The document discusses several issues that prevent women from fully participating in the workforce, including:
1. Women need permission from men in their families or villages to work outside the home or even go to the market alone. They face many preconditions for employment like long distances, restrictive timings, and expectations to still cook and care for the home.
2. Workplaces are often male-dominated without adequate safety, infrastructure, or facilities like hostels and creches legally required to support women workers.
3. Companies discriminate against hiring women and women feel inclined toward more "womanly" jobs. Skill training programs are often led by male teachers and families are reluctant to send girls, leaving gaps in preparing women
The document discusses several issues that prevent women from fully participating in the workforce, including:
1. Women need permission from men in their families or villages to work outside the home or even go to the market alone. They face many preconditions for employment like long distances, restrictive timings, and expectations to still cook and care for the home.
2. Workplaces are often male-dominated without adequate safety, infrastructure, or facilities like hostels and creches legally required to support women workers.
3. Companies discriminate against hiring women and women feel inclined toward more "womanly" jobs. Skill training programs are often led by male teachers and families are reluctant to send girls, leaving gaps in preparing women
The document discusses several issues that prevent women from fully participating in the workforce, including:
1. Women need permission from men in their families or villages to work outside the home or even go to the market alone. They face many preconditions for employment like long distances, restrictive timings, and expectations to still cook and care for the home.
2. Workplaces are often male-dominated without adequate safety, infrastructure, or facilities like hostels and creches legally required to support women workers.
3. Companies discriminate against hiring women and women feel inclined toward more "womanly" jobs. Skill training programs are often led by male teachers and families are reluctant to send girls, leaving gaps in preparing women
The document discusses several issues that prevent women from fully participating in the workforce, including:
1. Women need permission from men in their families or villages to work outside the home or even go to the market alone. They face many preconditions for employment like long distances, restrictive timings, and expectations to still cook and care for the home.
2. Workplaces are often male-dominated without adequate safety, infrastructure, or facilities like hostels and creches legally required to support women workers.
3. Companies discriminate against hiring women and women feel inclined toward more "womanly" jobs. Skill training programs are often led by male teachers and families are reluctant to send girls, leaving gaps in preparing women
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
why women falling out of workforce – Namita bhandare
Men got way more jobs
women always need to ask for permission – men in the family and even village panchayats family and household work permission to even got out to the market. Cant go out alone to seek a job too many pre conditions even when you get a job – distance – timings – cook food – safe safety, as places mostly male dominated – infrastructure – hostels and creches legally have to provide these facilities clear case of discrimination – companies don’t want to hire them themselves inclined to go towards womanly jobs skilling is a solution for this train people for what the market wants – there is a gap in that process few skill programmes – ustads and male teachers – family reluctant to send girls more diversity in companies women work only when the household needs it, otherwise they don’t u curve
sex workers manifesto – durbar mahila samanwaya committee
women do not have any bargaining power or any power against the client do they’ve the authority to say no if the client doesn’t want to use a condom the clients are also very poor – do they care about all of this? Its like a obstacle in their pleasure if she says no, she risks losing her client this will only work if all of them say no want decriminalisation of sex work history of sexual morality women are supposed to stay virgins, no sexual desires, those who do are sex workers considered to be “fallen” men are allowed to have open sexual desires family - very good environment for the man as he can still go to the sex worker despite having a wife, but the wife is supposed to be at home it is the man who goes to the sex worker, but it’s the sex worker who is called the home wrecker (women pit against each other) anti-men? No anti-patriarchy? Yes two images – pure and deviant why prostitution? Many jobs are risky, but people do demand for better conditions, but in prostitution they have to go for rehabilitation instead of better conditions criminalised and very marginalised – hide and do it despite of red areas always under the brawl of middle men, police, madams, pimps don’t have much power and double labour (take care of home, children and drunkard husband)
first wave of feminism
