Aprendiz de Todo
Aprendiz de Todo
Aprendiz de Todo
T R A N S F E R
V E H I C L E
Overview
Firefly Aerospace Inc. (“Firefly”) was founded to provide economical, high-frequency access to space
for small payloads. The Firefly team addresses the market’s need for flexible access to space with a
“simplest, soonest” approach to technology selection.
Firefly’s Alpha launch vehicle is scheduled for first launch in fourth quarter of 2019. This vehicle is
capable of delivering 1000 kg to an altitude of 200 km. In order to achieve higher altitudes and greater
mission flexibility, Firefly also offers an in-space vehicle, the orbital transfer vehicle. The goal of this
document is to provide summary information on this latter vehicle for the purpose of preliminary mission
planning for payload customers. The contents found herein are not intended to be mission specific and
are subject to change. Firefly welcomes detailed design data such as payload-specific requirements and
interfaces, and operational plans once a launch service agreement is in place.
Contact Firefly
Please contact Firefly Aerospace Launch Services with inquiries into the suitability of the OTV for your
mission.
Contents
List of Figures iii
1 Vehicle Description 1
2 Vehicle Capabilities 2
3 Vehicle Variants 4
3.1 LEO Vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2 Extended-Range Vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4 Payload Interfaces 4
5 Payload Support 4
6 Example Missions 6
6.1 Orbit Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6.2 Plane/Phase Changes and Constellation Deployment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.3 Deorbiting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6.4 Super Low Altitude Orbits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6.5 Lunar Orbit Insertion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
List of Figures
1 The Firefly OTV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 OTV cross section schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3 Maximum payload as a function of altitude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4 OTV integrated with primary and secondary payloads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5 Payload interface dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6 Maximum payload delivered from Cape Canaveral launch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7 Maximum payload delivered from VAFB launch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8 Transfer time to MEO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9 Transfer time to GEO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10 Transfer time to the Moon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
11 Plane change example mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
12 Transfer time for inclination changes at 500 km . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
13 Transfer time for inclination changes at GEO altitude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
14 Phase change example mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
15 Deorbit example mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
16 Lunar transfer trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
List of Tables
1 OTV characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 OTV payload interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3 OTV payload services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
List of Acronyms
Acronym Meaning
COTS Commercial Off-The-Shelf
GEO Geostationary Orbit
LEO Low Earth Orbit
MEO Medium Earth Orbit
OD Outer Diameter
OTV Orbital Transfer Vehicle
SSO Sun-Synchronous Orbit
VAFB Vandenberg Air Force Base
1 Vehicle Description
The Firefly Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) is a solar-electric third stage for the Alpha and Beta launch
vehicles. The OTV is illustrated in Fig. 1 and shown schematically in the Alpha launch vehicle fairing
in Fig. 2. This vehicle provides in space propulsion and can serve as a payload bus for missions lasting
up to five years. The OTV enables missions that require:
Higher altitudes than can be achieved using the launch vehicle alone
Payload support and services for up to 5 years, including high power (0.4–5 kW), up to 150 Mbps
downlink, and attitude control
Solar array
Propellant tank
Separation band
Deployed payload
Stowed payload
76.5 in
Fairing
39.3 in 18.6 in
18 in OTV
15◦
13.8 in
Height 18 in
Diameter 40 in
Dry mass 130 kg
Material Carbon fiber
Propellant Xenon
Propellant storage 70 L COPV, 17.3 in OD
Power 0.4–5 kW
Number of thrusters 2–4
Thrust 30–310 mN
Specific impulse 1150–1800 s
2 Vehicle Capabilities
Figure 3 illustrates the degree to which the OTV extends the capabilities of the Alpha launch vehicle.
For missions exceeding 2000 km, the OTV delivers substantially more payload mass. Up to 600 kg can
be delivered to GEO and up to 500 kg can be delivered to lunar orbit. The OTV is generally well suited
to high-energy missions, such as those requiring substantial inclination changes. The OTV can carry a
single primary payload as well as up to four secondary payloads (illustrated in Fig. 4). In addition, the
OTV can be stacked with a number of deployment rings for a greater number of secondary payloads,
or stacked with additional OTVs for increased mission capability.
