Tribal Movement

Tribal Movement in India
After independence, various efforts have been made to improve the socio economic
conditions of the tribals and to sustain the constitutional safeguard given to them. The
Central and State Governments have made endless efforts in the direction of tribal
welfare and development. Special programmes for their development have been
undertaken in the successive Five Year Plans. The aim was to bring them on par with
other developed sections of the society. But the results are not encouraging as in all
cases with an introduction of development plans, some societies have found themselves
disintegrated.
The establishment of heavy industries, construction of dams and launching of
development plans in tribal zones has necessitated displacement of local population.
Thousands of tribal families were displaced from their traditional habitats. Destruction
of forests as a consequence of felling of trees for industrial purposes has threatened the
small communities of hunters and food-gathers. Those who could take advantage of
new economic and educational frontiers were able to better their lot, while a large
section of the tribals were not adequately prepared to deal with new challenges and
were gradually depressed into poorer sections of the society. Against economic and
social disparities, they have raised a collective voice. The tribals especially in central
India had reacted against their exploiters. These movements by tribals were directed
towards freeing their land from all those who exploited them economically and
culturally. At the same time, each of these movements put emphasis on revitalization of
their traditional culture which was swayed under the impact of the outsiders.
Unfortunately, even after fifty years of independence, tribals have benefited least from
the advent-of freedom. Although independence has brought widespread gains for the
vast majority of the Indian population, Dalits and Adivasis have often been left out and
new problems have arisen for the tribal population. After independence, tribal
movements may be classified into three groups (i) movements due to exploitation of
outsider’s; (ii) movements due to economic deprivation; and (iii) movements due to
separatist tendencies.
Reformative movement was found among the Mundas under powerful leadership of
Dharli Aba, who preached Hindu ideals of ritual purity, asceticism and criticized the
worship of priests. The Naga revolution began in 1948 and continued up to 1972 when
the new elected Government came to power and the Naga insurgency was controlled.
The Naxalite movement of the tribals in Bihar, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh; the
agrarian movements of the Gonds and Bhils in Madhya Pradesh and the forest based
movements of Gonds were mainly launched for liberation from oppression and
discrimination, backwardness and a Government which was unconcerned to the tribal
plight marked by poverty, hunger, unemployment and exploitation. Jharkhand
movement was started which demanded for the creation of new state, due forest
alienation, job deprivation, and influx of outsiders etc.
Ever since the entry of multinational companies for bauxite mining and processing in
1993, the tribal people of Kashipur and Laxmipur blocks of Rayagada district ,Damantpur
block of Koraput district and Thuamul Rampur of Kalahand district of Orissa have been
Apprehensive of displacement and loss of livelihood. Concerned over prospect of having
to leave their hearth and home, people started organizing themselves and Road
blockades demonstrations were organized in front of Government offices at Kashipar
and Rayagada. Survey areas of the companies were denied access to the area. The
responses of tribal people were coordinated by organizations such the Prakrutik
Sampada Surakya Parishad, the Baphilimali Surakya Samiti and Anchahk Surakhya
Samiti. Every village now has a resistance body. Conflict over the mining of bauxite has
taken a violent turn with killing of three innocent tribal people. Since 1993, the police
have registered 80 criminal cases against the tribal people and activists. On several
occasions, the police resorted to lathi charge. Activists were attacked and offices of the
resistance movement were destroyed.
Another movement has been started in Keonjhar district of Orissa against mining in the
90s for the displaced people, particularly tribals. In Keonjhar, the mining activities have
led to heavy influx of workers from many parts of the country. The 90s decade saw an
increase in migration due to geographical and socioeconomic reasons, leading to a
threat of cultural invasion. Violence of all type increased. Mining has led to
indiscriminate deforestation and displacement of inhabitants. The movement against
mining is popular among the tribals such as Bhuiyan, Juang, Munda, Santhal, and Kondh.
The chief slogan of the movement against mining has been “our lands,’ our minerals and
our rights”. The villagers have been harassed by police and implicated in false cases for
organizing meetings, public rallies and hunger strikes. A number of villagers had been
sent to jail in false cases between 1994 to 1999.
The villager and tribals of Rallagaruvu village in Vishakhapatnam district of Andhra
Pradesh had put up a brave resistance against illegal mining by various companies in the
last decades. Kondadora tribe is the biggest tribe in Northern Andhra Pradesh located in
hilly terrains of the State Rallagaruvu is famous for its calcite, firestone and mica
reserves and is one of the most sought places for mining. There have been hundreds of
attempts at illegal acquisition of tribal lands. Due to prolonged struggle of the tribals
that much of the land still remains free from the clutches of the illegal mining.
Coming to the North-East, the Bodo and Naga movement are good examples of how
ethnic identity takes up political route for raising their interests. In all these separatist
movement, uneven development and modernization, concentration of gains in some
area and their non-dispersal to other, and urban- oriented models of growth are the
chief causes.
Rise of tribal consciousness, tribal regionalism, frontier tribalism, etc. gained currency
after the movements in North East Frontier areas. Tribal regionalism, political in nature,
has been said to be a struggle for identity against alienation from basic sources, viz.
land, forests and aspiration for preservation of traditional culture However, it is
imperative that all Advise districts receive special attention from the Central
Government in terms of investment in schools, participatory forest management and
preservation, non-polluting industries and opportunities for the Advise communities and
preserve their rich heritage. Advises must have special access to educational, cultural
and economic opportunities so as to reverse the effects of colonialisation and earlier
injustice experienced by the Advise communities. At the same time, the country can
learn much from the beauty of Advise social practices, their culture of sharing and
respect for all their deep humility and love of nature and most of all their deep devotion
to social equality and civic harmony.

Tribal Movement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tribal Movement

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tribal Movement

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tribal Movement in India

You might also like