BioMed Realty RFP Response
BioMed Realty RFP Response
BioMed Realty RFP Response
R FP R E S P O N S E
OCTOBER 5, 2018
October 05, 2018
BioMed Realty is pleased to present our vision and qualifications for Dexter Innovation
Quarter, a response to the Mercer Mega Block request for proposal. Dexter Innovation
Quarter will be an exemplary, well-integrated, community-focused development further
enhancing the unique character of the South Lake Union neighborhood. The project will
embrace a human-scale approach by celebrating community, collaboration, innovation
and discovery through iconic architecture and design.
The following proposal reflects our ongoing partnership with SkB Architects, Turner
Construction, PES Environmental, OAC Services and a diverse group of local consultants
and subcontractors who are industry-leading experts in design, construction, building
sustainability, environmental engineering and project management. Leveraging this
Dexter Yard (700 Dexter Avenue North) project team directly benefits the neighborhood
by preserving our transformative and thoughtful design approach and further solidifying
the mutually beneficial environmental cleanup strategy we have developed and are
implementing in partnership with the Department of Ecology.
The project team is backed by Blackstone Real Estate Partners, which is part of the largest
real estate private equity firm in the world with $119 billion of assets under management.
We thank the City of Seattle for their transformative, community-building vision for these
parcels, as well as Jones Lang LaSalle for their management of this proposal process.
BioMed Realty is honored to submit our proposal to you, and thank you for considering our
project, which holds the noble pursuits of innovation, creativity and the best interests of
the larger community at heart.
Sincerely,
S E C TI O N 1
E X ECUTI V E SU M M A RY
S E C TI O N 2
F I N A N C I A L Q UA LI F I C ATI O N S
S E C TI O N 3
PA ST PROJ EC T Q UA LI F I C ATI O N S
S E C TI O N 4
PROJ EC T CO N C E P T & PU B LI C B E N E F IT
S E C TI O N 5
PROJ EC T D E S I G N
S E C TI O N 6
FINANCIAL OFFER
S E C TI O N 7
PROJ EC T F I N A N C I N G PL A N &
SU PP O RTI N G PRO - FO R M A S
S E C TI O N 8
A PPE N D I C E S
F O R M C .1
FORM C.2
FORM C.3
PA R TN E R S H I P
E X ECUTI V E SU M M A RY
PROJECT CONCEPT
13+ MILLION
the Mercer Mega Block RFP.
500K RSF
2004. Community is at the core of our development platform and
Dexter Innovation Quarter will aim to maximize community benefits by
exploring solutions to the education, affordable housing, sustainability UNDER MANAGEMENT
and transportation needs which are among the most pressing socio- IN SEATTLE
economic issues in Seattle.
Seattle Public Schools, Seattle Colleges and Bellevue College have 520K RSF
expressed interest in partnering with BioMed Realty on programs for UNDER DEVELOPMENT
STEM/STEAM education, contract training for local workforce and local IN SEATTLE
internship/externship programs. Integrity Housing is providing their
multi-state expertise, as an affordable housing developer, to enhance
the affordable housing aspects of our offering. In other Seattle portfolio
developments, BioMed Realty continues to work closely with the South
Lake Union Community Council and the Seattle Parks Foundation to
maximize the positive impacts of our developments on the environment.
QUALIFICATIONS
Please see the Financial Offer section of this Mercer Mega Block RFP
Response for our official Letter of Intent.
CONTINUING A VISION OF A
BETTER SOUTH LAKE UNION
Requested information for RFP Requirements, Financial Qualifications have been
submitted under separate cover per the instruction in the RFP.
APPENDICES
AND DISCOVERY
SECTION 03
PAST PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS
D E X TE R YA R D
700 Dexter Avenue N, Seattle, Washington
open in early 2021, the 15-story building will comprise a pair of BioMed Realty
towers—each 175-feet-high—and provide 498,000 square feet Gross SF
of lab and office space and approximately 22,000 square feet 520,000 SF
of ground floor space devoted to retail and community space. A Acreage
pedestrian through-block passage will offer access to retail, office 1.5
elevator lobbies and an open gathering space. Construction Type
Laboratory / Office
The nature of the development
LEED Certification
The project will feature a unique, shared community amenity— LEED Gold
a semi-enclosed 5,500 square foot open area called the Field Stories
House, which will be reservable by building tenants and community 15
groups for a wide range of activities both during the work day and
Construction Start
after hours. The vision is to add energy and create a sense of place Q1 2019
beyond the typical nine-to-five environment. Approximately three
Construction Completion
levels of below-grade parking will be provided.
Q1 2021
Completed on Time?
Under development
and on schedule
Pedestrian Connector
“The building is designed to help establish a distinct identity for Key Project Drivers
the area and to enhance the developing pedestrian experience,”
notes Kyle Gaffney, Founding Principal at SkB Architects and co- S E N S E O F CO M M U N IT Y
lead designer for the project.
TAC TI LIT Y & TE X TU R E
O F M ATE R I A L S
According to BioMed Realty’s Vice President Mike Ruhl, UN- OFFICE THE OFFICE
“South Lake Union is a booming hub for the tech and biotech
industries. Dexter Yard represents a unique opportunity for CO N V E R G E N C E
C R E AT E A N E I G H B O R H O O D
innovative companies wanting to plug into Seattle’s most ANCHOR
sought-after neighborhood.”
E LE VATE TH E
Community benefits and open space N A R R OW S PAC E
Dexter Yard is designed to enhance the developing pedestrian
A DA P TA B LE S PAC E
experience with an inviting, porous 18-hour ground plane. Two
towers break down the overall scale to better fit the surrounding INVITE RESIDENTIAL
N E I G H B O R S TO T H E PA R T Y
context while maximizing view opportunities and sun exposure for
tenants and neighbors alike. Landscaping elements encourage B OT H E N E R G E T I C & S E R E N E
HUMAN EXPERIENCE
exploration and lingering, all with varying degrees of privacy. Poetic
“pinch points” allow people of all ages to seek out wonderful nooks, F LE X I B I LIT Y I N
crannies and comfortable places to sit like those found in many old A LL F O R M S
world European cities.
P O S I T I V E I M PAC T S
A N D E N G AG E M E N T
The crown jewel will be the Field House—a semi-open, multi-use
space that can be used by tenants, neighboring schools and
community groups alike for sports leagues, concerts, farmers
markets and any variety of events.
Taking advantage of the sloping
elevation on the site, a retail/hospitality
space will overlook the Field House
allowing visitors to survey the action
below while relaxing with a drink,
having a casual meeting or catching
up with friends. “I’m particularly excited
about the potential of the Field House
to become a destination for the entire
community,” notes Gaffney. “We paid
attention to the desire for activity and
wellness, which is such an integral part
of the Northwest lifestyle. The Field
House will be able to play host to an
amazing variety of activities that could
Initial sketch showing pedestrian flow through the site
extend beyond just tenant uses and include anything from concerts to art exhibitions to
indoor soccer games. Our goal is to create a strong identity for the project, such that it
engages and encourages people to hang out 18 hours a day.”
Dexter Yard recognizes and supports the need for a pedestrian focused green street
on 8th Ave N and in many ways serves as a strong northern gateway to draw foot traffic
into and out of the Mercer Mega Block site. The city has classified Dexter Ave N as a
Class II Pedestrian Street at the project site. By contrast, 8th Ave N is a Neighborhood
Green Street, while Valley St and Roy St are undesignated. This gives the site a distinct,
dual character between the busy, multi-modal arterial thoroughfare of Dexter Ave N and
the pedestrian-priority street at 8th Ave N, very similar to how the Mercer Mega Block
is bounded by the busy Mercer St thoroughfare on the south and the less busy Roy St
on the north. Dexter Yard takes advantage of these characteristics by providing ease
of navigation and extensive porosity along the street and through-block frontages to
create vibrant, pedestrian-focused community spaces activated with retail, restaurants,
and active public gathering spaces.
