Ubl
Ubl
Ubl
ABSTRACT
The openings in the webs of beams in building are necessary for the passage of utility ducts. This study aims to
investigate the behavior of steel reinforced concrete (SRC) beams with an opening, including the effects of
various opening shapes and different values of moment to shear ratio on the strength. Thirteen full-scale SRC
beams were designed to have different opening shapes and tested at different moment to shear ratios. Test results
indicate specimens with high moment to shear ratio demonstrated ductile behavior due to the confinement
attributed to the stirrup and structural steel. Specimens with low moment to shear ratio failed owing to the shear
cracking. An interaction between bending and shear was examined for tested SRC beams.
KEYWORDS: web opening, steel reinforced concrete, shear failure, interaction, SRC
1. INTRODUCTION
The transverse holes in the webs of beams in buildings are necessary for the passage of service ducts and piping
in order to minimize the story height and to attain economic requirements. The web openings of the beam result
in the decrease of flexural and shear strengths, flexural stiffness, and the increase of the deflection. The
reinforcement at the opening is needed to ensure the proper strength and stiffness of the beams.
Numerous experimental and analytical studies have been conducted to investigate the strength of reinforced
concrete flexural members with openings. The design for a flexural member with a large opening had been
proposed that the top and bottom cross members of the opening could be assumed to behave like a vierendeel
panel. The top and bottom chord members were expected to carry shear and axial force acted from the bending
moment (Nasser et al. 1967; Mansur et al. 1985). Further, ACI design provisions specify that the openings in the
web of a member can reduce the shear strength, and the effect of any openings on the shear strength shall be
considered (ACI 318 2005).
Meanwhile, numerous studies for structural steel beams, including steel beams supporting a reinforced concrete
slab, with web openings have been carried out and design provisions have been recommended. AISC
specifications specify that the effect of web openings on the nominal shear strength of beams shall be
determined, and adequate reinforcement shall be provided if necessary (AISC 2005). Several strength limit
states may control the design of a flexural member with web openings, such as local buckling of the
compression flange or the web, yielding or local buckling of the tee-shaped compression zone, and
moment-shear interaction. Moreover, the design procedure is given in the literature (ASCE 1999; Darwin 1990).
Although many investigations have been conducted on reinforced concrete and structural steel beams with
opening, there is very little information on the behavior for concrete-encased steel beams, or so called steel
reinforced concrete (SRC) beams, with web opening (Hsu and Lee 2002; Sugimoto et al. 2000; Arata et al.
2000). This paper presents experiments of SRC beams containing openings of various shapes under different
moment to shear ratios. Tests were conducted on 13 SRC beams and test results are presented and discussed.
th
The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
This experiment was conducted to study the behavior of the SRC beams with various opening shapes under
combined bending and shear at the location of the opening. Thirteen specimens were designed and fabricated. All
the specimens consisted of the same amount and arrangement of reinforcement and structural steel shape.
Specimens were well instrumented to collect the global and detailed deformation during the testing.
Thirteen specimens were designed to have the test variables of opening shape and the values of moment to shear
ratio at the opening. The SRC beams used in this study consisted of structural steel shape and reinforced concrete.
The cross-sectional dimensions of the beams were 30×50 cm. All the specimens had the same design:
H300×150×6.5×9 structural steel, four No. 8 (25 mm-diameter) longitudinal bars at each corner of the cross
section, No. 3 (10 mm-diameter) transverse bars at a center-to-center spacing of 12 cm, and 13 mm-diameter shear
studs at 15 cm spacing. Additional four No. 6 (19 mm-diameter) longitudinal bars were reinforced at the four
corners of the opening. The structural steel confirmed to ASTM A36 material. The longitudinal bars were Grade
60, while the stirrups were Grade 40. The configuration of the beams and details of the reinforcement at the
opening are presented in Figure 1. All the openings located at the mid-depth of the cross section.
