Ultilateralism Hat Is The Roblem: and Multilateralism. (United Nations, 2018) 1
Ultilateralism Hat Is The Roblem: and Multilateralism. (United Nations, 2018) 1
Ultilateralism Hat Is The Roblem: and Multilateralism. (United Nations, 2018) 1
Multilateralism has been defined as the cooperation of three or more states in a given area
of international relations.1 It is premised on generalized principles of conduct “without regard to
the particularistic interest of parties or the strategic exigencies that may exist in any specific
occurrence.”2 These principles aim to create “predictable actions in… international relations,
thereby creating a climate of trust, understanding and respect,” ultimately resulting in a “rules-
based world order which is necessary to address global concerns.”3
However, recent events have seen multilateral organizations such as the WTO and the
IMF held hostage by inflexible processes and a lack of political consensus on key policy
priorities relating to globalization.6 Issues in creating political and legal consensus have resulted
in inefficiencies in global governance and regulation , allowing vested interests the opportunity
to consolidate their advantage, thus aggravating economic inequalities and driving exclusive
growth.7 This, in addition to the disruptions resulting from frequent global, regional, and national
economic crises have led to a significant amount of public discontent, further undermining the
prospects of globalization and multilateralism.8
These failings are apparent in today’s “fear-factor politics” where globalization and the
system of multilateral cooperation is regarded as a “rigged, unfair system.”9 As a result, the
1 David M. Malone and Yuen Foong Khong, ed., Unilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy: International Perspectives. (Colorado:
Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003) 2-3.
2 John Gerard Ruggie, ed., Multilateralism Matters. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) 11.
3 Statement of Yldiz Pollack-Beighle, Foreign Minister, Republic of Suriname, at the 73 rd Session of the United Nations General
online at https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/crisis-trust-government-globalisation/.
stated objectives of multilateral cooperation towards global prosperity appear to some states to
be either falsehoods or neo-imperialistic pandering. The last few years have seen more
unilateralist views more clearly purveyed in public discourse, with the growing Euroskeptic
movement culminating in the 2016 Brexit vote for the United Kingdom to leave the European
Union,10 and US President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” platform premised on
trade protectionism11 and rollbacks on US climate change policy.12 This is unilateralism which
threatens to drive the world into “a dangerous new era of economic nationalism and
protectionism that can have catastrophic effects on the world economy.”13
Where then does this leave the system of multilateral cooperation, in view of the lack of
trust in foreign states and, even less trust in multilateral bodies composed of foreign states?14
In 2017, Hans Paul Bürkner, writing for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting,
wrote that the skepticism about globalization and the multilateral bodies facilitating it was
premised on one major failing: the failure to deliver inclusive growth.15 Fundamentally, the lack
of trust in multilateral institutions is the prime driver of populist politics—on the premise that, if
the town mayor can’t watch over my needs, maybe my community leader can. However, if the
town mayor in this scenario—the international system of multilateral cooperation—were to fail,
the results could be catastrophic. After all, “there are still 800 million people… still registered as
“hungry” … There are still nearly 60 million children… who do not attend primary school. There
are still around 2 billion adults who do not have a basic bank account.”16 These are issues that
globalization has helped to address all across the world. But if the people under its protective
aegis do not feel included in the process of building a better world—if they feel their interests are
not in fact being answered—the entire premise of globalization is at risk of collapse.
10
Taggart, Paul; Szczerbiak, Aleks, The Party Politics of Euroscepticism in EU Member and Candidate States. (Sussex: Sussex
European Institute, 2001) 7.
11 Statement of Donald J. Trump, President, United States of America, at the Signing of the U.S.-E.U. Agricultural Trade
International Law Journal, 2019; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 449.
14 Supra note 3.
15 Bürkner, Hans Paul, and The Boston Consulting Group. "What World Leaders Must Do Now to Restore Trust in