K E N DA LL SQ UA R E
500 Kendall Street, 450 Kendall Street,
675 West Kendall Street, 650 East Kendall Street,
350 East Kendall Street Garage,
Kendall Crossing Apartments,
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Developer
BioMed Realty
Gross SF
560,000 SF
Acreage
6.54
Construction Type
Laboratory / Office
LEED Certification
Gold—Shell & Core
Stories
12 (not including
Basement or Penthouse)
Construction Start
Q2 2017
Construction Completion
Q3 2019 (est.)
Completed on Time?
GATE WAY O F PAC I F I C , PH A S E 1 Scheduled for on-time
Gateway Boulevard, South San Francisco, California completion
CREATING AN ENVIRONMENT
Website
www.gatewayofpacific.com
A SC E NT
425 Fairview Avenue North
Seattle, Washington
In addition to this our construction partner Turner also ran the TSCM (Turner School
of Construction Management) program which is a free 8-week program that offers
construction management training to small minority-owned, women-owned and
emerging small businesses (SBA).
The 425 Fairview (Ascent) project not only showcases Turner’s ability to handle
projects in tight urban settings and their expertise with constructing buildings like
the one proposed, it also is a testament to how the Turner team can create a greater
benefit to the community during construction in terms of educational opportunities.
In addition to providing a program specifically for a diverse group in the construction
industry, it also draws local construction talent to be willing and interested in being
part of this project. The project team will also actively engage community outreach for
Dexter Innovation Quarter.
General Contractor
Turner Construction
Gross SF
161,647 SF
Acreage
1.26
Construction Type
New
LEED Certification
No, Three Globe™
certification—equivalent to
LEED™ Gold certification
Stories
13
Construction Start
Q1 2014
Construction Completion
Q2 2015
Completed on Time?
Yes
WA LTO N LO F TS Website
75 Vine Street www.lifeatwalton.com
Seattle, Washington
Walton Lofts includes studio, open one-bedroom and two-bedroom homes and
resident amenities, consisting of a rooftop lounge, grand library, rooftop pet walk, a
variety of residential storage options, an amenity kitchen, fully stocked fitness facility,
resident bike work room and storage, electric vehicle charging stations and a resident
guest suite.
The Dexter Innovation Quarter also aims at contributing to the city’s vision for the South
Lake Union and 8th Ave by adopting strategies that reduce negative environmental
effects. The development will be establishing top-Quartile performance for water,
energy and carbon compared to similar developments around the world.
21
DE X TER INNOVATION QUARTER
STRATEGY WITHIN THE FABRIC OF
INCORPORATING AN ACTIVATION
PROJ EC T CO N C E P T & PU B LI C B E N E F IT
OUR DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 04
PROJECT CONCEPT &
PUBLIC BENEFIT
CONCEPT STATEMENT
We’ve designed Dexter Innovation Quarter around the proven
principles of experience-based design to create a more
meaningful, engaging and sustainable destination within the fabric
of the South Lake Union neighborhood and the City of Seattle.
With the inclusion of Dexter Yard, the essence of Roy St and 8th OUR DESIGN FULFILLS
Ave N changes radically to one of pedestrian energy punctuated THE INTENT OF:
by lush landscaping, lake views and year round activities at
street level. The potential to add to this synergy with the inclusion THE SOUTH LAKE
of the Seattle City Light property to the north (800 Aloha) only UNION NEIGHBORHOOD
amplifies and complements it further. This is only one part of our DESIGN GUIDELINES
design and lifestyle vision for the Dexter Innovation Quarter.
THE 8TH AVE GREEN
Imagine a mixer and a magnet where people can swim, shop, STREET CONCEPT PLAN
listen to music, let their kids play, get work done, learn new
skills, grab a bite or relax at home. A place for learning, making, CITY OF SEATTLE
doing or even just watching. An oasis in the city where even COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
the sounds of cars are muffled by the sounds of running water,
music and animated conversation. A place that adapts to the
weather and the time of day and invites people in at all hours
and in doing so creates its own unique sense of place heavy on
human touch and human interaction.
PROSPECT ST
WARD ST
HIG
HL
PL
AN
RD
WA
DD
R
ALOHA ST
VALLEY ST
AV
EN
AURORA AVE N
8TH AVE N
6TH AVE N
DEXTER
YARD VALLEY ST
FAIRVIEW AVE N
TERRY AVE N
ROY ST
DEXTER AVE N
DEXTER
9TH AVE N
MERCER MERCER
WEST EAST
MERCER ST
N
AVE
REPUBLICAN ST
6TH
HARRISON ST
THOMAS ST
PROJECT CONCEPT &
PUBLIC BENEFIT
GENERAL SITE
Neighborhood Influence Diagram Plan PARKING FOR MERCER
EAST & WEST:
In many ways, the Mercer Blocks are at the nexus of many
different neighborhood uses and attributes. To the north is 4 LEVELS
largely residential, to the south mostly office and research, 780 STALLS
Seattle Center to the southwest and Lake Union and its
shore side restaurants to the northeast. We see this location 8 LOADING BERTHS
as not only a tremendous opportunity to create a thriving, PARKING FOR POSSIBLE
community-driven destination, but also as an imperative for OFFICE BUILDING ON
South Lake Union and Seattle as a whole. DEXTER WEST:
3 LEVELS
132 STALLS
The Mercer Mega Block Request for Proposal calls for “inclusion of strong, street-level activation and
the provision of actively managed open space that incorporates place-making best practices and
becomes a place of local and regional pride.” Dexter Innovation Quarter responds to this objective
by considering the following:
Focal points and vistas—Building height and Designed to attract a cross section of users—
massing provide view corridors for more than The design envisions offerings for people of
just tenants. Maker / educational spaces, multi- all ages and socio-economic strata and its use
use community spaces, and curated retail utilize is responsive to the needs of its community,
garage doors and pivoting window walls to regardless of the season or time of day.
entice sneaking a peak inside.
Creative use of art—Interactive water features, art
Choices within the space—Community you can sit on, artwork as pedestrian crossing.
p-patches, balcony-to-bistro restaurants, activity
Provide seasonal strategies for active uses—
pavilion, concerts, shopping, farmers markets,
Presented in the following pages.
movie nights, art fairs, rallies, exhibitions.
K-5 School—Limited time to work out details Skate Park—We explored this idea but found
with Seattle Public Schools, student safety and there wasn’t adequate space and the trade-off
financial viability are just two primary reasons we for usable green and pedestrian space was too
have not located a school on-site. Also, significant much. Our research and experience has shown
traffic challenges arise with students commuting that these are more successful in a larger park
in conjunction with the work commuters already setting, such as the existing Seattle skate parks
using Dexter Ave N and Mercer Street. Schools found at Greenlake or Judkins Park.
also create a significant amount of dark, closed off
space after 5pm. Diverse users and space uses “Design out the crime”—One might argue that
stretching beyond Mon-Fri 9-5 were seen by our with all the public use features, seating and the
team as most beneficial for the broader community. porous nature of our design is also an attractant
We are still discussing other ways to partner and to low-level street crime. We agree this is a
provide spaces for after-school programs and/or possibility but the alternative, to us, is far less
continuing education adult programs. attractive. Designing ‘defensible spaces’ with high
levels of surveillance and public exclusion can end
Playground—Similar to a skate park, we found up aggravating the problem rather than alleviating
there wasn’t adequate space and the trade-off it. “Strategies or policing approaches intended
for usable green and pedestrian space was to ‘design out crime’ can end up ‘designing out’
too much. people. Approaches that strip public spaces of
all features vulnerable to vandalism or misuse
actively discourage local distinctiveness and
public amenity.”1
1 The Social Value of Public Spaces, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Ken Worpole & Katharine Knox (2007)
CONCEPT DIAGRAMS
1 2 3
Heavy pedestrian, bike, and car flow at Dexter and Mercer. Extend Green Street from Dexter Yard to Mercer. Broaden the Green Street experience.
