (Local) or interpolating both
Ultimate bearing capacity 257 kPa 419 kPa 432 kPa 513 kPa 585 kPa
Factor of Safety 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Result
Safe bearing capacity assessed 86 kPa 140 kPa 144 kPa 171 kPa 195 kPa
Allowable bearing pressure kPa 100 kPa 140 kPa kPa kPa
Anticipated Total settlement in 25 years = #NUM! mm 24 mm 35 mm #NUM! mm #NUM! mm
Depending upon anticipated load intensity the foundation may be adopted at suitable depth as recommended below
Depth of foundation (m): Safe bearing capacity (kPa):
2.00 m 100 kPa 24 mm
3.00 m 140 kPa 35 mm
Name of work :
Design particulars
Assumed Foundation size and depth Isolated column footing
Foundation Shape = Square Square Square Square Square
Design N 14 18 20 20 20
Nq and Dq 13.08 1.06 15.97 1.12 17.65 1.18 17.65 1.25 17.65 1.31 1.20
Ny and Dy 14.88 1.06 19.37 1.12 22.07 1.18 22.07 1.25 22.07 1.31 0.80
Factor of Safety 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Result
2.00 m 100 kPa 21 mm
3.00 m 140 kPa 26 mm
Name of work :
Design particulars
Assumed Foundation size and depth Strip footing
Foundation Shape = Rectangle Rectangle Rectangle Rectangle Rectangle
Design N 18 20 17 17 15
Nq and Dq 15.97 1.15 17.65 1.31 15.19 1.45 15.19 1.60 13.74 1.74 1.00
Ny and Dy 19.37 1.15 22.07 1.31 18.14 1.45 18.14 1.60 15.90 1.74 1.00
Factor of Safety 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Result
2.00 m 100 kPa 10 mm
3.00 m 120 kPa 12 mm
Name of work :
Design particulars
Assumed Foundation size and depth Strip Raft Footing
Foundation Shape = Rectangle Rectangle Rectangle Rectangle Rectangle
Design N 14 17 20 20 20
Nq and Dq 13.08 1.15 15.19 1.30 17.65 1.46 17.65 1.61 17.65 1.77 1.00
Ny and Dy 14.88 1.15 18.14 1.30 22.07 1.46 22.07 1.61 22.07 1.77 1.00
Factor of Safety 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Result
2.00 m 100 kPa 11 mm
3.00 m 120 kPa 9 mm
Table of Laboratory Test Results
Name of Project : Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey no: 44/24B, Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district.
Classification
Free swell
Grain Size Analaysis (Particle Natural
Depth (m) SPT Atterberg Limits
Retained in IS Sieve) %
(%)
Bore N Moisture
IS
Depth Type of Soil Remarks
Hole No Value 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 Content
From To (m) Fines
mm mm mm mm LL PL PI %
BH 1 0.00 1.00 0.50 AS Silty Sand 0.00 0.49 53.30 33.38 12.84 0.0 SM 8.26
1.00 2.00 1.00 10 Silty Sand 0.22 1.06 52.26 33.48 12.97 0.0 SM 12.90
2.00 3.00 2.00 19 Clayey Sand 0.00 0.34 56.72 19.66 23.27 60.0 60.0 SC 12.30
3.00 4.00 3.00 12 Clayey Sand 0.00 0.76 56.29 17.52 25.43 60.0 60.0 SC 14.66 25.00
4.00 5.00 4.00 27 Silty Sand 0.31 5.88 58.67 16.55 18.59 0.0 SM 10.22
5.00 6.00 5.00 20 Silty Sand 0.00 13.50 45.73 23.04 17.74 0.0 SM 9.93
6.00 1.00 6.00 17 Clayey Sand 2.54 4.35 42.08 18.60 32.44 60.0 60.0 SC 12.97
BH 2 0.00 2.00 1.00 7 Silty Sand 1.90 0.64 52.54 32.49 12.44 0.0 SM 11.73
2.00 3.00 2.00 10 Clayey Sand 0.00 0.56 57.85 17.45 24.14 60.0 60.0 SC 14.55 21.43
3.00 4.00 3.00 17 Clayey Sand 0.00 1.19 54.56 18.96 25.29 51.0 20.0 31.0 SC 13.67 33.33
4.00 5.00 4.00 18 Clayey Sand 0.00 2.88 57.35 18.11 21.66 60.0 60.0 SC 11.18
5.00 6.00 5.00 26 Silty Sand 2.76 10.00 54.69 16.73 15.82 0.0 SM 10.44
6.00 7.00 6.00 17 Silty Sand 0.98 5.04 47.61 30.16 16.21 0.0 SM 11.81
7.00 8.00 7.00 16 Silty Sand 2.62 18.81 35.70 24.70 18.18 0.0 SM 13.31
8.00 0.00 8.00 13 Silty Sand 3.18 20.54 35.87 24.52 15.89 0.0 SM 13.09
AS - Augur Sample
BORE LOG
Name of Project : Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey
BH No 1 RL of the EGL m Water level 1.00 m below ground level
Date of commencement 18-09-2019 Type of Drilling Manual auger & Sand shell
Date of completion 18-09-2019 Dia of Bore hole 100 mm

