Retinoblastoma: Review Article
Retinoblastoma: Review Article
Retinoblastoma: Review Article
DOI 10.1007/s12098-017-2395-0
REVIEW ARTICLE
Retinoblastoma
Raksha Rao1 & Santosh G. Honavar2
Fig. 1 Genetics of
retinoblastoma
mutation is confined to one single cell in the retina. subretinal seeds. In contrast, an endophytic retinoblastoma
Heritable retinoblastoma constitutes 30–40% of all arises from the inner retinal layers, progressively fills the vit-
retinoblastomas, while the rest 60–70% are non-heritable. reous cavity, and causes vitreous seeding (Fig. 2b). At times,
One-fourths of the germline mutations are familial with the tumor may be a combination of these two growth patterns.
autosomal dominant in-heritance pattern, and the others are Diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma is a rare pattern of presen-
de-novo non-familial germline mutations [4]. tation where there is no obvious mass, only a flat retinal infil-
RB1 is a tumor suppressor gene that was identified in asso- tration, and is acalcific. It is generally seen in older children,
ciation with retinoblastoma and it validated the two hit and the incidence is less than 2%. Diffuse anterior retinoblas-
hypoth-esis. RB1 gene is located in the long arm of toma, a recent entity, is considered as an anterior variant of
chromosome 13 (13q), and most of the mutations are diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma [5].
nonsense codons or frame shifts. Sometimes retinoblastomas Patients with anterior extension of the tumor can present
are caused by genomic de-letion of chromosome 13q, a with white fluffy exudates in the anterior chamber resembling
syndrome known as RB1 gene deletion syndrome, where the a hypopyon, called pseudohypopyon [2]. Neovascularization
affected individual has varying degrees of dysmorphic of iris and glaucoma are other clinical presentations seen in
features and neurodevelopmental de-lays [2]. patients with advanced tumor (Fig. 2c). Orbital cellulitis-like
picture occurs when a large tumor undergoes necrosis and
induces inflammation in and around the eye (Fig. 2d).
Clinical Features Retinoblastoma which has extended outside the confines of
the eye is known as orbital retinoblastoma when the patient
Retinoblastoma is usually diagnosed at an average age of 18 generally presents with proptosis.
mo, with 95% of children diagnosed by 5 y of age. Germline
retinoblastomas can present as early as first month and spo-
radic retinoblastomas are detected at an average age of 24 mo Differential Diagnosis
[2]. Retinoblastoma can be unilateral or bilateral. All bilateral
cases are positive for germline mutation, whereas only 10– The most important differential diagnosis is Coats’ disease
15% patients with unilateral retinoblastoma carry a germline [6]. There are several other lesions that can simulate
mutation. The most common presenting symptom and sign is
leukocoria. Strabismus is the second most common sign. The
other common clinical features are as listed in Table 1.
Retinoblastoma typically manifests as a unifocal or multi- Table 1 Clinical features of retinoblastoma
focal, well-circumscribed, dome-shaped retinal mass with di- Leukocoria
lated retinal vessels. Although initially transparent and diffi- Strabismus
cult to visualize, it grows to become opaque and white. When Poor vision
small, the tumor is entirely intraretinal. As it enlarges, it Red painful eye
grows in a three-dimensional plane, extending away from the Vitreous hemorrhage
vitre-ous cavity (exophytic) or towards it (endophytic) [2]. Phthisis bulbi
In the exophytic growth pattern, the tumor arises from the Sterile orbital cellulitis
outer retinal layers and causes diffuse retinal detachment (Fig. Proptosis
2a). It is most often associated with numerous small
Indian J Pediatr
IAC Intra-arterial chemotherapy; IVC Intravenous chemotherapy; POC Periocular chemotherapy; IVitC
Intravitreal chemotherapy
Indian J Pediatr
Fig. 4 Intra-arterial
chemotherapy: Procedure in the
cath lab (a) Patient under
general anesthesia with a
transfemoral cathether (b) An
angiography performed with the
microcatheter at the ostium of
the ophthalmic artery, showing
a patent ophthalmic artery (c) A
group E eye with a very large
tumor and diffuse subretinal
fluid (d) After 3 cycles of intra-
arterial chemotherapy
Indian J Pediatr
Enucleation
Conclusions
Contributions RR: Drafting of the manuscript and figure compilation; 16. Abramson DH, Marr BP, Dunkel IJ, et al. Intra-arterial chemo-
SGH: Concept, critical revision and will act as guarantor for the paper. therapy for retinoblastoma in eyes with vitreous and/or
subretinal seeding: 2-year results. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:
Compliance with Ethical Standards 499–502.
17. Shields CL, Manjandavida FP, Lally SE. Intra-arterial
Conflict of Interest None. chemothera-py for retinoblastoma in 70 eyes: outcomes based
on the interna-tional classification of retinoblastoma.
Ophthalmology. 2014;121: 1453–60.
Source of Funding None.
18. Shields CL, Jorge R, Say EA, et al. Unilateral retinoblasto-ma
managed with intravenous chemotherapy versus intra-arterial
chemotherapy: outcomes based on the international
References classification of retinoblastoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol.
2016;5:97–103.