ψ13X50@15 cm 15 cm 30 cm
30 cm A A A
No.8 (typ) 5 cm
No.3@12
cm 17.5
No.6 (typ) cm
3 cm
ψ=150mm
15
H300X150X6.5X9 mm cm
3 cm 15 cm 15 cm
17.5
cm
5 cm
SECTION A-A A A A
115 cm 115 cm 130 cm
In the labeling of the specimens, alphabetic characters N, C, S and R refer to the specimens without opening, and
specimens with an opening of circular, square and rectangular hole, respectively. The second character was
numbered to reflect the variable of moment to shear ratio at the opening, with 1 referring to pure bending, and
others referring to different moment to shear ratio. The openings for C-, S- and R-series specimens were 15
cm-diameter circular hole, 15×15 cm square hole, and 15×30 cm rectangular hole, respectively.
To achieve the beams subjected to different combination of bending and shear, the locations of applied load and
supports were varied to obtain various values of the moment to shear ratio. Table 1 tabulates the loading
configuration for the specimens.
th
The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
The test setup is shown in Figure 2. The beams were simply supported and subjected to concentrated loads. The
specimens were loaded monotonically by a hydraulic actuator through stroke control to attain the test data
during the post-peak range. Testing was terminated until the applied load dropped significantly.
Testing Frame
Actuator
Specimen
Strong Floor
2.3. Instrumentation
Test specimens were well instrumented in additional to the installation of strain gauges on the structural steel,
longitudinal bars, and transverse stirrups. Beam deflections at various locations were recorded during the test.
Meanwhile, the distortion of the openings was calculated by measuring the diagonal elongation or shortening.
Concrete cylinder compressive test and steel coupon test were conducted to obtain the actual material strengths.
The concrete cylinder strength was 24.9 MPa measured during the time of testing. The yield and ultimate
strengths for structural steel and reinforcement are tabulated in Table 2. General behavior, mode of failure and
bending-shear interaction are presented in this section.
The behavior of specimens N1, C1, S1 and R1 subjected to pure bending was quite similar. While the specimens
were loaded, flexural cracks appeared initially on the bottom of the beams. The beams behaved linearly until
cracks were observed at the concrete cover within the midspan which subjected to the maximum pure bending.
Peak load was developed when the concrete cover in the compression zone started to be crushed, accompanied
with the wider flexural cracks. After the beams reached peak strength, the load dropped quickly but only a small
amount, and the beams maintained at that strength even though the deformation of the beams was continued to
increase. Further, owing to the confinement effect attributed primarily to the transverse reinforcement and the
structural steel, the beams developed increasing strength, and the applied load was gradually raised. Except for
specimen R1, the beams reached strength even higher than the peak load.
Specimen N1, without opening, reached highest post-peak load as well as the ductile behavior. Because of the
wide opening, specimen R1 could not develop strength higher than the peak load during the post-peak range.
The ultimate failure of the specimens subjected to pure bending was the complete spalling of the concrete cover,
buckling of the longitudinal bars, and local buckling of the steel top flange at the compression zone. A
progressive damage and deformed shape of the specimen S1 are presented in Figure 3. The load versus midspan
deflection curves for specimens subjected to pure bending are illustrated in Figure 4.
For specimens under combined bending and shear, the behavior and mode of failure depended on the values of
the moment to shear ratio. As presented in Figure 5, the progressive damage of specimens S2, S3 and S4
indicate that specimen S2 failed due to the combined flexural and shear cracking. Specimens S3 and S4 were
mostly damaged by the shear cracks occurred at the corners of the opening. The failure of the specimen S4
mainly caused by the shear cracking at the opening. Severe shear deformation occurred at the opening can be
seen from Figure 6 which indicates the rhombic shape of the steel web after removal of the concrete. Load
versus deflection curves for specimens C-, S- and R-series are presented in Figure 7.