1950s & 60s John Money and Robert Stroller – gender as a social concept Masculinity and femininity varied across cultures First time the idea that maybe it is acquired rather than innate Universal adult franchise – women as wives, mothers, etc They were in the forefront of these mass movements but not in the structured decision-making and institutions, working in a predominantly patriarchal structure with no gender sensitivity – FUCK WEBER – patriarchal authority – traditional society – male heads of house and control Engels – monogamous marriage – ensured control of women’s reproductive sexuality They considered men and women’s different “social positions” but that these are in fact social constructs in the first place didn’t strike them yet (no equal legal status) TALK ABOUT THE ASHAS – women working with the delivery and shit
Second wave – radical feminism
Where are women the most exploited/subjugated? In the private sphere of family – before this family was seen as the harmonious and peaceful space for women – the solution to this is – personal is political The basic assumption – because the woman is exploited in the private, that’s why they’re also exploited in the public Liberal political theories – family – 2 assumptions – 1. Free personal choice and free of power Challenge of feminists – free personal choice available ONLY TO MAN. Women have to work according to men, which mostly means housework and take care of family, Relation between mand and woman is one of power, one dominates the other Private sphere – sphere of inequality, hierarchy, domination and HIDDEN because government is not allowed to look inside or interfere, open it to normative scrutiny Doesn’t object privacy or want to abolish private/public distinction They just want to change the nature of private – based on equality and consent Gender decides the type of work given to you. Even your Capabilities are decided judged and defined on the basis of gender Feminine labour and masculine labour – home or work field Youre capable of doing only this kind of work, you lack strength, skill, refinement JUST BECAUSE you belong to a certain gender, that is when the problem arises, and that is when labour becomes gendered Under valued and under pain for the same work. EVERYONE DOESN’T HAVE THE EQUAL STRENGTH AND CAPABILITY. Some women are stringer than some men and vice versa Minimum wages act – 194, minimum wages for all Equal remuneration act – 1976, inequality in work conditions, heath conditions and pay 2012 – housework as economic work – because the only work many women do is seen as no work and hence theyre seen as not doing any work Housewife and homemaker – brought the concept that they’re doing work Formal sector – lady teachers – cultural activities Male teachers – physical activities Home – like an informal sector as well – homemaking – cooking, cleaning, child and old House help – sub allocation of work to another women – shows once again that it is not equal share of housework No stipulated working hours – no food to eat after serving others or no sleep at night since you’ve to take care of everyone – no holidays, facilities or incentives that are in the formal sectors – they don’t have rights or to question – they cant question and be like I want to take a holiday this week because I haven’t had one in the past 3 weeks Cooking food (also repetitive), cleaning – after a few hours once its eaten, there is no proof the work so since a concrete product is not to be seen the house work becomes invisible as a result of which their work is also undervalued Women who work outside – paid labour and unpaid labour at home, they’ve some support systems in the formal sector, the “support system” at the house is also constantly judging and criticizing their work and no place for improvements Home based work (cottage industries) – the family works as a unit – the women’s labour becomes a part of the process – but only the head (mostly man) recognised for credit for the finished product, man has the right to sell the product, advantage – they can take care of the home, dont have to commute, dis – housework + this work ( multiplied work) Women – cheap source of labour regardless kill or unskilled, therefore, more often employed in the informal sector (90%), women like it because flexible work hours Division of labour is okay but sexual division of labour is problematic Men are better with science and math (stereotypes and value judgements) even if the statistics show that, we’ve to focus on the cultural and parental decisions that even theyre like ladka yeh karega. This is problematic because these things don’t have ratoional basis and division of labour gets fucked Constant judgement – you’ve to prove yourself again and again or youre just too withdrawn Lets look at homes except for heterosexual ones Farmer suicide 9women centred families) – how many women farmers committed suicide? What happened to their families? Again leaves us with the stereotype that only heterogenous families are there Single parent – affordability and class – middle class women shares work with domestic help – lower class women does that work and the work of her own home. Class also dictates your work Girl children are also allocated work – isn’t this child labour too???? To take care of younger siblings and shit When you identify a women with only the work she does (housework) what happens when shes old and she cant do that anymore? There is a vacuum and her place in her own home is not enough anymore Question the home as a democratic space – dignity of labour, equal sharing and value recognition