J.Natn.Sci.

Foundation Sri Lanka 2015 43 (4): 303 - 312

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v43i4.7965

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Zn as soil addition and foliar application on yield and

protein content of wheat in alkaline soil
Sabir Gul Khattak1, Peter J. Dominy2 and Wiqar Ahmad3*
1
Directorate of Soil and Plant Nutrition, Agriculture Research Institute, 24330 Tarnab, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan.
2
Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
3
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, AMK Campus, Mardan, Pakistan.

Revised: 28 February 2015; Accepted: 25 March 2015

Abstract: Zinc (Zn) deficiency in plant tissues is a reflection of

INTRODUCTION
both genetic and soil-related factors and is the most widespread
problem in cereal crops worldwide, resulting in severe losses in
the yield and nutritional quality. Developing cost-effective and
Zinc (Zn) deficiency appears to be the most widespread
quick solutions to Zn deficiency is, therefore, highly important. and frequent micronutrient deficiency problem in crop
An experiment was conducted during 2009 − 2010, to assess and pasture plants worldwide, resulting in severe losses
the effects of various modes and concentrations of applied Zn in yield and nutritional quality. This is particularly
on wheat yield and nutritional quality grown in alkaline soils. the case in cereal production areas and it is estimated
that nearly half the soils on which cereals are grown
Both soil addition and foliar spray of ZnSO4 significantly have levels of available Zn low enough to cause Zn
increased grain yield, 1000 grain weight and grain protein deficiency [50 % of soils in Turkey (Eyupoglu et al.,
content, while its effect on biological yield and grain 1994), 30 to 70 % of soils in India (Takkar, 1991), 70 %
protein composition was not significant. Foliar spray of soils in Pakistan (Rashid et al., 1988), 2 m ha of paddy
0.5 % and 1.0 % ZnSO4 increased grain yield by 10 and
soils in Bangladesh and 8 m ha in China, Japan and the
18.8 %, respectively while its soil application at the rate of
Philippines (Alloway, 2008; 2009)]. Since cereal grains
5, 10 and 15 kg ha-1 increased grain yield by 18, 32 and 41%,
respectively over the control. The treatments receiving ZnSO4
have inherently low Zn concentrations, growing them on
as 5 kg ha-1 soil + 1.0 % foliar, 15 kg ha-1 soil + 1.0 % foliar and these potentially Zn-deficient soils further decreases the
5 kg ha-1 soil + 0.5 % foliar application recorded 29.5, 29.0 and grain Zn concentration. It is therefore not surprising that
27.5 % higher protein contents, respectively over the control. the well-documented Zn deficiency problem in humans
Comparing the value cost ratios (VCR) for the treatments occurs predominantly in the countries/regions such as
showing higher grain yield and protein content, the VCR for India, China, Pakistan and Turkey where soils are low in
5 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil + 1.0 % ZnSO4 as foliar (10.23) was available Zn, and cereals are the major source of calorie
three times higher than the VCR for 15 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil intake (Alloway, 2008).
+ 1.0 % ZnSO4 as foliar (3.46), thus confirming the superiority
of the former over the latter in terms of effectiveness. The Although Zn is required in small amounts, its
results further revealed that despite presumably sufficient availability is critical for several key physiological
native Zn concentration in the soils under study (1.95 mg kg-1),
functions in plants including growth regulation,
the crop responded positively to Zn treatment and therefore the
photosynthesis and sugar formation, seed production,
Zn level of sufficiency (1 mg kg-1) should be reconsidered in
accordance with the nature and type of soils. and defense mechanisms against various diseases.
Its deficiency adversely affects these functions, thus
Keywords: Alkaline soil, foliar application of Zn, modes of Zn resulting in lower yield and frequently in poor quality
application, soil application of Zn, Zn effect on protein content, crop products (Tahir et al., 2009). Humans consuming
Zn effect on yield. crops grown on Zn deficient soils may suffer Zn deficiency

* Corresponding author ([email protected])