4 5 6
Introduce an Activity Hub for synergy with Dexter Yard. Create eddy to buffer Mercer traffic. Lower scale buildings at Roy Street.
7 8 9
Rain Fly canopy at 8th Ave for protected year round activation. Primary activity flow. Final massing.
INSPIRATION
INSPIRATION
INSPIRATION IMAGERY
IMAGERY
IMAGERY
Center
Centerfor
forInnovation
Innovation Human
HumanActivity
Human Activity&&&Human
HumanScale
Scale
Center for Innovation
Center for Innovation HumanActivity
Activity &Human
HumanScale
Scale
Sustainable
SustainableDesign,
Sustainable Design,Construction,
Design, Construction,Activities
Construction, Activities
Activities Community
Community
Community
Sustainable Design, Construction, Activities Community
29
DE X TER INNOVATION QUARTER
BRINGING A HUMAN-SCALE
APPROACH TO ICONIC
ARCHITECTURE
PROJ EC T D E S I G N
SECTION 05
PROJECT DESIGN
SITE PLAN
A key differentiator is our ability to
connect and extend the pedestrian
experience on 8th Ave north to the
neighboring site at Dexter Yard, which
is being designed and developed
by the same team using the same
community-oriented approach. This
affords us the unique opportunity
to have a connecting portal where
the residential and office-focused
areas of the neighborhood converge
and draw people in both directions
along the green, pedestrian-focused
pathway with heavy emphasis on
European green street attributes.
All parking will be below-grade, with one underground parking garage serving the Mercer East and Mercer West buildings, and a N
separate underground parking garage at the Dexter West building. The Mercer East and West garage is four levels of parking with
approximately 780 stalls and 8 loading berths. The Dexter garage is three levels of parking with 132 stalls (no loading required
here). The parking garage for the Dexter West building would be three levels of parking to support a possible office building.
1” = 100’
GROUND PLANE
PLAN
Thriving neighborhoods foster a
wide variety of uses. Refreshingly
chaotic but intuitively organized.
A little something for everyone.
LEGEND
NOTE: Dexter Yard uses provided
for reference, not in scope
LOBBY
OFFICE
CORE
RETAIL PAVILION
RETAIL
DRIVEWAY
N
1” = 80’
tenant p-patches
“balcony to bistro”
VIEW FROM 8TH AVE TO FIELD HOUSE, ACTIVITY PAVILION, AND 8TH AVE PLAZA
The design will take advantage of excellent views, both from Materials are carefully chosen to be combined with those used
the site and through the site and improve sightlines and in the streetscape signaling the intent for this to be a truly public
wayfinding for the public. The use of high-quality durable amenity and gathering space—inclusive and accessible for all.
materials will signal user priority, extend the feel of the park-like
space into the public realm, and bring a context-sensitive
neighborhood feel.
DEXTER YARD
ACTIVITY
PAVILION
N
1” = 40’
N
1” = 40’
Silent discos can be seen, but not heard, after hours in the multi-use Activity Pavilion
N
1” = 40’
THE 5TH
ELEVATION:
ROOF PLAN
Dexter Innovation Quarter will
feature a variety of green spaces
that are knitted vertically through
each building. Community
p-patches, where residents and
community members can nurture
their own gardens, would be
available to all tenants in order to
inspire a healthy lifestyle.
N
1” = 100’
9TH AVE
8TH AVE
DEXTER
1 64
The four small garages that step along Roy each incorporate a roof
deck with a seating area and are surrounded by individual green
roofs. These are park-like spaces that will include community gardens
producing fresh veggies for the restaurants at ground level.
AURORA
9TH AVE
8TH AVE
DEXTER
MERCER EAST MERCER WEST DEXTER
1 64
DE X TER INNOVATION
DE X TER INNOVATION 45
QUARTER QUARTER 45
PROJECT DESIGN
MERCER EAST
WEST ELEVATION AT 8TH AVE
The community Activity Pavilion is located just inside Mercer
East on the ground floor and will be open for year round use.
The Pavilion can house a variety of uses; some that have been
considered include a community pool, flexible event space,
daycare, or an auditorium.
Visible to the northwest across the street from the Activity Pavilion
will be the Dexter Yard Field House, a 5,500 SF multi-use space
for sports, concerts, or community events.
MERCER
ROY
ACTIVITY PAVILION
MERCER EAST
EAST ELEVATION AT 9TH AVE
Mercer East is designed as a mix of street-level retail,
office and residential. At 9th Ave the public character of the
streetscape continues. The building lobby faces the corner and
a generous sidewalk accommodates unhindered pedestrian
use and connectivity.
ROY
Dexter Ave has long been a primary transit corridor and the
‘bicycling highway’ connecting north-south to downtown Seattle.
Pedestrian and bike safety continues to be of primary importance
on this street and should be supported.
MERCER WEST
WEST ELEVATION AT DEXTER AVE
Mercer West is designed as a mix of street-level retail
and office. The exterior massing was carefully sculpted to
provide an elegant and functional response to the site’s
unique placement within the South Lake Union neighborhood
context. Deep overhangs for cover—at sidewalk and plaza—
protect pedestrians from the elements. The smooth edged
podium with a mix of tactile materials and dynamic window
patterning provides visual interest and helps create a sense of
identity within Dexter Innovation Quarter..
MERCER
ROY
MERCER WEST
EAST ELEVATION AT 8TH AVE
Views to the water will be an important amenity in the tower
levels. While ground plane will have limited lake views, we
envision bringing the water to the pedestrian experience via
a small urban stream that naturally filters rainwater captured
on site.
ROY
Even when closed, passersby can peer in. These are classroom
sized—not affordable housing, but affordable office. Start-up
sized. Innovator sized.
Play your cards right and you might stay in the same building, just
move on upstairs to a bigger space. In the meantime, throw your
door up to the street and make, teach, sell, or just create.
DEXTER
EAST ELEVATION (AT DEXTER AVE)
At the ground plane of the Dexter building, three more small
garages face Dexter Ave N. These could be additional maker
spaces, similar to those at Mercer West, or could function as
the public-facing studios of Live-Work units. The residential
tower rises above with two rooftop garden levels providing
community gathering space and room for resident P-patches.
