"Science For The People", DOST - PCIEERD Directs R&D
"Science For The People", DOST - PCIEERD Directs R&D
"Science For The People", DOST - PCIEERD Directs R&D
The Philippine Council for Industry, Energy and Emerging Technology Research
and Development (PCIEERD) of the Department of Science and Technology
(DOST) is ready to accept research and development (R&D)/science and
technology (S&T) proposals for 2020. This Call for Proposals is for specific priority
areas identified in the Harmonized National R&D Agenda (HNRDA) 2017 – 2022.
Guided by the principle “Science for the People”, DOST – PCIEERD directs R&D
and S&T initiatives that will improve the innovation system to leverage economic
progress.
Proposals must be aligned with the following program areas for funding
consideration.
The cities of Cauayan, Iloilo, and Butuan were chosen as the pilot city of
implementation. With the city’s rapid economic and industrial growth, as well as
the local government’s enthusiasm and support in ushering innovation, the
concept and development of smarter cities in said sites has great potential, and
eventually, project as a good model to other cities.
1
3. Energy Storage Module
The following materials for the energy storage system are prioritized with the
respective performance charge/discharge cycle life targets:
The following technologies are prioritized: monitoring and control systems for
energy management, energy sensors/actuators, efficient thermal systems,
energy-efficient prime mover systems.
This call would like to address the need to develop efficient and cost effective
ballast water treatment technologies to be used on board ships, and establish
programs to develop, test, evaluate and approve the same in accordance with
the Ballast Water Management Convention (BWMC), an International
Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and
Sediments, 2004.
Further details of each program areas are specified in the Annex of this Call
document.
2
2. Outcomes - The effects or change directly realized from the delivery of
research outputs beyond academic knowledge and project manpower
development.
A. Fund Information
B. Partial Funding
The DOST – PCIEERD may partially fund discrete portions or phases of proposed
projects. If DOST – PCIEERD decides to partially fund a proposal, it will do so in
a manner that does not prejudice any applicant or affect the basis upon which the
proposal or portion thereof, was evaluated and selected for award, and therefore
maintains the integrity of the selection process.
The closing date for the submission of full-blown proposals through the e-
Proposals submission facility is on 2 August 2019. A notification will be issued
to eligible entities whose proposals have been evaluated and recommended for
award on or before 27 September 2019. A DOST - PCIEERD R&D Manager will
then be assigned to each project proponent to provide guidance in finalizing their
proposals.
The target commencement period for approved projects may start on January
2020 or depending on the result of the evaluation and notice of award of
successful applicants.
E. Type of Funding
The funding for selected projects will be in the form of a research agreement under
the DOST - PCIEERD Grants – In - Aid (GIA) Program. Research agreements
permit substantial involvement of the DOST - PCIEERD designated R&D
Managers and the selected applicants in the performance of the work supported.
Although DOST - PCIEERD will negotiate precise terms and conditions relating to
substantial involvement as part of the award process, the anticipated substantial
Government involvement for this project will be:
● Close monitoring of the successful applicants’ performance to verify the results
reported by the applicant;
3
● Collaboration during performance of the scope of work;
● Review of the substantive terms of proposed contracts and review of
competitive procurement procedures (DOST - PCIEERD will not select
contractors)
● Approval of qualifications of key program/project personnel (DOST - PCIEERD
will not select employees or contractors employed by the award recipient);
● Review and comment reports prepared under the research agreement
F. Supplementary Information
A. Eligible Entities
Any Filipino, public or private entity with proven competence may apply for GIA
support of DOST - PCIEERD and its grant - giving units, provided that projects fall
under the specific research areas with overall goal to benefit Filipinos.
Preference will be given to public and private universities and colleges, Research
and Development Institutes (RDIs), R&D Consortia, non-profit laboratories, other
public or private non- profit S&T institutions located in the Philippines. Non - profit
S&T organizations are those which: (1) are operated primarily for scientific,
educational, service, or similar purposes in the public interest; (2) are not
organized primarily for profit; and (3) use its net proceeds to maintain, improve,
and/or expand its operations. Non-profit organizations engaged in lobbying
activities are not eligible to apply.
The Applicant should provide at least 20% counterpart funding. Only eligible and
allowable costs may be used for counterpart fund and/or in - kind contribution (ex.
utility costs, office space rental, among others), as determined by DOST –
PCIEERD. The proposal must describe how the applicant will provide the
counterpart fund/in - kind contribution and the role that DOST - PCIEERD funding
will play in the overall project.
C. Threshold Criteria
4
1. Only proposals from Eligible Entities that meet all of the criteria will be evaluated
against the ranking factors in Section V of this announcement. Applicants found
ineligible for funding consideration as a result of the threshold eligibility review
will be notified within 15 calendar days of the ineligibility determination.
6. Proposals received after the submission deadline will be considered late and
returned to the sender without further consideration unless the applicant can
clearly demonstrate that lateness was due to mishandling on the part of DOST
- PCIEERD.
A. Content of e-Proposals
5
2. Narrative Proposal
The narrative proposal work plan must explicitly describe the following in the
downloaded forms.
Describe the project rationale and significance of the proposed project to the
current needs of the country. It may include novelty, potential for
publication/IP, and success/failure ratio.
b. Project Objectives
c. Review of Literature
d. Methodology
e. Work Plan
Identify the expected project outputs and how the progress towards
achieving the outputs will be tracked and measured. Identify the expected
quantitative and qualitative outcomes of the project; including what
measurements will be used to track the progress towards achieving the
outcomes and how the results of the project will be evaluated.
