CalAware Introduction 2019
CalAware Introduction 2019
CalAware Introduction 2019
The Right to Know, Norman Rockwell, 1968 Berry-Hill Galleries, New York
Parents attempting to address a school board or to find out what the district did or plans to do.
Reporters attempting to access a news scene, a government file or a court proceeding or document are denied
access without cause, or facing legal risks or threats in pursuing a story.
Taxpayers who can’t get answers about how public funds were spent or who played a role in changing or bending
the rules that affect their home or business.
Petition signature gatherers or pamphleteers prevented from approaching fellow citizens door to door, on the
street or in a shopping mall.
Condominium owners who want to get messages to neighbors about how their homeowners’ association is being
run — messages embarrassing to management.
College students kept out of meetings of student government that decide how fees are spent or other important
campus issues.
Neighborhood organizers warned to stop criticizing a project development or face a bankrupting lawsuit.
Elected board or council members warned to stop asking inconvenient questions at public meetings, or
questioning staff about a constituent’s neglected concerns.
CalAware Strategies
• CalAware promotes legislation to assure full and open access to governmental information and to
open and robust discourse in the public forum.
• CalAware puts government on written notice of violations of First Amendment, open meetings
and1public records violations and encourages correction to avoid legal action.
• When necessary, CalAware brings legal action to compel compliance with the Brown Act, the
California Public Records Act, and the First Amendment.
• CalAware sponsors educational activities and publishes guidebooks and other information to assure
that citizens know their rights and protections and how to use them confidently.
CalAware Achievements
Litigation
Protection from SLAPP Fees CalAware’s First Amendment/Brown Act challenge in 2007 to a school
board’s retaliation against a trustee’s outspoken criticism was unsuccessful. And it left CalAware’s co-
plaintiff and first president, Richard McKee, compelled to pay the board’s attorney fees for having the
case dismissed by a government SLAPP motion. That threat to Brown Act enforcement prompted the
passage in 2009 of SB 786, making citizens’ unsuccessful suits to enforce the open government laws
immune from such fee shifting consequences.
Overcharges for Public Records Copies CalAware in 2010 sued the Contra Costa County
Community College District for violating the California Public Records Act in charging $40 per hour
for staff time in compiling copies of public records; the District settled the suit by dropping the policy.
Posting Misleading Agenda CalAware in 2012 sued the San Diego Board of Supervisors for taking
action to adopt specific recommendations in a report that the agenda said should be simply received
and evaluated with a report back by staff in 60 days, and for acting in accordance with a staff-prepared
“cheat sheet” withheld from public dissemination. The board settled by rescinding the action taken.
Withholding Agenda Calendars CalAware in 2014 sued the City of Salinas for withholding from
the public, as a preliminary draft exempt from disclosure, a “calendar of upcoming events” to be
placed on future city council meeting agendas, although the document was made available to council
members. The city settled the suit by pledging to make future calendars available on request.
Backstage Serial Signatures CalAware in 2015 sued the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
alleging it violated the Brown Act when its members privately and serially signed letters to the
Legislature and the Governor opposing a bill intended to strengthen . . . the Brown Act. The Board
settled the suit in August 2016 by pledging to announce any future full board signature correspondence
on the open meeting agenda and authorize it by public vote.
Abuse of Closed Real Property Talks CalAware in 2012 sued the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
Commission and won a court decision that commissioners had violated Brown Act limits on the scope
of real property closed sessions by secretly engaging in wide-ranging discussions of multiple aspects of
a proposed lease to USC.
Abuse of Closed “Security” Talks CalAware in 2012 sued the Los Angeles Board of Supervisors for
holding an unlawful closed session to discuss with Governor Brown the financial burden on the County
of his plan to shift state prisoners to local jails, forcing the Board to settle by pledging not to repeat the
practice.
Abuse of Closed Litigation Talk CalAware in 2014 sued the Board of Trustees of the Pasadena Area
Community College for misrepresenting the facts justifying a closed session to consider litigation; the
court ruled that this Brown Act violation voided a departing chancellor’s $400,000 severance payment.
Withholding Asset Forfeiture Records CalAware in 2016 sued the City of Baldwin Park for failing
to retain records of its application to the U.S. Department of Justice for a share of funds or property
confiscated from citizens using civil asset forfeiture; the City settled by pledging to do so in the future.
Legislation
Remedy for Perceived Open Meeting Violations Prompted by an appellate court ruling that the
Brown Act provided no remedy for past violations if the perpetrating body claims they’ve been
suspended, CalAware co-sponsored a successful 2012 bill, SB 1003, providing a way for local public
bodies to avoid litigation by pledging to abandon meeting-related practices that prompt accusations of
Brown Act violations–without conceding that they are unlawful. It also gives citizens the opportunity to
Public Records Access Enforcement Prompted by its 2006 audit results, CalAware sponsored AB
2927, which among other things would have provided for immediate Attorney General review of every
public agency denial of access to its records, and for a fine of up to $100 per each day a public agency
was found by a court to have withheld access not only incorrectly but willfully. Vetoed by Governor
Schwarzenegger for requiring AG review of access denials by a governor’s office.
