CHAP10 Ordinal Numbers
CHAP10 Ordinal Numbers
CHAP10 Ordinal Numbers
ORDINAL NUMBERS
§10.1 Transitive Sets
We turn our attention to ordinal numbers. With finite numbers the cardinal
numbers, apart from zero, are 1, 2, 3, … while the ordinal numbers are 1st, 2nd, 3rd, …
There is really very little difference. For infinite sets there’s a big difference. While
cardinal numbers simply measure the size of a set, ordinal numbers describe the structure
of a well-ordered set.
Consider the well-ordered set {1, 2, 3, … , 0}. As a set this is no bigger than
{1, 2, 3, …}. But as well-ordered sets the ordering is quite different. One set has a
largest while the other does not.
The natural numbers are transitive, and the set of natural numbers itself is
transitive.
Example 2: The sets x = {{1, {1}}, {1}, 0, 1, 2} and y = {{2, {1}}, {1}, 0, 1, 2} are
transitive. Let u = {x, y}.
Then u = x y = {{1}, 0, 1, 2} and x = {{1, {1}}, {2, {1}},{1}, 0, 1, 2}, both of
which are transitive.
73
§10.2 Ordinal Numbers
An ordinal number is a transitive set that is well-ordered by the relation
“ or =”. So, for ordinals, < and are equivalent. We denote the class of ordinals by
Ord.
Examples 2: Ordinal numbers include all the natural numbers, as well as and +.
If (X, ) is a well-ordered set X and is similar to the ordinal we say that is its
ordinal number. We shall show that this is uniquely defined. We denote the ordinal of
X by ord (X, ). If the ordering is understood we can write ord(X).
74
Theorem 8: If X is a set of ordinals then X is an ordinal.
Proof: Suppose X is a set of ordinals. Then X is transitive. Let 0 Y X. Then the
elements of Y are ordinals and so Y is transitive. Let Y. Then Y . Thus Y
is an ordinal. Hence Y or Y = Y. Hence if Y Y, Y Y, a
contradiction. Thus Y is the least element of Y. Hence X is well-ordered by . Thus
X is an ordinal.
We can also define things by transfinite induction. The following is a special case.
75
(E0) 0 = 1;
(E1) = .;
+
Examples 4:
+ 1 = + 0+ = ( + 0)+ by (A1) = + by (A0) .
1 + = {1 + n | n < } = .
2 = {2n | n < } by (M2) = .
2 = 1+ = 1 + by (M1) = 0+ + = (0 + ) + by (M1)
= (0 + ) + by (M0) = {0 + n | n < } + = + = { + n | n < } by (A2).
2 = {2n | n < } by (E2) =
76
Then #(A X) = a and so A X has a subset, Y with #Y = x.
Then #[(X Y) + (Y X) + (Y Y)] = 3x.x
= x so
there exists a bijection from (X Y) + (Y X) + (Y Y) to Y.
We can thus extend f to a bijection g: (X + Y) (X + Y) X + Y, a contradiction.
Hence x = a and so a.a = a.
77
Theorem 19: { | < +} = .
Proof: If < + then and so .
78