The failure of R-series specimens under bending and shear was in a completely different mode from others, as
observed from the tests. When the R-series specimens failed, the shear deformation at the opening was evident
due to the wide opening. Shear strength was much lower than those of the specimens with other opening shape,
which led to the considerable decrease of the applied load, as indicated in Figure 7. It is evident that for a wider
opening width in the web of the structural steel section, a larger reduction factor needed to be considered for the
shear strength (Darwin 1990).
th
The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
1000
800
600
Load (kN)
400
N1
200 S1
C1
R1
0
0 100 200 300
Displacement (mm)
Figure 3 Progressive damage of specimen S1 Figure 4 Load versus midspan deflection for
specimens subjected to pure bending
600 600
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
600
Load (kN)
400 400 400
C1 S1 R1
200 C2 200 S2 200 R2
C3 S3 R3
C4 S4 R4
0 0 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250
Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm)
Figure 7 Load versus deflection curves for specimens C-, S- and R-series
The beams subjected to high moment to shear ratio, predominant bending, developed minor shear cracks at the
corners of the opening in addition to flexural cracks occurred on the bottom of the beams close to the load
applied region, and the failure was primarily attributed to the flexural failure associated with minor shear
cracking. Nonetheless, shear failure at the opening was the major cause of the beam subjected to low moment to
shear ratio, predominant shear.
Compared to reinforced concrete (RC) beams, steel reinforced concrete beams have additional structural steel
encased in the concrete, which made the behavior of SRC beams different from the RC beams, when the beams
subjected to combined bending and shear. In the SRC beams, the strength decreased gradually after the beams
reached the ultimate strength, and it is because the structural steel provided additional shear strength while the
reinforced concrete failed in shear.
Moment-shear interaction was proposed for the structural steel section with openings (Darwin 1990). At the web
opening, bending and shear interact and result in lower strengths than when the forces act alone. However, the
interaction between bending and shear is not distinct. Therefore, the interaction between the design bending and
shear strengths, φM n and φVn , for structural steel was proposed as
3 3
⎛ φM n ⎞ ⎛ φVn ⎞
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 1 (3.1)
⎝ φM m ⎠ ⎝ φVm ⎠
th
The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
where M m and Vm are the maximum nominal bending and shear capacity at the location of an opening,
respectively. Figure 8 shows the relations of moment versus shear at the web opening which the specimens
developed during the test. As indicated in the figure, the moment-shear interaction of the tested SRC beams did
not agree to Eqn. (3.1), proposed for the structural steel, except R-series specimens. Due to the wide opening,
R-series specimens had the lowest shear strength among the specimens.
Square opening
Circular opening
Rectangular opening
500
400
Moment (kN-m)
300
200
100
0
0 200 400 600 800
Shear (kN)
Figure 8 Moment-shear interaction of test specimens
4. CONCLUSIONS
Behavior and strength of the steel reinforced concrete beams with various opening shapes subjected to
combined bending and shear were studied. The tests conducted on 13 SRC beams are presented. Test results
indicated that the SRC beams with a small opening subjected to pure bending can develop flexural strength as
much as the beam without opening. The SRC beams under predominant bending failed primarily attributed to
the flexural failure. Nevertheless, the beams subjected to predominant shear failed mainly owing to shear failure
at the location of the opening. The moment-shear interaction of the tested SRC beams with openings did not
agree to the interaction proposed for the structural steel with an opening.
REFERENCES
ACI. (2005). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318-05).
American Concrete Institute.
AISC. (2005). Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago,
IL.
Arata, T., Sugimoto, H., Tanaka, H., Kikumoto, K. and Sato, T. (2000). Experimental study on strengthening
effects of steel reinforced concrete beams with an opening (part 5). Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual
Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan. 1129-1130.
ASCE. (1999). Specification for structural steel beams with web openings. SEI/ASCE 23-97. American Society
of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
Darwin, D. (1990). Steel and composite beams with web openings. AISC Steel Design Guide Series No. 2.
American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago, IL.
Hsu, H.-L. and Lee, J.-H. (2002). Cyclic behavior of steel reinforced concrete members with web opening.
Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Structural Engineering. Kenting, Chinese Taiwan.
Mansur, M.A., Tan, K.H. and Lee, S.L. (1985). Design method for reinforced concrete beams with large
openings. ACI Journal 82-46. 517-524.
th
The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
Nasser, K.W., Acavalos, A. and Daniel, H.R. (1967). Behavior and design of large openings in reinforced
concrete beams. ACI Journal 64-3. 25-33.
Sugimoto, H., Arata, T., Tanaka, H., Kikumoto, K. and Sato, T. (2000). Experimental study on strengthening
effects of steel reinforced concrete beams with an opening (part 4). Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual
Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan. 1127-1128.