Voltage Sag Distributions Caused
Voltage Sag Distributions Caused
Voltage Sag Distributions Caused
Such permission of
the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Helsinki
University of Technology's products or services. Internal or personal use of
this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this
material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective
works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to
[email protected].
By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright
laws protecting it.
PUBLICATION V
Heine, P., Lehtonen, M., Voltage Sag Distributions Caused by Power System Faults,
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, No. 4, November 2003, pp. 1367-1373.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 18, NO. 4, NOVEMBER 2003 1367
I. INTRODUCTION
and the share of the various fault types will satisfy two TABLE I
properties (3) and (4) FAULT FREQUENCIES AND SHARES OF DIFFERENT FAULT TYPES FOR
FINNISH TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS [8]
(3)
(4)
B. Sag Magnitude
The calculation of voltages in meshed transmission systems
is based on Thevenin’s theorem and the network impedance ma-
trix [4]. To calculate the sagged voltage at bus caused by a fault
at node , (5) or (6) can be applied • 20 kV medium voltage, radially operated, neutral un-
earthed, or compensated;
(5) • 0.4 kV low voltage, radially operated, solidly earthed.
Typical transformer connections
(6) • 400/110 kV, 400/220 kV, 220/110 kV: YNyn0d11 (d11,
typically 21 kV, is used for compensation);
where and are the sagged voltages during the fault • 110/20 kV: YNd11;
at the nodes and , respectively. and are the prefault • 20/0.4 kV: Dyn11.
voltages. is the driving element that corresponds to the di- Y refers to wye connected, d to delta connected, and n to
agonal element of the node impedance matrix, the transfer neutral earthed systems. Capitals refer to the primary side and
element of the node impedance matrix that corresponds to nodes small letters to the secondary side of the transformer.
and , and the fault impedance. Sags caused by symmetrical three-phase faults propagate
For radially operated distribution systems, the calculation can without changes through transformers. In the case of unsym-
be simplified and a voltage divider model can be used [3]. For metrical faults, however, the transformer connections have a
example, in the case of a symmetrical three-phase short circuit strong effect [4]. The phase voltages on the secondary side
fault in one radially supplied MV distribution feeder, the sagged are derived from the phase voltages on the primary side
voltage on the substation busbar can be calculated using (7) as follows:
(9)
(7)
(10)
where is the impedance between the substation and the fault
location, the impedance of the primary transformer, and
the source impedance of the transmission system. (11)
When considering faults behind a neighboring HV/MV trans-
former, the PCC (= point of common coupling) is on the HV side
of the transformer and (8) should be applied (12)
Fig. 2. Shares of different faults for one power distribution company: faults
cleared by high-speed (H-S) reclosers, time-delayed (T-D) reclosers, and
permanent faults.
2) Sag Propagation From MV to LV Systems: The typical 2) Faults Behind Neighboring HV/MV Transformers: In the
connection of an MV/LV transformer is Dyn11. This means that case of a fault behind a neighboring HV/MV transformer, the
in (12) the element is zero and the angle . sagged voltage will not collapse to a high degree because the
Further, the phase-to-phase voltage on the MV voltage side is transformer impedance is now on the load side of the PCC (8).
seen as a phase voltage on the LV side. The further away the neighboring substation is located, the
In the case of a symmetrical three-phase fault on the MV side, less severe the sag will be. However, the effect of the HV line
all three phase-to-phase and phase voltages will collapse to the length is small (Fig. 5). The sagged voltage is lowest in the case
same degree and propagate without changes to the LV side. In of a weak transmission system and a large neighboring HV/MV
the example presented in Fig. 3(a), a three-phase short circuit transformer (Fig. 6). The short circuit level of the transmis-
causes a remaining voltage of 50%. sion system is the most critical factor in this analysis. In typical
HEINE AND LEHTONEN: VOLTAGE SAG DISTRIBUTIONS CAUSED BY POWER SYSTEM FAULTS 1371
• fuses limit the fault current and thus also the voltage drop.
As for sags caused by MV faults, the most serious sags
caused by LV faults are those in the neighboring feeders
near the MV/LV transformer. These sags are rare, however.
Further, when considering sags caused by LV faults behind
neighboring MV/LV transformers, the impedance between
the MV busbar (PCC) and the fault location consists of the
MV/LV transformer and LV lines. The sagged voltages remain
high because the MV/LV transformers have a rather large
impedance and the impedance of the LV line referred to the
MV side also represents a high value. For example, in Finland
one typical MV/LV transformer rating is 315 kVA, .
This represents a transformer impedance of 63.5 on the MV
Fig. 4. Effect of the short circuit level of the subtransmission system and the
HV/MV transformer rating on voltage sag magnitude, when a three-phase fault side. In addition, when the LV line impedance is referred to the
occurs in the neighboring MV feeder, z = 0:4 + j0:4
=km, Z = 0
. MV side, the LV line impedance is multiplied by a factor of
. In a strong city network [40 MVA 110/20
kV transformer and kA (110 kV)], this means a sagged
voltage of on the MV busbar and a corresponding
value of in a weak rural area (16 MVA, 2 kA).
Thus, in practice, sags caused by faults behind MV/LV power
transformers can be neglected in sag analysis.
TABLE II
INPUT MV DATA FOR THE CASE STUDIES
TABLE III
EXPERIENCED SAGS PER YEAR BY AN LV CUSTOMER