Race and Racism Curriculum
Race and Racism Curriculum
Race and Racism Curriculum
By
Dr. Rowan Wolf, Sociology Instructor and Caroline Le Guin, Writing Instructor
INTRODUCTION
There aren’t too many Americans who want to claim to be racist, and most people would like to
believe they are “colorblind” when it comes to matters of race. But race and racism are integral and
inescapable parts of our culture and social history. Race consciousness is key to how we learn to
perceive ourselves and the people around us (even if we don’t always want to admit it); just think
of how we describe people—“an elderly asian woman, about five foot three; a tall black man in his
thirties, wearing a leather jacket”. In these “identifying descriptions”, race, along with gender, is
essential, especially if it is other than white.
Given the importance of race to our society, it’s remarkable how difficult it is to talk about and
how complex the definitions of race and racism can be. In fact, the issues surrounding the
definitions of race and racism are themselves a product of racism’s long and conflicted history in
our society. Any discussion of race and racism probably should begin with definitions of the
concepts involved, especially since there tends to be confusion and overlap between a lot of the
terms.
DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS
Race: Race is a socially constructed artifact that categorizes people based on visual differences
which are imputed to indicate invisible differences. These categorizations are amorphous and fluid
over time which reflects their social rather than physical basis. Its significance arises out of the
meanings we as societies assign to it, and the way we structure race in our societies. This
structuring shapes what we refer to as "institutional racism" (defined below).
The idea that race has a biological basis is an old idea that still hasn’t disappeared entirely and
continues to be debated in academia [for a good example see the Nova website at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/first/race.html for a discussion by anthropologists C. Loring
Brace and George W. Gill] Any discussion of the “biology of race”, however, needs to be
contextualized within the history of racism as an institution in this country, and an awareness of how
our interpretations of race are themselves reflections of our ideologies and our history.
Ethnicity: Ethnicity reflects cultural differences, and an ethnic group is a people who share a
historical and cultural heritage (and frequently have a sense of group identity). It may or may not
1
overlap with race. However, there is nothing within the concept of a cultural group that excludes
that group from being multiracial. For example, members of the U. S. society share a cultural
identity. That cultural identity is their ethnicity.
Racism: Racism can be defined simply as any policy, belief, attitude, action or inaction, which
subordinates individuals or groups based on their race. What this definition leaves out, however, is
the specific historical formation of racism as an institution and an ideology over the last several
hundred years. Taking into consideration the social and historical perspective, Paula Rothenberg
offers this more pointed—and useful--definition of racism:
"Racism involves the subordination of people of color by white people. While individual persons of color
may well discriminate against a white person or another person of color because of their race, this does
not qualify as racism according to our definition because that person of color cannot depend upon all
the institutions of society to enforce or extend his or her personal dislike. Nor can he or she call upon
the force of history to reflect and enforce that prejudice. . . . History provides us with a long record of
white people holding and using power and privilege over people of color to subordinate them, not the
reverse."
(Paula Rothenberg. Defining Racism and Sexism)
Institutionalized racism: Because racism is an ideology that is entwined within the cultural
ideology of this society, at some level, everyone who is a cultural member shares many aspects of
the ideology of race. That belief system plays out in our day to day interactions with each other -
whether we are blatantly (or consciously) racist or not. The system of race sets up certain hostilities
and conflicts that are played out in our lives.
Institutionalized racism is the structuring of benefit for the group with power. Institutionalized
processes carry multiple generational effects and are sometimes called "past in present"
discrimination.
Privilege: The structures of racism work in two ways: to discriminate against and subordinate
people of color, and to privilege white people. Privileges are unearned benefits from the
structuring of inequality, and as such are intimately tied to discrimination. Privilege (unearned
advantages) is sometimes difficult for those receiving them to see. This is particularly true in a
societal environment such as the United States, when we think that we get things because we are
nice people, or because we worked for them. Molly Ivins once alluded to privilege with the analogy
of baseball - a person is born on third base, but thinks they hit a triple. A good introduction to
privilege is the 1988 article by Peggy McIntosh White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack ,
and Allen Johnson's book Privilege, Power, and Difference is more detailed and highly readable.
2
A good example of how institutional racism works is the housing market. The creation of the
suburbs in the United States was driven by public policy and tax payer money. The GI Bill through
the VHA opened the opportunity to purchase a home to millions of veterans after World War II.
However of all the home loans made in those boom years, less than 2% went to non-whites.
Meanwhile, the federal government set up lending standards and created "red lining." "Red"
districts had low insurability because people of color lived in those areas. White communities
were seen as "good risks," and hence lenders did not offer mortgages in red lined districts. These
practices excluded people who were not white from the home ownership market.
The implication of this one set of policies has had (and still has) massive ramifications. For the
majority of people in the United States, their home is their single most important form of wealth.
The exclusion of people of color from the housing market meant that only whites had that access to
this form of wealth. Getting and owning a home became a "privilege" of being white. Meanwhile,
much school funding is still financed through local property taxes. Since people of color were
concentrated in areas where they could not own homes (or the homes they owned were devalued)
there was less money for schools - degrading educational opportunities. Meanwhile, for whites who
had moved "out and up," their schools had more funding and were seen as better schools. Quality
of education relates to economic opportunity, and those who were left behind ran even further
behind. None of this has anything directly to do with individual bias. Rather it is the consequence of
a social policy where whites, acting rationally in their own best interests, participated in increasing
levels of inequality between the races.
About ten years ago, a skeleton was uncovered on the banks of the Columbia River in Eastern
Washington; the bones were dated to around 7600 B.C.E. Almost immediately, a debate arose
over who had “rights” to the bones: the Umatilla, Yakama and Nez Perce tribes who saw the
remains as an ancestor who should be left alone and reburied, and members of the scientific
community—archeologists and anthropologists--who saw Kennewick Man as a rare find, a subject
for study that could reveal significant information about human history.