6
expected to produce and quantify possible socio - economic benefits, co -
investment, profitability, environment impacts and contribution towards the
advancement of S&T which can be derived from the project.
Provide the total budget requirement for the project reflecting the counterpart
of the Applicant using DOST - PCIEERD Form A. Applicants must itemize
the costs related to personnel, travel, equipment, supplies, other direct costs,
and total costs. Equipment and other large expense items should be
supported with justification. Estimation for the rates of project personnel
should be in accordance with the prescribed rates for Honoraria and hiring
of DOST - GIA Personnel.
i. Attachments
d. Past Performance
7
(i) whether, and how, you were able to successfully complete and manage
those agreements and (ii) your history of meeting the reporting
requirements under those agreements including submitting acceptable
final technical reports.
B. e-Proposals Submission
Contacts:
V. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Only those proposals that meet the threshold criteria in Section III Part C will be
evaluated according to the criteria set forth below. Applicants should directly and
explicitly address these criteria as part of their proposal submission. Each proposal
will be rated using point system, with a total of 100 points.
8
A. Evaluation Criteria
Criteria Points
9
4. Staff Expertise/Qualifications: 15
4.1 Project Personnel expertise/qualifications to successfully
achieve the goals of the proposed project, and
4.2 Description of the applicant’s organization and experience
relating to the proposed project.
5. Budget/Resources: 10
5.1 Proposed project budget is reasonable/justifiable to accomplish
the proposed goals, objectives, and measurable project outputs
and outcomes
5.2 Applicant’s counterpart to complement the PCIEERD funding as
a requirement in Section III Part B. Extent on how the applicant
will allocate the use of PCIEERD funding with other sources of
funds to carry out the proposed project(s).
TOTAL 100
A review team will evaluate each proposal using the evaluation criteria described
above. Each proposal will be given a numerical score and will be ranked
accordingly. Preliminary funding recommendations will be forwarded to the
Approving Authorities based on this ranking.
C. Other Factors
A. Award Notices
Following the evaluation of proposals, all applicants will be notified on the status
of their proposals.
Proposal Notifications.
c. DOST - PCIEERD will also notify the unsuccessful applicant(s) via electronic
10
or postal mail on or before 27 September 2019.
The Grants – In – Aid (GIA) award shall be governed by the DOST GIA Guidelines.
C. Reporting Requirement
Timetable
Activities Dates
Announcement of Call for Proposal 28 June 2019
Closing Date for Submission of Full–Blown Proposal 2 August 2019
Notification of Successful Applicants On or Before 27
September 2019
11
Annex
This phase essentially focuses on effective land use planning. Areas of the city
must be carefully assessed to know whether a particular site is for residence,
commercialization, or protection. The goal is to provide a sustainable layout for
the city that can support its people, as well as the provision of their citizens’ basic
needs, services, and infrastructure. Such a layout will be crucial in identifying
the challenges that the city faces, providing evidence-based solutions that
address the identified issues, and ultimately achieving sustainability and
efficiency. Partnerships with different governmental, social, and educational
institutions will be essential in the achievement of the goals of this phase.
Catalytic Projects
Once the urban layout is undertaken, what needs to be identified first and
foremost is the kind of economic activity that will fuel the accomplishment of the
city’s programs and projects. This is an exercise of knowing what the current
capabilities of the city are, and having the understanding to utilize these
12
capabilities to usher in more developmental opportunities for the local
government.
Private and public sectors will be identified as to who will be putting investments
in these areas for development, and how much it will contribute to local gross
domestic product. A detailed engineering & architectural design is then needed
to support the highlighted economic activity, which should be in accordance with
the city development strategy set out in the previous phase.
This phase recognizes the fact that the Philippine national government has
limited budget to accommodate ambitious projects such as this one, so the
commitment coming from the local governments to a fiscal responsibility is
crucial in the achievement of the city’s goals and objectives.
Data Hub
The key to a smarter city is the ability to leverage on the collection, processing,
and use of data to make more effective and efficient everyday decisions. The
establishment of a data hub is important to ensure an evidence-based planning
and decision-making approach for the city executives, as they are guided by a
facility that can monitor the impacts, externalities, and progress of the city under
its projects.
Through the data hub, data is basically devolved and localized to the city
governments for use in support & guidance of their local planning and decisions.
Broadening our perspectives, the concept of a smart city really revolves around
making better and more informed decisions through careful assessment and use
of data.
Healthy living and recreation: residents are able to live an active and
healthy life. Examples of outcomes in this area could include: increased
access to recreational programming; availability of remote health services;
reduction in adverse health outcomes.
Technologies to be used
The following materials for the energy storage system are prioritized with the
respective performance charge/discharge cycle life targets:
● Advanced Lead-acid batteries - 2 times the cycle period of conventional
lead-acid
● Nickel-iron Battery System - 5 times lower cycle period than lead-acid
The following technologies are prioritized: monitoring and control systems for
energy management, energy sensors/actuators, efficient thermal systems,
energy efficient prime mover systems.
This call would like to address the need to develop efficient and cost effective
ballast water treatment technologies to be used on board ships, and establish
programs to develop, test, evaluate and approve the same in accordance with
the Ballast Water Management Convention (BWMC), an International
Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and
Sediments, 2004.
This would also include study on biofouling (micro and macro) control,
management and monitoring of the effects of ballast water management in
waters under study. Such research and monitoring should include observation,
measurement, sampling, evaluation and analysis of the effectiveness and
15
adverse impacts of any technology or methodology as well as any adverse
impacts caused by the organisms and pathogens that have been identified to
have been transferred through ships’ ballast water.
16