304 Sabir Gul Khattak et al.

(on average, one-third of the world’s population, ranging fortification (Ahmad et al., 2012). Increasing the Zn
from 4 to 73 % in different countries), and related health content in food crops may be a good strategy to overcome
problems such as impairment in physical development, its deficiency in people in developing countries. Many
stunting in children, susceptibility to infectious diseases, researchers endeavoured to chalk out various strategies
increased morbidity and mortality, poor birth outcome of its better supplementation, which included; Zn
in women and poor immune system and brain function application to soil in the form of ZnSO4, Zn chelates,
(Hotz & Brown, 2004; Black et al., 2008; Cakmak, soil and foliar spray with different Zn compounds and
2008). seed priming (Singh & Abrol, 1985; Yilmaz et al., 1997;
Cakmak et al., 1998; Amar et al., 2000; Khattak et al.,
Alkaline soils with an apparently sufficient Zn level 2006; Khan et al., 2008; Maqsood et al., 2009). Realising
(>1 mg kg-1) may show reduced Zn availability to crops the importance of Zn in plant and human nutrition and
due to (a) Zn affinity towards adsorption/fixation on the the problems associated with its availability to plants in
clay adsorption sites, and (b) the high pH of soil (pH 8.0), alkaline soils, the present study was conducted to assess
which might have helped in the formation of unavailable the effect of various modes and levels of Zn application
forms of Zn as hydroxides. Zn has greater affinity for on wheat yield and protein content in order to evolve a
adsorption on clay and also it tends to make unavailable cost effective strategy to address Zn deficiency in cereals
zinc hydroxides due to increased pH (Khattak & Pulford, grown in alkaline soils.
1999). In such soils crops have responded positively to
Zn application by showing increased protein content in METHODS AND MATERIALS
grain as well as soil residual Zn concentration (Khattak
et al., 2006). A portion of additional Zn probably helps The present experiment was conducted in the greenhouse
in satisfying the adsorption sites and some of it might of the Institute of Biological and Life Sciences (IBLS),
be retained as available Zn to plants in solution form. University of Glasgow, UK during 2009 – 2010.
Besides fixation at adsorption sites and the formation of Wheat variety ‘Siran 2008’ obtained from the Institute
zinc hydroxide in alkaline conditions, low availability of of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (IBGE),
Zn is also attributed to a number of soil and environmental University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan was used
factors including low soil organic matter, calcareous for testing the effect of 0, 5, 10 and 15 kg Zn ha-1 (0.0,
nature of soil, water logging and arid climate (Morvedt 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mg Zn kg-1 soil in the form of ZnSO4)
et al., 1991; Tandon, 1995; Cakmak et al., 1998). as soil addition and 0, 0.5 and 1 % ZnSO4 solution
(0, 5 and 10 g ZnSO4 per litre of de-ionised water) as
Estimates suggest that 25 % of the world’s population foliar application on wheat yield and protein content
is at risk of Zn deficiency (Maret & Standstead, 2006). in alkaline soil. A total of 12 treatment combinations
Several approaches have been made to overcome (Table 1) arranged in RCB design with 4 replications
Zn deficiency in humans and these include Zn were applied in pots filled with 2 kg sandy loam soil of
supplementation, food diversification as well as food known physico-chemical characteristics (Table 2).

Table 1: Details of Zn treatments as soli application and foliar spray applied to wheat crop during experiment

Serial Treatments N:P2O5:K2O Zn as soil As foliar

No. (kg ha-1) treatment spray
(kg ha-1) (ZnSO4) (%)

1 Zn S0 F0 (Control) 120:65:110 0.0 0.0

2 0S-0.5F 120:65:110 0.0 0.5
3 0S-1.0F 120:65:110 0.0 1.0
4 5S-0F 120:65:110 5.0 0.0
5 5S-0.5F 120:65:110 5.0 0.5
6 5S-1.0F 120:65:110 5.0 1.0
7 10S-0F 120:65:110 10.0 0.0
8 10S-0.5F 120:65:110 10.0 0.5
9 10S-1.0F 120:65:110 10.0 1.0
10 15S-0F 120:65:110 15.0 0.0
11 15S-0.5F 120:65:110 15.0 0.5
12 15S-1.0F 120:65:110 15.0 1.0

S: soil treatment; F: foliar spray

December 2015 Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4)
Soli and foliar Zn effect on yield and protein content in wheat 305