The debate over the cultural and historical meanings of this 9000 year old skeleton reveals the
power that the concept of race still wields for us, and how entangled racism is in places we might
not expect to find it. While the debate over Kennewick Man can be seen as a conflict of world
views and cultural values--Native American faith and traditions up against Western scientific
rationalism--closer examination, such as Jack Hitts Harper’s article, “Mighty White of You”, reveals
how race and racism permeate the story. To begin with, the Native American claim to the bones is
based in the 1990 Native American Graves Repatriation Act, an attempt by the Federal
Government to make up for well over a century of mishandling (at best) and desecration (at worst)
of Native American remains, often in the name of science and the pursuit of knowledge (Hitts cites
an estimate of 200,000 Indian skeletons held in museums). The claims of the scientific community,
on the other hand, have relied in part on the identification of Kennewick Man’s remains as not being
3
paleo-Indian (and therefore not an ancestor of the current-day Umatilla and Nez Perce ), but
instead being “Caucasoid”. Underneath the scientific debate Hitts identifies a powerful and racially
charged motivation: the need to say “We (Europeans) were actually here first; therefore our
dominance is justified.”
A lot of exercises around race and racism work with developing an understanding of institutional
and internalized racism: how racism is not simply a matter of individual choice.
2. Another area for thought and discussion is to consider how your particular discipline
constructs and has historically constructed race:
How do other disciplines construct and interpret race differently (how does
biology construct race differently from anthropology and psychology differently from
literature?)
How has the construction of race has been a site of conflict and definition for your
discipline as a whole, and what role has your discipline played in both perpetuating
and deconstructing racial/ethnic stereotypes?
How does exploring the construction of race within your discipline help students
to understand that discipline’s particular discourse and world view?
An example from the study of folklore: Looking at Joel Chandler Harris’ “Uncle Remus”
stories as a site of cultural and ethnic conflict where issues of racial identity and
appropriation are illustrated in textual history of the stories: a white journalist writing
“authentic” black oral folk stories, many of which turn out to be Native American in origin.
3. Write about the first experience you remember in which you became aware of your race or
ethnicity as something that distinguishes you or marks you somehow.
4
Voice One is the bigot or racist, the one that has unconsciously (or consciously) picked
up and absorbed all the many stereotypes about different racial/ethnic groups that we are
bombarded with. Let this voice spew out all the stereotypes it knows about certain ethnic
groups. You don’t have to believe these ideas, you may well find them offensive, or be
ashamed to even have them in your head. Part of the point of the exercise is to understand
that we absorb these ideas even if we do not consciously believe in them
Voice two is the voice of conscience and reason, the voice that knows “stereotyping
and bigotry is wrong.” Let this voice challenge and question the assumptions and
conclusions of Voice One.
When you are done, write a reflection on these two voices. Where do they come from?
Where, or from whom did you learn the ideas each voice articulated? Which voice was
easier to give voice to, and why?
Use your reflection to discuss how stereotypes are learned and unlearned
Prejudice
Bias
Discrimination
Stereotyping
Ethnocentrism
Insensitivity
Inequality
Injustice
Indifference
Ignorance
5
How does each of these terms differ in denotation and connotation from “racism”? Think about the
scenarios depicted in the play, and discuss which of these terms seem best to apply and help make
sense of what happened.
________________________________________________________________________
RESOURCES
Many of these resources are adapted from the Bedford/St. Martin’s reference Website:
www.bedfordstmartins.com/rereadingamerica
Eric Lui, “Notes of a Native Speaker” “I never asked to be white. I am not literally
white…But like so many other Asian Americans of the second generation, I find myself now the
bearer of a strange new status: white, but acclamation.”
6
a comprehensive bibliography; links to recent articles in the media on race and science; and links to
sites on health, genetics, eugenics, ethnic study, and racism.
Jack Hitts, “Mighty White of You: Racial Preferences color America’s oldest skull
and bones” Harpers Magazine, July 2005 “The story of the Ancient European One is this kind
of story, toggling back and forth between the world of fiction and (possibly) non-fiction, authored
by a few curious facts and the collective anxiety of the majority”
The Other Race Card: Rush Limbaugh and the Politics of White Resentment By Tim
Wise http://www.counterpunch.org/wise10032003.html Article on Rush Limbaugh's comments
Paul L. Wachtel, “Talking About Racism: How Our Dialogue Gets Short-Circuited”
“The real crime of which white America is now most guilty is not racism. It is indifference.
Understanding the difference between the two is a crucial step in liberating ourselves from the
sterile and unproductive impasse that has characterized the dialogue on race relations in recent
years.
7
Reginald McKnight, “Confessions of a Wannabe Negro” I can’t say when I first noticed
my blackness…I do, however, remember the very day I noticed that my blackness made me
different.
Racial Bias from Another Perspective: Limbaugh, the United States and South Africa
By Heather Gray
http://www.commondreams.org/scriptfiles/views03/1006-09.htm
Article on Rush Limbaugh's comments
Shelby Steele “I’m Black, You’re White, Who’s Innocent? “I think the racial struggle in
America has always been primarily a struggle for innocence…Both races instinctively understand
that to loose innocence is to lose power.
The Arab-American Institute http://www.aaiusa.org/ A rich web site devoted to the Arab-
American community and the challenges and issues they face in contemporary American society.
This web site primarily provides policy and civic research support, but includes a section on
publications which contains many articles and essays on Arab/American relations. A link to an
educational packet on current discussions in the Arab American community, The Middle East, and
Islam, includes many articles from AAI staff writers
8
The United Nations declaration against racial prejudice lays out a universal conception of human
rights.