Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing: Rahul Kumar, Parag Bhargava
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing: Rahul Kumar, Parag Bhargava
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing: Rahul Kumar, Parag Bhargava
a r t i c l e i n f o
Keywords:
Carbon material
Counter electrode
Dye-sensitized solar cells
abstract
Carbon material was produced from the graphitization of glucose at high temperature in
flowing argon. The produced carbon material was characterized using Scanning electron
microscopy, Transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and XRD. Carbon
slurry of the produced carbon was made in ethanol by using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as
surfactant. Carbon slurry was coated homogeneously on fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO)
glass by a doctor blade technique and applied as counter electrode for dye synthesized
solar cell. The current density (J) and open circuit voltage (VOC) of fabricated cell was
8.30 mA cm 2 and 0.77 V respectively. The efficiency of the cell was 3.63%, which is
comparable to 5.82% of cell with platinum counter electrode under the same experimental
conditions.
& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have attracted much
attention due to ease of fabrication, low cost and high
conversion efficiency [12]. The DSSCs consists of a dye
sensitized TiO2 nanocrystalline electrode, liquid electrolyte
acts as a redox couple, counter electrode which collects the
electrons arriving from the external circuit and catalyze
the I3 /I redox-coupled regeneration reaction in electrolyte [3]. Platinum is the commonly used material to
fabricate the counter electrode for DSSCs due to its high
catalytic activity [4] but high cost of this material is the
major issue. A lot of research is going on to replace the
platinum by other alternatives like carbon materials, conducting polymers, inorganic materials, multiple compounds and composites to fabricate the counter
electrodes for DSSCs [57]. These materials also have good
performances in DSSCs.
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (R. kumar),
[email protected] (P. Bhargava).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2015.06.009
1369-8001/& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2. Experimental details
2.1. Materials and methods
Carbon material was produced from the graphitization
of glucose (Glucon-D, Heinz) (5 g) at high temperature
(14001 C) in flowing argon. Carbon slurry from produced
carbon was prepared as follows, PVP (K-32, Sigma-Aldrich)
(0.12 gm) solution was prepared in ethanol (10 ml), carbon
332
Fig. 1. FEG-SEM micrographs (a) at low magnification and (b) at high magnification, Raman Spectroscopy (c), XRD pattern (d) of the carbon produced from
the graphitization of glucose at 1400 1C.
333
Fig. 2. FEG-TEM micrographs (a) at high magnification and (b) diffraction pattern of carbon produced from graphitization of glucose at 1400 1C.
3I2 2e 2I3
334
Fig. 3. FEM-SEM micrographs (a) side view of the carbon film (b) upper surface of the carbon film, (c) and (d) upper surface of the sputtered platinum film.
Fig. 4. Cyclic voltammetry curves of carbon produced from graphitization of glucose and Pt counter electrodes at a scan rate of 50 mV s 1 from 0.6 to
1.2 V in 5 mM LiI, 0.5 mM I2 and 0.1 M LiClO4 acetonitrile solution. Reference electrode: Ag/Ag in acetonitrile. Auxiliary electrode: Pt/FTO.
335
Fig. 5. Photocurrentvoltage characteristics of the cells using carbon produced from graphitization of glucose and Pt counter electrodes.
Table 1
Photovoltaic and electrochemical parameters of DSSCs with different
counter electrodes.
Counter electrode
JSC (mA cm 2)
VOC (V)
FF
(%)
Platinum
Carbon
12.07
8.30
0.72
0.77
0.6
0.5
5.82
3.63
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to SAIF department IIT
Bombay.
References
[1] O ReganB, M. Grtzel, Nature 353 (1991) 737740.
[2] Y. Chiba, A. Islam, R. Komiya, N. Koide, L.Y. Han, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88
(2006) 223505223508.
[3] A. Ko, J. Oh, Y. Lee, S. Han, K. Park, Mater. Lett. 65 (2011) 22202223.
tzel, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144
[4] N. Papageorgiou, W.F. Maier, M. Gra
(1997) 876884.
[5] A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo, H. Pettersson, Chem. Rev. 110
(2010) 65956663.
[6] A. Kay, M. Grtzel, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 44 (1996) 99117.
[7] Q. Li, J. Wu, Q. Tang, Z. Lan, P. Li, J. Lin, L. Fan, Electrochem. Commun.
10 (2008) 1299.
[8] T.N. Murakami, S. Ito, Q. Wang, M.K. Nazeeruddin, T. Bessho, I. Cesar,
P. Liska, R Humphry-Baker, P. Comte, P. Pechy, M. Gratzel, J.
Electrochem. Soc. 153 (2006) A2255.
[9] G. Veerappan, K. Bojan, S.-W. Rhee, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3
(2011) 857.
[10] T.N. Murakami, S. Ito, Q. Wang, M.K. Nazeeruddin, T. Bessho, I. Cesar,
P. Liska, R. Humphry-Baker, P. Comte, P. Pechy, M. Grtzel, J.
Electrochem. Soc. 153 (2006) A2255A2261.
[11] J. Han, H. Kim, D.Y. Kim, S.M. Jo, S.Y. Jang, ACS Nano 4 (2010) 3503.
[12] W.J. Lee, E. Ramasamy, D.Y. Lee, J.S. Song, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
1 (2009) 1145.
336
[13] E. Ramasamy, W.J. Lee, D.Y. Lee, J.S. Song, Electrochem. Commun. 10
(2008) 10871089.
[14] J.D. Roy-Mayhew, D.J. Bozym, C. Punckt, I.A. Aksay, ACS Nano 4
(2010) 6203.
[15] G. Wang, W. Xing, S. Zhuo, J. Power Sources 194 (2009) 568.
[16] M.A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, L.G. Cancado,
A. Jorio, R. Saito, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9 (2007) 12761291.
[17] A.I. Popov, D.H. Geske, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1958) 1340.