Polymer Based Supercapacitors

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

POLYMER BASED SUPERCAPACITORS

Soney C George, Dean Research,


Center for Nanoscience and Technology
Amal Jyothi College of Engineering,
Kanjirappally

1. INTRODUCTION

The novel strategy for storing a large amount of electrical energy was ingeniously implemented

in the form of an electrochemical device called supercapacitors or ultracapacitors. The high

energy storage capacity, high power density, and energy density, and long cycle life make them

an alternative to other energy storage or generation devices such as secondary batteries and

fuel cells. Unlike other energy storage devices, the energy storage mechanism of

supercapacitors involves an electrical double-layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance.

Carbon-based materials are generally used in the electrical double-layer capacitors due to their

high specific surface area and conductivity. Metal oxides and conducting polymers and their

composites are used in the pseudocapacitors. The introduction of pseudocapacitive materials

increased the electrical energy storage capacity of electrical double-layer capacitors.

Polymers, especially conducting polymers including polyaniline, polypyrrole, polythiophene

has drawn the scientific attraction due to their promising pseudocapacitive behavior.

Furthermore, they can also be used as a separator, a binder, and electrolytes in the fabrication

of a supercapacitor device. Fluorine containing polymers such as polyvinylidene fluoride

(PVDF) is one such potential electrochemically active polymer (EAP) used in the fabrication

of supercapacitor. The unique set of properties, the versatility in the fabrication and processing,

exceptional stability towards thermal, chemical, radiation and whether drawn the attention of

many researchers for selecting PVDF as special attributes. Graphene is a good choice as

electrode materials due their high electrical conductivity.


2. EXPERIMENTAL

2.1. Materials

Graphite powder was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Other chemicals such as potassium

permanganate (KMnO4), sulphuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl) and hydrogen

peroxide (H2O2) were procured from Nice Chemicals, Kochi, India. All the experiments were

carried in deionized water without further purification of chemicals.

2.2. Preparation of Graphene Oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO)

About 5 gm of graphite powder was added into a beaker containing 115 mL of cooled H2SO4.

15gm of KMnO4 was added gradually with stirring and cooling so that the temperature of the

mixture was maintained at 10-150C. The mixture was then heated and stirred at 350C for 30

minutes. Then the temperature was raised to 900C for 30 minutes after that 125mL of deionized

water was added. Finally, 25 mL of 30% H2O2 solution was added sequentially to reduce the

excess KMnO4. The sample obtained was filtered and washed with 100 mL deionized water

followed by the addition of hydrochloric acid. The filtrate was resuspended in deionized water

and followed by ultrasonication treatment for 5 minutes. The process is repeated until the

filtrate became neutral. The solid product was then dried in a vacuum oven at 600C for 24 h.

About 1 gm of GO was added into 1L of deionized water and followed by ultrasonic treatment

for 15 minutes. 1.5 gm of hydrazine monohydrate was added into it and stirred continuously

for 10 h at 980C. The solution was cooled and the filtrate was washed with deionized water

several times. The filtrate is then dried in a vacuum oven at 600C for 24 h.
2.3. Characterization and Instrumentation

The X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out using Rigaku miniflex 600 diffractometer. The

analysis is carried out at a generator voltage of 40 kV and a current of 15 mA with Cuk alpha

of wavelength 1.5406.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


3.1. X- Ray Diffraction Analysis

The diffractograms of GO and RGO were depicted in figure 1. The XRD pattern of GO shows

a sharp peak at 2θ=10.280 attributed to GO. However, it is clear from the XRD pattern of GO

that the complete oxidation of graphite powder has not taken place. Because the small

characteristic diffraction peak obtained at 2θ=20.730 is the characteristic peak of graphite. The

diffractogram of RGO shows a peak at 2θ=21.380 indicating the presence of reduced graphene

oxide. The complete disappearance of the characteristic peak of GO at 2θ=10.280 indicates that

the chemical reduction of GO was successfully done. According to Bragg's law (2dhkl sinθ =

nλ), an increase in the peak position (θ) towards a larger angle resulted in a decrease in dhkl.

About 50% reduction in the interlayer spacing (dhkl) of GO (dhkl = 8.596nm) was observed after
the chemical reduction (for RGO dhkl = 4.15nm). As a result of the chemical reduction, the

oxygen-containing functionalities (such as carboxylic, hydroxyl, epoxy, carbonyl) were

removed from GO and the intramolecular bonding become stronger.

Figure 1: XRD pattern of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO)

3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic analysis

Figure 2
Figure 2: FTIR Spectrum of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO)

4. CONCLUSION

This report presents the initial step for the fabrication of polymer-based supercapacitor. The

samples of GO and RGO were given for the Raman and FITR analysis. The preparation of

PVDF/RGO nanocomposite is the next step of the study.


The diffractograms of GO and RGO were depicted in figure 1. The XRD pattern of GO shows

a sharp peak at 2θ=10.280 attributed to GO. However, it is clear from the XRD pattern of GO

that the complete oxidation of graphite powder has not taken place. Because the small

characteristic diffraction peak obtained at 2θ=20.730 is the characteristic peak of graphite. The

diffractogram of RGO shows a peak at 2θ=21.380 and it is the characteristic peak of reduced

graphene oxide. The complete disappearance of the peak of GO at 2θ=10.280 indicating the

successful chemical reduction of GO. According to Bragg's law (2dhkl sinθ = nλ), the shift of

peak position (2θ) towards a higher angle is the result of a decrease in dhkl. About 50%

reduction in the interlayer spacing of GO was observed after the chemical reduction. As a result

of the chemical reduction, the oxygen-containing functionalities (such as carboxylic, hydroxyl,

epoxy, and carbonyl) were removed from GO and the intramolecular bonding become stronger.

You might also like