MERCER
ROY
DEXTER
1 64
EAST-WEST SECTION
An interactive water feature and fountain creates a visual and neighborhood beyond. This generous central area creates
extension of 8th Ave. This feature can be used for play in opportunities for third party programming that will serve
summer, or just for some aural relief from the busy surrounding the community’s growing need for a mix of public and civic
streets in other seasons. gathering spaces that offer maximum flexibility. The design adds
vibrancy to the ongoing development in this neighborhood,
Additionally the connections to the city grid are reinforced contributing additional opportunities for interaction and
by the sculpture garden that runs parallel and adjacent to the engagement with the community while strengthening
water feature. This series of sculptures is framed on the ground connections that prioritize comfort and safety for pedestrians,
plane by landscaped plinths. The sculptures playfully meander transit users and bicyclists.
towards Mercer Street and will be sited to protect clear sight
lines that support wayfinding through the plaza to the streets
AURORA
9TH AVE
8TH AVE
DEXTER
DEXTER
56
DE X TER INNOVATION QUARTER
EXPLORING THE VISION
BEHIND THE NUMBERS
F I N A N C I A L O FFE R
SECTION 06
SECTION 06
FINANCIAL OFFER
LETTER OF INTENT
JLL
601 Union Street, Suite 2800
Seattle, WA 98101
Attn: Lori Hill
Dear Lori:
This letter (this “Letter of Intent”) is written in response to the Request for Proposals issued by JLL
on behalf of the City of Seattle (“Seller”) to express the intent of BioMed Realty, L.P. (“BMR”) and
affiliates of funds managed by Blackstone Real Estate Advisors (“Blackstone”), or their respective
affiliates and assignees, (collectively, the “Purchaser”), to negotiate an agreement for the purchase
and sale of the Property (as defined below) upon the basic terms and conditions described herein
and such other terms and conditions upon which the Parties (both Purchaser and Seller are herein
referred to as the “Parties”) may agree.
1. Property:
The “Property” is comprised of three fee simple land parcels located at 800 Mercer
Street and 615 Dexter Ave N in Seattle, WA, consisting of approximately 2.86 acres, and
includes all fixtures and improvements thereon, and common areas, rights and benefits
appurtenant thereto.
2. Purchase Agreement:
Within 5 days of full execution of this Letter of Intent, Purchaser shall endeavor to provide
Seller with a draft purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”).
3. Program:
4. Purchase Price:
The purchase price (the “Purchase Price”) for the Property shall be $55,000,000
for the Option A Program or $65,000,000 for the Option B Program. The
Purchase Price (less the Deposit) shall be payable at the Closing (as defined
below).
Note that the proposed Purchase Price above assumes the cost of incorporating
the desired Public Benefit elements identified in Purchaser’s RFP response,
including public open space, ground plane activation, and site connectivity which
reduces the buildable area of the Property by approximately 90k FAR SF. In
addition, the Purchase Price also reflects the cost of environmental remediation
which will be Purchaser’s responsibility post-Closing.
Concurrent with Seller’s execution of this Letter of Intent, Seller shall notify
Purchaser in writing of the Program Option (and corresponding Purchase Price)
which Seller has selected.
5. Financing Contingency
None.
6. Inspection Period:
Purchaser shall have 45 days after the date of full execution and delivery of the
Purchase Agreement (the “Inspection Period”) to complete such due diligence
of the Property as is customary for a transaction of this type. In order to perform
diligence in an expedited manner, Purchaser will need the cooperation of Seller
and Seller’s representatives. Seller shall provide Purchaser with information
Purchaser reasonably requests in order to perform diligence. Seller may not,
after the full execution and delivery of this Letter of Intent, enter into any new
agreements that would in any way encumber the Property or any portion thereof.
7. Deposit:
Within two business days after the full execution and delivery of the Purchase
Agreement (the “Effective Date”), Purchaser shall deposit $2,750,000 if the
Option A Program is selected by Seller or $3,250,000 if the Option B Program
is selected by Seller (the “Deposit”) to be held in escrow by a national title
insurance company selected by Purchaser (“Escrow Agent”). Following the
expiration of the Inspection Period, the Deposit shall be non-refundable, except
as otherwise provided in the Purchase Agreement. Purchaser, subject to
reasonable approval of the Seller, may elect to post a guaranty for the Deposit
from a mutually acceptable entity in lieu of cash.
8. Conditions to Closing:
9. Closing:
The consummation of the purchase and sale of the Property (“Closing”) shall
occur 30 days after the satisfaction of all closing conditions, subject to a mutually
agreed upon outside date. Both parties may extend closing one time each by
five business days. Upon Closing, the Deposit (and any accrued interest) shall be
credited against the Purchase Price, with the remainder payable by Purchaser
through Escrow Agent. Upon such payment, the deed conveying title to the
Property shall be released for recording, and Seller shall deliver to Purchaser
such other documents as Seller must deliver to Purchaser pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement.
a. Seller shall pay for (i) one-half of Escrow Agent’s fee, (ii) all documentary
transfer taxes and related costs, (iii) all of its recording fees and (iv) all of its
attorneys’ fees and transaction costs; and
b. Purchaser shall pay for (i) one-half of Escrow Agent’s fee, (ii) the cost of title
insurance, (iii) the cost of an ALTA survey, (iv) all of its recording fees and (v)
all of its attorneys’ fees and transaction costs.
11. Prorations:
All rents, real property taxes, assessments and Property operating expenses (to
the extent assumed by Purchaser) shall be prorated as of the date of Closing.
13. Confidentiality:
Neither Seller nor Purchaser shall disclose the terms or substance of this Letter of
Intent or the fact that negotiations are taking place between Seller and Purchaser
with respect to the Property without the other party’s prior written consent,
except (a) to their own employees, partners, attorneys, lenders, accountants,
advisers, consultants, investors, prospective investors and debt or equity
sources, title and escrow agents and brokers (in the case of attorneys, lenders,
accountants, advisers, consultants, title and escrow agents and brokers, with
respect to this transaction only) or (b) as required by law. The provisions of this
Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Letter of Intent for
a period of six months.
14. Exclusivity:
during the Exclusivity Period, Seller and Purchaser shall negotiate in good faith
with the objective of executing a mutually acceptable Purchase Agreement.
If Seller and Purchaser are unable to agree Purchase Agreement during the
Exclusivity Period (or such longer period upon which the parties may agree), then
either party may cancel this Letter of Intent by delivering written notice thereof
to the other, whereupon this Letter of Intent shall terminate and, except as
otherwise specifically provided for herein, be of no further force or effect.
15. Miscellaneous:
Seller and Purchaser acknowledge that this Letter of Intent is not a purchase agreement
and that it is intended solely as the basis for preparation of the Purchase Agreement
by Seller. The Purchase Agreement shall be subject to Seller’s and Purchaser’s
approval, and only a fully executed and delivered Purchase Agreement shall constitute
an agreement by Purchaser to purchase the Property. Absent a fully executed and
delivered Purchase Agreement, Purchaser may decline to pursue the Purchase
Agreement for any or no reason in its sole and absolute discretion. The final Purchase
Agreement shall incorporate the provisions contained in this Letter of Intent and any
new or different provisions upon which Seller and Purchaser may agree. This Letter of
Intent shall be non-binding upon Seller and Purchaser, except with respect to Sections
12, 13, 14 and 15, and shall not be the basis for any claim of promissory estoppel,
detrimental reliance or otherwise.
If the above terms and conditions are acceptable to you, please indicate by signing in the
space provided below. This Letter of Intent shall expire without notice if not countersigned
and returned to Purchaser by 5:00 p.m. PDT on Friday, October 19, 2018.
Regards,
Jon Bergschneider
Chief Development Officer, BioMed Realty, L.P.
By: By:
Name: Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
63
DE X TER INNOVATION QUARTER
EXPLORING THE NUMBERS
BEHIND THE VISION
PROJ EC T F I N A N C I N G PL A N &
SU PP O RTI N G PRO - FO R M A S
SECTION 07
PROJECT FINANCING PLAN &
SUPPORTING PRO-FORMAS
F I N A N C I N G PL A N
Capital Sources/Sponsorship
$119B
INVESTOR CAPITAL
In January of 2016, BioMed Realty was acquired by affiliates of
Blackstone’s proprietary data enables it
Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII L.P. in a transaction valued at to target specific themes with conviction
and deploy significant amounts of
more than $8 billion. Therefore, all funds required for the financing discretionary capital.
of this project will be sourced from Blackstone Real Estate
Partners VIII, which is referred to as “BREP VIII,” a real estate fund
with ample access to additional financing sources. The most
recent quarterly audited financials for Blackstone and BREP VIII $245B
VALUE OF GROSS ASSETS
are publicly accessible via their 10-Q, dated June 30, 2018 (10-Q).