Initially, seed grains were soaked in distilled water on background electrolyte. The solution in the tubes was
a double layered towel paper pad tray and kept in the then analysed by the ICP (OES).
growth chamber under 18 ‒ 22 oC, 9 hrs light/15 hrs dark,
60 ‒ 70 % humidity and light 150 µMole m-2 S-1. After Grain protein
germination, 6 healthy seedlings were transferred to each
pot and kept in a glass house under day and night lengths To assess the wheat grain protein content, 0.5 g of
of 16 and 8 hrs, respectively with mercury reflector wheat flour samples were taken in triplicate to which,
lighting of 400 watts/base E40. 0.25 mL protein buffer was added, mixed by Vortex
Mixer, and then centrifuged for 15 min at 13 K rpm.
Fertiliser at recommended levels i.e. N:P2O5:K2O at The supernatant was removed for spectroscopic analysis
the rate of 120:65:110 kg ha-1 (60:32.5:55 mg kg-1 soil) at E-280 nm by ultraviolet spectrophotometer in
was added to each treatment in solution form in two mg/mL i.e. approximately equal to 1 optical density (OD).
splits. Zn as soil treatment or foliar spray was applied in The absorbance was multiplied by the dilution factor and
required amount in the form of ZnSO4. To assess the yield the protein percentage was calculated as follow;
trend with Zn application at lower doses of NPK, the same
layout was repeated with half the recommended NPK % protein = absorbance reading × dilution × 100
levels (N:P2O5:K2O at the rate of 60:32.5:55 kg ha-1). 1000
Water was provided through plastic trays beneath the
pots to avoid nutrient leaching. At boot stage, two The effect of Zn on the composition of proteins
in wheat grain was studied using sodium dodecyl
healthy plants were cut at the base for analysis of ion
sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
retention by plants. At maturity, spikes were removed
for grain yield and 1000 grain weight determination,
while the remaining plants were harvested to determine RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
the total biomass yield.
Soil samples were analysed before sowing for various
Soil analysis physico-chemical characters. The results (Table 2) revealed
that the soil texture was a sandy loam, free from excess salinity
The composite soil sample was subjected to various and alkaline in reaction (pH > 7.0). The soil was moderate in
physical and chemical analyses. Existing standard organic matter content (OM > 2 %), and sufficient in macro
methods were followed for the determination of soil (N, P, K, S, Ca and Mg) and micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu
pH (McClean, 1982) and electrical conductivity (EC) and B contents) (Table 2).
(Rhoades, 1996) using 1:5 soil and water suspension.
The texture and organic matter content were determined Table 2: Physico-chemical characters of the
by Bouyoucous method (Bouyoucous, 1962) and Black experimental soil before sowing
procedures (1965), respectively.
Property Mean values
The nutrient ions were determined by Induced
Textural class Sandy loam
Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP- pH (1:5) 8.52
OEC; Perkin Elmer Optima 4300 DV). A 10 g soil sample EC (1:5) (dS m-1) 0.398
was taken in triplicate in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask to Organic matter (%) 2.34
which 20 mL of ammonium bicarbonate di-ethylene N (%) 0.041
triamine penta acetic acid (AB-DTPA) solution was P (mg kg-1) 34.44
added. Flasks were shaken on a reciprocating shaker K (mg kg-1) 235.35
at 180 rpm per min for 15 min. The suspension was Ca (mg kg-1) 197.2
filtered through a filter paper No. 42 and 5 mL of the Mg (mg kg-1) 33.38
AB-DTPA extract from each sample was transferred S (mg kg-1) 76.6
into 15 mL falcon tubes to which 0.5 mL concentrated Zn (mg kg-1) 1.95
HCl was added and mixed on a rotary shaker for 15 Cu (mg kg-1) 1.79
Mn (mg kg-1) 138.8
min to drive off CO2. After this, 4.5 mL of distilled
Fe (mg kg-1) 216.4
water was added to each tube in order to bring the pH
B (mg kg-1) 0.618
of the sample to be in accordance with the pH of the

Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4) December 2015
306 Sabir Gul Khattak et al.

Figure 1: Correlation between Zn uptake by plant at boot stage and total

grain yield of wheat

Application of Zn, both as soil and foliar treatments, to imbalanced use of fertilisers and micronutrient
significantly (p < 0.05) increased the wheat grain deficiencies, specially of zinc and boron. Qayyum et al.
yield and 1000 grain weight while the effect on wheat (1987) have also reported a yield loss of 27.8 % in maize
biological yield was not significant. The treatment that when Zn was omitted from the treatments involving NPK
received 5 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil treatment + 1.0 % ZnSO4 and micronutrients.
as foliar spray recorded 55 % higher grain yield while that
with 15 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil treatment + 1.0 % ZnSO4 A positive correlation (R2 = 0.39) was observed
as foliar spray recorded 48 % higher grain yield over the between the Zn uptake by the plant at boot stage and
control. However, the grain yield in both these treatments total grain yield (Figure 1). Takkar and Randhawa (1978)
was not significantly different (Table 3). These results have reported a similar positive correlation between the
are in line with those reported by Alloway (2008) who Zn concentration and grain yield and suggested that a
states that Zn deficiency in wheat reduces grain yield. Zn concentration below 30 mg Zn kg-1 plant dry matter
Kausar et al., (2001) have reported that despite a sharp would result in yields not attaining their maximum
increase in fertiliser use in Pakistan, the corresponding potential for the site, and the value of 20 mg Zn kg-1 is
increase in yield was only 15 %, which was ascribed the lower critical concentration. Previous studies (Viets,

Table 3: Effect of Zn application on grain yield (kg ha-1)

Serial Treatments Biomass yield Grian yield 1000 weight grain

No. (kg ha-1) (kg ha-1) (g)