600
Alpha Stage 2
400
200
0
102 103 104 105 106
Altitude, km
Figure 3: Comparison of Alpha payload delivered with and without the OTV third stage. All OTV trajectories
are calculated from an initial circular orbit at 200 km.
Secondary payloads
Figure 4: The OTV with primary and secondary payloads inside the Alpha launch vehicle fairing.
3 Vehicle Variants
3.1 LEO Vehicle
The LEO OTV employs a 400 W solar array and commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) avionics. This vehicle
is a high-value low-cost solution for payloads operating in the low-radiation environment below 2000 km.
4 Payload Interfaces
The interfaces for the primary and secondary payloads are described in Table 2 and illustrated in Fig. 5.
There are six secondary payload attachment interfaces vertically centered on the OTV at 60○ intervals
about the axis of symmetry. Custom adapters can be made to mate between the circular OTV interface
and the payload interface.
5 Payload Support
The OTV can provide support to the payload during transport to and following arrival at the payload’s
destination orbit. Typical parameters for services provided are indicated in Table 3. Of particular note is
that once the destination orbit is reached and the propulsion system is powered off, a significant amount
of power—up to 5 kW—is available to the hosted payloads.
15○
30○
∅38.81 in
6○
y ∅8.0 in
○
3
1/4-28 UNC-2B
↧ 0.375 in (×60) 1/4-28 UNC-2B
THRU (×12)
Figure 5: Payload interface dimensions in launch vehicle coordinate frame (see Alpha launch vehicle Payload
User’s Guide).
Power 0.4–5 kW
Downlink Up to 100 Mbps X-band,
50 Mbps Ka-band
Uplink 200 kbps S-band
Pointing Control 50 arcsec
Stability 5 arcsec/sec
Mission Duration 5 years
6 Example Missions
In this section, we provide examples of specific missions that are achievable using the OTV in conjunction
with the Alpha launch vehicle. While the possible destination trajectories are only weakly dependent on
available power and payload mass (assuming that the payload mass is under the maximum allowed), the
travel time for a given trajectory is strongly dependent on both power and payload mass. As a result, we
separately provide figures indicating maximum payload delivered and figures indicating mission duration.
We show the maximum payload achievable for a given altitude and inclination in Figs. 6 and 7 for Cape
Canaveral launch and for Vandenburg Air Force Base launch respectively. In Figs. 8, 9, and 10, we
provide mission duration for different payload masses and power levels. All missions are assumed to
begin at 400 km circular orbits. Larger payloads are possible by beginning at lower altitudes, but the
drag at low altitudes makes lower power missions (<1 kW) infeasible.
105 500 kg
Altitude, km
550 kg GEO
600 kg
104 650 kg
700 kg
750 kg 500 kg
700 kg
103 Alpha with OTV
900 kg
Alpha Stage 2
Figure 6: Comparison of Alpha payload delivered with and without the OTV third stage from a Cape Canaveral
launch. All OTV trajectories are calculated from an initial circular orbit at 400 km.
105 350 kg
Altitude, km
GEO
400 kg
104 450 kg
SSO
500 kg
350 kg
103 550 kg Alpha with OTV
Figure 7: Comparison of Alpha payload delivered with and without the OTV third stage from a Vandenberg Air
Force Base launch. All OTV trajectories are calculated from an initial circular orbit at 400 km.
15
400 W
10
1 kW
5
4 kW
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Payload Mass, kg
Figure 8: Minimum travel time to 10,000 km as a function of payload mass for different power levels.
Transfer to GEO
20
Transfer Duration, months
15
1 kW
10 2 kW
4 kW
5
10 kW
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Payload Mass, kg
Figure 9: Minimum travel time to GEO, including a 29○ inclination change, as a function of payload mass for
different power levels.