The breadth of Blackstone Real Estate’s
Global portfolio provides valuable real-
time proprietary market data. We believe
“By investing in real estate assets around the this information enables Blackstone to
identify mispriced and/or out-of-favor asset
globe, we’re helping to build a secure financial classes more rapidly than its competitors.
O F F I C E M A R K E T SU RV E Y
Office Lake Union
Office Lake Union
Market Rent Per Square Foot
207K
12 Deliveries 206,734
MonthSF in SQFT: 207KSF
12 MONTH DELIVERED SQFT,
Market Rent Per Square Foot 12 MonthinNet
12 Month Deliveries
DELIVERIES Absorption
SQFT: PAST 4in
207K SQFT: 851K
QTRS
851K
12
12 Month Net MonthSF 1,714,535
RentinGrowth:
Absorption SQFT: 5.0%
851K SF
12 MONTH NET DELIVERED SQFT,
ABSORPTION
Vacancy Rate: 3.1% NEXT 4 QTRS
12 Month Rent Growth: 5.0%
5.0%
Delivered
Vacancy Rate:
$980.50
3.1% SQFT Past SALES
4 Qtrs: 206,734 sqft
12 MONTH RENT IN PAST 12 MO AVG
GROWTH
Delivered SQFTDelivered
Past 4 SQFT
Qtrs: Next 4 Qtrs:
206,734 sqft1,714,535
3.1%
sqft
Delivered SQFT Next 4RATE
VACANCY Qtrs: 1,714,535
sqft Sales in Past 12 Months Average
RBA Price/SF:
Vacancy Rate Gross Asking Rent Availability Rate Net Absorption $980.50SF Under Construction
SF Deliveries
13,329,879 3.10% $43.78 9.30% Sales in Past 12 Months Average
137,837 0 1,907,238
RBA Vacancy Rate Gross Asking Rent AvailabiltyPrice/SF:
Rate Net $980.50
Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under Construction
13,329,879 3.10% $43.78 9.30% 137,837 0 1,907,238
RBA Vacancy Rate Gross Asking Rent Availabilty Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under Construction
13,329,879 3.10% $43.78 9.30% Vacancy Rate
137,837 0 1,907,238
Vacancy Rate
Data from
through 2022, with more than 35% of existing inventory delivering over the
Studio – 9.5% All-Time Average: 236 units
1 BR 12%
next couple of years.
1 Bedroom – 12% 2 BR 18%
2 Bedroom – 18%Rent Per Unit By Bedroom
Market 3 BR 47%
3 Bedroom – 47%
70
DE X TER INNOVATION QUARTER
PROVIDING ADDITIONAL
REFERENCE MATERIALS
REQUIREMENTS &
A PPE N D I C E S
SECTION 08
APPENDICES
Form C.1
Transmittal Letter
By:
Print Name: Mike Ruhl
Title: Vice President, Seattle Market Lead
Form C.2—A
Information Regarding Respondent, Major Team Members and Financially
Responsible Parties and Certifications
Corporation (If yes, then indicate the State/Country/Province and Year of Incorporation and
complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for the entity.)
Partnership (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Joint Venture (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Limited Liability Company (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2
for each member.)
Other (If yes, describe and complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2)
B. Business Address: 201 ELLIOTT AVENUE WEST, SUITE 150, SEATTLE, WA 98119
Headquarters: 17190 BERNARDO CENTER DRIVE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92128
Office Performing Work: 201 ELLIOTT AVENUE WEST, SUITE 150, SEATTLE, WA 98119
Contact Telephone Number: 858-207-5315
C. If the entity is a Joint Venture, Partnership or Limited Liability Company, indicate the name and role
of each member firm in the space below. Complete a separate Form C.2 for each member firm
and attach it to the RFP. Also indicate the name and role of each other financially liable party and
attach a separate form.
BRE EDISON L.P. – GENERAL PARTNER
CERTIFICATION
1. Has the firm or any affiliate, or any current officer, director or employee of either the firm or any affiliate,
been indicted or convicted of bid (i.e., fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, antitrust, etc.) or other
contract related crimes or violations or any other felony or serious misdemeanor within the past ten
years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
2. Has the firm or any affiliate ever sought protection under any provision of any bankruptcy act within
the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
3. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing
work for the federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
4. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for
making any false claim or other material misrepresentation to a public entity within the past ten years
(measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, as to each such inquiry, state the name of the public agency, the date of the inquiry, the grounds
on which the public agency based the inquiry, and the result of the inquiry.
Date
Jurisdiction
Grounds
Result
5. Has any construction project performed or managed by the firm or, to the knowledge of the
undersigned, any affiliate involved repeated or multiple failures to comply with safety rules, regulations,
or requirements within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, please identify the team members and the projects, provide an explanation of the
circumstances, and provide owner contact information including telephone numbers and e-mail
addresses.
Date
Project
Explanation
Contact Name
Contact Phone
Contact E-mail
6. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated or determined by any federal or state court or
agency (including, but not limited to, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs and any applicable Washington governmental agency) to
have violated any laws or Executive Orders relating to employment discrimination or affirmative action
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of RFP), including but not limited to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sections 2000 et seq.); the Equal Pay Act (29
U.S.C. Section 206(d)); and any applicable or similar Washington law?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
7. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated, or determined by any state court, state
administrative agency, including, but not limited to, the Washington Department of Industrial Relations
(or its equivalent), federal court or federal agency, to have violated or failed to comply with any law
or regulation of the United States or any state within the past ten years (measured from the date of
issuance of the RFP) governing prevailing wages (including but not limited to payment for health and
welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, subsistence, apprenticeship or other training, or other fringe
benefits) or overtime compensation?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
8. With respect to each of Questions 1-7 above, if not previously answered or included in a prior response
on this form, is any proceeding, claim, matter, suit, indictment, etc. currently pending against the
firm that could result in the firm being found liable, guilty or in violation of the matters referenced in
Questions 1-7 above and/or subject to debarment, suspension, removal or disqualification by the
federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity?
Yes No
If yes, please explain and provide the information requested as to such similar items set forth in
Questions 1-7 above.
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
9. Has the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors been involved in litigation relating to a development project, either voluntary
or involuntary, within the last ten (10) years?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the description.
10. Total amount of development work completed by the developer during the last ten (5) years.
Complete Appendix C – Form C.4 and list the total number of projects and the Total project cost
below:
11. Total amount of development work currently under development. Complete Appendix C – Form C.5
and list the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
12. Total amount of development work currently in the pipeline. Complete Appendix C – Form C.6 and list
the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
13. Does the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors have a known relationship, as it relates to this proposal, with any member of
the City, either elected officials or staff?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the explanation.
Explanation:
I certify that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the firm’s Official Representative:
By:
9. (Continued)
Form C.2—B
Information Regarding Respondent, Major Team Members and Financially
Responsible Parties and Certifications
Individual’s Title:
Firm’s CEO/Chairman:
Corporation (If yes, then indicate the State/Country/Province and Year of Incorporation and
complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for the entity.)
Partnership (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Joint Venture (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Limited Liability Company (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2
for each member.)