1 Zn S0 F0 (Control) 3589.3 ± 041.7 1476 ± 054.4 c 47.44 ± 0.4 d

2 0S-0.5F 3815.5 ± 193.8 1626 ± 075.1 bc 46.1 ± 0.2 ef
3 0S-1.0F 3272.5 ± 260.2 1752 ± 060.9 ab 49.3 ± 0.4 b
4 5S-0F 3503.8 ± 279.7 1747 ± 125.7 ab 44.5 ± 0.7 h
5 5S-0.5F 3441.0 ± 082.9 1859 ± 139.2 ab 48.2 ± 0.4 cd
6 5S-1.0F 4239.8 ± 324.8 2294 ± 184.2 a 48.2 ± 0.2 cd
7 10S-0F 3697.0 ± 666.3 1947 ± 202.2 a 48.3 ± 0.3 c
8 10S-0.5F 3575.3 ± 301.6 1819 ± 209.0 ab 45.0 ± 1.0 gh
9 10S-1.0F 3894.3 ± 095.5 1861 ± 067.5 ab 45.5 ± 0.6 fg
10 15S-0F 4093.3 ± 333.6 2085 ± 180.9 a 46.5 ± 0.0 e
11 15S-0.5F 3595.5 ± 504.2 1901 ± 033.9 a 50.7 ± 0.3 a
12 15S-1.0F 3569.0 ± 374.8 2132 ± 137.9 a 47.8 ± 0.2 cd
LSD (p < 0.05) ns 401.58 0.766

S: soil treatment; F: foliar spray

Figures followed by similar letters are not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level

December 2015 Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4)
Soli and foliar Zn effect on yield and protein content in wheat 307

1966; Rashid & Fox, 1992) have suggested the critical value Different modes and levels of Zn demonstrated variable
of 15 mg Zn kg-1 as a general value for the interpretation of effects on 1000 grain weight, and both increase and
grain analyses, and more recent work has shown a value of decrease in 1000 grain weight was observed with respect
10 mg Zn kg-1 (Brennan et al., 1993). The treatment of such to the control due to Zn application (Table 3). The highest
deficiencies with Zn fertilisers or foliar sprays can increase 1000 grain weight (50.6 g) was recorded in the treatment
receiving 15 kg ZnSO4 as soil and 0.5 % ZnSO4 solution
the yield and also improve the plant’s resistance to ‘foot rot’
as foliar spray. 1000 grain weight was statistically
fungus (F. graminarum) (Gooding & Davies, 1997). different among the levels of Zn applied as soil addition
with the best results shown by 15 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 (48.3 g),
The grain and biomass yields were plotted (Figure 2) while on average over the levels of soil application,
to observe their trends with the increasing levels of Zn different concentrations of foliar application did not show
application. The line for grain yield in the graph showed any significant change in 1000 grain weight. Previous
a significant response (R2 = 0.51) to increasing levels investigations (Khattak et al., 2006) have reported an
of Zn, while the biomass was independent (R2 = 0.06) increase in the grain yield of maize and wheat with Zn
of increasing levels of Zn. The biomass yield was not addition at the rate of 5 kg ha-1 or 2 times as foliar spray
affected by 50 % Zn treatments, while the remaining of 0.5 % ZnSO4, and this treatment showed an economical
50 % increased positively. This is in conformity with value greater than all the other concentrations added to
maize. Yilmaz (1997) has shown increased wheat grain
the results obtained by Rengel and Graham (1996), who
yield by 260 % and 124 %, with Zn application as soil
reported that the relative production of root and shoot dry
addition and foliar application, respectively.
matter at deficient compared to sufficient Zn supply for
two wheat genotypes tested had no difference. Khattak The present study reveals that Zn with higher levels of
et al., (2006) have concluded from their experiment on NPK performed well (R2 = 0.47) and almost an increasing
maize tested with various application levels of Zn that trend in the grain yield was observed. With lower doses
there was no statistically significant difference among of NPK (half NPK levels to that of the recommended
the treatments regarding fresh biomass yield; anyhow dose), application of Zn at lower levels both as soil and
they observed 8 ‒ 11 % increase in biomass yield in foliar spray recorded poor performance as compared to
various treatments. half NPK only treatment (Figure 3). This behaviour of

Figure 2: Effect of various modes and levels of Zn on grain vs Figure 3: Effect of various modes and levels of Zn application on
biomass yield in the presence of full dose of NPK grain yield in the presence of full and half doses of NPK

Zn could be attributed to its ineffectivity at lower levels potential as in the case of full dose of NPK. Yet, the R2
at the highly alkaline calcareous conditions in the soil value (0.55) showed that Zn increment, irrespective of
under study (Table 1), its reaction with clay minerals its mode of application, improved the overall yield of the
(Abat et al., 2012), or might be due to some negative crop better in the case of half NPK dose as compared
interaction with P (Brown, 2008). With higher doses of to full NPK dose (Figure 3). Increased phosphorus
Zn, although the yield improved, due to lack of major supply enhances the symptoms of Zn deficiency (Brown,
nutrients the total yield could not attain its maximum 2008), yet, nitrogen appears to affect the Zn status of

Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4) December 2015
308 Sabir Gul Khattak et al.