19. Shields CL, Kaliki S, Al-Dahmash S, et al. Management of ad-
1. Albert DM. Historic review of retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. vanced retinoblastoma with intravenous chemotherapy then
1987;94:654–62. intra-arterial chemotherapy as alternative to enucleation. Retina.
2. Shields J, Shields C. Retinoblastoma: introduction, genetics, 2013;33:2103–9.
clini-cal features, classification. In: Shields J, Shields C, editors. 20. Munier FL, Gaillard MC, Balmer A, et al. Intravitreal chemothera-
Atlas of Intraocular Tumors, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippinocott, py for vitreous disease in retinoblastoma revisited: from prohibition
Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 311–4. to conditional indications. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1078–83.
3. Satyanarayana L, Asthana S, Labani SP. Childhood cancer inci- 21. Munier FL, Soliman S, Moulin AP, Gaillard MC, Balmer A,
dence in India: a review of population-based cancer registries. Beck-Popovic M. Profiling safety of intravitreal injections for
Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:218–20. retinoblas-toma using an anti-reflux procedure and sterilisation
4. Nichols KE, Walther S, Chao E, Shields C, Ganguly A. Recent of the needle track. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1084–7.
advances in retinoblastoma genetic research. Curr Opin
22. Ghassemi F, Shields CL. Intravitreal melphalan for refractory
Ophthalmol. 2009;20:351–5. or recurrent vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma. Arch
5. Jijelava KP, Grossniklaus HE. Diffuse anterior retinoblastoma: Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1268–71.
a review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013;27:135–9.
23. Francis JH, Abramson DH, Gaillard MC, Marr BP, Beck-
6. Shields CL, Schoenberg E, Kocher K, et al. Lesions simulating
Popovic M, Munier FL. The classification of vitreous seeds in
retinoblastoma (pseudoretinoblastoma) in 604 cases: results
retinoblasto-ma and response to intravitreal melphalan.
based on age at presentation. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:311–6.
Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1173–9.
7. Rootman DB, Gonzalez E, Mallipatna A, et al. Hand-held high-
24. Shields CL, Manjandavida FP, Arepalli S, et al. Intravitreal melpha-
resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography in
lan for persistent or recurrent retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: prelim-
retino-blastoma: clinical and morphologic considerations. Br J
inary results. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:319–25.
Ophthalmol. 2013;97:59–65.
25. Shields CL, Shields JA, Cater J, et al. Plaque radiotherapy for ret-
8. Shields J, Shields C. Retinoblastoma: diagnostic approaches. In:
inoblastoma: long-term tumor control and treatment complications
Shields J, Shields C, editors. Atlas of Intraocular Tumors, 3rd
in 208 tumors. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2116–21.
ed. Philadelphia: Lippinoctt, Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 335–42.
9. Chantada G, Doz F, Antoneli CB, et al. A proposal for an 26. Shields CL, Honavar SG, Meadows AT, Shields JA, Demirci H,
interna-tional retinoblastoma staging system. Pediatr Blood Naduvilath TJ. Chemoreduction for unilateral retinoblastoma.
Cancer. 2006;47:801–5. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1653–8.
10. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, et al. The international 27. Shields CL, Honavar SG, Meadows AT, et al. Chemoreduction
classi-fication of retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction plus focal therapy for retinoblastoma: factors predictive of need
success. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2276–80. for treat-ment with external beam radiotherapy or enucleation.
11. Shields CL, Fulco EM, Arias JD, et al. Retinoblastoma frontiers Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:657–64.
with intravenous, intra-arterial, periocular, and intravitreal 28. Murphree AL, Villablanca JG, Deegan WF 3rd, et al.
chemo-therapy. Eye. 2012;27:253–64. Chemotherapy plus local treatment in the management of intraoc-
12. Shields CL, Shields JA. Retinoblastoma management: advances ular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1348–56.
in enucleation, intravenous chemoreduction, and intra-arterial 29. Honavar SG, Singh AD, Shields CL, Demirci H, Smith AF,
chemo-therapy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:203–12. Shields JA. Post-enucleation prophylactic chemotherapy in
13. Kingston JE, Hungerford JL, Madreperla SA, Plowman PN. Results high-risk reti-noblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:923–31.
of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced 30. Honavar SG. Orbital retinoblastoma. In: Singh AD, Murphee
intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1339–43. LA, Damato BE, editors. Clinical ophthalmic Oncology-
14. Manjandavida FP, Honavar SG, Reddy V, Khanna R. retinoblastoma. 2nd ed. NY: Springer; 2015. p. 185–94.
Management a n d o u t c o m e o f r e t i n o b l a s t om a w i t 31. Dunkel IJ, Khakoo Y, Kernan NA, et al. Intensive
h v i t r e o u s s e e d s . Ophthalmology. 2014;121:517–24. multimodality therapy for patients with stage 4a metastatic
15. Suzuki S, Yamane T, Mohri M, Kaneko A. Selective ophthalmic retinoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:55–9.
arterial injection therapy for intraocular retinoblastoma: the long- 32. Rao R, Honavar SG. Recent developments in retinoblastoma.
term prognosis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2081–7. Delhi J Ophthalmol. 2016;27:50–61.