Other (If yes, describe and complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2)
CERTIFICATION
1. Has the firm or any affiliate, or any current officer, director or employee of either the firm or any affiliate,
been indicted or convicted of bid (i.e., fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, antitrust, etc.) or other
contract related crimes or violations or any other felony or serious misdemeanor within the past ten
years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
2. Has the firm or any affiliate ever sought protection under any provision of any bankruptcy act within
the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
3. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing
work for the federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
4. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for
making any false claim or other material misrepresentation to a public entity within the past ten years
(measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, as to each such inquiry, state the name of the public agency, the date of the inquiry, the grounds
on which the public agency based the inquiry, and the result of the inquiry.
Date
Jurisdiction
Grounds
Result
5. Has any construction project performed or managed by the firm or, to the knowledge of the
undersigned, any affiliate involved repeated or multiple failures to comply with safety rules, regulations,
or requirements within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, please identify the team members and the projects, provide an explanation of the
circumstances, and provide owner contact information including telephone numbers and e-mail
addresses.
Date
Project
Explanation
Contact Name
Contact Phone
Contact E-mail
6. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated or determined by any federal or state court or
agency (including, but not limited to, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs and any applicable Washington governmental agency) to
have violated any laws or Executive Orders relating to employment discrimination or affirmative action
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of RFP), including but not limited to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sections 2000 et seq.); the Equal Pay Act (29
U.S.C. Section 206(d)); and any applicable or similar Washington law?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
7. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated, or determined by any state court, state
administrative agency, including, but not limited to, the Washington Department of Industrial Relations
(or its equivalent), federal court or federal agency, to have violated or failed to comply with any law
or regulation of the United States or any state within the past ten years (measured from the date of
issuance of the RFP) governing prevailing wages (including but not limited to payment for health and
welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, subsistence, apprenticeship or other training, or other fringe
benefits) or overtime compensation?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
8. With respect to each of Questions 1-7 above, if not previously answered or included in a prior response
on this form, is any proceeding, claim, matter, suit, indictment, etc. currently pending against the
firm that could result in the firm being found liable, guilty or in violation of the matters referenced in
Questions 1-7 above and/or subject to debarment, suspension, removal or disqualification by the
federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity?
Yes No
If yes, please explain and provide the information requested as to such similar items set forth in
Questions 1-7 above.
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
9. Has the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors been involved in litigation relating to a development project, either voluntary
or involuntary, within the last ten (10) years?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the description.
10. Total amount of development work completed by the developer during the last ten (5) years.
Complete Appendix C – Form C.4 and list the total number of projects and the Total project cost
below:
11. Total amount of development work currently under development. Complete Appendix C – Form C.5
and list the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
12. Total amount of development work currently in the pipeline. Complete Appendix C – Form C.6 and list
the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
13. Does the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors have a known relationship, as it relates to this proposal, with any member of
the City, either elected officials or staff?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the explanation.
Explanation:
I certify that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the firm’s Official Representative:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
9. (Continued)
Form C.2—C
Information Regarding Respondent, Major Team Members and Financially
Responsible Parties and Certifications
Individual’s Title:
Firm’s CEO/Chairman:
Corporation (If yes, then indicate the State/Country/Province and Year of Incorporation and
complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for the entity.)
Partnership (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Joint Venture (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Limited Liability Company (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2
for each member.)
Other (If yes, describe and complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2)
CERTIFICATION
1. Has the firm or any affiliate, or any current officer, director or employee of either the firm or any affiliate,
been indicted or convicted of bid (i.e., fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, antitrust, etc.) or other
contract related crimes or violations or any other felony or serious misdemeanor within the past ten
years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
2. Has the firm or any affiliate ever sought protection under any provision of any bankruptcy act within
the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
3. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing
work for the federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
4. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for
making any false claim or other material misrepresentation to a public entity within the past ten years
(measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, as to each such inquiry, state the name of the public agency, the date of the inquiry, the grounds
on which the public agency based the inquiry, and the result of the inquiry.
Date
Jurisdiction
Grounds
Result
5. Has any construction project performed or managed by the firm or, to the knowledge of the
undersigned, any affiliate involved repeated or multiple failures to comply with safety rules, regulations,
or requirements within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, please identify the team members and the projects, provide an explanation of the
circumstances, and provide owner contact information including telephone numbers and e-mail
addresses.
Date
Project
Explanation
Contact Name
Contact Phone
Contact E-mail
6. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated or determined by any federal or state court or
agency (including, but not limited to, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs and any applicable Washington governmental agency) to
have violated any laws or Executive Orders relating to employment discrimination or affirmative action
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of RFP), including but not limited to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sections 2000 et seq.); the Equal Pay Act (29
U.S.C. Section 206(d)); and any applicable or similar Washington law?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
7. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated, or determined by any state court, state
administrative agency, including, but not limited to, the Washington Department of Industrial Relations
(or its equivalent), federal court or federal agency, to have violated or failed to comply with any law
or regulation of the United States or any state within the past ten years (measured from the date of
issuance of the RFP) governing prevailing wages (including but not limited to payment for health and
welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, subsistence, apprenticeship or other training, or other fringe
benefits) or overtime compensation?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
8. With respect to each of Questions 1-7 above, if not previously answered or included in a prior response
on this form, is any proceeding, claim, matter, suit, indictment, etc. currently pending against the
firm that could result in the firm being found liable, guilty or in violation of the matters referenced in
Questions 1-7 above and/or subject to debarment, suspension, removal or disqualification by the
federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity?
Yes No
If yes, please explain and provide the information requested as to such similar items set forth in
Questions 1-7 above.
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
9. Has the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors been involved in litigation relating to a development project, either voluntary
or involuntary, within the last ten (10) years?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the description.
10. Total amount of development work completed by the developer during the last ten (5) years.
Complete Appendix C – Form C.4 and list the total number of projects and the Total project cost
below:
11. Total amount of development work currently under development. Complete Appendix C – Form C.5
and list the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
12. Total amount of development work currently in the pipeline. Complete Appendix C – Form C.6 and list
the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
13. Does the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors have a known relationship, as it relates to this proposal, with any member of
the City, either elected officials or staff?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the explanation.
Explanation:
I certify that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the firm’s Official Representative:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
9. (Continued)
Form C.2—D
Information Regarding Respondent, Major Team Members and Financially
Responsible Parties and Certifications
Individual’s Title:
Firm’s CEO/Chairman:
Corporation (If yes, then indicate the State/Country/Province and Year of Incorporation and
complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for the entity.)
Partnership (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Joint Venture (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Limited Liability Company (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2
for each member.)
Other (If yes, describe and complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2)
CERTIFICATION
1. Has the firm or any affiliate, or any current officer, director or employee of either the firm or any affiliate,
been indicted or convicted of bid (i.e., fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, antitrust, etc.) or other
contract related crimes or violations or any other felony or serious misdemeanor within the past ten
years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
2. Has the firm or any affiliate ever sought protection under any provision of any bankruptcy act within
the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
3. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing
work for the federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
4. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for
making any false claim or other material misrepresentation to a public entity within the past ten years
(measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, as to each such inquiry, state the name of the public agency, the date of the inquiry, the grounds
on which the public agency based the inquiry, and the result of the inquiry.
Date
Jurisdiction
Grounds
Result
5. Has any construction project performed or managed by the firm or, to the knowledge of the
undersigned, any affiliate involved repeated or multiple failures to comply with safety rules, regulations,
or requirements within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, please identify the team members and the projects, provide an explanation of the
circumstances, and provide owner contact information including telephone numbers and e-mail
addresses.