Figure 4: Interaction of various modes and levels of Zn treatment on grain

yield in the presence of full dose of NPK

crops by promoting plant growth and by changing the modes. These findings are supported by the findings
pH of the root environment (Alloway, 2008). In many of Yilmaz et al. (1997) who concluded that soil and
soils, nitrogen is the chief factor limiting the growth foliar Zn increased the grain yield of wheat by 260 and
and yield and therefore in the case of full dose of NPK, 124 %, respectively in Zn deficient calcareous soils. The
improvements in yield have been found through positive interaction plot (Figure 4) shows that increasing levels of
interactions between nitrogen and Zn fertilisers. soil application of Zn has an obvious increasing effect on
grain yield.
Further analysis of the data using minitab statistical
package to find the significance of Zn as soil, foliar, The value cost ratio (VCR) for 5 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as
and soil and foliar treatments revealed that Zn as soil soil treatment + 1.0 % ZnSO4 as foliar spray (10.23) was
treatment had a significant (p = 0.031) effect on the grain three times higher over the VCR for 15 kg ha-1 ZnSO4
yield and nearly significant (p = 0.084) effect of foliar as soil treatment + 1.0 % ZnSO4 as foliar spray (3.46),
spray on grain yield, but no interaction effect of the two confirming the superiority of the former over the latter

Table 4: Economic analysis of Zn application on grain yield of wheat

Treatment Grain Yield Gross ZnSO4 Cost of Net %

No. yield increase return used ZnSO4 return increase VCR
(kg ha-1) (kg ha-1) (Pak Rs) (kg ha-1) (Pak Rs) (Pak Rs) over
control

1 1476 000 00000 00 0000 00000 00.0 00.0

2 1626 150 03607 05 0300 03307 10.2 12.0
3 1752 277 06640 10 0600 06040 18.8 11.1
4 1747 271 06510 22 1320 05190 18.4 04.9
5 1859 383 09200 27 1620 07580 26.0 05.7
6 2294 818 19634 32 1920 17714 55.4 10.2
7 1947 471 11314 44 2640 08674 32.0 04.3
8 1819 344 08247 49 2940 05307 23.3 02.8
9 1861 386 09260 54 3240 06020 26.2 02.9
10 2085 610 14638 66 3960 10678 41.3 03.7
11 1901 425 10210 71 4260 05950 28.8 02.4
12 2132 657 15763 76 4560 11203 44.5 03.5

Note: Wheat grain rate = Pakistan rupees (Pak Rs) 24 kg-1 and ZnSO4 = Pakistan rupees (Pak Rs) 60 kg-1

December 2015 Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4)
Soli and foliar Zn effect on yield and protein content in wheat 309

Table 5: Effect of Zn application on glutenin fraction of grain protein in wheat

Serial Treatments Protein Protein % increase

No. (mg mL-1) (%) over control

1 Zn S0 F0 (Control) 20.00 2.00 0.0

2 0S-0.5F 21.90 2.19 9.5
3 0S-1.0F 24.50 2.45 22.5
4 5S-0F 25.05 2.51 25.5
5 5S-0.5F 25.45 2.55 27.5
6 5S-1.0F 25.90 2.59 29.5
7 10S-0F 24.50 2.45 22.5
8 10S-0.5F 23.45 2.35 17.5
9 10S-1.0F 23.60 2.36 18.0
10 15S-0F 23.80 2.38 19.0
11 15S-0.5F 23.70 2.37 18.5
12 15S-1.0F 25.75 2.58 29.0

S: soil treatment; F: foliar spray

in terms of effectiveness (Table 4). Although VCR for concentration of foliar spray. The bars (Figure 5) clearly
0.5 % ZnSO4 (VCR:12) and 1.0 % ZnSO4 (VCR:11) indicate an initial gradual increase in protein with low Zn
as foliar application was the highest among the list of concentration levels, but with medium Zn concentration
treatments (Table 4), yet, taking into account the yield levels it tends to decrease irrespective of its application
per unit area of the treatments, the performance of 0.5 % method. With higher application of Zn at 15 kg as soil
ZnSO4 (1626 kg ha-1) and 1.0 % ZnSO4 (1752 kg ha-1) as treatment and 1.0 % ZnSO4 as foliar spray, it shows an
foliar application only was not satisfactory as compared increase in the protein content. The regression coefficient
to 5 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil + 1.0 % ZnSO4 as indicated an overall increase of 21 % in grain protein
foliar (2294 kg ha-1) and 15 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil + 1.0 % content with increasing Zn level applied either as foliar
ZnSO4 as foliar (2132 kg ha-1). Thus in a country like application or as soil application (Figure 5).
Pakistan, which faces food deficit due to increased
population, the growers must adopt the technology In calcareous soils, Zn precipitates in unavailable
that could increase their production per unit area with forms for plants, and its uptake and transition to the shoot
acceptable margin of profit. Thus, this study suggested is inhibited by high concentrations of bicarbonate (Dogar
the best level of Zn as 5 kg ha-1 as soil treatment + 1.0 % & Van Haj, 1980). However, Zn deficiency in the plants
ZnSO4 as foliar application as a better option to improve grown in calcareous soils can be recovered fairly readily
the grain yield on alkaline soil (Table 4).