Soil profile
consistency
Standard Penetration Test
Thickness
Graphical representation of
density /
Depth of layer
Relative
Description of soil penetration resistance
from Number of blows
stratum Depth
RL (m)
I II III N
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.00 Existing ground level
Brown Silty Sand 1.00
1.00 1.00 2 3 7 10 Loose
Light Brown Silty

1.00
Sand
2.00 2.00 6 8 11 19 Medium dense
Greyish Brown
1.00
Clayey Sand
3.00 3.00 5 6 6 12 Medium dense
Brownish Grey
1.00
Clayey Sand
4.00 4.00 11 14 13 27 Medium dense
5.00 10 10 10 20 Medium dense
6.00 10 11 6 17 Medium dense
7.00 4 4 4 8 Loose
Grey Silty Sand 6.00
8.00 6 5 7 12 Medium dense
9.00 18 17 19 36 Dense
10.00 10.00 21 21 21 42 Dense

Bore Hole terminated at 10 m
BORE LOG
Name of Project : Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey
BH No 2 RL of the EGL m Water level 1.50 m below ground level
Date of commencement 18-09-2019 Type of Drilling Manual auger & Sand shell
Date of completion 18-09-2019 Dia of Bore hole 100 mm

Soil profile
consistency
Standard Penetration Test
Thickness
Graphical representation of
density /
Depth
of layer
Relative
Description of soil penetration resistance
from Number of blows
stratum Depth
RL (m) 0 20 40 60 80 100
I II III N
0.00 Existing ground level
1.00 3 3 4 7 Loose
Brown Silty Sand 2.00
2.00 2.00 4 5 5 10 Loose
Greyish Brown
3.00
Clayey Sand
5.00 5.00 12 13 13 26 Medium dense
Grey Silty Sand 5.00
10.00 10.00 11 14 13 27 Medium dense

Bore Hole terminated at 10 m
BORE HOLE LOCATION
Name of Project : Soil Investigation for the Construction of G+2 Residential Building at Plot no: 72, Survey no: 44/24B,
Vijayaganapathi Nagar, Navalur, Kanchipuram district.
4.50 m
BH I 1.50 m
60 Feet
8.00 m BH II
4.00 m
40 Feet
Road
Not to scale

Soil Report For RCC Building

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soil Report For RCC Building

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soil Report For RCC Building

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Soil Investigation carried out by :

Soil Testing - Stability Certificate - Load Test - Ground Improvement - Construction

Name of the Project :

Soil Testing - Stability Certificate - Load Test - Ground Improvement - Construction

2 Bearing Capacity Calculation

3 Consolidated Soil Test Results

5 Bore Hole Location

Soil Testing - Stability Certificate - Load Test - Ground Improvement - Construction

SOIL EXPLORATION REPORT

Date of test: 18-09-2019 Report No: GR44 -19

1.1 Scope of Work

Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at regular depth intervals.

Collection of Split Spoon Samples or Disturbed Soil Samples.

Conducting relevant laboratory test results as instructed.

1.2 Structure of the Report

2. Field Investigation Methodology & Lab Test

Laboratory Test Results

Field Test Location Drawing.

2. Field Investigation Methodology & Lab Test

2.1 Field Testing:

2.2 Equipment Used and Method of Drilling:

2.2.1 Equipment Used

2.2.2 Methodology of drilling

2.3 In-Situ Strength Tests:

2.3.1 Standard Penetration Test:

2.4. Collection of Samples:

2.4.1 Disturbed Soil Samples

2.5 Summary of Field Work

• Two boreholes were made up to 10.0m or N value > 100.

• Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at 1m depth intervals was conducted and

• The locations of the boreholes are shown in site plan attached.

2.6 Laboratory Testing:

2.6.2 Fine Grained Samples:

4.1 Bearing Strata Characteristics

4.2 Proposed Foundation System

IS 2131:1981. The allowable bearing pressure is calculated as per IS 8009(Part I)-1976

ISOLATED FOOTING Calculated Safe Total settlement by

3.0m x 3.0m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 24 mm

3.0m x 3.0m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 21 mm

STRIP RAFT FOUNDATION Calculated Safe Total settlement by

1.2m x 10m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 10 mm

1.2m x 10m 2.0m 100 kN/m2 11 mm

5. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Foundation Type – I: (Isolated footing)

5.2 Foundation Type – II: (Strip Foundation)

5.3 General Recommendations:

Date of completion 18-09-2019 Dia of Bore hole 100 mm

Brown Silty Sand 1.00

1.00 1.00 2 3 7 10 Loose

Light Brown Silty

5.00 10 10 10 20 Medium dense

6.00 10 11 6 17 Medium dense

8.00 6 5 7 12 Medium dense

10.00 10.00 21 21 21 42 Dense

Date of completion 18-09-2019 Dia of Bore hole 100 mm

2.00 2.00 4 5 5 10 Loose

3.00 6 8 9 17 Medium dense