Date
Project
Explanation
Contact Name
Contact Phone
Contact E-mail
6. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated or determined by any federal or state court or
agency (including, but not limited to, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs and any applicable Washington governmental agency) to
have violated any laws or Executive Orders relating to employment discrimination or affirmative action
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of RFP), including but not limited to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sections 2000 et seq.); the Equal Pay Act (29
U.S.C. Section 206(d)); and any applicable or similar Washington law?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
7. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated, or determined by any state court, state
administrative agency, including, but not limited to, the Washington Department of Industrial Relations
(or its equivalent), federal court or federal agency, to have violated or failed to comply with any law
or regulation of the United States or any state within the past ten years (measured from the date of
issuance of the RFP) governing prevailing wages (including but not limited to payment for health and
welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, subsistence, apprenticeship or other training, or other fringe
benefits) or overtime compensation?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
8. With respect to each of Questions 1-7 above, if not previously answered or included in a prior response
on this form, is any proceeding, claim, matter, suit, indictment, etc. currently pending against the
firm that could result in the firm being found liable, guilty or in violation of the matters referenced in
Questions 1-7 above and/or subject to debarment, suspension, removal or disqualification by the
federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity?
Yes No
If yes, please explain and provide the information requested as to such similar items set forth in
Questions 1-7 above.
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
9. Has the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors been involved in litigation relating to a development project, either voluntary
or involuntary, within the last ten (10) years?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the description.
10. Total amount of development work completed by the developer during the last ten (5) years.
Complete Appendix C – Form C.4 and list the total number of projects and the Total project cost
below:
11. Total amount of development work currently under development. Complete Appendix C – Form C.5
and list the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
12. Total amount of development work currently in the pipeline. Complete Appendix C – Form C.6 and list
the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
13. Does the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors have a known relationship, as it relates to this proposal, with any member of
the City, either elected officials or staff?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the explanation.
Explanation:
I certify that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the firm’s Official Representative:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
9. (Continued)
Form C.2—E
Information Regarding Respondent, Major Team Members and Financially
Responsible Parties and Certifications
Individual’s Title:
Firm’s CEO/Chairman:
Corporation (If yes, then indicate the State/Country/Province and Year of Incorporation and
complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for the entity.)
Partnership (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Joint Venture (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Limited Liability Company (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2
for each member.)
Other (If yes, describe and complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2)
CERTIFICATION
1. Has the firm or any affiliate, or any current officer, director or employee of either the firm or any affiliate,
been indicted or convicted of bid (i.e., fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, antitrust, etc.) or other
contract related crimes or violations or any other felony or serious misdemeanor within the past ten
years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
2. Has the firm or any affiliate ever sought protection under any provision of any bankruptcy act within
the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
3. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing
work for the federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
4. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for
making any false claim or other material misrepresentation to a public entity within the past ten years
(measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, as to each such inquiry, state the name of the public agency, the date of the inquiry, the grounds
on which the public agency based the inquiry, and the result of the inquiry.
Date
Jurisdiction
Grounds
Result
5. Has any construction project performed or managed by the firm or, to the knowledge of the
undersigned, any affiliate involved repeated or multiple failures to comply with safety rules, regulations,
or requirements within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, please identify the team members and the projects, provide an explanation of the
circumstances, and provide owner contact information including telephone numbers and e-mail
addresses.
Date
Project
Explanation
Contact Name
Contact Phone
Contact E-mail
6. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated or determined by any federal or state court or
agency (including, but not limited to, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs and any applicable Washington governmental agency) to
have violated any laws or Executive Orders relating to employment discrimination or affirmative action
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of RFP), including but not limited to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sections 2000 et seq.); the Equal Pay Act (29
U.S.C. Section 206(d)); and any applicable or similar Washington law?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
7. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated, or determined by any state court, state
administrative agency, including, but not limited to, the Washington Department of Industrial Relations
(or its equivalent), federal court or federal agency, to have violated or failed to comply with any law
or regulation of the United States or any state within the past ten years (measured from the date of
issuance of the RFP) governing prevailing wages (including but not limited to payment for health and
welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, subsistence, apprenticeship or other training, or other fringe
benefits) or overtime compensation?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
8. With respect to each of Questions 1-7 above, if not previously answered or included in a prior response
on this form, is any proceeding, claim, matter, suit, indictment, etc. currently pending against the
firm that could result in the firm being found liable, guilty or in violation of the matters referenced in
Questions 1-7 above and/or subject to debarment, suspension, removal or disqualification by the
federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity?
Yes No
If yes, please explain and provide the information requested as to such similar items set forth in
Questions 1-7 above.
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
9. Has the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors been involved in litigation relating to a development project, either voluntary
or involuntary, within the last ten (10) years?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the description.
10. Total amount of development work completed by the developer during the last ten (5) years.
Complete Appendix C – Form C.4 and list the total number of projects and the Total project cost
below:
11. Total amount of development work currently under development. Complete Appendix C – Form C.5
and list the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
12. Total amount of development work currently in the pipeline. Complete Appendix C – Form C.6 and list
the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
13. Does the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors have a known relationship, as it relates to this proposal, with any member of
the City, either elected officials or staff?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the explanation.
Explanation:
I certify that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the firm’s Official Representative:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
9. (Continued)
Form C.2—F
Information Regarding Respondent, Major Team Members and Financially
Responsible Parties and Certifications
Individual’s Title:
Firm’s CEO/Chairman:
Corporation (If yes, then indicate the State/Country/Province and Year of Incorporation and
complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for the entity.)
Partnership (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Joint Venture (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2 for each member.)
Limited Liability Company (If yes, complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2
for each member.)
Other (If yes, describe and complete Sections A-C and the Certification section of Form C.2)
CERTIFICATION
1. Has the firm or any affiliate, or any current officer, director or employee of either the firm or any affiliate,
been indicted or convicted of bid (i.e., fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, antitrust, etc.) or other
contract related crimes or violations or any other felony or serious misdemeanor within the past ten
years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
2. Has the firm or any affiliate ever sought protection under any provision of any bankruptcy act within
the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
3. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been disqualified, removed, debarred or suspended from performing
work for the federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
4. Has the firm or any affiliate ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for
making any false claim or other material misrepresentation to a public entity within the past ten years
(measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, as to each such inquiry, state the name of the public agency, the date of the inquiry, the grounds
on which the public agency based the inquiry, and the result of the inquiry.
Date
Jurisdiction
Grounds
Result
5. Has any construction project performed or managed by the firm or, to the knowledge of the
undersigned, any affiliate involved repeated or multiple failures to comply with safety rules, regulations,
or requirements within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of the RFP)?
Yes No
If yes, please identify the team members and the projects, provide an explanation of the
circumstances, and provide owner contact information including telephone numbers and e-mail
addresses.
Date
Project
Explanation
Contact Name
Contact Phone
Contact E-mail
6. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated or determined by any federal or state court or
agency (including, but not limited to, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs and any applicable Washington governmental agency) to
have violated any laws or Executive Orders relating to employment discrimination or affirmative action
within the past ten years (measured from the date of issuance of RFP), including but not limited to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sections 2000 et seq.); the Equal Pay Act (29
U.S.C. Section 206(d)); and any applicable or similar Washington law?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
7. Has the firm or any affiliate been found, adjudicated, or determined by any state court, state
administrative agency, including, but not limited to, the Washington Department of Industrial Relations
(or its equivalent), federal court or federal agency, to have violated or failed to comply with any law
or regulation of the United States or any state within the past ten years (measured from the date of
issuance of the RFP) governing prevailing wages (including but not limited to payment for health and
welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, subsistence, apprenticeship or other training, or other fringe
benefits) or overtime compensation?