Application of Zn, both as soil treatment and foliar

spray, to wheat crop in alkaline soil significantly
(p < 0.05) increased the protein content in wheat grains
over the control (Table 5, Figure 5). The treatments
receiving 5 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 soil application + 1.0 % ZnSO4
solution as foliar application, 15 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil
application + 1.0 % ZnSO4 solution as foliar spray and
5 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil application + 0.5 % ZnSO4 solution
as foliar spray application recorded the highest increase
in wheat grain protein content, which were 29.5, 29.0 and
27.5 % higher than the control treatment, respectively. It
was thus concluded that protein in wheat grain could be
increased either by low level of Zn as soil application +
comparatively higher dose of foliar application or higher Figure 5: Effect of various modes of treatment and levels of
dose of Zn through soil application along with higher Zn on percent protein content in wheat grain

Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4) December 2015
310 Sabir Gul Khattak et al.

by application of inorganic Zn salts such as ZnSO4 to in rice grains after Zn fertilisation of plants growing on
the soil (Nayyar & Takkar, 1980), and such application calcareous soil (Singh, 1991).
from external sources linearly increased the grain yield
and protein content of two wheat genotypes (Morshedi No major differences were observed in protein profiles
of the samples isolated from different Zn treatments
& Farahbakhsh, 2010). Szakal (1989) and Fecenko and
(Figure 6) despite the increase or decrease in protein
Lozek (1998) have reported similar findings. Khattak content in various treatments. Alloway (2008) reported
et al., (2006) have reported a maximum increase in that in general the amount of protein in the grains of
protein content in the grains of maize obtained from Zn deficient plants is greatly reduced, but the protein
the treatment supplied with 0.5 % ZnSO4 as foliar composition remains almost unchanged. In Zn deficient
spray at the stage when the crop was only 20 ‒ 25 days bean leaves, the concentration of free amino acids was
old. Several researchers have reported significant seed 6.5 times greater than in the control but these decreased,
protein and dry matter yield response to Zn fertilisation and the protein content increased after the administration
(Biswas et al., 1977; Tandon, 1992; Zaidan et al., 2010.; of Zn for 48 or 72 hours. The mechanism by which Zn
deficiency affects protein synthesis is considered to
Keram, 2014). Zn is required for the synthesis of auxin
be due to a reduction in RNA and the deformation and
[a growth regulating compound indole acetic acid (IAA)] reduction of ribosome. The importance of Zn in protein
(Brown et al., 1993). Tryptophan is the most likely synthesis suggests that a relatively high Zn concentration
precursor for the biosynthesis of IAA and Zn is required is required by meristematic tissues where cell division
for the synthesis of tryptophan (Marschner, 1995). This as well as the synthesis of nucleic acid and protein is
includes an observed increase in the tryptophan content actively taking place (Brown et al., 1993).

Figure 6: Effect of various modes of treatment and levels of Zn on composition of protein in wheat grain

Legends: Coomassie-blue strained SDS-PAGE gel of wheat grain proteins isolated from the 12
Zn treatments. Molecular weight standards are shown on the left.
Lane 1, S0F0: L2, S0F1: L3, S0F2: L4, S1F0: L5, S1F1: L6, S1F2: L7, S2F0: L8, S2F1: L9,
S2F2: L10, S3F0: L11, S3 F1: L12, S3F2
S = soil Zn application at 0, 1 (5 kg ha-1), 2 (10 kg ha-1), 3 (15 kg ha-1)
F = foliar ZnSO4 application at 0,1 (0.5 %), and 2 (1 %).

CONCLUSION ZnSO4 solution and 5 kg ha-1 as soil addition increased

the yield, while regardless of the method, Zn application
This study concludes that alkaline soils are Zn deficient increased the protein content in grains. Thus, for higher
in terms of availability to plants despite the apparent Zn yield and better quality Zn should be added by farmers
levels in the sufficient range (> 1.0 mg kg-1). Therefore, cultivating alkaline soils in Pakistan to the extent of 5 kg
this range should be revised in accordance with the nature ha-1 ZnSO4 as soil addition and 1.0 % ZnSO4 solution as
and type of soils. Foliar application of Zn up to 1.0 % foliar application.