Access to Records of Auxiliary Organizations Prompted by an appellate court ruling that nonprofit
auxiliary organizations providing funding to public colleges and universities were not subject to the
California Public Records Act, CalAware in 2009 supported SB 218, which subjects auxiliaries to
special records disclosure requirements closely paralleling the CPRA.
Protection for Citizens Speaking at Public Meetings Prompted by repeated abuses by local
government bodies, CalAware in 2014 co-sponsored AB 194, a bill protecting citizens’ rights to
address public officials at open meetings without viewpoint discrimination, interruptions and other
frustrations; Governor Brown vetoed the bill as unnecessary.
California Legislature Transparency Act CalAware in 2016 was an early endorser of this citizen
initiative constitutional amendment, which placed on the November ballot Proposition 54, ending last
minute “gut and amend” tactics to escape public awareness, and providing for both official and citizen
video of all hearings and floor action.
Statewide and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2007 From the Attorney General’s office to the
smallest local police station, almost all of the more than 200 agencies audited failed to comply with
their most basic disclosure obligations. As a result, CalAware developed a model policy statement,
“Your Rights to Know about Our Department.”
Statewide and Local Court Administrations, 2013 In contrast to previous audits, CalAware found
the state’s courts at all levels generally prompt and forthcoming in disclosing basic information about
how they are administered, including specifics about the pay, benefits, and outside financial interests
of judges and key executives.
Education
The CalAware Guide to Open Meetings in California, 2005 (second edition 2015), 305 pages
This second edition of the guide to all California law on access to government meetings focuses on the Ralph
M. Brown Act (local government councils, boards and commissions), with parallel coverage of the Bagley-
Keene Open Meeting Act (state government councils, boards and commissions) as well as special rules for
meetings of the state legislature, the California Judicial Council, the Commissions on Judicial Appointments
and Judicial Performance, the University of California Board of Regents, the Board of Governors of the State
Bar, Student Government Bodies at California State University campuses, local school site Parent Advisory
Committees, Homeowners Association Governing Boards, and locally adopted sunshine ordinances.
The Calaware Guide to Public Records and Private Information in California, 2012, 517 pages
This guide to all California law providing or restricting access to government and judicial records focuses on
the California Public Records Act (records of state executive branch officials, boards and departments and
local government agencies) but also covers the statutes providing access to records of the state Legislature,
case and administrative records of the trial and appellate courts, records of the California Judicial Council,
the Commissions on Judicial Appointments and Judicial Performance, and the State Bar.
The CalAware Guide to Journalism Law in California, 2006 (second edition 2013), 396 pages
This guide to all law affecting journalism in California covers both the rights of access to people, places and
information afforded reporters and photojournalists as well as the protection for news accounts, editorial
opinions and art, and post-publication encounters with legal challenges. Issues addressed in the guide
include access to government meetings and records, court proceedings and records at both the local and
federal levels; cameras and recording in the courtroom; information on hospital patients ; avoiding liability
for trespass, intrusion, secret eavesdropping and recording; California's unique paparazzi laws; avoiding
libel, slander and invasion of privacy; and protection from subpoenas and pretrial discovery. Chapters on the
rights of student journalists cover California laws providing freedom from censorship and punitive discipline,
as well as a primer on the libel and privacy laws most relevant to student newspapers and other media.
CalAware Leadership
Our leadership is a board of 12 volunteer directors representing three sectors of the community concerned
with open government and First Amendment rights: citizen activists, journalists and public officials.
Officers
Robert Stern, President (Public Interest Attorney, Government Ethics Veteran), Malibu, CA
Emelyn Rodriguez, Vice President and Executive Director, (Political Law Attorney), Sacramento, CA
Dan Laidman, Secretary, (Media Attorney), Los Angeles, CA
Kelly Aviles, Vice President/Open Government Compliance (Public Interest Attorney), LaVerne, CA
2218 Homewood Way, Carmichael, CA 95608 • (916) 949-4944• [email protected] • www.calaware.org
Directors
Tim Crews, President Emeritus (Weekly Newspaper Editor and Publisher), Willows, CA
JW August, San Diego, President Emeritus (Broadcast News Producer)
Donna Frye, San Diego, President Emerita (Citizen Activist)
Julie Hayward Biggs (Local Government Attorney)
Heather Hopkins, Sacramento (California Senate Staff)
Norberto Santana, Jr. Santa Ana (Publisher, Online Investigative News Site)
Nikki Moore, Sacramento, (California Assembly Staff)
Toni Momberger, Redlands (City Council Member)
Staff
General Counsel Terry Francke
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Become a member online (with a one-time or monthly payment) or by mailing your check to
CalAware at the address below (use memo line to designate membership category you select from
the list at http://calaware.org/support/membership)
Include a devise or bequest to Californians Aware in your will to make its support for informed
democracy part of your legacy. See examples of this and other planned giving approaches here.