Yes No
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
8. With respect to each of Questions 1-7 above, if not previously answered or included in a prior response
on this form, is any proceeding, claim, matter, suit, indictment, etc. currently pending against the
firm that could result in the firm being found liable, guilty or in violation of the matters referenced in
Questions 1-7 above and/or subject to debarment, suspension, removal or disqualification by the
federal government, any state or local government, or any foreign governmental entity?
Yes No
If yes, please explain and provide the information requested as to such similar items set forth in
Questions 1-7 above.
Date
Jurisdiction
Type
Explanations
9. Has the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors been involved in litigation relating to a development project, either voluntary
or involuntary, within the last ten (10) years?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the description.
10. Total amount of development work completed by the developer during the last ten (5) years.
Complete Appendix C – Form C.4 and list the total number of projects and the Total project cost
below:
11. Total amount of development work currently under development. Complete Appendix C – Form C.5
and list the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
12. Total amount of development work currently in the pipeline. Complete Appendix C – Form C.6 and list
the total number of projects and the total project cost below:
13. Does the developer, or joint venture partner, including their parent corporation(s) or subsidiary(s)
or affiliated corporation(s) as well as any of the development team’s officers, principal members,
shareholders or investors have a known relationship, as it relates to this proposal, with any member of
the City, either elected officials or staff?
Yes No
If Yes, provide the following information. If more room is necessary use a separate sheet and indicate
as such in the explanation.
Explanation:
I certify that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am the firm’s Official Representative:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
9. (Continued)
Form C.3
Project Qualifications
Project 1 of 5
Project Name Dexter Yard
Project Address 700 Dexter Avenue N
City and State Seattle, Washington
Project Data
Size of Project Gross Square Footage 520,000 Acreage
Construction Type Laboratory/Office
Level of LEED Certification Gold
Number of Stories 15
Construction Start Date Q1 2019
Construction Completion Date Q1 2021
Was the project completed on time?
Under construction
If not, why?
Project 2 of 5
Project Name Kendall Square
500 Kendall Street, 450 Kendall Street, 675 West Kendall Street, 650 East
Project Address
Kendall Street, 350 East Kendall Street Garage, Kendall Crossing Apartments
City and State Cambridge, Massachusetts
Project Data
Size of Project Gross Square Footage 1.0 million Acreage 10.0
Construction Type Laboratory/Office
Platinum (500 Kendall Street), Gold Core & Shell (650 East Ken-
Level of LEED Certification
dall Street)
500 Kendall Street – 14; 450 Kendall Street – 6; 675 West Ken-
Number of Stories dall Street – 8; 650 East Kendall Street – 13; Kendall Crossing
Apartments - 7 (37 Apartments)
Construction Start Date Various
Construction Completion Date Various
Was the project completed on time?
Yes
If not, why?
Project 3 of 5
Project Name Gateway of Pacific Phase 1
Project Address Gateway Boulevard
City and State South San Francisco, California
Project Data
Size of Project Gross Square Footage 560,000 Acreage 6.54
Construction Type Laboratory/Office
Level of LEED Certification LEED Gold (shell & core)
Number of Stories 12 + Basement + Penthouse
Construction Start Date Q2 2017
Construction Completion Date Q3 2019 (est.)
Was the project completed on time?
Scheduled for on-time completion
If not, why?
Project 4 of 5
Project Name (Ascent) 425 Fairview
Project Address 425 Fairview Avenue North
City and State Seattle, WA
Project Data
Size of Project Gross Square Footage 482,000 Acreage 1.26
Construction Type New
Level of LEED Certification Gold (Registered)
4 Levels below grade parking, 2 separate buildings (1) 24 stories
Number of Stories
(2) 7 story wood frame
Construction Start Date Q2 2016
Construction Completion Date Q2 2018
Was the project completed on time?
Yes
If not, why?
Project 5 of 5
Project Name Walton Lofts
Project Address 75 Vine Street
City and State Seattle, WA
Project Data
Size of Project Gross Square Footage 161,647 Acreage
Construction Type New
Level of LEED Certification No / 3 Globes – Green Globes
Number of Stories 13
Construction Start Date Q1 2014
Construction Completion Date Q2 2015
Was the project completed on time?
Yes
If not, why?
Walton Lofts is a 13-story high-rise apartment building located in Seattle’s Belltown neighborhood. The building includes
one and a half levels of below-grade parking with 70 stalls, including tandem options, 136 luxury loft-style residential homes
and one guest suite. The 161,647 SF building includes studio, open one-bedroom and two-bedroom homes. Located on
the corner of Western Avenue and Vine Street, Walton Lofts is situated on a unique site in downtown Seattle. Vine Street is
not only the city’s original Green Street and the centerpiece of the Growing Vine Street community initiative, it is adjacent to
the historic Belltown Cottage Park. The building’s location offers stunning, unobstructed water views from street level and a
unique park-like setting near the city’s renowned waterfront.
2. Describe any community benefits and open space that characterize this project.
Amenities enjoyed by residents- a rooftop lounge, grand library, rooftop pet walk, a variety of residential storage op-
tions, an amenity kitchen, fully stocked fitness facility, resident bike work room and storage, electric vehicle charging
stations and a resident guest suite.
During the duration of the project Turner provided The Turner School of Construction Management (TSCM)- The TSCM
program is a free eight-week program that offers construction management training to small minority-owned, wom-
en-owned and emerging small businesses (SBE). Participants are able to develop their professional skills in business
plan writing, marketing, accounting and financial management, bid estimating, purchasing, safety, risk management
and much more. Although our program has been offered to all SBE firms meeting SBA size standards for small business-
es, this past year we designed our program for S/DBE firms that met the size standards as outlined in RCW 39.26.010.
In doing so, we were able to offer a program specifically for a more diverse group of small business owners and their
key personnel.
Project 5 of 5
3. Describe how the referenced project is most relevant to elements of the scope as required by the
City and described in the RFP.
The project received Three Globe™ certification from Green Building Initiative’s Green Globes program -- equivalent to
LEED™ Gold certification. Walton Lofts’ participation in the Growing Vine Street Initiative is very similar to Dexter Inno-
vation Quarter as it relates to sustainability, community involvement and design to accommodate a city’s vision. In the
early 1990’s, a community group worked with the city to develop an initiative along Vine Street. Developments would be
encouraged to install community art features telling the story of the pathway of water from the City to the Sound. The goal
was to treat the eight-block length of Vine Street as a watershed, turning it into a street park in the heart of Belltown. Thus
Vine Street became Seattle’s first “green street”.
Walton Lofts is proud to contribute to this initiative. Designed within the landscaping is a system of runnels and weirs to
capture rainwater from the roof, filter it through a green roof at the fifth floor level, and convey it downward, via runnels set
into the exterior brick, to Vine Street. Water from the runnels is representatively captured; poured from sculpted hands into
the connected weir system where it is filtered through landscaping before ultimately ending in the Puget Sound. By partic-
ipating in this program Walton Lofts completed a missing link between the Belltown P-Patch and participating neighbors,
finally creating one continuous feature as the Growing Vine Street group intended it to be.
Provide up to two (2) pages of illustrations (photographs, drawings, and computer generated art) no
larger than 8x10” which may be used to illustrate each project. These can be before-and after shots,
interiors, elevations, sections, or other visual descriptions of project quality.
Partnership
Education
Partnership (Cont.)