December 2015 Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4)
Soli and foliar Zn effect on yield and protein content in wheat 311

302: 1 ‒ 17.
REFERENCES
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3
14. Cakmak I., Torun B., Eronoglu B., Ozturk L., Marschner
1. Abat M., Michael J.M., Jason K.K. & Samuel P.S.
H., Kalayci M., Ekiz H. & Yilmaz A. (1998). Morphological
(2012). Adsorption and desorption of copper and zinc
in tropical peat soils of Sarawak, Malaysia. Geoderma and physiological differences in the response of cereals to
176: 58 ‒ 63. zinc deficiency. Euphytica 100: 349 ‒ 357.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.01.024 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018318005103
2. Ahmad W., Watts M.J., Imtiaz M., Ahmad I. & Zia M.H. 15. Dogar M.A. & Van Haj T. (1980). Effect of P, N and HCO3ˉ
(2012). Zinc deficiency in soils, crops and humans. levels in the solution on rate of Zn absorption by rice roots
Agrochimica 104(2): 65 ‒ 97. and Zn content in plants. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie
3. Alloway B.J. (2008). Zn in Soil and Crop Nutrition. 98: 203 ‒ 212.
2nd edition, pp. 33. International Zinc Association (IZA) 16. Eyupoglu F., Kurucu N. & Sanisa U. (1994). Status of plant
and International Fertilizer Association (IFA) Brussels, available micronutrients in Turkish soils. Annual Report,
Belgium and Paris, France. pp. 25 ‒ 32. Turki Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute,
4. Alloway B.J. (2009). Soil factors associated with Ankara, Turkey.
zinc deficiency in crops and humans. Environmental 17. Fecenko J. & Lozek O. (1998). Maize grain yield formation
Geochemestry and Health 31: 537 ‒ 548. in dependence on applied zinc doses and its contents in
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-009-9255-4 soil. Rslinna Vyroba 44: 15 ‒ 18.
5. Amar S., Vyas A.K., Singh A.K. & Singh A. (2000). Effect 18. Gooding M.J. & Davies W.P. (1997). Wheat Production
of nitrogen and zinc application on growth, yield and net and Utilization: Systems, Quality and Environment. CAB
returns of maize (Zea mays L.). Annals of Agricultural International, Oxford, UK.
Research 21: 296 ‒ 297. 19. Hotz C. & Brown K.H. (2004). Assessment of the risk of
6. Biswas C.R., Rajinderjit S.G. & Sekhon S. (1977). Zinc zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control.
availability to maize and wheat in relation to P and K status Food Nutrition Bulletin 25: 94 ‒ 204.
of the soil in a long-term fertility experiment. Journal of 20. Kauser M.A., Hussain F., Ali S. & Iqbal M.M. (2001). Zinc
the Indian Society of Soil Science 25: 414 ‒ 421. and Cu nutrition of two wheat varieties on a calcareous
7. Black C.A. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis (part II). soil. Pakistan Journal of Soil Science 20: 21 ‒ 26.
American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, 21. Keram K.S. (2014). Response of zinc fertilization to wheat
USA. on yield, quality, nutrients uptake and soil fertility grown
8. Black R.E., Lindsay H.A., Bhutta Z.A., Caulfield in a zinc deficient soil. European Journal of Academic
L.E., De Onnis M., Ezzati M., Mathers C. & Rivera Essays 1(1): 22 − 26.
J. (2008). Maternal and child under-nutrition: global 22. Khan M.A., Fuller M.P. & Baloch F.S. (2008). Effect of
and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet soil applied zinc sulphate on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
371: 243 ‒ 260. grown on a calcareous soil in Pakistan. Cereal Research
9. Bouyoucos G.J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for Communication 36: 571 ‒ 582.
making particle size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/CRC.36.2008.4.6
53: 464 ‒ 465. 23. Khattak S.G. & Pulford I.D. (1999). Adsorption and
10. Brennan R.F., Armour J.D. & Reuter D.J. (1993). Diagnosis desorption behaviour of zinc in some selected soils of
of zinc deficiency. Zinc in Soils and Plants, chapter 12 United Kingdom in water background. Pakistan Journal of
(ed. A.D. Robson), p. 206. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Soil Science 17: 73 ‒ 78.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 24. Khattak S.G., Rohullah A., Malik A., Perveen Q. & Ibrar
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0878-2_12 M. (2006). Assessing maize yield and quality as affected
11. Brown P.H. (2008). Micronutrient use in agriculture in the by Zn as soil or foliar applications. Sarhad Journal of
United States of America: current practices, trends and Agriculture 22: 465 ‒ 472.
constraints. Micronutrient Deficiencies in Global Crop 25. Maqsood M.A., Rahmatullah, Ranjha A.M. & Hussain
Production, chapter 11 (ed. B.J. Alloway), pp. 267 ‒ 286. M. (2009). Differential growth response and zinc utilization
Springer, New York, USA. efficiency of wheat genotype in cultivars buffered nutrient
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6860-7_11 solution. Soil and Environment 28: 174 ‒ 178.
12. Brown P.H., Cakmak I. & Zhang Q. (1993). Form and 26. Maret W. & Sandstead H.H. (2006). Zinc requirements and
function of Zn in plants. Zn in Soil and Plants (ed. A.D. the risks and benefits of zinc supplementation. Journal of
Robson), pp. 90 ‒ 106. Kulwer Academic Publisher, Trace Elements and Medical Biology 20(1): 3–18.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2006.01.006
13. Cakmak I. (2008). Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: 27. Marschner H. (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants,
Agronomic or genetic bio-fortification. Plant Science 2nd edition, p. 890. Academic Press, London, UK.

Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4) December 2015
312 Sabir Gul Khattak et al.

28. McClean E.O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. composition of rice-wheat crops in an alkali soil. Fertilizer
Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2, 2nd edition (eds. A.L. Page, Research 8: 179 ‒ 191.
R.H. Miller & D.R. Keeney), pp. 209 ‒ 223. American DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01048901
Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 38. Singh M. (1991). Effects of zinc, phosphorous and nitrogen
29. Morshedi A. & Farahbakhsh H. (2010). Effects of on tryptophan concentration in rice grains grown on limed
potassium and zinc on grain protein contents and yield and unlimed soils. Plant and Soil 62: 305 ‒ 308.
of two wheat genotypes under soil and water salinity and
39. Szakal P. (1989). Effect of zinc and copper amine complexes
alkalinity stresses. Plant Ecophysiology 2: 67 ‒ 72.
on the yield and quality of maize. XIX ‒ HUNGAROCHEM.
30. Morvedt J.J., Cox F.R., Shuman L.M. & Welch R.M.
Konferencia Murtagyazas Novenyvedelem. pp. 43 ‒ 47.
(1991). Micronutrients in Agriculture, 2nd edition, Soil
Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 40. Tahir M., Fiaz N., Nadeem M.A., Khalid F. & Ali M. (2009).
31. Nayyar V.K. & Takkar P.N. (1980). Evaluation of various Effect of different chelated Zn sources on the growth and yield
zinc sources for rice grown on alkali soil. Zeitschrift für of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil and Environment 28: 179 ‒ 183.
Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 143: 489 ‒ 493. 41. Takkar P. (1991). Zinc deficiency in Indian soils and crops.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19801430502 Zinc in Crop Nutrition. pp. 55 − 64. International Lead
32. Qayyum F., Ashraf M. & Yasin M. (1987). Response of Zinc Research Organization Inc. and Indian Lead Zinc
corn to micronutrients on Barani land. Proceedings of the Information Centre, New Dehli, India.
National Seminar on Micronutrients in Soils and Crops 42. Takkar P.N. & Randhawa N.S. (1978). Micronutrients in
in Pakistan, NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar, Indian agriculture. Fertiliser News (Delhi) 23(8): 3 ‒ 26.
Pakistan, December 13 ‒ 15. 43. Tandon H.L.S. (1995). Micronutrients in Soils Crops
33. Rashid A. & Fox R.L. (1992). Evaluating internal zinc and Fertilizers. Fertilizer Development and Consultation
requirements of grain crops by seed analysis. Agronomy Organization, New Delhi, India.
Journal 84: 469 ‒ 474. 44. Tandon H. (1992). Management of Nutrient Interactions
34. Rashid A., Rahmatullah & Salim M. (1988). Soil conditions
in Agriculture. Fertilizer Development and Consultation
and crop factors inducing zinc deficiency in plants.
Organization, New Delhi, India.
Proceedings of the National Seminar on Micronutrients
45. Viets F.G. (1966). Zinc deficiency in the soil plant
in Soils and Crops in Pakistan, NWFP Agricultural
system. Zinc Metabolism (eds. A.S. Prasad & C.C.
University, Peshawar, Pakistan, December 13 ‒ 15.
35. Rengel Z. & Graham R.D. (1996). Uptake of zinc for Thomas), pp. 90 ‒ 127. Springfield, Illinois, USA.
chelated-buffered nutrient solutions by wheat genotypes 46. Yilmaz A., Ekiz H., Torun B., Gultekin I., Karanalik S.,
differing in zinc efficiency. Journal of Experimental Bagsi S.A. & Cakmak I. (1997). Effect of different zinc
Botany 47: 217 − 226. application methods on grain yield and zinc concentration
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.2.217 in wheat cultivars grown on zinc-deficient calcareous soil.
36. Rhoades J.D. (1996). Salinity: electrical conductivity Journal of Plant Nutrition 20: 461 ‒ 471.
and total dissolved salts. Methods of Soil Analysis, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904169709365267
part 3 (ed. D.L. Sparks), pp. 417 ‒ 436. American Society 47. Zeidan M.S., Mohamed M.F. & Hamouda H.A. (2010).
of Agronomy, Madison, USA. Effect of foliar fertilization of Fe, Mn and Zn on wheat
37. Singh M.V. & Abrol I.P. (1985). Direct and residual effect yield and quality in low sandy soils fertility. World Journal
of fertilizer zinc application on the yield and chemical of Agricultural Sciences 6(6): 696 − 699.

December 2015 Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 43(4)