Lunar Transfer
20
Transfer Duration, months
15
1 kW
10 2 kW
4 kW
5
10 kW
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Payload Mass, kg
Figure 10: Minimum travel time to the Moon as a function of payload mass for different power levels.
In Fig. 11, we show the trajectories of three 17 kg 12U CubeSats, each in a unique sun-synchronous
orbit plane separated by approximately 60○ . Using the OTV, such a configuration is achievable in a
single launch. At 2 kW, this mission can be accomplished in four months, a similar transfer time to
an equivalent chemical propulsion mission. While the chemical propulsion mission is not possible from
an Alpha launch vehicle, the electric propulsion version of this mission can both complete the CubeSat
mission, and also deliver a 350 kg primary payload to offset mission cost.
N
CubeSat 1
CubeSat 2
CubeSat 3
Figure 11: After being delivered to 500 km SSO by an Alpha launch vehicle, the OTV can deliver three 12U
CubeSats to unique planes 60○ apart. At 2 kW propulsion power, this mission can be accomplished in 4 months.
In Fig. 12, we show transfer time as a function of change in inclination for a 2 kW 500 km mission for
various payload masses. Figure 13 shows transfer time for similar missions performed at GEO altitudes.
Transfer time can sometimes be substantially reduced by taking advantage of the orbital mechanics at
a particular altitude and inclination (as demonstrated in Fig. 11).
Orbital phase changes—either for a single satellite, or to deploy an array of satellites at unique
relative positions—are easily accomplished by the OTV, typically in periods of 1 to 3 weeks per change
of 90○ . An example of such a mission is illustrated in Fig. 14, where four 17 kg 12U CubeSats are
deployed at 90○ phase intervals at 500 km. This mission is accomplished with 400 W propulsion power
within 1 month using less than 1 kg of propellant. Heavier payloads may be accommodated with longer
transit durations or higher power levels. Arbitrarily small amounts of propellant can be used when
mission duration is not critical.
100 kg payload
6
10 kg payload
4
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Inclination Change, deg
Figure 12: Transfer time for inclination changes at 500 km altitude with 2 kW of propulsion power for different
payload masses.
6
400 kg payload
100 kg payload
2
10 kg payload
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Inclination Change, deg
Figure 13: Transfer time for inclination changes at GEO altitude with 2 kW of propulsion power for different
payload masses.
CubeSat 4
CubeSat 3
CubeSat 1
CubeSat 2
Figure 14: After being delivered to 500 km SSO by an Alpha launch vehicle, the OTV can deliver four 12U
CubeSats at 90○ phase intervals. At 400 W propulsion power, this mission takes less than 1 month to reach the
final orientation and uses less than 1 kg of propellant.
6.3 Deorbiting
500
300
200
400 W Hall thruster, 2.3 months, 12 kg Xe
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Months
Figure 15: Deorbit time for a 1000 kg second stage from 500 km using a 400 W Hall thruster pair compared to
relying on aerodynamic drag alone.
NASA guidelines stipulate that all spacecraft and rocket bodies deorbit within 25 years of end of mission.
For missions with a perigee greater than 500 km, aerodynamic drag alone is typically insufficient to
deorbit a craft in that time span. The OTV can deorbit satellites or rocket bodies. In Fig. 15, a
comparison is made between an Alpha second stage deorbit using drag alone, and a similar deorbit
assisted by the OTV. The OTV is shown to deorbit the second stage in 2.3 months at 400 W, compared
to 50 months with drag alone. This mission requires only 12 kg of propellant.
OTV
Earth Moon
OTV
Moon
Figure 16: OTV lunar transfer trajectory (red, left) and descent to low lunar orbit (right) simulated using the
General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT).
High altitude missions, such as those to the Moon, typically require high power levels in order to
deliver a significant payload mass in a reasonable time frame. For this reason, the OTV is especially
suited to missions that require high power at the destination orbit. For example, if a communications
relay satellite is needed at the Moon, the solar array can power the propulsion system during transit to
the Moon. Once the destination orbit is reached and the propulsion system is powered down, the solar
array can be used to power the communications system.